SERC Achievements and Program Direction Art Pyster Deputy Executive Director November, 2010 www.SERCuarc.org Note by R Peak 12/7/2010: This presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Systems Engineering Research Center UARC Dr. Dinesh Verma Executive Director January 13,
Advertisements

Chapter: 3 Agile Development
BENEFITS OF SUCCESSFUL IT MODERNIZATION
Roundtable Discussion Topics Tools/Technologies for Rapid SE - Room 107 –Tools and technologies that enable rapid development of mission/business capabilities.
The System and Software Development Process Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Enterprise Architecture Managing the Paradigm Shift Deborah Carter, CEA Director, Office of Enterprise.
13 th Command & Control Research & Technology Symposium Bellevue WA June, 2008 Briefing Managing the Life Cycle of Net- Centric Architectures This document.
Material supported by a SERC research activity February Helix Investigating the DNA of the Systems Engineering Workforce This material is based.
Continuous Process Improvement (CPI) Program Update Colonel Ric Sherman, United States Army Office of the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for.
Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Presentation to: SBE Advisory Committee By: Dr. Kaye Husbands Fealing National Science Foundation November.
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
DoD Systems and Software Engineering A Strategy for Enhanced Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office.
The Executive’s Guide to Strategic C H A N G E Leadership.
Stevens-USC SERC: A DoD University Affiliated Research Center (UARC) Barry Boehm, USC USC-CSSE Annual Research Review March 16, 2009.
Recent Trends in DoD Systems and Software Engineering Processes Bruce Amato Acting Deputy Director, Software Engineering and Systems Assurance Office of.
Stevens-USC SERC: A DoD University Affiliated Research Center (UARC) Barry Boehm, USC SERC-Internal Kickoff Tasks Workshop January 29, 2009.
Certified Business Process Professional (CBPP®)
ERS ASRR 5 Oct 2011 Page-1 Distribution Statement A – Cleared for public release by OSR on 04 October 2011, SR Case # 11-S-3813 applies Engineered Resilient.
Investment Management Concepts Portfolio Management | Segment Architecture March 25, 2009 Adrienne Walker and Kshemendra Paul
KM enhances mission command, facilitates the exchange of knowledge, supports doctrine development, fosters leaders’ development, supports lessons learned,
Company LOGO Leading, Connecting, Transforming UNC… …Through Its People Human Capital Management.
INCOSE 1 st reactions. One other area that struck me has the sheer number of levels of proficiency—in ours we are going with 5 and the first one is limited.
Annual SERC Research Review - Student Presentation, October 5-6, Extending Model Based System Engineering to Utilize 3D Virtual Environments Peter.
ASRR 10/05/2011 Page-1 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 05 October SR case number 11-S-3744 applies Developing.
Delivering Business Value WebDirector. Personal Productivity Disconnected Business Processes Disconnected Information Disconnected People Forms LOB.
The Evergreen, Background, Methodology and IT Service Management Model
Technology Transformation Task Force Presenter’s Name HERE.
© Stevens Institute of Technology, All Rights Reserved 1 Systems Engineering: Meeting the Challenges of the 21 st Century Jon Wade Associate Dean of Research.
© 2013 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Systems Engineering: MITRE & SERC Dr. J. Providakes Director, SE Tech Center “The SERC-MITRE Doctoral.
Lori Smith Vice President Business Intelligence Universal Technical Institute Chosen by Industry. Ready to Work.™
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
. Traffic Flow Management System Benefits Flexibility for Future Growth: TFMS provides a modern software architecture to meet future growth and support.
Air University: The Intellectual and Leadership Center of the Air Force Aim High…Fly - Fight - Win The AFIT of Today is the Air Force of Tomorrow. Distribution.
NIEM Domain Awareness June 2011 Establishing a Domain within NIEM.
Role-Based Guide to the RUP Architect. 2 Mission of an Architect A software architect leads and coordinates technical activities and artifacts throughout.
Systems Engineering In Aerospace Theodora Saunders February AUTOMATION IN MANUFACTURING Leading-Edge Technologies and Application Fairfield University.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
CHECKPOINTS OF THE PROCESS Three sequences of project checkpoints are used to synchronize stakeholder expectations throughout the lifecycle: 1)Major milestones,
Build the Right Team 1 Organize for Success 2 Build Coalition with Business Partners 3 Maintain Flexibility 4 Key Success Factors KSF 1.1: Relentlessly.
Software Product Line Material based on slides and chapter by Linda M. Northrop, SEI.
The Value Driven Approach
Last Updated 1/17/02 1 Business Drivers Guiding Portal Evolution Portals Integrate web-based systems to increase productivity and reduce.
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
The Future of Veterinary Services. VS is evolving to meet the needs of 21 st century animal health.
Lecture 2.1b: DoD Acquisition Process (SEF Ch 2)
Align Business and Information Technology – with SOA Pradeep Nair Director – Software Group (IBM India/SA)
1 Power to the Edge Agility Focus and Convergence Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century presented to the Focus, Agility and Convergence Team Inaugural Meeting.
Annual SERC Research Review, October 5-6, The Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering By Art Pyster Deputy Executive Director,
1 Innovation & Transformation: Enabling Information Superiority for the Warfighter Mr. Arthur R. Friedman OASD(NII)/DoD CIO 4 October 2006.
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A -- Cleared for public release by OSR on 08 October SR case number #11-S-0041 applies. 13 th Annual NDIA SE Conf Oct 2010.
Systems Engineering Initiatives 04/13/10 Page-1 CLASSIFICATION – UNCLASSIFIED Systems Engineering Initiatives and the SPRDE Career Field 13 April 2010.
UNCLASSIFIED The Open Group 01/07/10 Page-1 Kick-off Meeting for The Open Group Acquisition Cyber Security Initiative Ms. Kristen Baldwin Director, Systems.
Logistics Community Competency Initiative Update November 20, 2006 Mark Tregar, CNAC Judith Bayliss, DAU “The Total Force must continue to adapt to different.
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering
Mgt Project Portfolio Management and the PMO Module 8 - Fundamentals of the Program Management Office Dr. Alan C. Maltz Howe School of Technology.
Michael J. Novak ASQ Section 0511 Meeting, February 8, 2017
Why KM is Important KM enhances mission command, facilitates the exchange of knowledge, supports doctrine development, fosters leaders’ development, supports.
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
SysML 2.0 – Systems Engineering Process (SEP) Working Group
Digital Artifacts and the Need for Portability
Enterprise Architecture at Penn State
MAZARS’ CONSULTING PRACTICE
INCOSE IW 2014 Town Hall January 27, 2014
KEY INITIATIVE Shared Services Function Management
Perspectives on Transforming DT and OT Industry-Government Roundtable
KEY INITIATIVE Financial Data and Analytics
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

