Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) Purdue, Norfolk State, Northwestern, MIT, Molecular Foundry, UC Berkeley, Univ. of Illinois, UTEP Atomistic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Int. Conf. II-VI 2007 Coherent Raman spectroscopy of Cd 1-x Mn x Te quantum wells Lowenna Smith, Daniel Wolverson, Stephen Bingham and J. John Davies Department.
Advertisements

Contact Modeling and Analysis of InAs HEMT Seung Hyun Park, Mehdi Salmani-Jelodar, Hong-Hyun Park, Sebastian Steiger, Michael Povoltsky, Tillmann Kubis,
Multisubband Monte Carlo simulations for p-MOSFETs David Esseni DIEGM, University of Udine (Italy) Many thanks to: M.De Michielis, P.Palestri, L.Lucci,
© 2013 Eric Pop, UIUCECE 340: Semiconductor Electronics ECE 340 Lecture 3 Crystals and Lattices Online reference:
1 Analysis of Strained-Si Device including Quantum Effect Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. Ryo Tanabe Takahiro Yamasaki Yoshio Ashizawa Hideki Oka
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) UC Berkeley, Univ.of Illinois, Norfolk State, Northwestern, Purdue, UTEP First-time User Guide for Piecewise.
Coulomb Interaction in quantum structures - Effects of
Quantum Mechanics Discussion. Quantum Mechanics: The Schrödinger Equation (time independent)! Hψ = Eψ A differential (operator) eigenvalue equation H.
1 Fermi surfaces and Electron dynamics  Band structure calculations give E(k)  E(k) determines the dynamics of the electrons  It is E(k) at the Fermi.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) Purdue, Norfolk State, Northwestern, MIT, Molecular Foundry, UC Berkeley, Univ. of Illinois, UTEP Periodic.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) UC Berkeley, Univ.of Illinois, Norfolk State, Northwestern, Purdue, UTEP Quantum Transport in Ultra-scaled.
LPS Quantum computing lunchtime seminar Friday Oct. 22, 1999.
Quantum Dots PA2003: Nanoscale Frontiers Artificial atoms Schr ö dinger equation Square well potential Harmonic oscillator 2D Harmonic oscillator Real.
1 Motivation (Why is this course required?) Computers –Human based –Tube based –Solid state based Why do we need computers? –Modeling Analytical- great.
Quantum Dots and Spin Based Quantum Computing Matt Dietrich 2/2/2007 University of Washington.
Image courtesy of Keith Schwab.
Physics of Graphene A. M. Tsvelik. Graphene – a sheet of carbon atoms The spectrum is well described by the tight- binding Hamiltonian on a hexagonal.
Project topics due today. Next HW due in one week
J. H. Woo, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Texas A&M University GEOMETRIC RELIEF OF STRAINED GaAs ON NANO-SCALE GROWTH AREA.
IWCE, Purdue, Oct , 2004 Seungwon Lee Exchange Coupling in Si-Quantum-Dot-Based Quantum Computer Seungwon Lee 1, Paul von Allmen 1, Susan N. Coppersmith.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) UC Berkeley, Univ.of Illinois, Norfolk State, Northwestern, Purdue, UTEP Tutorial 5 Strain Hesameddin Ilatikhameneh.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) UC Berkeley, Univ.of Illinois, Norfolk State, Northwestern, Purdue, UTEP First Time User Guide to OMEN Nanowire**
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) Purdue, Norfolk State, Northwestern, MIT, Molecular Foundry, UC Berkeley, Univ. of Illinois, UTEP DFT Calculations.
Science and Technology of Nano Materials
Efficient solution algorithm of non-equilibrium Green’s functions in atomistic tight binding representation Yu He, Lang Zeng, Tillmann Kubis, Michael Povolotskyi,
1 Lecture IX dr hab. Ewa popko Electron dynamics  Band structure calculations give E(k)  E(k) determines the dynamics of the electrons.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) Purdue, Norfolk State, Northwestern, MIT, Molecular Foundry, UC Berkeley, Univ. of Illinois, UTEP NEMO5.
Rajib Rahman Stark Tuning of Electronic Properties of Impurities for Quantum Computing Applications Rajib Rahman Advisors: Gerhard Klimeck Lloyd Hollenberg.
December 2, 2011Ph.D. Thesis Presentation First principles simulations of nanoelectronic devices Jesse Maassen (Supervisor : Prof. Hong Guo) Department.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) UC Berkeley, Univ.of Illinois, Norfolk State, Northwestern, Purdue, UTEP First-Time User Guide Drift-Diffusion.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) Purdue, Norfolk State, Northwestern, MIT, Molecular Foundry, UC Berkeley, Univ. of Illinois, UTEP Multi.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) Purdue, Norfolk State, Northwestern, MIT, Molecular Foundry, UC Berkeley, Univ. of Illinois, UTEP Tight-Binding.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) Purdue, Norfolk State, Northwestern, UC Berkeley, Univ. of Illinois, UTEP CNTbands First-Time User Guide.
