On Designing Open Access Mandates for Universities and Research Funders Stevan Harnad Chaire de recherche du Canada en sciences cognitives Université de.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Advertisements

Publisher Tail Wagging the Research Dog. Harvard Mandate (copyright-retention mandate) NIH Mandate (central deposit mandate) ID/OA Mandate (convergent.
The Open Access Research Web Publication-archiving, Data-archiving and Publications as Scientometric Data Metrics and Mandates Stevan Harnad Canada Research.
These slides were made by Tim Brody, Chawki Hajjem and Stevan Harnad (Southampton University & Université du Québec à Montréal). Thanks also to Alma Swan,
Open Stirling: Open Access Publishing and Research Data Management at Stirling Monday 25 th March 2013 Michael White, Information Services STORRE Co-Manager/RMS.
Sunday October 28, www.eprints.org Tim Brody - Stevan Harnad -
Open Access, Research Funders and the REF Open Access Team, Library.
Open Access What’s Happening? Nia Wyn Roberts, March 2015.
OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING Sally Scholfield UTS Library.
Copyright Reform Should Not Be Made A Precondition For Mandating Open Access Stevan Harnad UQAM & U Southampton Berlin 14 nov 2008.
Mandating (Green) Open Access to Maximize the Usage and Impact of Danish Research Output Stevan Harnad Denmark at an Open Access crossroads – mandate or.
Week 10 1 Z514: Social Aspects of IT. Open Access to What? ESSENTIAL: to all 2.5 million annual research articles published in all 25,000 peer-reviewed.
Open Access Free/Open Software, Open Data, Creative Commons Wikipedia: Commonalities and Distinctions Stevan Harnad UQAM & U Southampton FSFS Kerala 2008.
Society for Endocrinology Society for Endocrinology BES March 2007 Steve Byford Society for Endocrinology
Open Access Publishing with Wiley. Gold v Green Open Access Gold or pay to publish Open Access: Article is made freely accessible online to anyone anywhere.
& WILEY. Simba OA Journal Publishing
Metrics and Mandates for University Open Access Repositories Stevan Harnad UQAM & U. Southampton.
Open Access: International issues and developments from National Scholarly Communications Forum (NSCF) and Electronic Theses and Dissertations Conference.
Swansea University 2013 Open Access: a quiet revolution?
Learn more about Open Access Breakfast meeting at BMC March 30th 2010 Aina Svensson and Karin Meyer Lundén Electronic Publishing Centre, Uppsala University.
Information Services and Systems Getting Published Information Services & Systems Post Graduate Research Programme.
Tim Brody - Eprints - Southampton U. Specific Proposal for Synergies Network To maximize the visibility and impact of Canadian SS/H Research: Support the.
Open Access: Validating Metrics and Motivating Mandates Stevan Harnad, UQAM & U. Southampton Alma Swan, Key Persectives & U Southampton Arthur Sale, U.
Making AgriScience Open Access Stevan Harnad Canada Research Chair in Cognitive Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal & Department of Electronics and.
Faculty Self-Archiving: The Gap between Opportunity and Practice Denise Troll Covey Carnegie Mellon University Libraries DLF Forum – November 2007.
N.B. The first slide is the excerpted core of the Berlin Declaration. The rest of the slides are independent suggestions (not contained in the Berlin Declaration)
Making One's Mark in the PostGutenberg World: How to Enhance Research Impact Through Self-Archiving.
Integrating Universities' Thesis and Research Deposit Mandates: Institutional Repositories, Deposit Mandates, and Research Impact Metrics Stevan Harnad.
Tim Brody - Eprints - Southampton U. Research Assessment, Research Funding, and Citation Impact “Correlation between RAE ratings and mean departmental.
Optimizing and Integrating Open Access Mandates Stevan Harnad UQAM & U Southampton U Minho 15 December 2008.
November 2, 2009 SFU Library Tools & Support for Open Access Publishing.
EA: Early Advantage: Self-archiving preprints before publication increases citations (higher-quality articles benefit more) QA: Quality Advantage: Self-archiving.
Talking to our faculty about open access and authors’ rights Joyner Library Forum October 23, 2008.
Universal Access: By Revolution or Evolution? Open Access by Peaceful Evolution.
What does the community of scientists “own”?  What do authors own?  What does the scholarly community own?
Daniela Nastasie, PhD BEng(Hons) AALIA Senior Metadata Librarian Repository and Archive Metadata Services UniSA Library Open Access Publishing and UniSA.
Presented by Ansie van der Westhuizen Unisa Institutional Repository: Sharing knowledge to advance research
Alma Swan Key Perspectives Ltd Truro, UK. Key Perspectives Ltd.
Mandates and Metrics: How Open Repositories Enable Universities to Manage, Measure and Maximise their Research Assets Stevan Harnad Canada Research Chair.
Important Resources DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals SHERPA/JULIET Research funder´s open access policies
Self-archiving The term usually refers to the self-archiving of peer reviewed research journal and conference articles as well as theses, deposited in.
These slides were made by Tim Brody and Stevan Harnad (Southampton University) Permission is granted to use them to promote open access and self-archiving.
Wien, 15 December 2008, Relevance and Impact of the Humanities The prospects opened up by Open Access Christine Kosmopoulos Centre National de la Recherche.
Open Access The Lingo, The History, The Basics, and Why Should We Care.
Alma Swan Key Perspectives Ltd Truro, UK University of Huddersfield OA event, 17 March 2010.
Extending Access: Priorities and Solutions, November 2005 What are publishers doing to support research needs? Martin Richardson.
Open Access Publishing Nadine Lewycky, Senior Manager, Research Strategy & Planning Chris Biggs, Metadata and Repository Specialist.
Open Access Opportunities, Policies & Rights IAS ACE Programme 19 November 2015.
Antti Rousi Aalto University Library
Enabling Open Scholarship The Open Access advantage Alma Swan Convenor Enabling Open Scholarship Open Access, Open Data: Cologne, Germany, 13/14 December.
Traditional Distribution Electronic Distribution User Florida Entomologist Issues Reprints FTP.
AACP Annual Meeting #RxOA #PharmEd14.  What is Open Access?  Spencer D. C. Keralis Research Associate  Institutional Repositories.
Greater Visibility, Greater Access QSpace QSpace Queen’s University Research & Learning Repository.
The Use and Value of Scientific Journals Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee.
Open Access/ Parallel publishing at the JU What, Why, How? Marja-Leena Harjuniemi JU.
Open Access FAQ Maria Elisabeth Rehbinder Legal Counsel IP, Art University Advisory Services Member of Rights Administration Working Group/Open Science.
Open Access (OA) : a summary for 2006 Joanne Yeomans CERN Scientific Information Group (Presentation for the CESSID students 12 th May 2006)
Open Access Initiatives Memorial University Libraries Lisa Goddard Scholarly Communications Librarian April 2011.
SPUR5 meeting – 21 March 2014 Getting published …and open access… Steve Byford Research Information Officer RBI, Wallscourt House.
You Know What You Write, But Do You Know Your Rights? Understanding and Protecting Your Rights As an Author Jill Cirasella The Graduate.
Open Access, the next REF and the CRIS Rowena Rouse Scholarly Communications Manager March 2016.
Open Access: what you need to know This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.This work is licensed under a Creative.
Journal of Transport and Land Use Presented at Current & Future Publishing Practices December 2, 2010, Anderson Library David Levinson.
Open Access: What We’re Doing and Where You Fit In Joshua Neds-Fox Wayne State University Libraries October 24, 2012.
NRF Open Access Statement
Open Access Scholarly Resources: what’s available & where
Mandates and Metrics: How Open Repositories Enable Universities to Manage, Measure and Maximise their Research Assets Stevan Harnad Canada Research.
Open Access, Research Funders, Research Data, and the REF
Where can I publish my article in Open Access without extra costs?
Presentation transcript:

On Designing Open Access Mandates for Universities and Research Funders Stevan Harnad Chaire de recherche du Canada en sciences cognitives Université de Québec à Montreal & Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

What is OA? Free Immediate Permanent Online Access Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Open access to what? 2.5 million articles Published yearly In 25,000 peer reviewed journals Across all scientific and scholarly disciplines In all countries and languages Don’t over-reach for open books, “open knowledge,” “open information” Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Why provide OA? Because it maximizes research uses and impact Making it accessible to all users Not just those who can afford to subscribe to the journal in which the article was published Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

No North/South Differences in Users’ and Authors’ Need of OA OA maximized access for users OA maximizes impact for authors OA maximizes research progress Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

1.GREEN OA: By publishing in any journal at all, but self-archiving a copy free for all on the web 1.GOLD OA: By publishing in a journal that makes its articles free for all on the web Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Refereed “Post-Print” Accepted, Certified, Published by Journal Impact cycle begins: Research is done Researchers write pre-refereeing “Pre-Print” Submitted to Journal Pre-Print reviewed by Peer Experts – “Peer- Review” Pre-Print revised by article’s Authors Researchers can access the Post-Print if their university has a subscription to the Journal Months New impact cycles: New research builds on existing research Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Refereed “Post-Print” Accepted, Certified, Published by Journal Impact cycle begins: Research is done Researchers write pre-refereeing “Pre-Print” Submitted to Journal Pre-Print reviewed by Peer Experts – “Peer- Review” Pre-Print revised by article’s Authors Researchers can access the Post-Print if their university has a subscription to the Journal Months New impact cycles: New research builds on existing research This limited subscription-based access can be supplemented by self-archiving the Postprint in the author’s own institutional repository as follows: Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

