Successful Inclusion through Effective Collaborative Teaching By Debbie Archer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study Skills Strategies: Meeting the Needs of Students with Disabilities Presented by Frank A. Shaffer and Phyllis Seeba.
Advertisements

Inclusive Services: An Overview
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
Co-Teaching in the Inclusive Classroom Presented by Cathy Torbik Supervisor of Special Education Inclusion Facilitator
Co-Teaching? What’s That?
Purpose of Instruction
Special education teacher training in the context of inclusive settings Orit Gilor.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
S-1 SUPERVISION. S-2 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.
Trigg County Collaboration Roundtable Discussion “ March 17, 2009.
A Study of Teacher Competencies and Involvement in Transition Services for Middle and High School Students with Disabilities Conducted by: John Mattos.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Cooperating Teacher and Teacher Candidate Workshop
Understanding Inclusion Kristin McChesney. Review…  Based on the article, what is the definition – or concept – of inclusion?  The generally accepted.
Inclusion DAN SCANLON JOE ENSMANN Alex-Dunn.jpg.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
By Laura Nicole Bramlett Watkins
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
Improving Access to General Curriculum for All Students Through Co-Teaching Some Information from The Access Center: Improving Outcomes for All Students.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
Inclusive Education Defining Inclusive Education Inclusive Education(IE): “ …Means that all students in a school regardless of their differences are.
InclusionInclusion Tracy Swenson EDC410 – May 2009.
CO-TEACHING INSTRUCTION
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © The Homework Effect: Does Homework Help or Harm Students? Katherine Field EdD Candidate, Department.
Reading Action Research Team
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Instructional Plan | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan December 17, 2012 Kevin Houser.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Setting the Stage II: Understanding Data Purposes & Uses.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Cultural Competency and the Inclusive Classroom Professional Development Session Kalyn Estep.
The Brave New World of Special Education The purpose of special education and our roles in facilitating optimal learning outcomes for ALL students.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
Final Project Presentation ETEC 550
Building Inclusive Schools Boston Public Schools Department of Special Education and Student Services.
Traditional Classroom Alternatives Paula Meyers and Linda Wolf ED 5104 Realities of Education Team Presentation March 16, 2004.
Molly Fisher Dara Ludens Sharon Packard. How Many Gen. Ed. Teachers feel prepared to work with students of Sp. Needs?  According to a study, “From Ryan.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved What.
Team Teaching and Inclusion By Michelle Lefever. Introduction Duties of regular education teacher Added duties when learning support students are assigned.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Crafting a Co-Teach Classroom
1 Building Collaborative Relationships to Improve Student Learning Presented by Auburn Montgomery School of Education.
Instructors’ General Perceptions on Students’ Self-Awareness Frances Feng-Mei Choi HUNGKUANG UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH.
 Together, my Co-Teaching partner and I have 32 first grade students. All of the students listed below are either 6 or 7 years old.  One child has.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Co-Teaching Whittney Smith, Ed.D. Adelphi University 2013.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Diana Dinzey Educational Placement. General Education Paraprofessional Residential Treatment Center Alternative H.S Self Contained Resource Room I nclusion.
School Leadership for Students With Disabilities Project #H325A Course Enhancement Module Anchor Presentation #3.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
How to create and maintain an open relationship among all teachers~ By: Chanel R Moon EFFECTIVE COLLABORATION IN EDUCATION.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
Developing Structures for Teacher- Lead Learning Communities Jill Cabrera, Ph.D. Western Kentucky University.
EdHD 5016 Teaching a Class of Mixed Abilities: Differentiated Instruction Instructional Intervention Ideas Fall, 2012.
 Federally-funded project  Hands-on science classrooms.
1 Superintendent’s “Everybody Teaches” Academy Overview and Implementation Plan.
Creative Intervention Planning through Universal Design for Learning MariBeth Plankers, M.S. CCC-SLP Page 127.
IMPROVING THE ROLE OF GENERAL EDUCATION TEACHERS TO PARTICIPATE MEANINGFULLY IN INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAMS Tanya Gonzales, M.Ed. SWTLC, April 2014.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
INCLUSION The Road to Success for Students with Disabilities.
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT  EDU 310 Week 1 Individual Assignment Main Factors of Lesson plans EDU 310 Week 1 DQ 1 EDU 310 Week 1 DQ.
Donna Lipscomb EDU 695 MAED Capstone Common Core Presentation INSTRUCTOR KYGER MAY 21, 2015.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
The Affects of Visual Strategies in Teaching Students with Autism From the Perspective of Educators Diana Whitlock.
Defining Co-Teaching and Inclusion
Presentation transcript:

Successful Inclusion through Effective Collaborative Teaching By Debbie Archer

Under IDEA, FAPE for all students in the LRE. Inclusion- Instruction of all students (G.E. & S.E) in the G.E. classroom. Two teachers in the classroom-(G.E & S.E) Co-teacher frustrations in how to teach, plan, and manage classroom duties and students. Direction, guidance, and roles, and strategies are being questioned. The Issue

Purpose of the Study To examine the perceptions that collaborative teachers (in the inclusionary classroom) have of themselves, their co- teachers, and their success or failures of their collaborative teaching practices.

