Law School Survey of Student Engagement Users’ Workshop November 4, 2011 Seton Hall Law School 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model of Minority Student Retention
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
OCCC AtD Meeting, September 16, 2009 Mr. Stuart Harvey 1.
Connecting Work and Academics: How Students and Employers Benefit.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
Enrollment Management and Student Affairs at Portland State University Enrollment Management and Student Affairs is a student-centered organization, dedicated.
Illinois Educator Code of Ethics Training
National Survey of Student Engagement Department of Institutional Research and Planning December 2006.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Gender umanitoba.ca.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
INQUIREINSPIREINNOVATEIMPLEMENT Leadership, Community and Values University of Washington LEADERSHIP, COMMUNITY and VALUES Preliminary Findings: Surveys.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Faculty Said/Students Said Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenters: LaSylvia Pugh & Pamela G. Senegal – February 17, 2006.
Connecting Work and Academics: How Students and Employers Benefit.
Achieving Campus Diversity: The University of Central Florida Model
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
About Us. Integrity: We demonstrate this cornerstone of our profession through honesty, accountability and high ethical standards. Respect: We create.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Perspective for a Diverse America ACCSHRMA Diversity Conference October 17, 2013 Montgomery, Alabama.
ENHANCING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IWU DR. MARY ANN SEARLE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT AFFAIRS.
1 Presentation of Results NSSE 2005 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Symposium On University Research and Creative Expression (SOURCE) SOURCE is an annual university-wide forum for CWU students representing all disciplines.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Law School Survey of Student Engagement (LSSSE) Results June Scores range from one to four.
Assessment Presentation Day For Faculty Cindy J. Speaker, Ph.D. Wells College August 21, 2006.
Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Faculty Well-Being: What is it, Can it survive, and Why does it matter? Ann E. Austin Michigan State University and National Science Foundation AAC&U Annual.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
The University of Texas-Pan American
Faculty Evaluations: Tenured, Tenure-Track, and Associate
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
The CCPS Strategic Plan
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Presentation transcript:

Law School Survey of Student Engagement Users’ Workshop November 4, 2011 Seton Hall Law School 1

Applied Analysis Using LSSSE in Strategic Planning 2

Informing Strategic Planning Mission Statement “Teaching, legal scholarship, and public service, inspired by our distinctive law-in-action approach and our commitment to justice” University of Wisconsin Law School 3

Informing Strategic Planning Strategic Goals 1.Equip our students with the skills, knowledge and values essential to professional excellence and leadership 2.Create a diverse, collaborative, and supportive learning community 3.Attract, support, and retain a renowned faculty, whose insights and scholarship expand our knowledge of the law and how it affects society 4.Embody the Wisconsin Idea by connecting our scholarship with our service to the profession, the government, and our global society LSSSE Items 1.10b - Job or work-related knowledge and skills; 10c/d - Writing and speaking clearly and effectively; 10e - Thinking critically and analytically; 10n - Developing a personal code of values & ethics; 10h - Working effectively with others; 5i - Taking a leadership role in student organizations 2.1f/g - Worked with other students during or outside of class; 1s/t - Had serious conversation with students of different race or ethnicity, or who are very different in terms of religion/politics/personal values; 9a/b/c - Feel supported with regard to other students, faculty, staff; 8g/f - Providing support you need to thrive socially and with non-academic responsibilities 3. 1p – Worked harder than you thought you could to meet faculty members’ standards or expectations 4.7d - Participation in legal pro bono; 10o - Commitment to contributing to welfare of your community; beta Qs - Connection to international students 4

Informing Strategic Planning Strategic Priorities Ensure an Outstanding Student Experience  Re-imagine the Curriculum  Foster a Culture of Participation and Shared Enterprise  Anticipate Emerging Areas of Law Practice and Legal Scholarship  Embrace the Opportunities of Globalization  Build on Our Scholarly Traditions to Create Knowledge for a Changing World  Advance the Wisconsin Idea 5

Informing Strategic Planning Action plans to ensure an Outstanding Student Experience  Staff and maintain our curricular offerings to meet the future needs and current interests of our students Strengthen our admissions-to- placement commitment to student support services and counseling  Continue to encourage a supportive and collegial culture  Make the Law School a national model for the important role of diversity in legal education  Use technology to enhance learning and to provide student support   Provide an opportunity for every student to connect meaningfully with at least one member of the faculty for advice and support throughout the educational experience

Informing Strategic Planning LSSSE survey items related to career counseling: 1m - How often do students talk about career plans or job search activities with a faculty member or advisor? 6d - To what extent does the law school provide the support they need to succeed in your employment search? 9c - What is the perceived quality of relationships with administrative staff and offices? 10m - How much do they perceive their experiences at law school help them to develop clearer career goals? 7 LSSSE survey items related to faculty interaction: 1m - How often do students talk about career plans or job search activities with a faculty member or advisor? 1a - Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions 1k - Used to communicate with a faculty member 1l - Discussed assignments with a faculty member 1n - Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with faculty members outside of class 1o - Received prompt feedback (written or oral) from faculty on your academic performance 1p - Worked harder than you thought you could to meet faculty members' standards or expectations 1q - Worked with faculty members on activities other than coursework (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.)

Guiding questions for institutional peer comparisons: Q1. How often do our students talk about their career plans or job search activities with a faculty member or advisor? A. Between “sometimes” and “often” but closer to “sometimes” - mean below 2.5 Q2. How do our students’ responses compare to other law schools? A. Like at our school, the mean is below 2.5 for all peer institutions. Our students (1Ls through 3Ls) are slightly less satisfied in comparison to those attending selected peer institutions but these are not meaningful differences. For 4Ls, our students are slightly more satisfied than those at peer schools. 8

Guiding questions for comparisons by subpopulations: 9 Who talks most or least with faculty and advisors about career plans and job search activities? Which group of students never talks with faculty or advisors about these matters? Examine frequency of students who responded “never” or “sometimes.” Start with class level.

How often do students talk about career plans or job search activities with a faculty member or advisor - Age 10

How often do students talk about career plans or job search activities with a faculty member or advisor -Race 11

How often do students talk about career plans or job search activities with a faculty member or advisor - Gender 12

How often do students talk about career plans or job search activities with a faculty member or advisor –Satisfaction with career counseling 13

How often do students talk about career plans or job search activities with a faculty member or advisor – frequency of contributing to class discussion or asking questions in class 14

How often do students talk about career plans or job search activities with a faculty member or advisor – Grades 15

How often do students talk about career plans or job search activities with a faculty member or advisor – Preferred job setting 16

How often do students talk about career plans or job search activities with a faculty member or advisor – working for pay in law-related job 17

Sharing Results

How to share and with whom? Presentations to faculty and staff Creating a culture of student involvement and transparency Strategic planning Curriculum review and design Management

812/ Questions? Ideas to discuss?