Future of Field Stations and Marine Labs: A strategic planning effort Supported by NSF, DBI-1126161 to Ian C. Billick (PI), Brian Kloeppel, Ivar G. Babb,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evolution and Biodiversity in the Antarctic: The response of life to change LSSSG primary proposal.
Advertisements

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
The Role of Environmental Monitoring in the Green Economy Strategy K Nathan Hill March 2010.
Research Infrastructure Policy and Priorities in Australia David de Carvalho Head of Higher Education Group 5 November 2013.
PNW Strategic Plan: Developing a Blueprint for Future Direction Research for Resources.
Funding Opportunities at NSF Jane Silverthorne International Arabidopsis Consortium Workshop January 15, 2011.
SDSC Computing the 21st Century Talk Given to the NSF Sugar Panel May 27, 1998.
Proposition 301 and Arizona State University The Arizona Board of Regents (ABOR) has established a high level.
Do you know what it takes to manage global change wisely?
Jerry L. Miller, Ph.D. Assistant Director for Ocean Sciences White House Office of Science and Technology Policy MARACOOS Washington, DC
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research J Michael Kuperberg, Ph.D. Dan Stover, Ph.D. Terrestrial Ecosystem Science AmeriFlux.
NSF on the web- An indispensable resource
Monitoring by NGOs for marine conservation management – examples from Indonesia “The big Grouper in the room”
Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Research Infrastructures and Horizon 2020 The EU Framework.
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research G. L. Geernaert Climate and Environmental Sciences Division Workshop on Community Modeling.
Discussions on Innovation Opportunities in China Quan Bo First Secretary, Science and Technology Office Chinese Embassy in the Netherlands
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
Disaster Reduction & Climate Change Adaptation by Fengmin Kan, UN-ISDR Africa Nairobiwww.unisdr.org.
The BIO Directorate Microbial Biology Emphasis BIO Advisory Committee April, 2005.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
 Unsolicited proposals  1x year:  preproposals (4 pages);  invited full (~30 pages)  Some special competitions  E.g., sustainability, climate investment.
The West Coast Governors’ Agreement on Ocean Health Jessica Hamilton Keys Natural Resources Policy Advisor Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski Hydrographic.
The Status and Future of Integrative and Organ Systems Sciences October 20 – 21, 2002 Bethesda, MD Sponsored by:APS and ASPET Co-sponsors: Burroughs Wellcome.
Future Research at the Toolik Field Station Perspectives from Breck Bowden Science Support Visioning Workshop Portland, Oregon 2-4 August 2012.
Food Security, Environmental Change, Biodiversity, and Interdependencies Jeff Brawn Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
Presentation to the Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee December 3, 2002 by David Reichle 1 An Evaluation of the Department of Energy’s.
1 The SURA Regional Infrastructure Initiative Gary Crane Director, SURA IT Initiatives Southeastern Universities Research.
Multi-scale Integration Introduction to the Panel - Michael Hamilton Multi-Scale Sampling - Greg Pottie Scaling Challenges in Ecology - Michael Hamilton.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO Ocean Studies Board November 10, 2009.
All this and so much more… Biology Technology Materials Engineering Mathematics Polar Nano Physics Climate Change Earth Science Astronomy Education & Human.
GTL User Facilities Facility IV: Analysis and Modeling of Cellular Systems Jim K. Fredrickson.
Software Engineering Committee Status Report: Preliminary Findings and Recommendations Richard Loft and Gerry Wiener SE Committee Co-chairs National Center.
Rock Mechanics/Geophysics Larry Costin, Sandia National Labs Paul Young, University of Toronto Discussion Points November 12, 2004 DUSEL Workshop.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey History of the Southwest Biological Science Center A Short Overview.
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research DOE Workshop on Community Modeling and Long-term Predictions of the Integrated Water.
Chapter 6: Integrating Knowledge and Action Scott Kaminski ME / 9 / 2005.
Why Does NOAA Need a Climate & Ecosystem Demonstration Project in the California Current System? Capabilities and Drivers La Jolla, CA 6 June, 2005.
Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research Climate Research Roadmapping Workshop Mike Kuperberg Presentation to BERAC September.
Overview of NSF and the Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) Overview of NSF and the Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) Tom Brady Division.
Strategies for Building Biological Infrastructure And On-Campus STEM Collaborations QEM Network Workshop Baltimore October 21, 2006.
FY07 Setting the Stage Dr. Mary E. Clutter Dr. Joann Roskoski April 7, 2005.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
Science requirements for implementing EBM Rob Stephenson DFO, St. Andrews Biological Station.
North Slope Science Initiative Dr. John F. Payne, Executive Director Dr. Denny Lassuy, Acting Deputy Director North Slope Science Initiative
A 10 YEAR OUTLOOK A REPORT BY THE NSF ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & EDUCATION SPONSORED BY THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION SEPTEMBER.
NOAA OAR innovateincubateintegrate Capt. Craig N. McLean Acting Assistant Administrator Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research National Oceanic and.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems Malta, 27 January 2004 Alan Edwards EUROPEAN COMMISSION GMES – Implications.
Measuring Conservation Outcomes for Biodiversity: Name Date Location An overview on monitoring the status of biodiversity and the Outcome Monitoring Program.
Prepared by Collaborative Economics. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  San Diego is participating in a new global innovation economy  San Diego’s global reach has.
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A A.T. MEGA-Transect Fred Dieffenbach, Environmental Monitoring Coordinator Appalachian National Scenic Trail National.
Stennis Space Center Industry Day Casino Magic, Bay St Louis, Ms. 19 August 2003 Stennis Space Center Industry Day Casino Magic, Bay St Louis, Ms. 19 August.
CEPF Strategic Funding Direction 3 Meeting: 28 th June, 2006 Outcomes Monitoring: Status & trends in biodiversity Establishing standard regional monitoring.
DOE/HENP Networking Update Vicky White October 26th, 2001 HENP Network Users Group Internet 2, Ann Arbor.
NSF Priority Areas Status Report Dr. Joann Roskoski April 7, 2005.
1 North Slope Science Initiative - Introduction Bill Seitz USGS January 2004.
Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry Scoping Workshop on Terrestrial and Coastal Carbon Fluxes and Exchanges in the Gulf of Mexico May 6-8, 2008 St. Petersburg,
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Aquatic Ecosystems as Sentinels of Change Field Station & Marine Lab Emerging Initiatives Workshop November 17, 2011 Colorado Springs, CO Craig Williamson.
Theme : Information, monitoring & research NWRS Workshops October - December
The National Science Foundation Independent Federal Agency Support for all fields of fundamental science and engineering.
Supported by NSF, DBI to Ian C. Billick (PI), Brian Kloeppel, Ivar G
Lecture 4. Coastal Resilience
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
Cognitus: A Science Case for HPC in the Nordic Region
NSF Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education (AC ERE) Purpose: To provide advice and recommendations concerning support of the NSF’s.
Animal Telemetry Dr. Matt Ogburn.
BCoN Data Integration Workshop, University of Kansas, Feb 13-14, 2018
Presentation transcript:

Future of Field Stations and Marine Labs: A strategic planning effort Supported by NSF, DBI to Ian C. Billick (PI), Brian Kloeppel, Ivar G. Babb, James G. Sanders, Jo-Ann C. Leong.

Ecosystem Services $33 trillion Costanza et al. 1999, Nature

Natural Capital Hawkens and Lovins

Edward Glaeser, Oct. 20, 2009, NY Times, Economix

How do we plan for the FSML’s of the future? What do we invest in? Broadband, sensors, housing, research space, lab equipment, databases, long-term monitoring, experiments, etc.

Why is Planning Important? Limited funds; FSML’s embody a substantial investment; Inertia--- how do we match up slowing moving facilities with dynamic and innovative science

Strategic Planning Workshop– Where is research, education, and resource management headed? Survey– What is status of existing infrastructure? Final report– Recommendations about future investments, best practices

Structure- Steering Committee OBFS: Ian Billick, Jan Hodder, Brian Kloeppel, Hilary Swain NAML: Ivar Babb, Joanne Leong, Jim Sanders

Structure- Work Groups Macrosystems- Jim Gosz (Idaho) Organismal and Population Biology- Cindy van Dover (Duke) Molecular Biology and Genomics- Mitch Sogin Environmental Change- Craig Williamson (Miami) Ecosystems- Lindsey Rusted (USFS) Education- Kathleen Waters Resource Management- Peter Stine (USFS)

Structure: Staff Support Jessica Ruvinsky- Professional science writer Apex Education- Survey Sonda Donovan- Project Manager

What do we need to know? How important are FSMLs; Opportunities for networking and collaboration; Critical components of FSMLs; Current status; Where to invest; Best practices.

Scientific Trends Gene regulation in natural environments (FSML’s as bridges);

Processes happening on greater temporal and spatial scales (regional networking, climate change, bioinformatics);

Profusion in environmental sensors (bandwidth, bioinformatics);

Value of place-based research (model ecosystems, complex processes that require sustained research).

Where are research, education, and resource management headed? What do we need to understand about existing infrastructure? What are the critical investments?

Talking Points for Discussions Unique value of FSML’s– Value Proposition Real value, not PR exercise When possible, integrate public benefit and scientific merit Develop logic Identify data/assessment holes Prioritize