DOE/USDA Biomass Feedstock Gate Review Meeting March, 2005 Note: Each presentation is allotted 35 minutes; 20 min. for the presentation and 15 min. for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Institute of Local and Global Consequence Future of Biofuels in Alabama Larry Fillmer Auburn University.
Advertisements

BIOMASS AS A FUEL AND BLENDING STOCK Shawn T. Grushecky Assistant Director WVU Appalachian Hardwood Center
DOE – Products Platform Stage Gate Review Meeting August, 2005 Note: Each presentation is allotted 30 minutes; 20 min. for the presentation and 10 min.
Office of the Biomass Program Traci Leath U.S. Department of Energy Atlanta Regional Office Southern Bio-Products Conference Biloxi, MS March 4 th, 2004.
PROJECT TITLE Project Leader: Team: Executive Project Sponsor (As Required): Date: Month/Day/Year 110/17/2014 V1.
PROJECT TITLE Project Leader: Team: Executive Project Sponsor (As Required): Date: Month/Day/Year 110/17/2014 V1.
ECONOMIC MODELING OF A LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS BIOREFINING INDUSTRY Francis M. Epplin Lawrence D. Mapemba Gelson Tembo Department of Agricultural Economics.
EuroChar : Development of technologies for long-term carbon sequestration Energy AwayDay May 22 nd 2012.
Looking at the Economics of the Next Generation of Biofuels
Risk Assessment and Economics of Forest Biorefinery Concepts USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, Wisconsin.
Agro-forestry & crop combination options Dr Calliope Panoutsou Biomass Department CRES.
Opportunities and Challenges of Expanding Agriculture’s Contribution to the Energy Supply Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte University of Tennessee.
Ethanol. Conversion of sugars to ETOH The manufacture of alcoholic beverages originated over 5000 years ago –Water was generally impure and thus fermented.
Comparative Regional Economic Advantages for Cellulosic Feedstocks for Bioenergy Production. Burton C. English.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 Integrated Biomass Supply Analysis & Logistics IBSAL Shahab Sokhansanj and Anthony Turhollow.
Current Research and Emerging Economic and Environmental Issues on Biofuels Madhu Khanna University of Illinois.
The New World of Biofuels: Implications for Agriculture and Energy Keith Collins, Chief Economist, USDA EIA Energy Outlook, Modeling, and Data Conference.
The Potential Costs and Benefits of A Biomass-to-Ethanol Production Industry In California National Ethanol Conference National Ethanol Conference Las.
Chapter 2, Operations Strategy
Future of the Bioeconomy and Biofuels: Overview, Industry, and Agriculture? Dan Otto Chad Hart John A. Miranowski Iowa State University.
COSTS AND BENEFITS OF A BIOMASS-TO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY IN CALIFORNIA Pat Perez- Energy Commission May 8, rd Symposium on Biotechnology for.
Integrating Forages into Multi-Functional Landscapes: Enhanced Soil Health and Ecosystem Service Opportunities Douglas L. Karlen USDA-ARS Presented at.
Economics of Cellulosic Ethanol Production Marie Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Richard Nelson SAEA Annual Meeting Mobile,
Biomass Logistics and Site Selection. About Strata-G Founded by UT Agricultural Engineering graduate Approximately 120 staff Offices in Tennessee, South.
1 Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Delivering Results for Over a Decade Presented to Wood Pellet Association of Canada, 20 November 2013.
Beyond Theory—Creating a New Biomass Energy Market in the Midwest Gary Radloff Midwest Energy Policy Director.
NRCS Programs Provide Biofuel and Biomass Opportunities for Producers Switchgrass harvest for biofuels, Photo: NRCS Iowa.
Liberalization of Trade in Biofuels: Implications for GHG Emissions and Social Welfare Xiaoguang Chen Madhu Khanna Hayri Önal University of Illinois at.
Anaerobic Digestion – a demonstration programme under the Environmental Transformation Fund 3 rd and 4 th September 2008.
Forest Biomass Sustainability: Policy Themes & Research Needs Alan A. Lucier, Ph.D. Senior Vice President, NCASI FIA User Group Meeting & Biomass / Bioenergy.
International Consultation on Pro-Poor Jatropha Development IFAD, Rome, April 10-11, 2008 Foundation Perspectives on Financing Pro-Poor Jatropha Development:
NexSteppe Vision Be a leading provider of scalable, reliable and sustainable feedstock solutions for the biofuels, biopower and biobased product industries.
