What do international assessments measure: PISA Raymond J. Adams Washington DC, May 30 2008 This paper is intended to promote the exchange of ideas among.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU Presidency Conference Effective policies for the development of competencies of youth in Europe Warsaw, November 2011 Improving basic skills in.
Advertisements

A.Review of PISA constructs and indices (and variables) to identify those that are likely to be operable and not operable in developing country contexts,
Innovation and Growth of Large Scale Assessments Irwin Kirsch Educational Testing Service February 18, 2013.
Achieving the Dream. Achieving the Dream is a national effort to help more community college students succeed, with a special focus on students of color.
Literacy Assessment and Monitoring Programme (LAMP) UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
1 SECONDARY EDUCATION CURRICULUM REFORM in TURKEY Emin Karip Assoc. Professor of Educ. Admin. Deputy Chair of the Turkey’s National Board of Education.
What is PIAAC?. About PIAAC PIAAC is an international large-scale assessment administered in in 23 countries It assessed 16 - to 65-year-olds,
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Good teaching, good teachers and comparative analysis Fernando Reimers.
Topic: Assessment and Evaluation
Core Maths. THE NEED - Statistics The government has set out an ambition for the overwhelming majority of young people in England to study mathematics.
Science Achievement and Student Diversity Okhee Lee School of Education University of Miami National Science Foundation (Grant No. REC )
Measuring Learning Outcomes Evaluation
Maths matters: the Northern Ireland experience Katrina Godfrey Department of Education.
15 April Fostering Entrepreneurship among young people through education: a EU perspective Simone Baldassarri Unit “Entrepreneurship” Forum “Delivering.
ICT and Education Indicators S
21st Century Skills in Minnesota TIES 2009 Education Technology Conference Leslie Yoder, Saint Paul Schools Julie Beddow-Schubert, Le Crescent-Hokah Schools.
GeSCI-MINEDUC Partnership 13th May 2010 Conference Room, National Curriculum Development Centre (NCDC) Focus Group Discussion ICT Teacher Professional.
American Diploma Project 11 September 2009 Andreas Schleicher International Benchmarking International Benchmarking What it means – what it takes Washington,
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
MoHEST-MoYAS-GeSCI Workshop Kenya Institute of Education, June 2 nd – 4 th 2010 Defining ICT Competencies for TIVET Lecturers & Instructors in Kenya Standards.
Raising Academic Standards for all School Development Planning Initiative.
High School Mathematics: Where Are We Headed? W. Gary Martin Auburn University.
1 U.S. PIAAC National Supplement: Prison Study Overview Association of State Correctional Administrators Research and Best Practices Committee Gaylord.
Civic and Citizenship Education in Times of Change: Curriculum and its Implementation Some Results of the IEA Studies Civic Education in Iraq: Study Tour.
Measuring Learning and Improving Education Quality: International Experiences in Assessment John Ainley South Asia Regional Conference on Quality Education.
Benchmarking with National and International Assessments Larry V. Hedges Northwestern University This paper is intended to promote the exchange of ideas.
PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment PISA for Development Andreas Schleicher Paris, 27 June 2013 Welcome PISA for Development Andreas.
PIAAC: SOME THINGS IT TELLS US ABOUT HIGHER EDUCATION New England Association of Colleges Conference 2014 William Thorn Senior Analyst, OECD.
Hong Kong PISA Project Monitoring The Quality of Education in Hong Kong From An International Perspective Hong Kong November 2001 OECD Programme for International.
Assessing assessment: the role of student effort in comparative studies Ray Adams Jayne Butler.
Session 19 Large-Scale Assessment Cont…. Pan Canadian Assessment Program (PCAP) Conducted by the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC). Cyclical.
Apprentice Teacher Preparation CECS 5610 Dr. Knezek Kevin Miller Final Presentation.
Institute for School Development Research (IFS) Researching the influence of educational policy on school- and teaching quality – The European Collaborative.
The background of the improvement of PISA results in Hungary Trends in Performance Since 2000 International Launch of PISA 2009 Report February 10 th,
“EQAO has an accountability mandate to provide data that inform classroom teaching practices and contributes to improved student achievement in Ontario’s.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
1 Comparing International Assessments to NAEP May 30, 2008 Eugene Owen Senior Advisor, NCES International Activities Program This paper is intended to.
Establishing educational standards and monitoring student performance Directions for methodological improvements in international assessments.
What should we expect from 2 nd year students? A realistic approach. Tuesday 25 th February 2014 Tutor CPD Seminar.
What Use Are International Assessments for States? 30 May 2008 Jack Buckley Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics Institute of Education.
Education and Assessment in France Bruno Trosseille DEPP - Assessment, Forecasting and Performance Directorate Ministry of Education, France International.
Lecture # 32 SCIENCE 1 ASSOCIATE DEGREE IN EDUCATION Professional Standards for Teaching Science.
Andreas Schleicher, OECD Directorate for Education, 2003 Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow.
IMPROVING SCHOOL LEADERSHIP: LESSONS FROM OECD COUNTRIES UNESCO MEETING, 12 JANUARY 2013 Beatriz Pont, Sr. Policy Analyst Policy Advice and Implementation.
Andreas Schleicher, Quality of Education – Teachers’ Professional Training and Development, Athens, 2003 Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
Education in Hungary: challenges and recent developments Improving literacy skills across learning CIDREE Conference, Budapest Halász Gábor.
IMPROVING SCHOOLS IN SCOTLAND: AN OECD PERSPECTIVE (REVIEW OF CURRICULUM FOR EXCELLENCE) OECD Review Team Edinburgh, 14 Dec 2015.
Martin Ripley – World Class Arena National PISA and TIMSS centre OECD.
Chapter 6: High-Leverage Practice 1: Formative Evaluation.
International Large-Scale Assessments – Best practice and what are they good for? Dirk Hastedt, IEA Moscow, October 2015.
UAE National Agenda – A World Class Education
Minsk, February  Strong and robust economic growth and development will necessarily have to rely on the country's human capital Challenges:  Demographic.
1 A Framework for Junior Cycle BRIEFING October 2012.
SSA – Technical Cooperation Fund End of Project Conference The Role of International Achievement Studies (OECD PISA, IEA TIMSS, PIRLS…) Importance of Large-scale.
11 PIRLS The Trinidad and Tobago Experience Regional Policy Dialogue on Education 2-3 December 2008 Harrilal Seecharan Ministry of Education Trinidad.
OECD EMPLOYER BRAND Playbook 1 What makes schools and school systems successful? Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Organisation for.
1 Perspectives on the Achievements of Irish 15-Year-Olds in the OECD PISA Assessment
Commission on School Reform 13th April OECD - some positives  Above average levels in PISA science and reading  Around average in PISA maths 
NAEP What is it? What can I do with it? Kate Beattie MN NAEP State Coordinator MN Dept of Education This session will describe what the National Assessment.
New Survey Questionnaire Indicators in PISA and NAEP
Session 6: Education- International databases and comparisons
INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENTS IN QATAR TIMSS
Integrating Transversal Competencies in Policy and Practice
PISA 2015 Excellence and Equity in Education Peter Adams
Australian Council for Educational Research in the International Context Marion Meiers.
國立臺灣師範大學英語系陳秋蘭 PISA 與英語閱讀素養 國立臺灣師範大學英語系陳秋蘭
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development Indicators on the Quality of Educational Performance Quality of Education Teachers’ Professional.
Presentation transcript:

