Applying feed intake monitoring systems into producer testing programs Dr. Daryl R. Strohbehn Extension Beef Specialist Iowa Beef ISU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEAT GOAT SIRE EVALUATION TEST USING THE GROWSAFE 4000 SYSTEM David Seymour WVU Extension Agent – Pendleton County
Advertisements

Alternative Livestock Production: Miniature Cattle Adele Harty Cow/Calf Field Specialist Rapid City Regional Center.
Lambs from Birth to Harvest Feeding and Managing
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
Matt Spangler University of Nebraska- Lincoln DEVELOPMENT OF GENOMIC EPD: EXPANDING TO MULTIPLE BREEDS IN MULTIPLE WAYS.
Nutrition for Show Steers Jim Sprinkle Area Extension Agent, Animal Science University of Arizona American Hereford Association.
“Knowing the Growth Efficiency Potential in the Lamb Crop ” Dr. Jeff Held South Dakota State University.
Residual Feed Intake and the Cow Herd A. M. Meyer 1 *, R. L. Kallenbach 2, M. S. Kerley 1 University of Missouri, Columbia 1 Division of Animal Sciences.
Beef Cattle – Biological Types. Biological Type ● Bos taurus vs Bos indicus ● Temperate vs Tropically Adapted ● Early vs Late Maturing ● High vs Low Maintenance.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada The Genetics of Feed Efficiency in Cattle Dr. D.H. “Denny” Crews, Jr. Research Scientist,
Making the Web equal Profit Surfing for Genetics Dorian Garrick & Mark Enns Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
Improvement of Beef Cow Biological Efficiency
Economic Feasibility of Adopting Genomic Selection in Beef Cattle Kenneth Poon & Getu Hailu University of Guelph CAES 2010, Niagara Falls June 18 th, 2010.
BEEF CATTLE FEED EFFICIENCY: OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT Dan Faulkner Department of Animal Sciences.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
EPD 101 PredictingProfit… Red Angus – EPD 101. EPD 101 Members (Seedstock producers) succeed through enabling the success (profit) of their commercial.
Daryl Strohbehn, Ph.D. Emeritus Professor Iowa State University Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Ext. Cow-Calf Specialist Kansas State University.
The Beef Industry. The average size beef herd is around 100 head.
Genetics of feed efficiency in dairy and beef cattle
Computer Applications in Beef Nutrition
From Conception to Carcass 2006 National Angus Conference Mike Kasten.
D. H. “Denny” Crews, Jr. Colorado State University BIF SubCommittee Chair.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Dr. George R. Wiggans, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
Breeding cattle for a more efficient and sustainable milk and meat production Oscar González-Recio, J. Pryce, M.E. Goddard, B. Hayes EURO FOOD
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
Forage Quality I: Nutritional Quality Lawton Stewart SE Hay Convention March 29, 2011.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How Do I Decide What Traits are Important? Carcass/Ultrasound EPDs Bob Weaber GRA-Cornell.
Characterizing Change in the Beef Industry Justin W. Waggoner, Ph.D. Beef Systems Specialist Kansas State University Garden City, KS.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Fitting cows to your environment Harvey Freetly U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA.
Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle - MP 391 Overview.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Kansas State University
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
Beef Cattle Production
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
Genetic Evaluations & Decision Support to Improve Feed Efficiency Dorian Garrick Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
NBCEC Brown Bagger: Economic Selection Index Wade Shafer American Simmental Association.
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Energy Systems for Feedstuffs Energy is the potential to do work.
Winter Supplementation Utilizing Co-Products as a Supplement on Winter Range and Crop Residue Systems Aaron Stalker University of Nebraska.
Breeding Objectives for Terminal Sires Michael MacNeil USDA ARS Miles City, MT.
Feed Efficiency Genetic Projects. Terms Gain/Feed = Feed Efficiency FE Feed/Gain = Feed Conversion FC: -FE Residual Feed Intake RFI Net Feed Intake NFI:-RFI.
National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium Brown Bagger Seminar Carcass EPDs Integrating Carcass and Ultrasound October 22, 2008 Sally L. Northcutt Genetic.
Advanced Animal Breeding
Sally L. Northcutt American Angus Association Selection Tools Beef Improvement Federation April 20, 2006.
Genetics – Trait Selection An S 426 Fall Genetics – Trait Selection Has led to development of Economically Relevant Traits (ERT) and Indicator Trait.
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Division of Animal Sciences University of Missouri-Columbia
Importance of Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency By: Colton Turner.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Wallace Center Pasture Project Rotational Grazing
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle
Quiz for Beef Cattle EPDs.ppt
RATION FORMULATION SPRING 2018.
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
Methods to compute reliabilities for genomic predictions of feed intake Paul VanRaden, Jana Hutchison, Bingjie Li, Erin Connor, and John Cole USDA, Agricultural.
CGs to EPDs 2006 BIF Symposium Sponsored by Ultrasound Guidelines Council Dr. Lisa A. Kriese-Anderson Auburn University.
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Hay Burners versus Hay Converters (a.k.a. Feed Efficiency)
Presentation transcript:

Applying feed intake monitoring systems into producer testing programs Dr. Daryl R. Strohbehn Extension Beef Specialist Iowa Beef ISU

Why Feed Efficiency? l With everything else equal or even less wouldn’t you rather have a more feed efficient sire?