Removing Risk from the Biomass Supply Chain: Growing a Sustainable Pathway Biofuels Law and Regulation Conference Sam Jackson May 2, 2014.
Energy and Products from Agricultural Biomass: Prospects and Issues F. Larry Leistritz Donald M. Senechal Nancy M. Hodur Presented at: IAIA 2007 Conference,
Selected Texas A&M Agriculture Research High biomass and drought-tolerant crop research Genomics and biotechnology for biofuel feedstocks Alternative feedstocks.
BioProducts & BioEnergy Sector Lignocellulose Techno-Business Meeting UBC Video-Conference Bob Ingratta Jan. 13, 2009.
Supply chains for the UK to 2050 A. Bauen (*), R. Slade, S. Jablonski and C. Panoutsou The context The aim of this work is to explore the potential for.
Simulation Of Bioprocess ERT Modeling and Assessment in Process Development.
Defra Bioenergy Crops R&D Programme Bruno Viegas Sustainable Farming and Food Science Division.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Logistics of Biomass Supply Agricultural crops and residues Shahab Sokhansanj, Ph.D., P.Eng. Bioenergy.
America’s 21st Century Transportation Fuel Ethanol From Biomass.
National Forest Restoration Working Partnership Grant Multi-collaborative effort to explore the use of woody biomass for cellulosic ethanol development.
APCA Agricultural Policy Options for Improving Energy Crop Economics Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Agricultural Policy Analysis Center University of Tennessee.
2005 OBP Bi-Annual Peer Review Fran Ferraro Merrick & Company Sealaska Corporation Southeast Alaska Ethanol Project Integrated Biorefinery Session November.
Bio-based electricity: How biomass resources can support renewable electricity policies Matt Kocoloski and Paulina Jaramillo Carnegie Mellon University.
Colin Robertson Edinburgh Napier University Environmental Sustainability Conference 11 November 2015.
APCA 2007 Farm Bill: Agricultural Policy Considerations Burley Stabilization Corporation Board Meeting Knoxville, TN January 15, 2007 Kelly Tiller Agricultural.
1 The role of biomass in the UK energy system TSEC-BIOSYS: A whole systems approach to bioenergy demand and supply Ausilio Bauen.
2005 OBP Bi-Annual Peer Review Feedstock Platform Analysis Shahab Sokhansanj, Bob Perlack, Anthony Turhollow November 14, 2005.
Value to Utilities of Agronomic Uses for Gypsum Lamar Larrimore Southern Company September 13, 2006.
2005 OBP Biennial Peer Review Selective Harvest Kevin L. Kenney, Christopher T. Wright Biomass Feedstock Interface Platform November 14, 2005.
2005 OBP Bi-Annual Peer Review Summary of Feed Processing & Handling Effort John Jechura, NREL Thermochemical Platform November 14, 2005.
2005 OBP Biennial Peer Review Platform Analysis Overview Bob Wallace, NREL Integrated Biorefinery Project Date: November 16, 2005.
Forest Knowledge Know-how Well-being Luke’s and VTT’s joint research and innovation programme 2012–2016.
Department of Economics Biofuel Economics Intensive Program in Biorenewables Ames, Iowa June 9, 2009 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist.
Feedstock Supply Chain Analysis Jacob J. Jacobson Idaho National Laboratory April 7 - 9, 2011 This presentation does not contain any proprietary,
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Biofuel Report Summary Biofuels Team - David Terry Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop Denver,
BioEnergy Sustaining The Future 2 BESTF2 Briefing Event 11 th December 2013 Dr Megan Cooper, BESTF co-ordinator.
Demonstration of On-Farm Production of a Dedicated Energy Crop incorporating Multiple Varieties of Switchgrass Seed Sam Jackson and Nicole Labbé University.
2005 OBP Bi-Annual Peer Review Project Presentation Template Name Platform Date Please see the notes section for expected presentation outcomes.
Developing a Bioenergy Crop Supply Chain: Contracts and Policy ` Madhu Khanna University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Logistical Efficiency with Dedicated Energy Crops
BIOENERGY IN ELECTRICITY GENERATION
Environmental sustainability
Building sustainable biomass-to-biofuel systems:
Session 4: Biofuels: How Feasible Are Large-Scale Goals for Biofuel Penetration in the US and Canada? Ken Andrasko, EPA Session Objectives: Gauge.
Chad Hart & Bruce Babcock
DOE Biomass Program Integrated Biorefinery
Agro-forestry & crop combination options
Tek. Bioenergi (TKK-2129) Instructor: Rama Oktavian
Presentation transcript:

DOE/USDA Biomass Feedstock Gate Review Meeting March, 2005 Note: Each presentation is allotted 35 minutes; 20 min. for the presentation and 15 min. for reviewer Q&A.

