Charles Galey, Peter J. Jay, Nicholas Roder, William Ryan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Android Enabled Camera Positioning system Design Team 3 Chris Sigler Yan Sidronio Ryan Popa Jeremy Iamurri Austin Fletcher Facilitator: Dr. Oweiss Sponsor:
Advertisements

SD-May1014 Team: Michael Peat, Kollin Moore, Matt Rich, Alex Reifert Advisors: Dr. Nicola Elia and Dr. Phillip Jones.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Autonomous Quadrocopter Proposal Brad Bergerhouse, Nelson Gaske, Austin Wenzel Dr. Malinowski.
By: Brett Snyder (Team Leader) John Williams Ryan Kindred Gavin St. John Faculty Advisor – Dr. Jamali Course Instructor – Dr. Serpen Final Presentation.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew.
Charles Galey, Peter J. Jay, Nicholas Roder, William Ryan.
Rock it rocke Temple University
Eric Marz Joe Mozloom Swati Maini Linda Mclaughlin Swapnil Mengawade Advisor: Jin Kang, PhD June 22, 2011 Drexel University RockSat1.
Joe Mozloom Eric Marz Linda McLaughlin Swati Maini Swapnil Mengawade Advisor: Jin Kang, PhD.
RockSat 2010 Harding Flying Bison RockSat-C Rocket Team Harding University Ethan Lilly, Eric Locke, Darah McDaniel, Ed Wilson June 22, 2011.
Proposal Presentation EE 396 – Micromouse Spring 2008 Saturday, February 9, 2008 Donald Kim Lab - POST 214.
Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
In Order of Presentation: Ishaan Sandhu DannY Kang Arslan Qaiser Eric Otte Anuar Tazabekov Capacitive Rain Sensor for Automatic Wiper Control.
Reegan Worobec & David Sloan In collaboration with UAARG.
University of Wyoming Charles Galey, Nicholas Roder, Peter J. Jay, William Ryan 10/14/
Phase V Presentation Group 7 Thomas Kudej Marko Sutovic Timothy Smith.
Good Vibrations Conceptual Design Review University of Wyoming James Richey, Justin Thornton, Luke Voss, Jake Thatcher, Tony Allais Oct 27, 2008.
METEOR BACKGROUND This is a foundation project in an ambitious endeavor to provide the RIT research community with a means to conduct near space.
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
University of Wyoming Dorin Blodgett, Kevin Brown, Heather Choi, Ben Lampe Eric Robinson, Michael Stephens, Patrick Weber October 7,
NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY CHAD LARSON, BEN GORDON, DAVID VINSON, SETH LEIJA, ZACH THOMAS, DREW JOHNSON NNU Team Conceptual Design Review.
Wireless Data Acquisition for SAE Car Project by: J.P. Haberkorn & Jon Trainor Advised by: Mr. Steven Gutschlag.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
EDGE™ MAV Control System - P09122 Final Project Review Erik Bellandi – Project Manager Ben Wager – Lead Engineer Garrett Argenna – Mechanical Engineering.
Project ASCEND! Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Spring 2014.
RockSat-C 2012 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report Zero Tilt Frostburg State University Kaetie Combs, Francisco Diaz, Sean Hughes, Jared Hughes, Andrew.
Embedded Microcomputer Systems Andrew Karpenko 1 Prepared for Technical Presentation February 25 th, 2011.
CanSat Interim Presentation II
MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.
Wearable Sensors Final Presentation Problem Background Inferred Transmission (short range) Bulky Design, hard to wear 20 Samples per second.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Zero Tilt Conceptual Design Review Frostburg State University Michael Stevenson, Mayowa Ogundipe, Subhasis Ghosh, Andrew Huntley, Derek.
IWheels. Overview Team Introduction Design Concept Mechanical Design Electrical Subsystem Design Software Platform Design Stereo Vision Path Planning.
CS-EE 481 Spring March, 2005 University of Portland School of Engineering Project Swift Fox Automotive Accelerometer & RPM Monitor Team Andrew Robinson.
Abstract Proposed Approach Solution Development Project Requirements Estimated Resources Other Resources Financial Resources Project Schedule Computer.
Project ASCEND! Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Spring 2014 Presented By: Ankit Jain – Project Manager.
Golf Swing Robot EE 486 Project Presentation College of Engineering and Technology Presented by Nasser Almarri.
Time and Monetary Budgets Repair ExpenseCost Autopilot Replacement$2,500 RX Antenna Replacement$55 Camera Lens Replacement$78 Camera Replacement$190 Total.
Team Klickitat Persistence of Vision Globe Team Members Maldeep Kang Chris Scott Rose Harber Michael Burton Faculty Advisor Dr. Peter Osterberg Industry.
Disturbance Rejection: Final Presentation Group 2: Nick Fronzo Phil Gaudet Sean Senical Justin Turnier.
TEAM MEMBERS: STAN WEED (TEAM LEADER), PAVEL KUZNETSOV, ERIC-THOMAS ARROYO PROJECT ADVISORS: DR. JOHN R. LACOURSE, PROF. FRANCIS C. HLUDIK Wireless Activity.
Hy-V.1 Skin Friction Sensor Experiment Presenters: Ryan F. Johnson Mitchell Foral-Systems November 24, 2008 University of Virginia.
Robotic Sensor Network: Wireless Sensor Platform for Autonomous Topology Formation Project: Sponsored By: Advisor: Dr. S. Jay Yang, CEManager: Steven.
MinnRock Design and Canister Layout Team members Bryce Schaefer (team coordinator)- AEM Cameron Japuntich- AEM Liz Sefkow- ME Mitch Andrus-
Individual Subsystem Testing Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Stevens Institute of Technology 2/13/2012.
Design Team # 4 Design of low cost flight computer for unmanned aerial vehicles Status Report # 4 Ryan Morlino Chris Landeros Sylvester Meighan Stephen.
Lesson 2 How do electric circuits work?. Electric Circuits You know that electric circuits only work when the circuit is closed. OPEN.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
COSMOSMotion Slides.
Michael Lisoski Leblanc Meneses Jason Schaer Bryan Staton.
Carries out instructions of a computer program by performing the basic arithmetic, logical control, and input/output (I/O) operations.
DemoSat IV: Metro Triple Threat Metropolitan State College of Denver Matt Hanley David Fifield Jason Igo Evan I Spitler Devlin Thyne Matt Hanley David.
Components of a Computer. Main components of a computer.. Power Supply Motherboard Central Processing Unit (CPU) Random-Access Memory (RAM) Read-Only.
Hybrid Power Controller (HPC) Final Presentation Senior Design II.
Joseph Ratliff EE Software Research PCB Design Obstacle Detection Motion Detection Ryan Crownover EE Coding Logic Motion System Software Design Website.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
Laser Image Display Team Ingenuity Patrick Beler Jeong Kim Brad Odums Ryan Williams.
RFID Automated Navigation of a Mobile Platform Tommy Brant, Charles Harper, Patrick Smith, Eni Ofong, Caleb Howell Georgia Institute of Technology School.
Temple University Advisors: Dr. John Helferty & Dr. Chang-Hee Won Charles Wright Jinyan Chen Billy Cheng Brittany Gray 1.
ECE 477 FINAL PRESENTATION TEAM 6  SPRING OUTLINE  Project overview  Block diagram  Design challenges  Individual contributions  Project demonstration.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
SENSOR SELECTION CALIBRATION OVERVIEWOVERVIEW DESIGN ROADMAP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The project would not have been possible without the extensive.
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
Dr. Marcos Esterman Faculty Guide W. Casolara Project Leader
CanSat Competition Competition Objectives Pre-Launch Launch
PROJECT METEOR: RITSAT1 P08102
Earthquake Simulation Table
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 1  Spring 2008
Presentation transcript:

Charles Galey, Peter J. Jay, Nicholas Roder, William Ryan

Team Overview  Students  Charles Galey (Team Leader)  Programming, Data Analysis and Testing  Peter Jay  Structural Analysis/Model and Testing  Nicholas Roder  Camera Board Testing, Bread-boarding, System Testing  William Ryan  PCB Layout, Bread boarding, Circuitry  Harish Muralidhara  Programming and Circuitry  Faculty Advisors  Dr. Paul Johnson(Physics Dept.)  Dr. David Walrath(ME Dept.)  Dr. Steven Barrett(EE Dept.)

Team Overview

Mission Overview  Objectives / Goals  Measure rocket speed and spin rate  Determine the rocket’s motion and flight path  Design a stable platform to achieve clear images during flight  Successfully retrieve the flight data wirelessly (post-flight)  Obtain basic knowledge and understanding of the design requirements and obstacles in real world applications

Design Overview: Mechanical Solid Works model of both UW, UM and Augsburg payload system Stabilized Plate Optical Port Motor Power Supply Camera Main Sensor / Processor Board UM Payload Augsburg Payload

Design Overview: Structure

 Design and Testing:  Based on last year  Solidworks Analysis  Planned Vibrations Testing Structure deformed under 25g vertical load

Design Overview: Electrical

 Plate Stabilization:  Data is extracted from two peripheral accelerometers  Acceleration data is converted to velocity via the trapezoid rule  The processor then compares current and new rocket velocities  Velocities are converted to steps per second and transmitted to the motor controller

Design Overview: Final

Expected Results  Benefits  Provide Future Rocksat Groups:  Stabilization system for experiments  Accurate data of flight parameters  High quality clear images for future flights  Allow expansion for wireless transmission data post-flight

Fabrication: Mechanical

Fabrication: Electrical

Testing  Potential Points of Failure  Electrical  Electrical connection breakage during high G’s  Unforeseen code interruption due to interference  Creating own circuit board  Mechanical  Vertical supports buckling  Platter or camera platform malfunction

Testing

Final Integration

Lessons Learned  What did we learn from this experience:  Do not procrastinate  Communication is key for a smooth payload integration  Words of wisdom for next year’s groups:  Do not underestimate the size of project  Involve underclassmen  Keep constant communication with other group(s) in canister  Hardest part:  Coordinating presentations and reports for both groups  Programming  Integrating systems together  What would we change:  Less electrical design