The GLAIR Cognitive Architecture Stuart C. Shapiro and Jonathan P. Bona Department of Computer Science & Engineering Center for Cognitive Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pat Langley Computational Learning Laboratory Center for the Study of Language and Information Stanford University, Stanford, California USA
Advertisements

Pat Langley School of Computing and Informatics Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona A Cognitive Architecture for Integrated.
Cognitive Systems, ICANN panel, Q1 What is machine intelligence, as beyond pattern matching, classification and prediction. What is machine intelligence,
Semantics (Representing Meaning)
Title: Intelligent Agents A uthor: Michael Woolridge Chapter 1 of Multiagent Systems by Weiss Speakers: Tibor Moldovan and Shabbir Syed CSCE976, April.
SPECIFYING MODALITIES IN THE MGLAIR ARCHITECTURE Stuart C. Shapiro and Jonathan P. Bona Department of Computer Science and Engineering And Center for Cognitive.
S.C. Shapiro Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Stuart C. Shapiro Professor, CSE Director, SNePS Research Group Member, Center for Cognitive.
Research in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science & Engineering Center for MultiSource Information.
CPSC 322, Lecture 19Slide 1 Propositional Logic Intro, Syntax Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 19 (Textbook Chpt ) February, 23, 2009.
The GLAIR Architecture for Cognitive Robotics Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science & Engineering and Center for Cognitive Science.
The GLAIR Cognitive Architecture and Prospects for Consciousness Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science & Engineering and Center.
A Categorization of Contextual Constraints Michael Kandefer and Stuart C. Shapiro University at Buffalo Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
The GLAIR Architecture for Cognitive Robots Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science & Engineering and Center for Cognitive Science.
Knowledge Representation for Self-Aware Computer Systems Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science and Engineering, and Center for Cognitive.
S.C. Shapiro Development of a Cognitive Agent Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science and Engineering and Center for Cognitive Science.
S.C. Shapiro Endowing Agents with a Personal Sense of Time Haythem O. Ismail & Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
S.C. Shapiro Knowledge Representation for Natural Language Competence Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science and Engineering and.
Cassie as a Self-Aware SNePS/GLAIR Agent Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science and Engineering, and Center for Cognitive Science.
Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Representation دانشگاه صنعتی اميرکبير (پلي تکنيک تهران) دانشكده مهندسي كامپيوتر آزمايشگاه سيستم‌هاي هوشمند
Research in Knowledge Representation, Reasoning, and Acting Stuart C. Shapiro Professor, CSE Affiliated Professor, Linguistics, Philosophy.
S.C. Shapiro Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Stuart C. Shapiro Professor, CSE Director, SNePS Research Group Member, Center for Cognitive.
S.C. Shapiro An Intelligent Interface to a GIS Stuart C. Shapiro Professor, CSE Director, SNePS Research Group Member, Center for Cognitive.
Semantics of a Propositional Network Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science & Engineering Center for MultiSource Information Fusion.
S.C. Shapiro Symbol-Anchoring in Cassie Stuart C. Shapiro and Haythem O. Ismail Department of Computer Science and Engineering and Center for.
A Logic of Arbitrary and Indefinite Objects Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science and Engineering, and Center for Cognitive Science.
Knowledge Acquisition by an Intelligent Acting Agent Michael Kandefer and Stuart Shapiro Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Center for Cognitive.
S.C. Shapiro Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Stuart C. Shapiro Professor, CSE Director, SNePS Research Group Member, Center for Cognitive.
S.C. Shapiro Symbol Anchoring in a Grounded Layered Architecture with Integrated Reasoning Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science.
SNePS 3 for Ontologies Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science and Engineering, and Center for Cognitive Science University at Buffalo,