SERC Achievements and Program Direction Art Pyster Deputy Executive Director November, Note by R Peak 12/7/2010: This presentation ppt file is based on excerpts from the original full presentation available here: Update on SERC Status Since 1st ASRR and 2011 Plans Art Pyster, Deputy Executive Director, SERC (Stevens) (this version also has ** added on slides 7-9 to indicate SERC projects involving my lab)

1.Research organization within a university or college 2.Provides or maintains DoD essential engineering, research, and/or development capabilities defined as core 3.Receive sole source contract funding from DoD. May also receive other funding 4.UARCs perform research in specific mission areas. By design, no two UARCs have the same mission 5.Maintain long-term, strategic relationships with sponsoring DoD components in specific core areas and operate in the public interest What is a UARC? University Affiliated Research Center 2

For Internal SERC Use Only Any U.S. university can be added to the SERC to provide capabilities needed to support the SERC mission 3 Who We Are

The mission of the SERC is to enhance and enable the DoD's capability in Systems Engineering for the successful development, integration, testing and sustainability of complex defense systems, services and enterprises 4 SERC Mission

SERC Vision 5 DoD and Intelligence Community systems achieving mission outcomes – enabled by research leading to transformational SE methods, processes, and tools. The SERC will be the primary engine for defense and intelligence community SE basic research

6 1.Respond more quickly, flexibly, agilely – Systems Engineering Transformation 2.Acquire, operate, and evolve large complex systems that have distributed and diffuse governance, architecture, and mission – Systems of Systems and Enterprise Systems 3.Increase the pool and capabilities of systems engineers, and instill systems engineering into all engineers – Human Capital Development 4.Address security challenges in a systemic fashion rather than piecemeal – Trusted Systems With an increasing focus on design for affordability DoD Mission Themes Drive SERC Research Themes