Thermoelectric properties of ultra-thin Bi 2 Te 3 films Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Network for Computational Nanotechnology, Electrical and Computer.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) UC Berkeley, Univ.of Illinois, Norfolk State, Northwestern, Purdue, UTEP Generation of Empirical Tight Binding.
1 BULK Si (100) VALENCE BAND STRUCTURE UNDER STRAIN Sagar Suthram Computational Nanoelectronics Class Project
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) SungGeun Kim Purdue, Norfolk State, Northwestern, MIT, Molecular Foundry, UC Berkeley, Univ. of Illinois,
Quantum Confinement in Nanostructures Confined in: 1 Direction: Quantum well (thin film) Two-dimensional electrons 2 Directions: Quantum wire One-dimensional.
Quantum Confinement BW, Chs , YC, Ch. 9; S, Ch. 14; outside sources.
Macroscopic quantum effects generated by the acoustic wave in molecular magnet 김 광 희 ( 세종대학교 ) Acknowledgements E. M. Chudnovksy (City Univ. of New York,
Valley Splitting Theory for Quantum Wells
The Tightbinding Bandstructure Theory
Organization Introduction Simulation Approach Results and Discussion
12/8/2015A. Ali Yanik, Purdue University1 Spin Dependent Electron Transport in Nanostructures A. Ali Yanik † Dissertation † Department of Physics & Network.
Bandstructures: Real materials. Due my interests & knowledge, we’ll mostly focus on bands in semiconductors. But, much of what we say will be equally valid.
F. Sacconi, M. Povolotskyi, A. Di Carlo, P. Lugli University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy M. Städele Infineon Technologies AG, Munich, Germany Full-band.
Seung Hyun Park Hyperfine Mapping of Donor Wave Function Deformations in Si:P based Quantum Devices Seung Hyun Park Advisors: Prof. Gerhard Klimeck Prof.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) UC Berkeley, Univ.of Illinois, Norfolk State, Northwestern, Purdue, UTEP First Time User Guide to MOSCAP*
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) UC Berkeley, Univ.of Illinois, Norfolk State, Northwestern, Purdue, UTEP First time user guide for RTD-NEGF.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) Gerhard Klimeck Berkeley, Univ. of Florida, Univ.of Illinois, Norfolk State, Northwestern, Purdue, Stanford,
Electronic Properties of Si Nanowires Yun Zheng, 1 Cristian Rivas, Roger Lake, Khairul Alam, 2 Timothy Boykin, and 3 Gerhard Klimeck Deptartment of Electrical.
Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) UC Berkeley, Univ.of Illinois, Norfolk State, Northwestern, Purdue, UTEP OMEN Nanoiwre* Supporting Document.
2 s 2.org 2008 MSD Annual Review Simulation study and tool development for ultra-scaled InAs HEMTs Theme 6 Neerav Kharche, Mathieu Luisier, & Gerhard.
Thermal Strain Effects in Germanium Thin Films on Silicon Travis Willett-Gies Nalin Fernando Stefan Zollner.
Flat Band Nanostructures Vito Scarola
Excitons in Excited States in a Quantum Well
Contact Resistance Modeling and Analysis of HEMT Devices S. H. Park, H
Spin-orbit interaction in a dual gated InAs/GaSb quantum well
Spin-Orbit Coupling (SOC) Parameters in Si/SiGe QWs: Structure (SIA) and Bulk (BIA) Inversion Asymmetry Objective: Previous theoretical models for T2.
Contact Resistance Modeling in HEMT Devices
Band Structure Lab with NEMO5 Yi Shen, Nicolás Esquivel Camacho, Michael Povolotskyi ,and Gerhard Klimeck Approach: The communication between Rappture.
OMEN: a Quantum Transport Modeling Tool for Nanoelectronic Devices
Neerav Kharche Advisors: Prof. Gerhard Klimeck Prof. Timothy Boykin
Schrödinger's Cat A cat is placed in an airtight box with an oxygen supply and with a glass vial containing cyanide gas to be released if a radiation detector.
Tightbinding (LCAO) Approach to Bandstructure Theory
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Christian Scheller
The Pseudopotential Method Builds on all of this.
Energy Band 7 In free electron model, electrons occupy positive energy levels from E=0 to higher values of energy. They are valence electron so called.
Bandgap modification due to strain
Presentation transcript:

Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) Purdue, Norfolk State, Northwestern, MIT, Molecular Foundry, UC Berkeley, Univ. of Illinois, UTEP Atomistic Modeling of Nanostructures -Effects of disorder on valley splitting- Zhengping Jiang Committee: Prof. Gerhard Klimeck (Chair) Prof. Supriyo Datta, Prof. Alejandro Strachan

Zhengping Jiang Nanoelectronic Device Scaling One bit, typically: DRAM: MOS transistor + capacitor 2 PC 2G 2008 Laptop 2*2G 2009 PC 4*2G 2010 Future? 2^n*2G Future: More info in one memory unit or decrease size. Acknowledgement: Robert Chau, Intel MOS: ~60nm with pitch Technology makes life simple, not heavy.

Zhengping Jiang Why quantum computation is pursued? Concept of Quantum computation: Can we realize it? Electrical engineer 3 10 a|1>+b|0> bit qubit Is it small? Spin ! comparable or even smaller than DRAM Computer science Computer science Logician Physicist … … More information in one qubit! What are we waiting for?

Zhengping Jiang Challenge to realize qubit Quantum computing dilemma: Manipulate qubit by external force. Isolation from external force to maintain quantum information between gate operations. Which material could be used? silicon Closest to mainstream semiconductor technology. Long spin coherence time. Existence of spin ‐ free nuclear isotopes. xValley degeneracy could be problem in qubit operation. 4 Valley degeneracy is potential source for decoherence.* To use silicon, degeneracy must be lifted. *B. Koiller et al. PRL 88 (2002)

Zhengping Jiang valley splitting – lift valley degeneracy Biaxial strain splits six-fold* valley- degeneracy into Lower two-fold degeneracy Higher four-fold degeneracy kxkx kyky kzkz Lowest two-fold degenerate valleys split in the presence of sharp confinement potentials in QWs. QW Valley-splitting Valley-splitting is a critical design parameter for QC devices. -> remove degeneracy. 6 fold 2 fold 4 fold kxkx kyky kzkz How to lift valley degeneracy? *Spin degeneracy is not included here. Energy spacing between two resulting energy level. 5

Zhengping Jiang Parabolic Dispersion E k Simple quantum well states Most basic quantum mechanical problem: Particle in a box Schrödinger Equation 2 propagating states L quantize k 1 st 2 nd 1 bound state 1 st 6 Thanks to Neerav for figures.