Research in Knowledge Representation, Reasoning, and Acting Stuart C. Shapiro Professor, CSE Director, Center for Cognitive Science Director,
AI: Trends and Directions Stuart C. Shapiro Professor, CSE Affiliated Professor, Linguistics, Philosophy Director, SNePS Research Group ACM.
A Logic of Arbitrary and Indefinite Objects Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science and Engineering, and Center for Cognitive Science.
Research in Knowledge Representation, Reasoning, and Acting Stuart C. Shapiro Professor, CSE Affiliated Professor, Linguistics, Philosophy.
S.C. Shapiro An Introduction to SNePS 3 Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science and Engineering and Center for Cognitive Science State.
2APL A Practical Agent Programming Language March 6, 2007 Cathy Yen.
Steps Toward an AGI Roadmap Włodek Duch ( Google: W. Duch) AGI, Memphis, 1-2 March 2007 Roadmaps: A Ten Year Roadmap to Machines with Common Sense (Push.
Ontologies Reasoning Components Agents Simulations Belief Update, Planning and the Fluent Calculus Jacques Robin.
Knowledge representation
Chapter 15: Agents Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents – Munindar P. Singh and Michael N. Huhns, Wiley, 2005.
An Architecture for Empathic Agents. Abstract Architecture Planning + Coping Deliberated Actions Agent in the World Body Speech Facial expressions Effectors.
CSE4/563: Knowledge Representation Recitation September 13, 2010 “Intelligence is the art of good guesswork.” –H.B. Barlow.
Inference Graphs: A Roadmap Daniel R. Schlegel and Stuart C. Department of Computer Science and Engineering L A – Logic of Arbitrary.
Emotions: a computational semiotics perspective Rodrigo Gonçalves, Ricardo Gudwin, Fernando Gomide Electrical and Computer Engineering School (FEEC) State.
Panel Discussion I: Brainstorm on Language, Embodiment and the Critical minass of Intelligence Moderator: Alexei Samsonovich Panelists: Kenneth De Jong,
Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition – University of Sydney Concept Formation in a Design Optimization Tool Wei Peng and John S. Gero 7, July,
NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING FOR SOFT INFORMATION FUSION Stuart C. Shapiro and Daniel R. Schlegel Department of Computer Science and Engineering Center.
Concurrent Reasoning with Inference Graphs Daniel R. Schlegel and Stuart C. Shapiro Department of Computer Science and Engineering University at Buffalo,
A Common Ground for Virtual Humans: Using an Ontology in a Natural Language Oriented Virtual Human Architecture Arno Hartholt (ICT), Thomas Russ (ISI),
The SNePS Research Group Semantic Network Processing System The long-term goal of The SNePS Research Group is the design and construction of a natural-language-using.
Modeling Speech Acts and Joint Intentions in Modal Markov Logic Henry Kautz University of Washington.
1 Viewing Vision-Language Integration as a Double-Grounding case Katerina Pastra Department of Computer Science, Natural Language Processing Group, University.
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence CS 438 Spring 2008 Today –AIMA, Chapter 1 –Defining AI Next Tuesday –Intelligent Agents –AIMA, Chapter 2 –HW: Problem.
CPSC 322, Lecture 19Slide 1 (finish Planning) Propositional Logic Intro, Syntax Computer Science cpsc322, Lecture 19 (Textbook Chpt – 5.2) Oct,
Some Thoughts to Consider 8 How difficult is it to get a group of people, or a group of companies, or a group of nations to agree on a particular ontology?
Cognitive Architectures and General Intelligent Systems Pay Langley 2006 Presentation : Suwang Jang.
Intelligent Agents Chapter 2. How do you design an intelligent agent? Definition: An intelligent agent perceives its environment via sensors and acts.
Artificial Intelligence Knowledge Representation.
Definition and Technologies Knowledge Representation.
Artificial Intelligence Logical Agents Chapter 7.
Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents
“Perceptual Symbol Systems”
Ontology From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Building an mglair Agent a tutorial
Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents
MGLAIR Modal Grounded Layered Architecture with Integrated Reasoning
Patterns.
Logic for Artificial Intelligence
MGLAIR Modal Grounded Layered Architecture with Integrated Reasoning
Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents
Presented by Yuqian Jiang 2/27/2019
Presentation transcript:

The GLAIR Cognitive Architecture Stuart C. Shapiro and Jonathan P. Bona Department of Computer Science & Engineering Center for Cognitive Science State University of New York at Buffalo

Outline  Overview Integration of Acting and Reasoning Symbol Grounding BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona2

Grounded Layered Architecture with Integrated Reasoning Major Concern: –Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Driving Motivation: –Natural Language Understanding & Generation Additional Concern: –Agents that act Question: –Where do beliefs come from? Partial Answer: –Agent’s being embodied –Agent’s being situated in the world BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona3

BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona 4 KL PMLa PMLb PMLc SAL Mind Body Independent of lower-body implementation Hearing Vision Motion Speech WORLDWORLD I/P s o c k e t s GLAIR Architecture Dependent on lower-body implementation Proprioception

Sensori-Actuator Layer Sensor and effector controllers BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona5

Perceptuo-Motor Layer PMLa PMLb PMLc BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona6

PMLc Abstracts sensors & effectors Body’s behavioral repertoire BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona7

PMLb Translation & Communication –Between PMLa & PMLc Highest layer that knows body implementation BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona8

PMLa Grounds KL symbols –Perceptual structures –Implementation of primitive actions Registers for Embodiment & Situatedness –Deictic Registers –Modality Registers BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona9

The Knowledge Layer Implemented in SNePS Agent’s Beliefs Representations of conceived of entities Semantic Memory Episodic Memory Quantified & conditional beliefs Plans for non-primitive acts Plans to achieve goals Beliefs re. preconditions & effects of acts Policies: Conditions for performing acts Self-knowledge Meta-knowledge BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona 10

Outline Overview  Integration of Acting and Reasoning Symbol Grounding BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona11

SNePS A KRR system Every non-atomic expression is simultaneously –An expression of SNePS logic –An assertional frame –A propositional graph Every SNePS expression is a term –Denoting a mental entity BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona12

Ontology of Mental Entities Entity –Proposition Agent can believe it or its negation Includes quantified & conditional beliefs –Act Agent can perform it –Policy Condition-act rule agent can adopt –Thing Other entities: individuals, categories, properties, etc. BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona13

Policies Reasoning Acting Forward Reasoning whendo(φ, α) wheneverdo(φ, α) Backward Reasoning ifdo(φ, α) BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona14

Types of Acts I External Acts affect the environment supplied by agent designer Mental Acts affect the knowledge layer believe, disbelieve adopt, unadopt Control Acts sequence, selection, loop, etc. BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona15

Types of Acts II Primitive Acts Implemented in PMLa Composite Acts Structured by control acts Defined Acts Defined by ActPlan(α, p) belief BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona16

Acting Reasoning Control Acts snif({if(φ 1, α 1 ), …, if(φ n, α n ), [else(δ)]}) sniterate({if(φ 1, α 1 ), …, if(φ n, α n ), [else(δ)]}) withsome(x, φ(x), α(x), [δ]) withall(x, φ(x), α(x), [δ]) BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona17

Goal Talk GoalPlan(φ, p) achieve(φ) BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona18

Shapiro & Bona Behavior Cycle English (Statement, Question, Command) (Current) Set of Beliefs (Updated) Set of Beliefs Actions(New Belief) English sentence expressing new belief answering question reporting actions Answer NL Analysis NL Generation Reasoning Clarification Dialogue Looking in World Reasoning BICA

Outline Overview Integration of Acting and Reasoning  Symbol Grounding BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona20

Shapiro & Bona Entities, Terms, Symbols, Objects Agent’s mental entity: a person named Stu SNePS term: B4 Object in world: 21 BICA 2009

Shapiro & Bona Alignment Mind (KL) Body (PML/SAL) World KL term PML structure Object/PhenomenonAction BICA

Deictic Registers For being situated in the world PML registers hold KL terms I term denoting agent YOU term denoting dialogue partner NOW term denoting current time BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona23

Modality Registers For privileged first-person knowledge of what agent is doing Register for each modality holds KL term denoting act modality is engaged in BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona24

Building Episodic Memory BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona25 KL PML e1 I a1 b1b1 ! t1e2 a2 ! t2 ! NOW COUNT n hom 0 q ! before after event time act agent duration ACT

For More Details See the Paper BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona 26

BICA 2009 Shapiro & Bona27 Collaborators Past and present members of SNeRG: The SNePS Research Group