Electoral Participation of Immigrants in European Cities Amparo González-Ferrer CSIC-IEGD & Univ. Pompeu Fabra Localmultidem Project Brussels, 28th January.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Political parties, lecture 1 of 3
Advertisements

ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN SUBURBANISATION IN ESTONIA Tiit Tammaru University of Tartu Centre for Migration and Diaspora Studies.
Second Generation Immigrants Attitudes and Behavior under Multiculturalist Policies Matthew Wright American University Irene Bloemraad.
Benchmarking Industry – Science Relationships Based on the OECD report, March 2002 Presented by: Inês Costa Vanessa Figueiredo.
FP6 CivicActive Civic participation and people with disabilities EU Parliament, Brussels 5 March 2008 Gabor Toka Central European University Budapest Patricia.
Political participation of ethnic minorities in Britain Anthony Heath Universities of Manchester and Oxford.
FP6 CivicActive Gender, Electoral Turnout and Abstention in Europe Susan Banducci, University of Exeter Yvonne Galligan, Queen’s University Belfast Bernadette.
The Case for Secular Assimilation? The Latino Experience in Richmond, Virginia Stephenie Reimer H.B. Cavalcanti, Debra Schleef. Journal for the Scientific.
European experience with migration and integration problems: Ways for overcoming xenophobia and extremism ELDR&YABLOKO International Conference Youth under.
The political and civic engagement of migrants in Southern Europe: comparing the results in Barcelona, Lyon, Madrid and Milan Laura Morales (Universidad.
Capital Social y Participación Ciudadana de los Imigrantes en Espana Y Europa Madrid, 31 de Octubre de 2008 Social Capital and Civic Engagement of Migrants.
Muslims in Belgium Muslims are central to the debate on « integration ». A quick media analysis would show that the question of Islam is an element of.
The role of social capital in migrants’ engagement in local politics in European cities Laura Morales (University of Murcia & University of Manchester)
MIGRANTS’ POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: THE LOCALMULTIDEM PROJECT Dr. Laura Morales (University of Murcia & University of Manchester)
Are Migrants and their Children Politically Included? Associational and Political Participation in European Cities Dr. Laura Morales (University of Murcia.
Policy Blueprint for the EC Good Practices and Main Issues to Address Marco Giugni (University of Geneva) Sponsored by:
“Local Political Parties and Young Voters.” Daniel Shea, 2009.
Sponsored by: Is ‘home’ a distraction? The role of migrants’ transnational practices in their political integration into receiving-country politics Laura.
Turnout in multi-level systems André Blais. Why is there a turnout gap between regional, national and European election? Usual assumption : first order.
“What can vote advice applications tell us about (non) voters?” VOTEADVICE A Marie Curie European Industrial Doctorate Network.
Acculturation and Adaptation of Immigrant Youth John W. Berry Queen’s University Kingston, Canada Open Lecture, Moscow, April, 2012.
Between Postmodern Democracy and the Trajectories of the Past: Mass Media and Political Communication in New Democracies Katrin Voltmer Institute of Communications.
Roles of political parties Encouraging greater political participation Giving the electorate choice of government and policies Articulating the interests.
Discrimination A cross country comparison on the Turkish Second Generation Patrick Simon INED Amsterdam, Stakeholder Conference, May 13, 2009.
Active citizens? Presentation by the Vienna team: Claire Wallace, Georg Datler and Reingard Spannring Youth, Citizenship & European Identities European.
Paul Dourgnon*, Yasser Moullan** * Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics (IRDES), France **University of Oxford.
Changing institutional landscapes for wind power implementation. an international comparison Aberdeen, February 21 st 2008 Seminar: “Explaining National.
1 Immigrant Economic and Social Integration in Canada: Research, Measurement, Data Development By Garnett Picot Director General Analysis Branch Statistics.
Social Groups and Voting: A Comparative View. Who typically votes in Democratic societies? According to recent research by Jeff Manza & Ruth Braunstein.
Daniel Stockemer Inclusion and Exclusion Conference, Ottawa, Canada April 26, 2012.
 Definition:  Electoral system in which candidates run for a single seat from a specific geographic district.  The winner is the person who receives.
Native and immigrant fertility patterns in Greece: a comparative study based on aggregated census statistics and IPUMS micro-data Cleon Tsimbos 1, Georgia.
…or lack thereof Voter Turnout “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state.
©2005 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd. Introduction The Life-Span Perspective.
Building Blocks of Research Process Chapter 2: Alan Monroe.
Evaluating Electoral Democracy Susan Banducci Professor of Comparative Political Behaviour Politics.
For use with Keeping the Republic. Copyright © 2006 by CQ Press. American Citizens and Political Culture Chapter 2.
American Citizens and Political Culture Chapter 2.
Comparisons…Sys tems. Electoral Systems: Single Member District Plurality vs. Proportional Representation.
Voting behaviour Joan Garrod FOTOLIA. Voting behaviour Falling turnout Politicians from all parties are increasingly concerned by the falling turnout.
Journalism in a diverse, MMP democracy – help or hindrance? JEANZ Annual Conference 2004 Peter Northcote Manager Communications.
1 The Labour Market Integration of Immigrants in OECD Countries on-going work for OECD's Working Party 1, EPC presented by Sébastien Jean (OECD) Workshop.
Strangers to These Shores, Tenth Edition by Vincent N. Parrillo©2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reservedStrangers to These Shores, Tenth Edition.
22 February From Theory to Evidence. Hypothesis vs. Research Question When no expected direction to relationship. Exploratory research, not deductive.
Political Parties & Interest Groups. Interest Groups Any collection of people trying to influence government are called interest groups. Definition:-
Electoral geographical approaches in Hungary Mátyás Bódi Ferenc Bódi Where are the voters?! - Low voting turnouts in Hungary -
Italy and Greece: Between Individual Integration and Institutional Exclusion Dr. Anna Triandafyllidou ELIAMEP 31 May 2007.
Voting as a measure of social inclusion for natives, immigrants and descendants in Sweden Pieter Bevelander International Migration & Ethnic Relations,
TOWN: SMSTs Policy Issues from the case studies Rob Atkinson(UWE) RTPI Conference: Planning for the Future of Small and Medium Sized Towns, Parc Eirias,
Lecture 2: WHAT TO COMPARE? HOW TO COMPARE? A. Why do we compare? B. What do we compare in comparative politics? C. How do we compare? D. Structure Versus.
Measurement of the Socio-economic Conditions of Migrants : some comments Jean Christophe Dumont OECD, Head of International Migration Division, Directorate.
De-Secularisation The Demographic Imperative. The Rise of Demography Demographic Transition Uneven Ethnic differentials have had political ramifications.
1 Labour market integration of immigrants and their children Education-related findings from OECD country studies…and open issues Thomas Liebig Non-Member.
Receive-Accept-Sample Model an information-processing model GV917.
Eligibility, registration, turnout and vote choice.
Comparison Systems. Electoral Systems: Single Member District Plurality vs. Proportional Representation.
American Citizens and Political Culture Chapter 1.
Problems with democracy in the UK
Building Blocks of Research Process
Higher Modern Studies Torry Academy.
Culture: An Empirical Investigation of Beliefs, Work, and Fertility
Mark Setzler, High Point University
Making Causal Inferences and Ruling out Rival Explanations
Workshop 1A Summary.
Learning the Economic Vote at Local Elections: Case of Lithuania,
Comparison Systems.
Why is voter turnout so low in the United States?
Comparison Systems.
Why is voter turnout so low in the United States?
Gabriella Melis (UCL Institute of Education)
Presentation transcript:

Electoral Participation of Immigrants in European Cities Amparo González-Ferrer CSIC-IEGD & Univ. Pompeu Fabra Localmultidem Project Brussels, 28th January 2009

The research questions 1.Do immigrants assimilate in voting behaviour? 2.If not, what are the factors accounting for the lack of assimilation? 3.In particular, which is the role played by immigration regulations and naturalisation regimes? 4.Do we observe variations across generations? Why?

Previous Research 1.Voting behaviour of naturalised immigrants in the US 2.Scarce research on immigrants’ voting in Europe, except from UK 3.Alternative focus of interest: political engagement, associational membership, informal political action, etc. (Ethnic vs. Cros-ethnic) Social Capital POS (national and sub-national level)

Main theoretical approaches Resources model Political orientations model Immigration model (Ethnic) social capital hypothesis Political opportunity structures Contextual factors (polarisation, presence of anti-immigrant parties)

Previous Results Against expectations, naturalised immigrants do not participate more There is no a clear intergenerational pattern, but it varies across origin groups. In any case, no linear assimilation Inconclusive results about differential effect of ethnic & cross-ethnic social capital effect Support for the POS approach, although poor measurement and little attention to cultural dimension

Hypotheses about POS Naturalisation Selection Effect Escape into naturalisation Combined effect?

Definitions Nauralised Immigrant: Individual of immigrant origin that acquired the host nationality after birth Second Generation: Individual of immigrant origin born in the country of residence

Sample size by group & city

The dependent variable: turnout in the host country's national elections

Assimilation in voting behaviour?

Naturalisation Selection Effect?

Escape into Naturalisation?

Effect of these two specific POS indicators on voting probability

Intergenerational Patterns In general, second generation vote more than naturalised first generation immigrants (also for Muslim groups) The role of ethnic associations and their impact on voting behaviour seems to vary across generations but gap with autochthonous still remain

Technical and Theoretical Limitations A major question on representativeness and selection bias! Lack of cross-groups comparisons Mobilisation indicators (residential concentration, length of group's residence) Other institutional characteristics (electoral system, open candidates' lists, etc...)

What to do? Focusing on naturalised and take out the second generation If so: 1. Analysis of turnout gaps 2. Complementary analysis on the selection process involved in naturalisation???