Zhengping Jiang Valley splitting: Quantum Wells Special Considerations in Si 1 st 2 nd 2 valleys 4 propagating states 2 bound states k 1,2 envelope k m fast oscillations k 1,2 =  /L E k 7 T. Boykin et al. PRB 70 (2004)

Zhengping Jiang Can we build QC now? Quantum computation requirements: 2 level system: spin degree of freedom. Non-degenerate state well separated from excited states. Valley + spin splitting Valley splitting QC states E0E0 E1E1 E2E2 E3E3 Sufficient valley splitting is required to preserve quantum information. 8 Valley + spin splitting Valley splitting QC states Insufficient valley splitting: Interaction with environment destroy origin phase of states. Error when reading out states. 2 fold

Zhengping Jiang Realization of a Si based QC architecture Quantum Computing devices Friesen et al., PRB, 2003 Goswami et al., Nature Physics, 2007 Why choose SiGe: 1.SiGe substrate provide tensile strain to Si, which lifts degeneracy (6 to 2). 2.Relaxed SiGe confines electron in Si. (2 to 1) 3.Confinement potential and strain could be tuned by Ge composition, which could be used to control valley splitting. Disorder in alloy must be considered! 9 Kharche et al., APL., 2007 Si SiGe Alloy disorder

Zhengping Jiang Realization of a Si based QC architecture Si SiGe Alloy disorder Quantum Computing devices Friesen et al., PRB, 2003 Quantities show potential effects: »Electric field: top and back gate »Strain: SiGe lattice mismatch »Well width »Barrier disorder Understand effects of these quantities and find a effective simulation model. 10 Kharche et al., APL., 2007

Zhengping Jiang Simulation results Valley splitting in (100) SiGe/Si/SiGe Approaches Electric field and well width dependence »QW with no disorder barrier »QW with SiGe barrier Dependence of VS on barrier disorder Approaches Disorder effects »Ordered barrier and random alloy barrer »Ordered barrier and partially ordered barrier 11

Zhengping Jiang Valley splitting in (100) SiGe/Si/SiGe QW Objective: Modeling real strain in Si QW. Modeling valley splitting in quantum well structure with SiGe barrier. Method: Strain: VFF Keating model Bandstructure: Nearest neighbor sp3d5s* tight - binding model Results: Experimental observed tri-mode bond length distribution. 12 Increase SiGe volume in strain calculation to mimic relaxed SiGe substrate and strained Si Lattice mismatch Bond length changes with Ge composition but tends to preserve their bulk value.

Zhengping Jiang Valley splitting in (100) SiGe/Si/SiGe QW Objective: Valley splitting dependence on well width with smooth barrier.(no SiGe) Valley splitting dependence on electric field. Method: Strain: VFF Keating model Bandstructure: Nearest neighbor sp3d5s* tight - binding model Smooth barrier simulated by carbon TB parameters. Results: Strong oscillation with well width in flat QW. Suppression of oscillation in electric field. 13 Boykin et al., APL no disorder Smooth VS variation with electric field WF confinement Effective W not change E

Zhengping Jiang Valley splitting in (100) SiGe/Si/SiGe QW Objective: VS dependence on well width with disorder barrier. Match VS with experimental width and electric field. »2MV/m electric field »Si well thickness: 3.8~20nm Method: Strain: VFF Keating model Bandstructure: Nearest neighbor sp3d5s* tight - binding model Results: Qualitative agreement with experiments.(trend & error) Disorder mixes valley splitting values for thin QWs. Exp: At 2MV/m, well width did not change for W>9nm* *K. Sasaki, APL (2009) 14 Exp. Data

Zhengping Jiang Valley splitting in (100) SiGe/Si/SiGe QW Objective: VS dependence on electric field. Predict VS in high electric field. Method: Strain: VFF Keating model Bandstructure: Nearest neighbor sp3d5s* tight - binding model Results: Uncertainty due to disorder is huge in high field. In contrast to smooth barrier simulation: Electric field != smooth VS variation High electric field: WF is pushed to interface. Strong alloy scattering. Uncertainty due to disorder 15

Zhengping Jiang Simulation results Valley splitting in (100) SiGe/Si/SiGe Approaches Electric field and well width dependence »QW with no disorder barrier »QW with SiGe barrier Dependence of VS on barrier disorder Approaches Disorder effects »Ordered barrier and random alloy barrer »Ordered barrier and partially ordered barrier 16

Zhengping Jiang dependence of VS on barrier disorder Objective: Understand how disorder affects VS. Effects of different bonds in VS. Method: Strain: VFF Keating model Bandstructure: Nearest neighbor sp3d5s* tight - binding model Geometry construction powered by atomistic modeling Example: »25% atom replaced by Ge »Ge disconnected cell »Ge adjacent cell 17 (a) (b) Replace #4 and #6. Only Si-Ge bond exist. Replace #2 and #6. Si-Ge and Ge-Ge bond in crystal.

