Burlington County. Initial Networks 79 Stations, 47 Interchanges, Total guideway length is 101.38 km. (63 miles)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

PRT WORK SESSION PRESENTATION By: Dao Mi and Matthew Douglas.

Advertisements

3.3 Cost, Profit and Revenue Functions

SCATTER final seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2004 SCATTER Testing and evaluating potential solutions to control urban sprawl, through simulation.

This is my “focus” slide, used to make sure that I’m getting the sharpest possible picture on the projection screen. It is the 1954 Freeway Plan for the.

Taxi Alternate Days March 2012 Dawn Huddleston Commercial Roadway Systems Manager.

Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.

What is Coordinated Services? Common Goals Increase ridership Minimize expenses Maximize Revenues Build Partnerships Share Resources Reduce duplication.

GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.

Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee May 7, 2014 MODERNIZATION PROJECTS EXPANSION PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY.

NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.

Analysis and Multi-Level Modeling of Truck Freight Demand Huili Wang, Kitae Jang, Ching-Yao Chan California PATH, University of California at Berkeley.

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.

Morris County PRT Ivan Kleinfeld January 11, 2011 ORF 467.

PRT for Atlantic County ORF 467 NJ PRT Anna Zhao Jan 7 th, 2011.

1 Integration as a competitiveness instrument for Public Transport in rural areas Helder Cristóvão, José M Viegas Integration as a Competitiveness Instrument.

September 16, 2008 From the Paved State Back to the Garden State Mobility without Highways for New Jersey Alain L. Kornhauser Professor, Operations Research.

Tourism Economics TRM 490 Dr. Zongqing Zhou Chapter 4: Restaurant Economics.

The Rural NTD – What Have We Learned? Mary Martha Churchman Senior Policy Advisor Office of Program Management Mary Martha Churchman Senior Policy Advisor.

M IAMI F ORT L AUDERDALE W EST P ALM B EACH O RLANDO Addresses Florida’s demand for express, intercity rail travel. Is designed to serve tourists, business.

Transport for London Surface Transport Leon Daniels Managing Director 19 th September 2013.

Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.

Presented on January 20, ◦ Services 2 3 fixed routes, 1 bus 23 vans, 19 daily vehicle runs.

TECHNIX 2009 January, 11, 2009 From the Paved State Back to the Garden State Mobility without Highways for New Jersey Alain L. Kornhauser Professor, Operations.

Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.

Serving New Jersey’s Personal Mobility Needs: With Walking, Bicycling, aTaxis and Trains Mercer County.

Service Implementation Getting Transit on the Road! with Kevin Schubert and Emily Watson.

CCTA Peer Analysis June What’s New in this Peer Analysis Last group of peers was chosen in 2003 CCTA has “outgrown” that set of peers –Used to be.

ADA Complimentary Paratransit in the Atlanta Region TCC Presentation March 09, 2012.

1 TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REVIEW Balancing Transit Service with Travel Demand and Available Resources.

Transit Service Quality and Transit Use: TBOT, Task 5.

Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.

Bolton Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 974 – GMATS Bolton Key Centre report Whereas report.

Regional HOT Lanes Study Preliminary Findings An Informational Hearing of the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Toll Roads and Managed Lanes.

00 Metropolitan Transit System Transit Serving Point Loma September 23, 2008.

赴国际水稻所访学情况汇报长江大学农学院邢丹英 2010 年 6 月. 学习目的学习时间、地点学习内容学习收获几点体会汇报提纲.

JOSHUA CRAIN CE 458: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS JUNE 4, 2009 Costs in Small Public Transit Systems in Oregon.

A Simple Methodology to Evaluate the Disproportionate Impacts of Fare and Service Changes on Protected Populations in a Fixed Guide-way System By Vijay.

PRTC Challenges, Opportunities, and Experience with a Regional Fare Collection System.

PASSAIC COUNTY. 197 square miles (185 of land) Population: 489, New Jersey Transit Train Stations 3 Colleges: Montclair State University, William.

FlexBRT Project Briefing. Background Feasibility Study began in – $750,000 TEA-21 Grant to study an ITS Circulator in North Orange County/South.

Beyond Business as Usual: Ensuring the Network We Want is the Network We Get David Levinson, Norah Montes de Oca and Feng Xie Feng Xie Mn/DOT Final TAP.

Prince William County Potomac River Commuter Ferry Study & Route Proving Exercise A Summary of Project Purpose and Results Presented by: Charles “Cody”

Let us consider one producer P and four customers, which are supplied each day with one item of product each. Customers can be supplied only by trucks.

Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.

New Tools and Technologies to Assess Public Transport Network and Accessibility October 8, 2015 Istanbul Dr. Jen JungEun Oh Senior Transport Economist,

ALGEBRA READINESS LESSON 6-4 Warm Up Lesson 6-4 Warm-Up.

Improving the Health Care-Transportation Connection Presented to PPTA April 9, 2015 York Adams Transportation Authority.

A-Taxi System: Analysis of Passaic, Morris, & Bergen County Luke Cheng Proma Banerjee.

3.10 Business and Economic Applications.

南水北调东线第一期工程山东段情况简介. 主要汇报内容二、南水北调山东段工程总体布置三、山东段工程项目划分及工程主要建设内容一、南水北调东线工程概况四、前期工作及工程建设进展情况五、工程总投资.

STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY.

EUROPEAN FORUM FOR GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS KRAKOW CONFERENCE October, Krakow, Poland Travel Behaviour in Pristina City Author 1: Naim Kelmendi.

Cliquez pour modifier le style du titre 43 RD ASECAP STUDY & INFORMATION DAYS Investing in the future mobility across Europe : building, managing and connecting.

Wherever Your Path May Lead …. RTS Takes You There!

How can we encourage more private investment in Britain’s railways?

Electricity is produced at the power station.

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Seattle Link Light Rail, Initial Segment

T-Share: A Large-Scale Dynamic Taxi Ridesharing Service

IndE 311 Problem Session March 2nd, 2007.

Simulation of a shared fleet of autonomous cars in Canberra

aTaxis: Demand Management in Middlesex County

PARTNERSHIPS An experiment! Public Private Partnership

16 October 2006.

New Jersey’s Rail Network

Annual Operating & Capital Budget

Scale of integration.

April 23, 2018.

Charles “Cody” Smith, PE

Annual Operating & Capital Budget

Complete Vehicle Systems.

Presentation transcript:

Burlington County

Initial Networks

79 Stations, 47 Interchanges, Total guideway length is km. (63 miles)

Total Stations:27 Total Interchanges:17, Total guideway length is km. (24.58 miles)

Total Stations:30 Total Interchanges:16, Total guideway length is km. (25.12 miles)

Total Stations:22 Total Interchanges:14, Total guideway length is km. (15.79 miles)

Networks Statistics; Burlington County StationsInterchanges Miles of Guideway Length Total Trip ends servedToal Trips Peak hour TripsFleet size Average trip Length Average Vehicle OccupancyFare Vehicle Operating Costs (#) (miles)(per day) (#)(Miles) (Trips/vehicl e) ,808 45,077 6, $ 3.00 $ 0.20 Basic Costs, Revenue; Burlington County Capital CostsAnnual Recurring CostsAnnual RevenueP&L StationsGuidewayVehiclesTotal Cost of Capital Maintenanc e OperatingTotalFare Station lease and naming rights Total (M$) $ 142 $ 315 $ 74 $ 531 $ 43 $ 11 $ 7 $ 60 $ 41 $ 3 $ 43 $ (17)

Break Even point: $4.25

Expansion and Connection StageStationsInterchangesGuideways (mi)

Full Network

Total Stations:574 Total Interchanges:513, Total guideway length is 968 km. ( miles)

Profit

Number Trip ends served home school work shopping transportatio n entertainment/et c dinning Total 1 6, ,254 8,360 16, ,908 1,953 9,420 39, ,248 8,172 48,840 61, , ,270 6, ,812 9,470 11, , ,820 7, ,484 … Total 999,124 63, , ,654, ,329,020 County Total Trip Ends 1,770, ,918 1,005, ,304, ,181,560 T rips served (per day) 1,315,015

Networks Statistics; Burlington County StationsInterchanges Miles of Guideway Length Total Trip ends servedTotal Trips Peak hour TripsFleet size Average trip Length Average Vehicle OccupancyFare Vehicle Operating Costs (#) (miles)(per day) (#)(Miles) ,346,000 1,315, ,252 21,69852 $3.00 $0.20 Basic Costs, Revenue; Burlington County Capital CostsAnnual Recurring CostsAnnual RevenueP&L StationsGuidewayVehiclesTotalCost of CapitalMaintenanceOperatingTotalFare Station lease and naming rightsTotal (M$) $1,148 $3,007 $2,170 $6,325 $506 $ 127 $197 $ 830 $1,184 $21 $1,204 $374

Break even point: $2.05

Conclusion Great location for connectivity to other counties Rough start, but better with more stations over time Gradual reduction in fares Size of demand greatly varies across the county