TopicDescription SE Body of Knowledge and Graduate Reference Curriculum Create mature SE BoK and graduate reference curriculum with broad community involvement Modular Reconfigurable Architecture for Tailored and Rapid SE Knowledge Dissemination Create way to rapidly publish and maintain currency of SE artifacts and other documents, extensively tailoring them to audience Rapid CONOPS Development Environment for Agile SE Develop approach to quickly construct a CONOPS that strongly informs all key stakeholders and can evolve quickly and easily Develop SE Technical Leaders Create way to educate SE technical leaders rapidly and effectively using innovative educational technologies Evolutionary SE Create MPT for evolutionary SE for acquisition in context of new and emphasis on early SE prior to Milestone B Data Quality and Estimation Research In Support of Future Defense Cost Analysis Create improved ways to cost complex software-intensive systems, especially systems of systems Agile Methods, Processes, and ToolsExplore agile MPTs with focus on those applicable to NSA Systems Engineering Transformation Create a roadmap of research to transform SE into a much faster, more responsive discipline 7 Research Projects

TopicDescription Security Systems Engineering Create a roadmap of research on security SE and begin executing that roadmap System Readiness Level Explore the equivalent of technology readiness levels, but for systems integration and other facets of engineering maturity RT 21 ** Verification, Validation and Accreditation using Modeling and Simulation Explore ways to perform “built-in” VV&A when creating system models and running system level simulations Early Identification of SE-Related Program Risks Extension Continue work begun under FY09 project to explore early identification of SE-related program risks SE Development Experience Accelerator Significantly reduce the amount of time it takes for an SE to become proficient Valuing Flexible Systems Develop architectural and other approaches to enable flexible systems SE Capabilities within Universities (STEM) Develop teaching capabilities within universities to build tomorrow’s workforce DoD Systems 2020 Future SE capabilities that enable more efficient platform development, derivatives (flexibility), and adaptive systems 8 More Research Projects ** Project involving R Peak lab at GIT

TopicDescription Communications Effects Server Establish systems architecture modeling and assessment environment with Army’s communications effects server RT 24 ** Integration of Modeling and Simulation, Software Design, and DoDAF Integrate activities and artifacts of modeling and simulation, software design, and architecture Requirements Definition for Net- Centric Enterprises Prototype method and tooling to support emerging requirements for net-centric enterprises Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities Determine competencies and capabilities needed for vehicle systems engineering 9 And Still More Research Projects ** Project involving R Peak lab at GIT

SERC Objectives TRANSFORM systems engineering practice throughout the DoD and IC by creating innovative methods, processes, and tools that address critical challenges to meeting mission outcomes (what we do), CATALYZE community growth among systems engineering researchers by enabling collaboration among many research organizations (who does it), ACCELERATE systems engineering competency development through rapid transfer of research to educators and practitioners (how we impact others). 10

Ability to conduct long-term, comprehensive SE research focused on DoD acquisition, including Enable integrated development and management New ways to link requirements to design Leverage modeling and simulation Ability to leverage developments in systems architecting, complex systems theory, systems thinking, systems science, knowledge management and SwE to perform research to advance the design and development of complex systems across all DoD domains, including System and open systems architecture/analysis SE in complex SoS and FoS environments Enterprise SE SW-unique extensions and modern SW-development technology Ability to leverage developments in open systems standards, organizational theory, program management, SE management, and IT to provide needed integration of program/technical management MPTs, including Integrate TPMs with EVM Maturity reviews SE team structures, etc. for improvement Improved SE information sharing Link technical baselines to architectures Apply SE to acquisition of services Flexible SE environment Knowledge management Undergraduate/Graduate SE education needs Rationale and way ahead for standards Toolsets throughout the life cycle Analyzing SE costs, accounts, and ROI SE metrics and leading indicators SERC Core Competencies 11

Reference The full original presentation is available here: Update on SERC Status Since 1st ASRR and 2011 Plans Art Pyster, Deputy Executive Director, SERC (Stevens)