Research Questions How do co-teachers perceive their current experience in the classroom? What teaching practices do collaborative educators find effective? What concerns do co-teachers have? What school-based supports are essential to collaborative teaching?

Method Survey of all middle school co-teachers in Warren County, New Jersey. (Northwest N.J.) Survey consisted of 3 parts: Demographic data- short answer. Co-teacher perceptions-Likert Scale rating Short answer questions. Surveys were dispersed either through Directors of the S.S. Department or Child Study Team Supervisors.

Data Collection Procedure/Research Design A.A qualitative and quantitative study analyzing teacher responses to survey questions. B.Demographic info. used comparatively (charts, %’s) C.Comparison of G.E. & S.E. co-teachers survey questions (%’s, tables, and graphs.)

Results and Findings Question#1 How do co-teachers perceive their current experience ? -46% of teachers agreed that the G.E. co-teacher did the most in the classroom. -Consensus that both populations worked well together, positive experience, co-teaching contrib. academically. -65% of S.E. teachers- their role was defined in classroom -85% of G.E. teachers- their role was defined.

Question #1 continued -55% of S.E. teachers and 56% of G.E. did not think that either groups of teachers shared instructional duties Both groups agreed that students were academically and socially benefiting from the inclusive classroom. 40% of S.E. and 32% of G.E. felt that their school district was following a specific collaborative teaching model.

Discussion- Question#1 45% of teachers had at least an MA yet only 20.5% of G.E and 45% of S.E recently took course work in inclusion. Points to lack of training in collaborative techniques. A majority of co-teachers did not volunteer for co-teaching. Concerns and frustrations that teachers share could be attributed to this. Teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion can effect the implementation of inclusion. A low percentage of teachers felt their school district was following a specific collaborative teaching model. The teachers were feeling that there is not a definitive format that they should be following in their teaching practices- leaves teachers feeling unsupported and without direction.

Question #2 What are some concerns? -More planning time amongst themselves. -Support was greatly needed from the S.E. perspective -G.E. felt that there were too many S.E. students in the class, they always had to reinforce to the students that the S.E teacher was not an aide, they felt like they did most of the work, their co-teachers were seldom with them the next year so there was a feeling of “re-training” of S.E. co-teachers, and difficulties in differentiating instruction.

Discussion- Question #2 -Concerns were numerous and accentuates the points that a school based inclusion model needs to be defined along with administrative support that will help to provide workshops and pre-service instruction in collaborative teaching. -Despite concerns both groups remained optimistic and believed it contributed positively to students academic development.

Question #3- School Based Supports that facilitate collaborative teaching. -Majority felt not enough planning time (75% S.E, 73.5% G.E.) -Many felt not enough workshops offered on inclusion or collaborative teaching (65% S.E., 58% G.E.) -50% of G.E. felt they had access to many supports, practices, and preparations concerning collaborative teaching while 80% of S.E. felt they had support accesses.

Discussion- Question #3 - School-based supports are lacking- only half of G.E. felt that they had support when needed. S.E. may be relying on their S.E. background when trying to fill in the holes and gaps in the class. - Administrators need to help guide their staff with sufficient course work and in developing their own inclusion (teaming) model. Without a solid framework and background many of the co- teaching teams will become frustrated and unsupportive concerning the education of special needs students in the classroom.

Question #4 What teaching practices are effective in the collaborative classroom? Too numerous to list all- the most prominent were chosen. -Mutual planning time with co-teachers -Collaborative teaching (with training) -Modifications made jointly -Collaboratively, create alternate assignments -Mutual respect -Keep communication open at all times -Target students learning styles and teach to them -Use of visual, kinesthetic, auditory, and tactile learning styles -Differentiated instruction -Cooperative learning/hands-on activities

Discussion- Question #4 -Despite the teachers lack of co-teaching expertise, training and supports they have developed a sizeable list of effective practices. The teachers now need the instructional tools and school based supports to help facilitate the inclusionary process.

Implications/Recommendations Offering feedback, sharing classroom management, providing daily mutual planning time & using cooperative learning techniques were perceived as important co-teaching practices. Teacher preparation programs relevant to collaborative teaching were essential.

Implications/Recommendations Commitment of administration, faculty, staff, and parents is critical for inclusion to work. Further research needed in inclusive effectiveness based on students’ test scores & report cards. School districts should provide proper training, practices, and supports to prepare teachers.

~~The End~~