It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Gender umanitoba.ca.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strategic Value of the HR Function Presentation by
Advertisements

Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
CREATING A CULTURE THAT ENGAGES AND RETAINS MILLENNIALS Like us and check in on facebook at DaleCarnegieNY Tweet during the workshop at #DaleCarnegie.
Biology Staff Survey Why we ran a staff survey  To see how things have changed since the last survey (2011)  To find out what’s working well and.
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey U of M: Overall Results umanitoba.ca.
Title of presentation umanitoba.ca President’s Town Hall Monday, November 28, 2011.
Law School Survey of Student Engagement Users’ Workshop November 4, 2011 Seton Hall Law School 1.
2010 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.
Campus Climate for UNC Charlotte Faculty Findings from the 1998, 2001, & 2004 UCLA HERI Faculty Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of.
Diversity Assessment and Planning with members of the October 14, 2005.
1 Faculty Climate Survey Highlights Institutional Research & Faculty Development and Diversity March 2008.
Executive Report to Council
TalentMap 1 York Community Services: November 1-12, TalentMap Athabasca University – Spring TalentMap Employee Survey Results Presentation.
INQUIREINSPIREINNOVATEIMPLEMENT Leadership, Community and Values University of Washington LEADERSHIP, COMMUNITY and VALUES Preliminary Findings: Surveys.
Effect of Staff Attitudes on Quality in Clinical Microbiology Services Ms. Julie Sims Laboratory Technical specialist Strengthening of Medical Laboratories.
EXCELLENCE CANADA UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO LIBRARY PILOT April 22, 2014 Excellence Canada – University of Waterloo Library Pilot.
Human Resources Office of Summary of Results 1 University of Minnesota Morris.
Phase II: Survey Findings January 2015 APSAC and CSSAC Presentation Purdue Quality of Work Environment Initiative 1.
PRESENTATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Priorities for an Engaged Community of Employees TRU People Make Things Happen.
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
UGA Libraries Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey Conducted Spring 2006.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
A&S Staff Survey Fall 2014 Results. 1. Competence.
Employee Survey Results Employee Survey  Employees were asked to respond to a survey of questions covering several themes: Day-To-Day Job.
Teacher Engagement Survey 2014
York St John University Staff Survey Highlights 2010 David Evans Research Consultant October 2010.
March Staff Survey Results. STATE OF THE STAFF (2010 Staff Survey Results)
Presented by: Karen Gauthier
A Tale of Two Surveys Metropolitan State College of Denver Faculty Senate Marilyn Cullen-Reavill, Diane Davis, Christopher Jennings & Aaron S. Richmond.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
© All rights reserved 2014 Great Colleges Survey All Campus Update January 21, 2015.
© All rights reserved 2014 Great Colleges Survey Richard K. Boyer.
Human Resources Office of FACULTY Summary of Results _College of Design_FACULTY.
Emory University Climate Survey Results Presented to HR Leadership Group April 21, 2005 Del King Senior Director, Human Resources.
2005 Performance Development System Survey Human Resources Staff Meeting March 20, 2006.
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results Dr Pam Wells Adviser, Evidence-Informed Practice.
UBC Department of Finance Office Staff Survey Forum Presentation March 17, 2004.
Engagement at The Health Trust Presented by Quantum Workplace 2014 Executive Report - The Health Trust.
Blended Learning: Finding the Right Mix Work Expectations Profile  Explores the “psychological contract” of needs and expectations between employees.
Mountain View College ModernThink © Survey Results Analyzed MVC College-wide Forum April 9, 2009 MVC Core Values: Celebration of Student & Employee Success.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
12-14 Pindari Rd Peakhurst NSW 2210 p: e: Employee Survey Links2Success.
“Employee Survey 2007” Analysis of results and comparison with 2005 survey results May 2007.
Group Members: Teng Mei Ling031857X Chan Ren Hui031771G Siti Raudhah031569Q R.Laarvanya030886R Ong Woan Wen030954P Final Presentation!!
Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.
Force Results – August 2012 Sussex Police Employee Survey 2012.
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
Gallaudet University 2015 There’s No Place Like Home: Assessing Climate Prepared by OAQ/Office of Institutional Research October 20,
Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Work Areas 2015 Response Count 2014 Response Count.
Employee Pulse Survey March 2010 Office of Human Resources.
College Student Survey (CSS) 2006 CSS INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE Margie Bennett, Director Institutional Research and Compliance March 2007.
School of Biological Sciences Staff Survey 2013 Department of Zoology Results Briefing, 21 May 2013.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Student Life.
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Information Technology.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Advancement.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
Managing Talent – Maximizing Your Employee’s Potential 3 rd SACCO LEADERS’ FORUM Monique DunbarLorri Lochrie Communicating Arts Credit UnionCentral 1 Credit.
Mid Michigan Community College Prepared by President Christine Hammond March 31, 2016 PACE Survey Results Summary.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
0 Faculty Senate October 17, 2006 Working at IOWA.
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results
Faculty Climate Survey Highlights
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Butler University Great Colleges To Work For
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
Departure View Glossary
Presentation transcript:

It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Gender umanitoba.ca

Outstanding Workplace Initiative U of M Strategic Planning Framework. Goal: The University of Manitoba will be an employer of first choice, offering and expecting respect for all staff and faculty, providing opportunities for leadership, growth and development, and recognizing the contributions made at all levels of the organization.

It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey First opportunity for academic and support staff to provide feedback about what it is like to work at the U of M. Designed by U of M representatives in consultation with Probe Research Inc. Survey questions which emerged from previous qualitative process included: Two-pronged opinion statements measuring importance of and agreement on 31 factors across 7 dimensions. Eight open-ended questions. Five statements measuring attitudes toward the workplace. One question measuring overall job satisfaction.