Zhengping Jiang dependence of VS on barrier disorder Objective: Understand how disorder affects VS. Effects of different bonds in VS. Method: Strain: VFF Keating model Bandstructure: Nearest neighbor sp3d5s* tight - binding model Geometry construction powered by atomistic modeling Results: Different bond types have different effects on VS. Different bonds show different scattering potential for electrons.* Saumitra etc. APL (2011) 18 Notes: Build barrier with one cell type -> ordered barrier Random place Ge in barrier -> disorder barrier Notes: Build barrier with one cell type -> ordered barrier Random place Ge in barrier -> disorder barrier (# in fig.: Ge atom position)

Zhengping Jiang conclusions Atomistic simulation considers geometry construction intuitively. Atomistic simulation reproduce bond length disorder in real structures. Valley splitting is sensitive to surface condition. 1.Dependence on electric field and well width »VS oscillates with well width in low electric field. »High electric field suppress oscillation with well width, but disorder will bring in big uncertainty. 2.Dependence on disorder »Ge-Ge bond plays important role in determining VS. »Disorder provides rough scattering potential and hence reduce valley orbit coupling. 20

Zhengping Jiang Summary of contributions Valley degeneracy in Si (110) QWs match experimental observation by introducing miscut in QW. Valley splitting in Si (100) QWs Valley splitting dependence on electric field and well width. Strain effects on valley splitting. Alloy disorder in SiGe Match experimental band structure by band unfolding. Effects of disorder on valley splitting. Software development: RTDNEGF in nanoHUB: Resonance finding algorithm & RGF NEMO3D: band-unfolding algorithm, VCA, Parallel computation benchmark NEMO5: Resonance finding algorithm, semi-classical solver, effective mass Hamiltonian constructor etc. 21

Zhengping Jiang acknowledgement Committee members: Professor Klimeck, Professor Strachan and Professor Datta Funding and support from my advisors. Professor Timothy Boykin Klimeck Group Members & Alumni Labmates 22

Zhengping Jiang Questions

Zhengping Jiang

dependence of VS on barrier disorder Objective: Understand how disorder affects VS. Effects of different bonds in VS. Method: Strain: VFF Keating model Bandstructure: Nearest neighbor sp3d5s* tight - binding model Geometry construction powered by atomistic modeling Results: Different bond types have different effects on VS. Disorder provides rough scattering potential, which will suppress valley orbit coupling.* 17 *D. Culcer etc. PRB 82 (2010) Cell {46}: flat scattering potential Cell {56}: Periodic scattering potential Cell {26}: Scattering potential with Ge-Ge bond Cell {26/34}: 50%{26} + 50%{34} Cell {46}: flat scattering potential Cell {56}: Periodic scattering potential Cell {26}: Scattering potential with Ge-Ge bond Cell {26/34}: 50%{26} + 50%{34} # in fig.: Ge atom position

Zhengping Jiang Wavefunction penetration Effects of electric field »Wavefunction piles up near barrier How much WF is inside barrier? 1.Up to 3% WF will penetrate into Barrier. 2.High Ge gives less WF penetration due to strong potential barrier.

Zhengping Jiang Dispersion Barrier potential comes from band offset Random alloy materials do not have translational symmetry Electronic dispersion from band unfolding Random samplesOrdered samples Dispersion is not directly related to VS. WF in Si is composed of Pz orbit. Difference in E-K might be related to orbit info. ~70meV Cell {26} is more transparent.