Judy M. Chang, JD 1 ; Anne D. Renz, MPH 1 ; Douglas A. Conrad, PhD, MBA, MHA 1 ; Megan A. Morris, PhC, CCC- SLP 1, 2 ; Carolyn A. Watts, PhD 1, 3 Shared.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New America Forum April 12, 2010 New America Forum: A First Look at Implementing Health Reform The Delivery System Challenge State Implementation Issues.
Advertisements

THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Developing Innovative Payment Approaches: Finding the Path to High Performance Stuart Guterman Vice President, Payment and System.
Shared Decision Making Were in This Together Michael J. Barry, MD President.
Karen Merrikin, JD Senior Policy Advisor Group Health Cooperative Shared Decision Making: Promoting patient centered care through health policy changes.
Strategies for Implementing Outcomes in Practice Carolyn Baum, PhD, OTR, FAOTA.
Shared Decision Making – a strategic framework for commissioners 2 May 2012.
Patient Navigation Breast Health Patient Navigator Program.
Community Medic Initiative. Community Medic Fulfilling our mission statement: DGEMS provides for the health and well-being of our communities with a team.
Acknowledgements RHH ED staff Safety and Quality Unit RHH for their participation and valuable contribution Next Steps It is envisaged over the next 12.
Shared Decision-making’s Place in Health Care Reform Peter V. Lee Executive Director National Health Care Policy, PBGH Co-Chair, Consumer-Purchaser Disclosure.
The Standards of Practice for a Tobacco Treatment Specialist (TTS) Gaylene Mooney, M.Ed., RRT-NPS, CTTS Program Director, Respiratory Therapy San Joaquin.
Shared Decision-Making: Using Patient-Centered Decision Aids to Improve Outcomes and Reduce Overuse Debra L. Ness Co-Chair, Consumer-Purchaser Disclosure.
Study Design Principal Findings Conclusions Relevance to Delivery or Clinical Practice Research Objectives Applying Behavioral Economics to Implementation.
Measuring Rehabilitation Outcomes. 2 Objectives 1.Describe the importance and benefits of using classification schemes and outcome measures to evaluate.
THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON DEMONSTRATION TEAM & OUR DEMONSTRATION PARTNERS SDM CONFERENCE SESSION 4 MAY 26, Washington Shared Decision Making.
Summer Institute on Informed Patient Choice David Arterburn, MD, MPH Group Health Research Institute Carolyn (Cindy) Watts, PhD University of Washington.
INTRODUCTION The use of and interest in shared decision making (SDM) and decision aids (DAs) in the clinical setting has increased in recent years. Stakeholder.
Connecting the Dots Creating a learning health system linking clinical quality improvement, Maintenance of Certification, and research Maureen Smith, MD,
Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to Implementation of Shared Decision Making and Decision Aids Megan A. Morris, MS CCC-SLP 1,2 ; Anne D. Renz, MPH 1.
Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to Implementation of Shared Decision Making and Decision Aids Introduction In 2007, the Washington State Legislature.
Policy Research Shop Support for the Policy Research Shop is provided by the Ford Foundation and by the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education,
Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Clinical Practice October 2014 Dawn Stacey RN, PhD Research Chair in Knowledge Translation to Patients Full Professor,
DR EBTISSAM AL-MADI Management of Information in health care organizations.
The Benefits of Sponsoring APTA Membership for Your Physical Therapy Staff ______________ Invest in your physical therapy team. Improve your facility’s.
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
Collaborative Implementation of Shared Decision Making State Legislation Megan Morris, MS CCC-SLP 1,2 ; Leah Hole-Curry, JD 3 ; Douglas Conrad, PhD, MBA,
1 What’s the Goal? Jeff Thompson, MD MPH Chief Medical Officer, Washington State Health Care Authority.
Lecture 14 Policy, Legal, and Regulatory Issues in HIS (Chapters 18,19,20)
ACGME OUTCOME PROJECT : THE PROGRAM COORDINATOR’S ROLE Jim Kerwin, MD University of Arizona.
Interprofessional Collaboration on Behalf of Older Persons With Compromised Decisional Capacity: Developing and Implementing Core Professional Competencies.
Current and Emerging Use of Clinical Information Systems
Affordable Care Act Section 3004 Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality Reporting Program Provider Training Caroline D. Gallaher, R.N., B.S.N, J.D.
1 The Three Phases of Collaboration: Chronic Disease Management, Cancer Prevention, and Capacity Kim Salamone, Ph.D. Vice President, Health Information.
Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency in The Effective Health Care Program Supriya Janakiraman MD MPH AHRQ.
AHRQ’s Role in Comparative Effectiveness Carolyn M. Clancy, MD Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Alliance for Health Reform Briefing.
Designing a Medical Home for Medicare Beneficiaries Linda M. Magno Director, Medicare Demonstrations.
© VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY 2009 B I O M E D I C A L I N F O R M A T I C S A System to Improve Medication Safety in the Setting of Acute Kidney Injury Intervention.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Developing Innovative Payment Approaches: Finding the Path to High Performance Stuart Guterman Assistant Vice President and Director,
1 “The Integrator” Accountable Care Across the Continuum BRENDA BRUNS, MD EXECUTIVE MEDICAL DIRECTOR, HEALTH PLAN ACHP Medical Directors, March 2, 2011.
Steps for Success in EHR Planning Bill French, VP eHealth Strategies Wisconsin Office of Rural Health HIT Implementation Workshop Stevens Point, WI August.
Forging New Partnerships and Employment Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities SPI and BARC SSA Projects Office Virginia Commonwealth University Beth.
Secondary Translation: Completing the process to Improving Health Daniel E. Ford, MD, MPH Vice Dean Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Introduction to Clinical.
Meaningful Connections: Patient Centered Medical Home and Health IT David Nace, MD, VP, Chief Medical Officer, McKesson and Company; Chair, Center for.
Origin and Process of Utah Guidelines Anna Fondario, MPH Utah Department of Health Violence and Injury Prevention Program.
AHRQ’s Role in Building Evidence to Advance the Accessibility and Usability of Health IT Tiffani J. Bright, PhD Senior Staff Fellow, Health IT September.
Ann Bonham, PhD Chief Scientific Officer August 24, 2012 Methods, Metrics and Outcomes Evaluating the Success of Community Engaged Research.
Health Information Technologies and Health Care Transformation James Golden, PhD Director, Division of Health Policy Minnesota Department of Health February.
CMS National Conference on Care Transitions December 3,
The Patient-Centered Medical Home: A Work in Progress Alliance for Health Reform Briefing Washington D.C. September 22, 2008 Diane R. Rittenhouse, MD,
Accountable Care Organizations: What is the role of the pathologist? What are the public policy implications?
Adoption and Use of Electronic Medical Records (in Federally Qualified Health Centers) and Supporting an ASP Community Care Network of Virginia, Inc.
Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC): sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Cancer Screening Surveillance in Clinical Practice Tracy Onega,
The Science of Public Reporting September 10, 2012 AHRQ 2012 Annual Conference Lunch & Learn Session Celeste Torio, PhD, MPH Staff Service Fellow AHRQ.
Health Information Technology Summit John Tooker, MD, MBA, FACP Executive Vice President/CEO American College of Physicians Washington, DC October 21,
Oral Health Integration in Well Child Care A Collaboration of Group Health Cooperative, Washington Dental Service and WDS Foundation.
Achieving automated health data linkages for learning healthcare systems: Lessons learned Allison Devlin, MS Program Director, Comparative Effectiveness.
Practice Transformation for Physicians and Health Care Teams
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
Do Decision Aids Promote Shared Decision-Making for Prostate Cancer Screening? Alex Krist MD Steven Woolf MD MPH Robert Johnson PhD Department of Family.
Group Health’s experience September 24, 2015| Kathryn Ramos Implementing CDSME in an integrated health care system.
Promoting Health Information Technology Linda Magno Director, Medicare Demonstrations Group.
Integrated Healthcare Services.
Performance Measurement of Information Technology Investment October 16, 2006 Kevin J. Leonard MBA, Ph.D., CMA Associate Professor, Dept of Health Policy,
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
PARTNERSHIPS WITH CLINICAL SETTINGS: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF NURSE EDUCATORS – Chapter 9 –
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Student loan support to strengthen the health care workforce:
For PUBLIC SECTOR HEALTHCARE ROUNDTABLE NOVEMBER 2, 2017
Affordable Health Care Act Provisions
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Presentation transcript:

Judy M. Chang, JD 1 ; Anne D. Renz, MPH 1 ; Douglas A. Conrad, PhD, MBA, MHA 1 ; Megan A. Morris, PhC, CCC- SLP 1, 2 ; Carolyn A. Watts, PhD 1, 3 Shared Decision Making Demonstration Project May 13, ) Department of Health Services, University of Washington; 2) Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington; 3) Department of Health Administration, Virginia Commonwealth University

Outline Definition of Shared Decision Making Washington State Legislation Demonstration Project Barriers to Implementation Overcoming Barriers Future of Shared Decision Making

What is Shared Decision Making? “Shared decision making is the process by which a health care provider communicates to the patient personalized information about the options, outcomes, probabilities, and scientific uncertainties of available treatment options and the patient communicates his or her values and the relative importance he or she places on benefits and harms. Shared decision making has been widely advocated as an effective means for reaching agreement on the best strategy for treatment.” – Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making

Patient Decision Aids Tools to support the decision-making process Advantages and disadvantages of treatment options Evidence-based Balanced Paper-based or electronic (online, recorded media, kiosk, etc.)

Washington State Legislation First and only state to pass legislation supporting the use of SDM and PDAs for preference-sensitive treatment decisions Mandated a SDM demonstration project Increased legal protection for physicians Other states looking to WA for guidance

Demonstration Project Purpose and Objectives Support and document implementation of SDM in fee-for-service settings Understand barriers and facilitators Explore perceptions of providers, patients, and payers Disseminate findings to assist other decision makers interested in implementing SDM Sites MultiCare – Maple Valley Clinic The Everett Clinic – Orthopedics Group Virginia Mason Medical Center – Breast Clinic

Barriers to Implementation Competing initiatives Organization Availability of resources Sophistication of EMR Practice Group Changing the habits of clinicians and staff Individual

Overcoming Barriers SDM Champions – organization leaders, project managers, clinicians Working closely with practice groups to revise workflow and provide patient feedback Learning from other sites

Future of Shared Decision Making Affordable Care Act § Program to Facilitate Shared Decision Making  Develop standards to evaluate preference-sensitive care PDAs and a certification process  Establish Shared Decision Making Resource Centers  Provide grants to health care providers § Establishment of Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Within CMS  Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation to test innovative payment and service delivery models to reduce program expenditures while preserving or enhancing quality of care FIMDM Demonstration Projects Shared Decision Making Conference on May 26 th

Acknowledgements Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making Partner Sites MultiCare The Everett Clinic Virginia Mason Medical Center Thank you! Questions?