What do international assessments measure: PISA Raymond J. Adams Washington DC, May This paper is intended to promote the exchange of ideas among researchers and policy makers. The views expressed in it are part of ongoing research and analysis and do not necessarily reflect the position of the National Center for Education Statistics, the Institute of Education Sciences, or the U.S. Department of Education.

2 What is PISA? Programme for International Student Assessment Funded by the Organisation for Cooperation and Development (OECD) International data collection has been managed and led by ACER since its inception

3 Developing PISA  1995: OECD countries sought comparative assessment of yield of education systems a basis for defining educational standards cross-nationally  1997: OECD countries adopted strategy and financial framework to... monitor a broad range of curricular and cross-curricular outcomes... …within a comparative framework established collaboratively by countries  1998: Contract let

4 Participation  2000 OECD 28, non-OECD 4 PISA+, 11 non-OECD  170,000 students  2003 OECD 30, non-OECD 12  250,000 students  2006 OECD 30, non-OECD schools 398,750 students (representing a cohort of over 22 million)  2009 OECD 30, non-OECD 35 ( plus Scotland )

5 Plus: Dubai, Kazakhstan, Moldova

6 PISA survey cycle

7 eg: self-regulation, metacognitive eg: Reading Activities, motivation, interest, engagement

8 PISA survey cycle

9

10 PISA survey cycle

11 Separating policy and science Two consortia commissioned to run PISA 2009 Core A Australian Council for Educational Research Unit for the Analysis of Educational Systems and Practices. University of Liege, Belgium Westat, USA National Institute for Educational Research, Japan The German Institute for International Educational Research cApStAn Linguistic Quality Control

12 Separating policy and science  Core B Netherlands National Institute for Educational Measurement ( CITO) University of Jyvaskyla University of Twente French Ministry of Education

Sets policy objectives and priorities Sets budget Monitors adherence to policy objectives Guides analysis and reporting of results Establishes quality standards Adjudicates on breaches of quality standards

Consortia are commissioned to run PISA

15 Innovations in PISA  International, intergovernmental ownership primary focus on public policy issues sustained commitment collaborative development  Age not grade-based target population  Substance not common denominator of national curricula not whether students have learned whether they can use what they have learned criterion-based reporting

16 PISA’s Literacy Orientation  Projective (rather than reflective) approach to instrument development  Not specifically related to curriculum It is about authentic application of what is learned In contrast to assessments that are like instructional exercises  A broadening, not narrowing notion

17 Literacy Orientation  Domain definitions include two components: each domain defined, in terms of knowledge and skills needed in adult life, not merely in terms of mastery of the school curriculum. emphasis is placed on the mastery of processes, the understanding of concepts and the ability to function in various situations related to real life.

18 Basic Methodology  Target population: 15-year-olds in school Students are spread over classes and grades  Target sample sizes of schools of 35 students 50 schools required for national sub-entities  Rotated two-hour written tests 13 booklets 3 domains (two minor and one major) About 200 items in total About 11 responses per item in each school Students respond to an average of 13 minor domain items and 30 major domain items Some students are not assessed in minor domains

19 Basic Methodology  Student questionnaires  School questionnaires  Parent questionnaires  No teacher questionnaires Students from multiple classrooms Focus is not limited to taught subjects

20 Focus of the Results  Yield for well-defined populations and domains Reading, Mathematics, and Science every three years Sub-domains every nine years  National sub-group performance  Profiles encompassing broad domain definitions Literacy orientation, habits, behaviours, attitudes  Trends  Focus on comparisons of equity Eg Gender, minority status, socio-economic status  Relations between national structures outcomes Eg Tracking, Assessment, funding and Decision making policies

21 Shall I slice the pizza into four or eight pieces? Make it four ! I could never eat eight !