Land Use Impacts of Bus Rapid Transit: The Boston Silver Line Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
This is my “focus” slide, used to make sure that I’m getting the sharpest possible picture on the projection screen. It is the 1954 Freeway Plan for the.
Arthur C. Nelson, Ph.D., FAICP, Metropolitan Research Center, University of Utah with support from National Center for Transportation & Communities Reno,
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan Planning for the Future – BRT 46 th St Station Concept Plan Public Input.
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority THE HEATHLINE EUCLID CORRIDOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT Michael J. Schipper, P.E DGM- Engineering & Project.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
South Jersey Rail Past, Present and Future John J Reiser Senior Seminar.
October 4-5, 2010 TCRP H-37: Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Prepared for: AMPO Modeling Subcommittee Prepared by:
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan and Construction John Dillery & Mac Sweidan Kingfield Neighborhood Association June 2010.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Swift BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) ITS Washington November 12, 2008.
Cheryl Thole, Jennifer Flynn CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associates Transit in GIS Conference September 14, 2011 St. Petersburg, Florida.
1 AASHTO: SCOPT/MTAP Winter Meeting METRO Update: Light Rail Operations and the Status of Future Corridors Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Project Development.
SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPTS IN TRANSPORT SECTOR/ OPTIONS AND BENEFITS
Miao(Mia) Gao, Travel Demand Modeler, HDR Engineering Santanu Roy, Transportation Planning Manager, HDR Engineering Ridership Forecasting for Central Corridor.
RapidRide Briefing Growing Transit Communities East Corridor Task Force January 31 th, 2012 Ron Posthuma, Assistant Director King County Dept. of Transportation.
I-35W and 46 th Street Station Concept Service Plan Planning for the Future – BRT 46 th St Station Concept Plan Public Input.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
CIVITAS ELAN Open Academy Ljubljana 16 April 2010 Eric N. SchrefflerTom Rye, PhD Transport ConsultantNapier Edinburgh San Diego, California, USAUniversity.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
Joint Transport Forum I Rapid Transit Line 2 Our Future Transport I West of England Sub Region.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Results of a Hedonic Regression Model That Estimates the Impact of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Stations on Surrounding Residential Property Values Along the.
Sketch Model to Forecast Heavy-Rail Ridership Len Usvyat 1, Linda Meckel 1, Mary DiCarlantonio 2, Clayton Lane 1 – PB Americas, Inc. 2 – Jeffrey Parker.
Land Market Monitoring: Beyond Land Supply Gerrit-Jan Knaap Professor and Director National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education University of.
Presented by Runlin Cai, CAUPD Affiliate. Issue: What determines travel mode choice Transit mode share in LA county was 3% in (Source: SCAG Year.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements PRIMO & ENHANCED AMENITIES PLANNING PHASE September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee August 11,
: Research Question: Would ridership needs in the area of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project be better Served by the implementation of a Bus Rapid.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
1/30/03 Page 1 Rescue Muni’s Recommendations for Geary Rapid Transit For PAR 1/30/2003.
Background Transit-Dependent Communities o Low-income o Minorities o Auto-oriented development McKenzie 2013, Tomer 2011 Metro aims to “promote fair and.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
© 2007 Noblis, Inc. BUS RAPID TRANSIT AS A CATALYST FOR LAND USE CHANGE: THE ROUTE 1 CORRIDOR CASE STUDY 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Measuring the Effects of Light Rail Plans in Portland: A Trilogy Gerrit Knaap Professor and Director National Center for Smart Growth University of Maryland.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
BRT in Pittsburgh: Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway
The Purple Line Transit Connecting Bethesda, New Carrolton, and the Washington Metro Presented by- Nick Flanders Rose Ryan Anupam Srivastava.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Impacts of the Hiawatha Light Rail Line on Commercial and Industrial Property Values in Minneapolis Kate Ko and Xinyu (Jason) Cao Hennepin-University Partnership.
Land Use and Property Value Change along the Blue Line Transit in Minneapolis, MN Tanner Borgen.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Supporting a Regional Approach Optimizing the Durham-Chapel Hill high-capacity light rail transit corridor Joe Milazzo II, PE Executive Director, RTA September.
DICK RUDDELL EAST LANCASTER BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT ______________________.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER DRAFT MASTER PLAN Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2008.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Ronald F. Kirby Director, COG Department of Transportation.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
Form & Function of Metropolitan America WALKABLE URBAN DRIVABLE SUB-URBAN WALKUPS: (Walkable Urban Places) DRVABLE EDGE CITIES WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS.
STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY.
Using Viewshed Analysis to Determine the Impact of the Proposed Sound Transit Transportation Plan on the Cross Kirkland Corridor Gavin Blake (‘18) Environmental.
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
Understanding The 606’s impact on the neighborhood housing market
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
D Line Project Overview
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
Central Avenue Rapid Transit
Presentation transcript:

Land Use Impacts of Bus Rapid Transit: The Boston Silver Line Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida, Tampa Steven Reader, Ph.D., Associate Professor Department of Geography, Environment, and Planning University of South Florida, Tampa GIS in Public Transportation Conference September 14, 2011 St. Petersburg, Florida

Can bus rapid transit (BRT) impact surrounding land uses and property values in a similar way as light rail transit (LRT)? Issue of permanence of services & facilities Research Objective

BRT is an enhanced bus system that operates on bus lanes or other transitways in order to combine the flexibility of buses with the efficiency of rail. BRT operates at faster speeds, provides greater service reliability and increased customer convenience. BRT uses a combination of advanced technologies, infrastructure and operational investments that provide significantly better service than traditional bus service. What is Bus Rapid Transit? Source: Federal Transit Administration

Integration of Elements BRT Elements

BRT in the U.S.

