P.V. PANEL WIND LOAD EFFECTS M ARCH 2011 Arman Hemmati, Brady Zaiser, Chaneel Park, Jeff Symons, Katie Olver Interim Review II TEAM 12.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P.V. PANEL WIND LOAD EFFECTS M ARCH 2011 Arman Hemmati, Brady Zaiser, Chaneel Park, Jeff Symons, Katie Olver In-Class Presentation TEAM 12.
Advertisements

School of Mechanical, Aerospace & Civil Engineering Postgraduate Research Conference, PGR-MACE10 Performance of two k T -k L -ω models in a separation-induced.
P.V. PANEL WIND LOAD EFFECTS D ECEMBER 2010 Arman Hemmati, Brady Zaiser, Chaneel Park, Jeff Symons, Katie Olver Design Review #2.
P.V. PANEL WIND LOAD EFFECTS N OVEMBER 2010 Arman Hemmati, Brady Zaiser, Chaneel Park, Jeff Symons, Katie Olver Design Review #1.
P.V. PANEL WIND LOAD EFFECTS F EBRUARY 2011 Arman Hemmati, Brady Zaiser, Chaneel Park, Jeff Symons, Katie Olver Design Review #3 TEAM 12.
P.V. PANEL WIND LOAD EFFECTS N OVEMBER 2010 Arman Hemmati, Brady Zaiser, Chaneel Park, Jeff Symons, Katie Olver Class Presentation #1.
P.V. PANEL WIND LOAD EFFECTS A PRIL 2011 Arman Hemmati, Brady Zaiser, Chaneel Park, Jeff Symons, Katie Olver Winter Project Review TEAM 12.
Dominic Hudson, Simon Lewis, Stephen Turnock
A Seminar Presentation On AERODYNAMICS OF F1 RACING CAR
Experiment #5 Momentum Deficit Behind a Cylinder
Lecture 3: Take-off Performance
University of Western Ontario
The Stall, Airfoil development, &Wing Lift and Span Effects
Gliding.
Computer Simulation of Vehicle Aerodynamic Forces and Moments Using Fluent 6.2 MSC VisualNastran 4D WorkingModel 2D Zerguy Maazouddin California State.
Pharos University ME 352 Fluid Mechanics II
ES 202 Fluid and Thermal Systems Lecture 29: Drag and Lift Coefficients (2/18/2003)
External Flows.
David Chandpen (Lead Engineer) Matthew Maberry Travis Cushman Benjamin Waller Zach Veilleux Joseph Travaglini.
HPC Impacts Automotive Aerodynamics Computational Fluid Dynamics HPC demands Kevin Golsch Aerodynamics – Energy Center 1 October 2010.
Greg Hyde Raymond Zheng Joseph Rojano Katie Bentley Lori Liebman P14414 P3 ARBORLOO WIND RESISTANCE TEST STAND DETAILED DESIGN REVIEW 1.
Engineering H193 - Team Project Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Spring Quarter P. 1 Drive Train Calculations Week 3 Day 1.
Wind Tunnel Analysis Presented by: Mary Elizabeth Pozydaev ME 498 November 16, 2004.
Flow Over Immersed Bodies
ME 388 – Applied Instrumentation Laboratory Wind Tunnel Lab
Engineering H193 - Team Project Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Spring Quarter 2004 P. 1 Drive Train Calculations Week 3 Day 1.
Design and Fabrication of a Miniature Turbine for Power Generation on Micro Air Vehicles Team Arman Altincatal Srujan Behuria Carl Crawford Dan Holt.
 Purpose  Test design  Measurement system and Procedures  Uncertainty Analysis.
Paper Airplane Experiments KEN BLACKBURN NCASE Atlanta, GA March 2004.
Basic Aerodynamic Theory and Drag
Wind Turbine Project Recap Wind Power & Blade Aerodynamics
From Left to Right: Katie Bentley(ME), Greg Hyde(IE), Lori Liebman(ME), Joe Rojano(ME), Ray Zheng(ME) What is an Arborloo? An arborloo is a simple and.
Inclined Plane Simple Machines.
Principles of Flight Spitfire. Chapter 1 – Weight and Lift How is an aircraft, which is much heavier than the air it flies in, supported by the air? C130.
FLIGHT.
Human Powered Submarine: System Modeling Jason Collins, William Darling Advisor: Michael “Mick” Peterson, Ph.D. Background The System Modeling Team was.
Landslide Tsunamis by Maida Cervania Mr. Leingang’s 6 th Period Science Class.
Kite Science Why a Kite Flies?.
Vibration Isolation Overview Session 3 Examples. Choosing the right part Example.
COSMOS FloWorks Wind Tunnel Simulation
Designing an aerodynamic car
What’s Keeping Me Up?. US Air Force C-5 The largest plane in the US Air Force.
Measurement of Pressure Distribution and Lift for an Airfoil  Purpose  Test design  Measurement system and Procedures  Instrumentation  Data reduction.
P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi
 Purpose  Test design  Measurement system and Procedures  Uncertainty Analysis.
CFD Pre-Lab 2 Simulation of Turbulent Flow around an Airfoil Seong Mo Yeon, and Timur Dogan 11/12/2013.
SDMAY11-01 Advisor: Dr. Ajjarapu Team Members: Luke Rupiper Shonda Butler Andrew Nigro Ryan Semler Chad Hand.
3 th International Symposium on Integrating CFD and Experiments in Aerodynamics U.S. Air Force Academy, CO, USA June 20-21, 2007 Integration of CFD and.
2D Airfoil Aerodynamics
Measurement of Pressure Distribution and Lift for an Airfoil  Purpose  Test design  Measurement system and Procedures  Uncertainty Analysis  Data.
Lecture Objectives -Finish Particle dynamics modeling -See some examples of particle tracking -Eulerian Modeling -Define deposition velocity -Fluid Dynamics.
CE 1501 Flow Over Immersed Bodies Reading: Munson, et al., Chapter 9.
Shielded Metal Arc Welding SMAW - Introduction. Term to Know Slag –A nonmetallic product resulting from the mutual dissolution of flux and nonmetallic.
Problem and Purpose Hypotheses Design Plan Background Information Currently, school buses are very fuel inefficient, averaging 7 mpg (Laughlin, 2004).
3/16/2016 Vanderbilt Motorsports Intake and Exhaust Project 1 Vanderbilt Motorsports Intake/Exhaust Team January 17, 2008 Presentation Kristina Kitko Mark.
Wind Turbine Project Recap Wind Power & Blade Aerodynamics.
Paper Airplane Experiments
Types of Blades used on Cutoff Saws and Tips on using Saws
Aerodynamic Force Measurement
Water Bottle Rocket Team 9: Darren Combs, Lauren Darling, Andrew Moorman, Esteben Rodriguez, Amanda Olguin.
Belarusian team SPECTRUM
The application of an atmospheric boundary layer to evaluate truck aerodynamics in CFD “A solution for a real-world engineering problem” Ir. Niek van.
Design Brief Liam and Dorsa.
Simple Machines Inclined Planes.
Potential Energy Problems
By: Kyle Greulach and Grant Gallagher
Drag and Lift Elliott.
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurement
Presentation transcript:

