Eden German Grammar: main developments March-July 2003 Increase in structural complexity covered –provision of X-bar structural backbone within noun phrases.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The filler-gap hypothesis and the acquisition of German relative clauses Holger Diessel University of Jena
Advertisements

This presentation is timed so you will only need to click on the left mouse button when it is time to move to the next slide. Right click on this screen.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Computing FACULTY OF ENGINEERING Chunking: Shallow Parsing Eric Atwell, Language Research Group.
Relativpronomen / Relativsätze
October 2004CSA4050: Semantics III1 CSA4050: Advanced Topics in NLP Semantics III Quantified Sentences.
Deciphering Case. Nominative = Subject First, look for the subject of the sentence. The subject is usually the very first part of the sentence. The sentence.
 Christel Kemke 2007/08 COMP 4060 Natural Language Processing Feature Structures and Unification.
Proceedings of the Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing-2007) Learning for Semantic Parsing Advisor: Hsin-His.
Sequence Classification: Chunking Shallow Processing Techniques for NLP Ling570 November 28, 2011.
Statistical NLP: Lecture 3
October 8, : Grammars and Lexicons Lori Levin (Examples from Kroeger)
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Some basic linguistic theory part2.
Linguistic Theory Lecture 8 Meaning and Grammar. A brief history In classical and traditional grammar not much distinction was made between grammar and.
Chapter 20: Natural Language Generation Presented by: Anastasia Gorbunova LING538: Computational Linguistics, Fall 2006 Speech and Language Processing.
Natural Language Processing - Feature Structures - Feature Structures and Unification.
IR & Metadata. Metadata Didn’t we already talk about this? We discussed what metadata is and its types –Data about data –Descriptive metadata is external.
NaLIX: A Generic Natural Language Search Environment for XML Data Presented by: Erik Mathisen 02/12/2008.
Parsing: Features & ATN & Prolog By
Amirkabir University of Technology Computer Engineering Faculty AILAB Efficient Parsing Ahmad Abdollahzadeh Barfouroush Aban 1381 Natural Language Processing.
Sag et al., Chapter 4 Complex Feature Values 10/7/04 Michael Mulyar.
Artificial Intelligence 2005/06 From Syntax to Semantics.
Syntax Lecture 4.
Features and Unification
Information Retrieval and Extraction 資訊檢索與擷取 Chia-Hui Chang National Central University
1 CONTEXT-FREE GRAMMARS. NLE 2 Syntactic analysis (Parsing) S NPVP ATNNSVBD NP AT NNthechildrenate thecake.
Models of Generative Grammar Smriti Singh. Generative Grammar  A Generative Grammar is a set of formal rules that can generate an infinite set of sentences.
Phonetics, Phonology, Morphology and Syntax
Linguistic Theory Lecture 3 Movement. A brief history of movement Movements as ‘special rules’ proposed to capture facts that phrase structure rules cannot.
1 A Chart Parser for Analyzing Modern Standard Arabic Sentence Eman Othman Computer Science Dept., Institute of Statistical Studies and Research (ISSR),
Artificial Intelligence Research Centre Program Systems Institute Russian Academy of Science Pereslavl-Zalessky Russia.
11 CS 388: Natural Language Processing: Syntactic Parsing Raymond J. Mooney University of Texas at Austin.
Albert Gatt LIN 3098 Corpus Linguistics. In this lecture Some more on corpora and grammar Construction Grammar as a theoretical framework Collostructional.
CASES Everything you ever wanted to know and didn’t dare ask!
ICS611 Introduction to Compilers Set 1. What is a Compiler? A compiler is software (a program) that translates a high-level programming language to machine.
Relative clauses Chapter 11.
Profile The METIS Approach Future Work Evaluation METIS II Architecture METIS II, the continuation of the successful assessment project METIS I, is an.
A Survey for Interspeech Xavier Anguera Information Retrieval-based Dynamic TimeWarping.
IV. SYNTAX. 1.1 What is syntax? Syntax is the study of how sentences are structured, or in other words, it tries to state what words can be combined with.
Ling 570 Day 17: Named Entity Recognition Chunking.
Development of a German- English Translator Felix Zhang Period Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology Computer Systems Research.
Modifier (grammar) Definition: A word, phrase, or clause that functions as an adjective oradverb to provide additional information about another word or.
Semantic Analysis CMSC Natural Language Processing May 8, 2003.
© Child language acquisition To what extent do children acquire language by actively working out its rules?
May 2006CLINT-LN Parsing1 Computational Linguistics Introduction Parsing with Context Free Grammars.
NLP. Introduction to NLP Is language more than just a “bag of words”? Grammatical rules apply to categories and groups of words, not individual words.
A Cascaded Finite-State Parser for German Michael Schiehlen Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung Universität Stuttgart
PARSING David Kauchak CS159 – Spring 2011 some slides adapted from Ray Mooney.
October 2004CSA4050: Semantics III1 CSA4050: Advanced Topics in NLP Semantics III Quantified Sentences.
Linguistic Essentials
SVETLA KOEVA SVETLOZARA LESEVA BORISLAV RIZOV. The project Automatic information extraction based on semantic relations (RILA – a bilateral co-operation.
Culture , Language and Communication
Semantic Construction lecture 2. Semantic Construction Is there a systematic way of constructing semantic representation from a sentence of English? This.
Rules, Movement, Ambiguity
Copyright © 2006 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Ambiguity in Grammars A grammar is ambiguous if and only if it generates a sentential form that has.
CSA2050 Introduction to Computational Linguistics Parsing I.
Building a Semantic Parser Overnight
SYNTAX.
CS 4705 Lecture 17 Semantic Analysis: Robust Semantics.
1 Chapter 4 Syntax Part III. 2 The infinity of language pp The number of sentences in a language is infinite. 2. The length of sentences is.
April 2010Semantic Grammar1 A short guide to Blackburn’s Grammar of English.
NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING
PAIR project progress report Yi-Ting Chou Shui-Lung Chuang Xuanhui Wang.
Chapter 3 Language Acquisition: A Linguistic Treatment Jang, HaYoung Biointelligence Laborotary Seoul National University.
Statistical NLP: Lecture 3
Comma Rules.
Part I: Basics and Constituency
Multimedia Information Retrieval
Natural Language - General
آسان عربی گرامر حصّہ اول مرکبِ عطفی و توصیفی
Linguistic Essentials
Presentation transcript:

