MICE Beam Loss vs Particle Rate Adam Dobbs, ISIS Meeting, 18 th December 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
Summary of MICE 4/4/2008 shift during the ISIS machine-physics period Goals for 04 Apr08 MICE shift: 1. Radiation survey in MICE Hall with target operating,
ISIS Related Issues for MICE Adam Dobbs Proton Accelerator Development Meeting, RAL 24 th March /03/20111A. Dobbs.
TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
MICE Particle Rate and ISIS Beam Loss Adam Dobbs, Target – ISIS Meeting, 17 th September 2010.
Particle ID in the MICE Beamline MICE Collaboration Meeting 30 March Paul Soler, Kenny Walaron University of Glasgow and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
D. Huang, MICE video conference1 Proton and Pion productions: preliminary simulation & measurements Dazhang Huang.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 21 September, 2009.
Linda R. Coney – 24th September 2009 MOM Update End of Sept Run Linda R. Coney 05 October, 2009.
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
Online Reconstruction Update Linda R. Coney UCR Dec 17, 2009.
MICE Commissioning Issues Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICO Meeting—RAL.
MICO Meeting, 1 st March 2010 Terry Hart (MOM) - Decay Solenoid - Targets - DAQ - March User Runs Plans - Suggestions.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
M.apollonioMICE Funding Agency Committee Meeting - RAL 18/4/ M. Apollonio – MICE Operations Manager University of Oxford MICE beam line commissioning.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Reconstruction & a little about Online Monitoring Linda R. Coney 18 August, 2009.
MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 14 September, 2009.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Luminosity Monitors MICE Video Conference 7 May 2009 Paul Soler.
MOM - M.ApollonioAccel. R&D/Physics and IADR - RAL - 19/3/ Summary of MICE operations – 14/15 March 2008 AIMS - establish MICE beamline in ISIS synchrotron.
Commissioning needs: K.Long. Routine: LN2 bottle: –Needs to be sited in MICE Hall or outside vault so that routine checks of contents can be made.
MICO 15 th February 2010 Terry Hart (MOM) - Decay Solenoid and Target - MICE Machine Physics runs - User Run Plans.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
CMPB Alain Blondel 14 April STATUS OF MICE.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICO.
14/1/20097 January 2009MICE CM23 - Harbin - Beamline Session1 MICE Beamloss Data Adam Dobbs.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 7 September, 2009.
MICE Video meeting Alain Blondel 7 December MICE -- what running strategy? reflections on steps I and II.
MICE VC Aug '10J.S. GraulichSlide 1 MOM report o Achievements Since CM27 o Daily Operations o Run Plans o Summary Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
Goals and Status of MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment J.S. Graulich.
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
MICE Beamline Commissioning Linda R. Coney NFMCC Meeting 16 January 2010.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
MICE Step 1: First Emittance Results with Particle Physics Detectors Linda R. Coney EuCARD Meeting – 10 May 2011.
M. apollonio MICE Beamline summary. - Beamline parallel session (June 1 st ): - envisaged goals (Alain) - assess readiness of the line magnet status (Ken)
Plans (& ideas) for beamline commissioning The beamline Magnet field tests Source characterisation Optics (& model) commissioning K. Tilley CM18, 14/06/07.
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Particle Production in the MICE Beamline IPAC10 Linda Coney, UC Riverside, Adam Dobbs, Imperial College London, Yordan Karadzhov, Sofia University The.
Linda R. Coney – 24th September 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 24 September, 2009.
1 Calorimeter in G4MICE Berkeley 10 Feb 2005 Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
Online Reconstruction 1M.Ellis - CM th October 2008.
MICE Run Plan Sept/Oct 2009 m. apollonio – IC MACHINE PHYSICS USERs RUN NO SHIFT A B C D E.
March 18, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Status1 MICE Beamline Status (March 18, 2008) Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology.
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
Target tests 1 st – 2 nd Nov. Chris Booth Sheffield 7 th December 2006.
Running plan Step I.1 Basic radiation levels. I.1.1 ISIS running with beam elements on, target off, beam stop shut. Establish permanent MICE monitoring.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
26 Oct 2010PC Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My.
Database David Forrest. What database? DBMS: PostgreSQL. Run on dedicated Database server at RAL Need to store information on conditions of detector as.
Software Overview 1M. Ellis - CM21 - 7th June 2008  Simulation Status  Reconstruction Status  Unpacking Library  Tracker Data Format  Real Data (DATE)
M. Bonesini - CM 22 RAL October 081 TOF0 status M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
ISIS Beam and MICE Target Simulation MICE Collaboration Meeting Adam Dobbs 19 th Oct 2008.
1 Updated Run Plans. K.Tilley, MICO, 07/02/08 - pre-commissioning - Target, - beamline functionality - detectors, particle production - decay solenoid.
M. apollonio 7/7/2010CM27 - RAL11 Beam-Line Analysis …
A Student on MICE Adam Dobbs, Imperial College Goldsmith’s Particle Physics Summer School 21 st July 2009.
This presentation will describe the state of each element in the beam line with regards to the current update being undertaken. Firstly, it will describe.
What do we want to achieve in this running period? Michael S. Zisman Deputy Spokesmouse Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICO.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
Early Results from Beam Line Studies Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva
MICE Operations Scenario Run 1
MICE: First Beam Emittance Results w/Particle Detectors
Luminosity Monitor Status
Global PID MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick
A BeamLine update m. apollonio 7/7/2010 CM27 - RAL 1.
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Presentation transcript:

MICE Beam Loss vs Particle Rate Adam Dobbs, ISIS Meeting, 18 th December 2009

Outline  Current Beamline  Analysis Procedure  Latest High Beam Loss (~5V) results  Future Plans 18/12/20092A Dobbs

Current MICE beamline 18/12/2009A Dobbs3 Target Q1-3 D1D2Q4-6Q7-9 DS CKOV A, BGVA1BM1TOF0 BM2 TOF1 D = Dipole bending magnet Q = Quadrupole magnet DS = Decay solenoid DSA = Decay Solenoid Area GVA1 = Scintillator counter CKOV = Cherenkov detector BM = Beam Profile Monitor TOF = Time of Flight ISIS DSA MICE Hall

Beam Loss vs Particle Rate Flow Diagram 18/12/2009A Dobbs4 Target DAQ dataDATE DAQ data Data Reduction 1 – fitted peak beam loss analysis, etc Particle rate data extraction with ScalersAnalysis Reduced Beam Loss dataParticle Rate data Combine data by matching time stamps Combined data (ROOT files) Data reduction 2: extract means and sigmas for variables on a run-by-run basis Final plots of beam loss vs particle rate

Results 18/12/20095A Dobbs One point = the mean values of the beam loss and particle rate for a run

18/12/20096A Dobbs

18/12/20097A Dobbs

Future Plans 18/12/2009A Dobbs8  Another high beam loss study planned for December machine physics period  Reproducibility  Better statistics (400 – 500 pulses per setting)  Use ToF data  Another rate counter  PID  Compare with G4BeamLine simulations

Preliminary ToF Data for Run /12/2009A Dobbs9  Produced using G4MICE/TofMonitor e µ π

Analysis Procedure Step I.I – Beam Loss 18/12/200910A Dobbs  Initially for each target dip a whole spectrum of data is present for each variable (black sample spectra shown above). Canonical single values for each variable are calculated from the spectra using BLA Part 2 to given one value for each variable per target dip (fits doing this shown in red). These are written to an ascii file. Target DAQ data Reduced Beam Loss data

Analysis Procedure Step I.II - Particle Rate  Held in DATE data stream i.e. in binary  Contains GVA1, BM1, BM2, various TOF0 and TOF1 data  Extracted using a modified version of G4MICE ScalersAnalysis application  Output is an ascii file containing the number of hits for each detector per spill (i.e. per target dip)  TOF data harder to interpret 18/12/200911A Dobbs DATE DAQ data Particle Rate data

Analysis Procedure Step II - Combine the data  Once the beam loss and particle rate data has been converted to ascii files containing values for each target dip, the data from the two streams must be combined  Data are synchronised using timestamps associated with each target dip data set (the clocks of the two DAQs are synched)  -> Leads to combined data set holding both beam loss and particle rate data per target dip 18/12/200912A Dobbs Reduced Beam Loss data Particle Rate data Combined data (ROOT files)

Analysis Procedure Step III - extract mean values per run and plot  A combined data file is produced for each run  This file is processed using ROOT to calculate the mean and sigma of each value for a run (a second data reduction) e.g. the mean of GVA1, the mean summed beam loss in sector 7  The values are finally plotted for a series of runs, each having a different nominal beam loss value, but with all other parameters (e.g. Optics) held constant 18/12/200913A Dobbs Combined data (ROOT files) Final plots of beam loss vs particle rate

Histogramme of GVA1 rate per target dip, for run /12/200914A Dobbs One of the better fits!