P.V. PANEL WIND LOAD EFFECTS M ARCH 2011 Arman Hemmati, Brady Zaiser, Chaneel Park, Jeff Symons, Katie Olver Interim Review II TEAM 12

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC Overview Refresh Wind Tunnel Experiment Progress CFD Progress 1

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC Refresh 2 Ideal angle of inclination is 51° Too much weight for the roof? Wind Tunnel testing – Experimental Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) - Computational

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC Wind Tunnel – Where We Were Designed model in SolidWorks Talked to Mike Johnson ▫Increase the thickness of adjustable support rods ▫Panel to be made from MDF Machining to be done at faculty shop 3

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC Wind Tunnel – Building the Model 4 Work order submitted February 4 Started work on February 22 ▫½” MDF was unavailable  substituted ¾” Picked up on Friday February 25 Some problems with design ▫Filler on welded parts means that parts don’t fit together ▫MDF panel is heavier than expected  Need to do force analysis

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC Wind Tunnel – Budget Estimated cost of model ▫Materials:  ~$10 ▫Labour:  ~$25 ▫Total:  ~$35 This is the only planned cost for our project Extra costs may occur if something breaks or we do further tests 5

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC Wind Tunnel – Force Measurement 2 load cells measure lift force & pitching moment Drag plate measures drag ▫Old springs & strain gauge were not stiff enough ▫Rebuilt with load cell Using LabView program to capture data ▫3 data streams 6

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC Wind Tunnel – Wind Speed Measurement Wind speed affects drag/lift force by: F D or L = C D or L ∙ ½ ρv 2 A Cannot control speed in wind tunnel Need to measure wind speed Unable to capture digitally ▫Pressure too small for department’s pressure transducers ▫Hot wire anemometer fragile and expensive Manually read dynamic pressure ▫Source of error ▫Average not instant 7

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC Wind Tunnel – Testing Parameters Testing 3 parameters: ▫Wind direction ▫Panel angle ▫Panel height Wind direction ▫How does the force on the panel change depending on the wind direction?  Front, back ▫2 levels 8

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC Wind Tunnel – Testing Parameters Panel angle ▫How does the force on the panel change as the angle increases? ▫In Calgary the ideal angle is 51° ▫Testing at:  35°, 50°, 65° and 80° ▫4 levels 9

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC Wind Tunnel – Testing Parameters Panel height ▫How does the force on the panel change as the distance between the ground and the bottom of the panel increases? ▫Unable to use CFD for this ▫ Testing at:  0, 1”, 2”, …, 6” ▫7 levels 10

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC Wind Tunnel – Testing Procedure How many runs? ▫2∙4∙7 = 56 runs per replication ▫2 replications = 112 runs Randomize run order ▫Lots of set-up between runs How long will it take? ▫5 min/run + daily set-up ▫Estimate 15 hours  1 week 11

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC Wind Tunnel - Schedule Behind schedule ▫Hoped to test during reading week ▫Machining took longer than anticipated Next 5 weeks: ▫1 week testing ▫1 week analysing results ▫2 weeks further testing if necessary ▫1 week preparing report 12

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC CFD - Update Pressure Coefficient Initially, C P > 1.5 Now, C P < 1.1 ▫Biggest contributing factor: length of CV in front of panel 13

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC CFD - Verification Vertical Flat Plate Reference: “On the Flow of Air Behind an Inclined Flat Plate of Infinite Span” -Fage and Johansen,

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC 15

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC CFD – Initial Results 16

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC 17

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC CFD – Initial Results 18

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC CFD – Next Step Determine why pressure increases with finer mesh Overcome convergence problems Try different solution models 19

MARCH- 2011Design Review #4: DeLoPREC