a.k.a. Neo-Classical Criticism Herbert Wilchelns (1925): “The Literary Criticism of Oratory” Sought to distinguish study of oratory from study of literature
Concerned with particular audience response Concerned with reasonable effect Judges rhetoric by its persuasive appeals and effects
Goal is to identify aspects of the rhetorical action that explains its persuasive effect on the audience. Reconstructing the context: Context/Occasion Audience Rhetor
Invention Arrangement Style Delivery Memory
The main ideas, themes, lines of argument, and content Inartistic Proofs Artistic Proofs: Ethos Logos Pathos Inductive Arguments Deductive Enthymeme
Types of organization structures Chronological Spatial Thematic Problem-solution Cause-effect Delayed thesis
Word choice Dramatic depictions Stories Metaphors Repetition
Use of voice Facial expressions Body movement/posture All non-verbal components
Not as relevant today
Effects can be difficult to isolate and verify Strict interpretation of effects doesn’t allow for moral judgments Works best with oral presentations