Before 2009, no recent quantitative modeling studies on property value impacts of BRT in the U.S. Previous studies address impacts of rail modes on property values –Isolate effect of distance from transit (either right-of-way, stations, or both) –Typical results find positive impacts on property values from nearby rail transit, but magnitudes are relatively small Previous Work

We hoped to find statistically significant, positive impacts on surrounding property values from BRT, with magnitudes approaching those found for rail transit modes. Estimate the impacts of BRT on surrounding property values using hedonic regression models –Estimate the variation in property values due to proximity to BRT stations –Isolate the effect of distance to nearest BRT station from all other (measurable) factors that determine property values Hypothesis & Method

Pittsburgh Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway Hedonic regression model, statistically significant results, using data within ½-mile of BRT stations Moving from 101 to 100 feet from a station increases market value of single-family home by $19.00 Moving from 1,001 to 1,000 feet from a station increases market value of a single-family home by $2.73 Next application: Boston Silver Line First Application

Boston Rapid Transit

Branded as part of MBTA’s rapid transit system Low-floor 60 ft. CNG vehicles Exclusive bus lanes 10-minute peak frequency 15-minute off-peak frequency Real-time passenger information Transit signal priority Phase I Washington Street opened July 2002 Phase II Waterfront opened December 2004 Proposed Phase III to connect the two Boston Silver Line

As the first phase of the Silver Line, this corridor was selected for research Replaced MBTA Route 49 Two routes operate along the corridor: SL4 & SL5 –Provide two options into Downtown Boston 14 stations Approximately 15,500 daily boardings Boston Silver Line Washington Street Corridor

Parcel data from City of Boston Assessing Department, Sales transactions of condominium units from the City of Boston, U.S. Census data Data set constructed using GIS Used only parcels located within one quarter-mile of the Washington Street corridor Data set contains approximately 5100 sales transactions from 2000 to 2009 Data

Data Sources GIS Parcel Layer Property Appraiser Database Sales Data

Use of GIS in the Project – Data Matching Identification of “Condominium Main” Parcel using Point- in-Polygon (spatial join) b/w sales data “points” and GIS Parcel Layer 2007, clipped to ¼ buffer around BRT Line Use of Table “Relates” to relate b/w Condominium Main ID from sales data and multiple years of Property Appraiser Data, for identification of specific condominium unit ID’s and characteristics thru time.

Use of GIS in the Project – Network Analysis Condominium property parcels generalized to centroids Shortest-path road network distances calculated in ArcGIS Network Analyst based on above centroids, ESRI StreetMap database for 2008, and BRT stations as destinations

Parcels within ¼ Mile Buffer of the Boston Silver Line BRT indicating Condominium Parcels with Sales

Condominium Parcels within ¼ mile of Silver Line with Sales (n=563)

Condominium Parcels within ¼ mile of Silver Line with Sales Built after 1997, by Year Built (n=37)

TypeNumber ParcelsNumber Sales Built before 1998, not remodeled Built before 1998, remodeled after Built after Totals Built after 1997, with 40+ sales * Number of Condominium Sales ( ) within ¼ mile of Boston Silver Line BRT by Type of Parcel

Condominium Parcels within ¼ mile of Silver Line with 40+ Sales Built after 1997, by Year Built (n=11)

Median Price Per Square Foot by Year for All Condominium Sales within ¼ mile of Boston Silver Line BRT

Dependent variable: sale price per square foot Key independent variable: network distance of parcel to nearest BRT station Other variables –Property characteristics –Neighborhood characteristics –Local housing price index Variables

Results

Hedonic regression models using sales from years 2000, 2001, and 2002 indicate that price per square foot was higher for condos further away from the corridor, but this relationship was not statistically significant. Beginning in 2003, after the opening of the Silver Line Washington Street, similar models begin to show a statistically significant inverse relationship between distance to a BRT station and sale price per square foot. Results, cont’d

2007 sales indicate a premium of $0.18 per square foot for each foot closer to a BRT station 2009 sales indicate a premium of $0.11 per square foot for each foot closer to a BRT station (although this result is only significant at the 90% level) These relationships exhibit decreasing marginal effects, meaning the effect diminishes farther from the stations Results, cont’d

With recent research on BRT in Pittsburgh and the Boston Silver Line, we are beginning to show that proximity to BRT stations can have a positive effect on residential property values and sale prices. These effects are very similar to those shown in the literature for LRT Conclusion

A report on this research will be available later in the Fall Additional work will begin on further analyzing the Boston data, as well as data from other cities with BRT such as Cleveland Work underway this year to update information on local, regional, and state policies and plans related to transit and development For more information please visit Upcoming Work