It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Conducted between June 15 – 30, out of 4725 eligible employees responded to this survey (30.5% response rate). Overall survey response rate for many higher education institutions is about 20%. 31.5% of respondents provided verbatim comments to the open-ended questions (3634 units of entry).

Results Results are a benchmark - will inform our action plan to strengthen our outstanding workplace OWI Process Consult / Spark Conversations Identify Best Practices Communicate Draft Framework and Plan Take Action For Continuous Enhancement Continuously Assess OWI Process

It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Survey Results Comparing U of M general data with Gender Most data that follow represent 5, 6, 7 scores on a 7-point scale where “1” = Extremely Unimportant/Strong Disagree and “7” = Very Important/ Strongly Agree

Eligibility and Participation Rates U of M compared with Gender Total Eligible % of Total Eligible Survey Participation % Survey Participation U of M4725N/A % FMFM Gender %35%

Profile of Respondents Survey Participation (% of employees responding to survey Gender Survey Participation n = 1440F = 931M = 509 CAMPUS Bannatyne21% 22%18% Fort Garry78% 77%80% Other1% 2% YEARS OF SERVICE 2 years or fewer 18% 3-4 years 13% 5-9 years 25% 26%22% years 16% 15%19% years 6 % 7%6% years 14% 30+ years 7% 8% GENDER Male 35% Female 65%

Eligible and Participation Rate U of M compared with Employee Groups/Gender Eligible Survey Participation % Survey Participation U of M F= 931 M = % FMFM Academic/Librarians %10% PT Academics %2% Support Staff (Union) %11% Support Staff (Excluded) %11% Senior Admin %23%

Overall Job Satisfaction U of M (n = 1440) Gender (Female n = 931 Male n = 509 Manitoba FM Very Satisfied 35%38% 30% 53% Somewhat Satisfied 51% 38% Not Very Satisfied 10%8%12%6% Not at all Satisfied 2% 4%3% Unsure 2% 1%

Attitudes toward the Workplace U of M (n = 1440) Gender F = 931 M = 509 FMFMFM AgreeNeutralDisagreeAgreeNeutralDisagree Recommend the U of M as an employer 73%12%15%77% 67% 11%12% 13% My workload is appropriate for my position 59%12%29%58% 61% 11% 31%18% Confidence in the organization’s commitment to support OWI 52%20%28%56% 45% 19% 25%36% U of M is a great place to work76%10%14%80% 70% 9% 10% 11%20% Feeling good about what I achieved at work 75%11%14%78% 70% 9% 14% 13%16%

Contributions U of M (n = 1440) Gender F = 931 M = 509 ImportantAgreeImportantAgree FMFM Making a meaningful contribution to society92%85%93%90%86%83% Work is important to the success of the University92%87%93%89%87%86% U of M is well regarded externally85%59%85%78%65%48%

Working Conditions U of M (n = 1440) Gender (n =36) ImportantAgree ImportantAgree FMFM Flexibility in work arrangements95%82%95% 93% 80%84% Able to do job with minimal bureaucracy/ red tape 94%55%94%96%58%48% Having adequate space to do job well96%76%96%97%77%74% Having adequate equipment and tools to do job well 97%77%97%98%80%73%

People and Community U of M (n = 1440) Gender F = 931 M = 509 ImportantAgreeImportantAgree FMFM Feel respected in the workplace97%71%97%96%73%65% Effective cooperation between departments96%44%96%95%47%38% Having friendly and supportive co-workers97%82%97% 84%81% Having formal recognition programs70%57%72%67%62%51%

People and Community (cont’d) U of M (n = 1440) Gender F = 931 M = 509 ImportantAgreeImportantAgree FM FM Receive informal recognition (e.g. ‘thank you)91%69%92%88% 73%61% Have community space that enables social interaction 82%55%85%77% 57%51% Employees treated equitably regardless of rank or position 95%41%96%94% 39%43% Workplace that celebrates diversity80%68%87%69% 72%59%

Confidence in Senior LeadershipU of M (n = 1440) Gender F = 931 M = 509 ImportantAgreeImportantAgree FMFM Senior leadership provides a clear direction for the future 93%53%94%93%58%43% Senior leadership ‘walks the talk’94%43%94%92%47%37% Satisfied with decisions made by senior leadership91%45%91%90%49%38%

Management Practices U of M (n = 1440) Gender F = 931 M = 509 ImportantAgreeImportantAgree FMFM Mutual trust between managers and employees 96%74%97%96%76%72% Ability to speak freely 97%75%97%96%76%75% Receiving support 97%74%97%96%74%72% Implementation of RWLEP 91%60%93%86%63%55% Receiving useful feedback 96%68%96%95%70%65%

Professional and Career Development U of M (n = 1440) Gender F = 931 M = 509 ImportantAgreeImportantAgree FMFM Access to good learning and development resources93%66%94%88%69%62% Opportunities for career/professional advancement93%57%93%91%59%51% Receiving support for career/professional development 89%55%91%85%58%51%

Compensation and Benefits U of M (n = 1440) Gender F = 931 M = 509 ImportantAgreeImportantAgree FMFM Receiving fair pay 98%67%98%97%71%58% Comprehensive benefits package 98%82%98%96%85%78% Good pension plan 98%80%98%96%81%75% Access to health and dental benefits after retirement 95%86%97%93%88%82% Access to scholarships for dependents and spouse 65%52%64%65%52%51%