Presentation Outline Strategic Fit –Feedstock fit –Milestone fit –Stage gate fit Technical Barriers Addressed Customers Technical Feasibility and Risks Competitive Advantage Project Overview History and Accomplishments Plan/Schedule Legal/Regulatory Compliance Critical Issues and Show-stoppers Plans and Resources for Next Stage Summary

Improved Plants & Production Practices for Grasslands & Biomass Crops Native Grass Utilization Project Biomass Power for Rural Development Chariton Valley Switchgrass Project UT Switchgrass Project Biomass Supply Systems & Logistics Supply Forecast & Analysis Economic Impacts from Competing Demands for Ag. Feedstocks to Produce Bioenergy & Bioproducts Project Fit in the Overall Feedstock Stage Gate Scope Feedstock Fit

B Milestone Ag. Residue & Energy Crop Feedstocks Available to a Biorefinery at $35/dry ton by 2015 Collection/ Harvesting Technology is Available Storage Technology is Available Transportation Technology is Available Preprocessing Technology is Available Feedstock Milestone Hierarchy Intermediate Targets ? 2010: xx tons at $xx/ton 2015: xx tons at $xx/ton 2020: xx tons at $xx/ton Production Technology is Available C Milestone By 2010 identify sufficient, sustainable ag. residue supply at $10/dry ton grower payment C Milestone By 2009, develop and demonstrate innovative dry storage methods so that feedstock degradation is less than 5% providing a 50% cost reduction compared to current (2003) bale based systems. ( $1.75/dry ton ) C Milestone By 2009, demonstrate preprocessing technologies that produce ag. residue resources with bulk and flowability properties similar to other large solid commodities so that it can be handled with traditional high- volume conveyance thus reducing costs by 50% when compared to bale-based systems. ( $2.75/dry ton ) C Milestone By 2010, technologies and methods are developed to harvest and collect nationally xx M tons/year of ag. residues with a 50% cost reduction when compared to current (2003) technologies. ( $12.50/dry ton ) C Milestone By 2009, demonstrate transportation cost reductions resulting in average transportation costs of$8/dry ton or less. C Milestone By 2006, resource data with national coverage for all significant existing ag. residue resources is up-to-date, documented, and readily accessible via the internet Systems Integration C Milestone By 2007 develop optimized process and cost models for feedstock supply systems and validate analytically that ag residue feedstocks could be supplied to biorefineries at $35/dry ton. Milestone Fit

What Stage is the project in? Stage Gate Fit

Sustainable Supply Cost Social Impacts Economic Impacts Environmental Impacts Biomass Variability Engineering / Infrastructure - Single Pass/Selective Harvest - Preprocessing & Storage - Transportation Resource Availability Sustainability Requirements - Erosion & Soil Health - Crop Yield & Productivity Technology for Agricultural Residues Technology for Energy Crops Agriculture Sector Paradigm Shifts Forest Sector Systems New Crop Development - Perennial Grasses - Hybrid Poplar - Willow Other Long Term Barriers Gray areas not covered in current review 1 st Tier 2 nd Tier 3 rd Tier Technical Barriers Addressed

List and discuss customers of this work Customers

Discuss feasibility and risks of project and processes/technology it is developing (see Stage Gate guide) Technical Feasibility and Risks

Discuss how this project will improve the chances of commercial launch of the technology. Describe what could happen to make this area of research obsolete. Competitive Advantage

Discuss project activities, participants, objectives Project Overview

Discuss history and accomplishments at a level of technical detail sufficient to provide basis for reviewer evaluation – this is the “meat” of the presentation History and Accomplishments

Show plans and schedule for this project and discuss any deviations or issues Plan/Schedule

Discuss patent positions, waste streams emissions, safety, permitting, etc. issues. Are these issues insurmountable? Legal/Regulatory Compliance

What are the critical performance parameters that must be met? Are there any potential show-stoppers (e.g. environmental issues, capital replacement cycles/needs) Critical Issues and Show-stoppers

If this project is successful, what’s next? Plans and Resources for Next Stage

Summary comments/issues Summary