Why Feed Efficiency? l Feed cost represents 60% of the total cost in finishing cattle BIF) l Feed cost represents 63% of total financial cost to run a beef cow. (Strohbehn, IA SPA results ) l A 10% improvement in feed efficiency can improve feedlot profits 43%. (Fox, et.al. 2001) l 65-75% of total dietary energy cost in breeding cows is required for maintenance. (Ferrell & Jenkins 1985; NRC 1996) l A 5% improvement in feed efficiency has an economic impact 4 times greater than a 5% improvement in ADG. (Gibb & McAllister 1999)

Why Feed Efficiency? l Environmental friendly cattle l Selection for improved feed efficiency will: –Lower methane emissions by 9 to 12% (Okine, et.al. 2001) –Reduce manure N, P and K production by 15-17% (Arthur, et.al. 2002)

Why Feed Efficiency? It’s a heritable trait. TraitHeritability Feed conversion (f/g).36 Feed efficiency (g/f).42 Feed intake.41 Koots, et.al. 1994

Feed Conversion = Feed Intake / Animal Gain Example - 4:1 or 8:1 (lbs of dry matter / lb gain) Feed Efficiency = Animal Gain / Feed Intake Examples:.25 lbs gained / lb feed or.125 lbs gain / lb feed Efficiency Traits – Let’s get our definitions straight (usually expressed in units of 100% dry matter) Later on I will talk about RFI, NFI and NFE.

I remember when… ’s l Individual fed bulls in separate pens –Example: Wye Plantation in Queenstown, Maryland l Daily hand kept written records l Very, very high labor l No animal peck order, thus no impact from competition

<-PinPointer 4000 system Technology Advancements

Calan Electronic Feed Gates  - Each animal has its own space and daily written records Technology Advancements System at Circle A Angus, MO

GrowSafe System, Canada

Feed Conversion testing with on the farm/ranch systems l Don’t take this job lightly –It’s like milking dairy cows, methodical daily duties. l Requires attention to feed and management details, regardless of intake monitoring system utilized. l Requires meticulous record keeping, both with feed intake and weight gains.

Record analysis assistance may be needed. l Feed conversion is just not feed intake divided by gain. l Most tests are equal time on feed, thus bull weights while on test vary a great deal. l BIF method: account for differences in average bull weights during test. Range in off test weight:

BIF Methodology l Adjusted Feed Conversion uses metabolic weights. –( W.75 / W i.75 ) x ( Feed / Gain ) –W is the mid test weight; the average of the initial weight and final weight. –This method adjusts feed/gain of heavier than average bulls downward and lighter than average bulls upward.

Question ??? l Two bulls have the same Feed Conversion and 3.5 lb ADGs on 120 day test. –6.5 lbs feed to 1.0 lb gain –Bull A and B have off test weights of 1300 and 1200, respectively. –Are they the same for Feed Conversion? l NO ! –After adjusting for differences in body weight –Bull A’s average test weight was 1090 lbs, Bull B’s average test weight was 990 lbs »Bull A Adjusted FC=6.27 »Bull B Adjusted FC=6.74 Beef Improvement Federation Guidelines

Duane Warden Warden’s Ironwood Angus Council Bluffs, IA 24 years of feed efficiency testing using PinPointer system

Warden’s Adjusted Feed Conversion

701 bull New Level bull 0350 bull 4 Point 8 bull 3303 bull 4333 bull Influence sires – Past and Present

Warden’s Adjusted Feed Conversion bull New Level bull 0350 bull 4 Point 8 bull Warden Smarts SireAdj Feed Conversion New Level Point bull 4333 bull

Warden’s Adjusted Feed Conversion bull New Level bull 0350 bull 4 Point 8 bull Warden Smarts SireRFI New Level Point bull 4333 bull

Over 40 Years Ago l Dr. Robert Koch, U of Nebraska research and reported on a new system that adjusted feed intakes for body weight and growth. l Splits feed intake into two portions –1. feed intake for a given level of growth & size –2. a residual portion Data from: -Lincoln, NE -Fort Robinson, NE -Fort Reno, OK Breeds: Angus Hereford Shorthorn

Thus was born RFI (Residual Feed Intake) l RFI is also known as: –NFI: Net Feed Intake –NFE: Net Feed Efficiency l RFI is the difference between a bull’s actual feed intake and its expected feed intake based on its size and growth. l RFI = actual DMI – expected DMI l Heritability estimates 29% to 46%

RFI (Residual Feed Intake) l Used to identify animals that are either + or – from their expected ME intake. l -NFE = high efficiency l +NFE = low efficiency ADG Wt. Individual Bull Expected DMI Individual bull DMI -NFE

Studies indicate RFI is an independent trait l Warden data no correlation between Off Test Weight and RFI r = -.02

Studies indicate RFI is an independent trait l Warden data no correlation between ADG and RFI. r = -.01

Studies indicate RFI is an independent trait, but related to Adjusted Feed Conversion l Warden data.46 correlation between Adjusted Feed Conversion and RFI r =.46 RFI

Studies indicate RFI is an independent trait, but related to Dry Matter Intake l Warden data. 55 correlation between Dry Matter Intake and RFI. r =.55

Other relationships were evaluated…. l A significant correlation between RFI and ultrasound fat cover existed (.17) –Means fatter bulls were less efficient l No significant relationships existed between RFI and other performance parameters. –EPDs (BW, WW, YW, Milk) and ultrasound REA

Dilemma with calculating RFI l Requires doing a regression analysis of the data to develop an equation called Expected Dry Matter Intake. l Expected Dry Matter Intake is then used against Actual Dry Matter Intake to develop the RFI. l Not many producers have the expertise and knowledge of statistics to do this exercise. l Going to require serious expertise involvement either from Extension Service or Breed Association.

Warden-Beedle information gathering system using off the shelf electronic components. Joint project with the Iowa Beef Center, Miraco, ID-ology, and Rice Lake Scales

Our Future…..Let’s Hope. A view from Australia on the possibilities Angus NFI Percentile