New impact cycles: New research builds on existing research Researchers can access the Post-Print if their university has a subscription to the Journal Refereed “Post-Print” Accepted, Certified, Published by Journal Impact cycle begins: Research is done Researchers write pre-refereeing “Pre-Print” Submitted to Journal Pre-Print reviewed by Peer Experts – “Peer-Review” Pre-Print revised by article’s Authors Post-Print is self-archived in University’s Eprint Archive Months More impact cycles: Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Bjork et al estimates of green and gold percentages (2009) Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Gold OA growth curve Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Nonmandated vs mandated Green OA Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Green OA mandate growth Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Why does green OA need to come before gold OA? 1.Because green OA can be provided by the research community and gold OA can only be provided by the publisher community 2.Because green OA can be mandated by research institutions and funders and gold OA cannot 3.Because the money to pay for gold OA is still locked up in journal subscriptions 4.Don’t over-reach for immediate gold OA Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

"Gratis" OA vs "Libre" OA Gratis OA means free online access Libre OA means free online access plus certain further re-use rights Don’t over-reach for libre OA Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Institutional repositories vs central repositories Institutional vs funder mandates Deposit institutionally, harvest centrally Don’t over-reach for direct central deposit Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Parasitism? Catastrophe? Subscriptions pay for publication Authors contribute work for free Peers review for free Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Copyright, Embargoes Desirable but not necessary to retain copyright Immediate green OA self-archiving can be mandated even if authors wish to comply with publisher OA embargoes Don’t over-reach for copyright retention Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

The optimal green OA self-archiving mandate Immediate Deposit/”Optional OA” Deposit is sole means of submitting research for institutional performance review (“Liège model”) “ eprint request” button for embargoed deposits Don’t over-reach for immediate-OA mandates Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Leveraged transition 1.Institutions and funders mandate ID/OA 2.Universal green OA 3.Subscriptions become unsustainable 4.Publishers downsize to peer review alone 5.Offload access-provision and archiving on institutional repositories 6.Journals convert to gold OA 7.Gold (much lower) OA fees paid out of institutional windfall subscription cancelation savings Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

No-fault peer review Instead of charging for publication Journals charge for each round go peer review “No fault” Rejected paper charges no longer wrapped into accepted paper fees Journals not tempted to lower standards for more revenue Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Versions Author’s peer-reviewed final draft has the fewest publisher restrictions on it Don’t over-reach for publisher’s version-of- record Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Self-selective (non-mandated) green OA levels (70%) vs Mandated green OA levels (20%) Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: The earlier you mandate Green OA, the sooner (and bigger) your university's competitive advantage: U. Southampton School of Electronics and Computer Science was the first in the world to adopt an OA self-archiving mandate. Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Cumulative number of citations per article for Mandated and Self-Selected OA vs NOA articles (articles published in 2002) OMN = 897 ØMN = 493 OSN = 1,098 ØSN = 3,269 Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Separate proportions for OA vs NOA articles at each citation count Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Average cumulative number of citations per article as a function of article age for articles published in Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Average cumulative number of citations per article as a function of article age by field for articles published in 2000 Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Sample of candidate OA-era metrics: Citations (C) CiteRank (like Google) Co-citations Downloads (D) C/D Correlations Hub/Authority index Chronometrics: Latency/Longevity Endogamy/Exogamy Book citation index Links Tags Commentaries Journal Impact Factor h-index (and variants) Co-authorships Publication counts Number of publishing years Semiometrics (latent semantic indexing, text overlap, etc.) Research funding Students Prizes Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

ROAR & ROARMAP Registry of Open Access Repositories Registry of Open Access Repository Archiving Mandates AGE : age of institution’s deposit mandate (in months) STRENGTH: strength of institution’s deposit mandate deposits : total number of deposits in institutional repository rate : rate of deposit (number of days per year with deposits) RANK : Webometrics rank of institution Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Scatter plot matrix : pairwise scatter plots of all variables Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Grasp what is within immediate reach Don’t keep over-reaching and getting next to nothing for yet another decade… Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

There are many repositories but few deposits because deposit mandates are still few: Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

The optimal green OA self-archiving mandate Immediate Deposit/”Optional OA” Deposit is sole means of submitting research for institutional performance review (“Liège model”) “ eprint request” button for embargoed deposits Don’t over-reach for immediate-OA mandates Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Across all countries and disciplines, 95% of researchers report that they would comply with a self-archiving mandate from their funders and/or employers, and over 80% report that they would do so willingly. -- But only 15% self-archive spontaneously, if it not mandated. Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

What about copyright? Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

SUMMARY: OA: How? Universities and funders mandate Green OA self- archiving Deposit Where? In universities' own Institutional Repositories (IRs) Deposit How? A few minutes of keystrokes per paper is all that stands between the world research community and 100% OA Deposit What? Author's final, revised, peer-reviewed draft ("postprint") Deposit When? Immediately upon acceptance for publication Optimizing OA Self-Archiving Mandates: What? Where? When? Why? How? Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

The optimal green OA self-archiving mandate Immediate Deposit/”Optional OA” Deposit is sole means of submitting research for institutional performance review (“Liège model”) “ eprint request” button for embargoed deposits Don’t over-reach for immediate-OA mandates Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Why provide OA? Because it maximizes research uses and impact Making it accessible to all users Not just those who can afford to subscribe to the journal in which the article was published Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

EnablingOpenScholarship (EOS) Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics

Thank you Slides for Promoting OA Mandates and Metrics