Eden German Grammar: main developments March-July 2003 Increase in structural complexity covered –provision of X-bar structural backbone within noun phrases –simulation of restricted cross-categorial rules (e.g., clause-like structures as adjective phrases) –conjunctions of most categories added Restriction of potential ambiguity –stronger use of feature agreement –reliance on ‘flat’ result for matching purposes (gr-list triples)

Eden German Grammar: developments March-July 2003 Rules covering annotated inputs –dates, numbers, addresses, telephone numbers, addresses (in progress) Rules covering sentence fragments –Bulleted lists, parenthetical elements, etc. Extended ‘stop-list’ for restricting matching of results with general term –380 lexical items –general terms such as ‘where’, ‘be’, ‘I’, ‘would like’, etc.

Statistics Grammar: 750 rules –350 rules automatically generated for word order permutation with verb-second clauses (VP1) –150 rules automatically generated for word order permutations with verb-final clauses (VP2) –both taken over from the Dutch Eden grammar Lexicon: full-form entries – distinct forms – distinct lexical items

Examples of grammatical constructions covered Die Baubehörde hat aber zuvor eine Stellungnahme des für die Stadtplanung zuständigen Gemeinderatsausschusses einzuholen. The building authorities first have to obtain a statement from the council commission that is responsible for town planning.

Examples of grammatical constructions covered Die Baubehörde hat aber zuvor eine Stellungnahme des für die Stadtplanung zuständigen Gemeinderatsausschusses einzuholen. Noun phrase with extensive prenominal modification: ‘the for the town-planning responsible commission’

Examples of grammatical constructions covered Die Baubehörde hat aber zuvor eine Stellungnahme des für die Stadtplanung zuständigen Gemeinderatsausschusses einzuholen. Modification by clause-like adjectival phrase ‘for the town-planning responsible…’

Examples of grammatical constructions covered Die Baubehörde hat aber zuvor eine Stellungnahme des für die Stadtplanung zuständigen Gemeinderatsausschusses einzuholen. Noun phrase with genitive postmodification ‘of the commission’ : restricted by agreement of genitive case ( des [the] and Gemeinderatausschusses)

Examples of grammatical constructions covered Die Baubehörde hat aber zuvor eine Stellungnahme des für die Stadtplanung zuständigen Gemeinderatsausschusses und der Stadt einzuholen. (The building authorities first have to obtain a statement from the council commission that is responsible for town planning and the town.)

Examples of grammatical constructions covered Die Baubehörde hat aber zuvor eine Stellungnahme des für die Stadtplanung zuständigen Gemeinderatsausschusses und der Stadt einzuholen. Conjunction constrained by agreement of grammatical features: here genitive case over ‘X and Y’

Example of use of features to restrict ambiguity The following noun phrase is potentially ambiguous according to the X-bar backbone: einem Wagen für den Mann und der Frau a car for the man and the woman Either: a car for [the man and the woman] [a car for the man] and [the woman]

Example of use of features to restrict ambiguity But : both the car [einem Wagen] and the woman [der Frau] are in the dative case. Therefore: 1.they can be combined with the conjunction and [und] 2. the man [den Mann], which is in the accusative case, cannot be combined with the woman [der Frau] There is only one appropriate structure

Example of use of features to restrict ambiguity

BOTH DATIVE → conjunction OK

NO CASE AGREEMENT → no CONJUNCTION

The entire NP is also dative and is therefore unambiguously an Indirect Object (IObj)

Example of use of flat semantics to avoid ambiguity einen Wagen für den Mann und die Frau a car for the man and the woman Now all of the NPs can be accusative case and so there is no possibility of avoiding the ambiguity The grammar therefore has both alternatives as hypotheses: a car for the man] and [the woman] a car for [the man and the woman]

a car for the man] and [the woman] a car for [the man and the woman]

a car for the man] and [the woman] a car for [the man and the woman]

Despite the different grammatical structure, the flat semantics contains similar elements, thereby reducing the consequences of the ambiguity for matching p-mod WAGEN MANN relation FUER MANN More systematic use of this property is to be explored further

Remaining tasks Tuning and extension for the application domains for recall and precision Systematic testing and evaluation against standard analysis benchmarks Exploration of the optimal semantic patterns for improving matching and retrieval results Lexicon augmentation