John Purdie II, Ph.D. Assoc. Dir., Residence Life Western Washington University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
Advertisements

Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Dr. Catherine Whiting Medical Officer of Health North Bay & District Health Unit PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AT THE LOCAL HEALTH UNIT LEVEL Panel Presentation.
Internal Audit Who? What? When? How? Why? In brief...
Essentials of Enrolment Management and Planned Organizational Change Presentation to the National Conference of the RCCFC November 3, 2006 Victoria J.
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Advancing Our Profession INTRODUCTION Why Does It Matter?
ORGANIZATION. 2 Problem scenario  Develop an organizational chart for your laboratory showing lines of authority from the head of the organization to.
CAS Standards Announced for Parent and Family Programs NASPA - Philadelphia, PA March 15, 2011 Margaret (Mickey) Hay, Ph.D., Southwestern Michigan College.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Prepare Understand the accommodation process & choose level of engagement. Engage Follow procedures for receiving accommodations.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Maps, Rubrics and Templates A Primer on Their Uses for Assessment in Student Affairs.
Outcomes Assessment and Program Effectiveness at Florida Atlantic University : Student Affairs Gail Wisan, Ph.D. July 13, 2010.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Student Services Program Review Plan. Overview Develop/Review Mission, Purpose, Vision and Values Create Strategic Academic Development Plan (5 year plan)
John Purdie II, Ph.D. Assoc. Dir., Residence Life Western Washington University.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Patricia Carretta George Mason University CAS Officer-at-Large
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
CAS STANDARDS INCORPORATING THE CAS STANDARDS INTO YOUR DAILY LIFE.
A Connoisseur, a Critic, and a Skeptic walk into a student union… CAS provides a structured method of evaluation: Is the “X” functioning effectively to.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Creating a Culture of Student Affairs Assessment Katie Busby, Ph.D. Jessica Simmons Office of Student Affairs Assessment & Planning University of Alabama.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Advancing Our Profession INTRODUCTION Why Does It Matter?
Assessment The Student Affairs Mission To support a student-centered learning environment that encourages student development and inspires.
Copyright 2005, CAS All rights reserved. Tidewater Community College and CAS –The Basics of Program Self-evaluation in Community College Student Affairs.
S TUDENT F INANCIAL A SSISTANCE Mission Statement: The Office of Student Financial Aid will strive to make a significant and positive difference in the.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Student Affairs and Services Creating an environment for learning and service.
Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education Building Bridges of Accountability: Using CAS Standards to Sustain a Culture of Assessment.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education CAS Basics CAS Standards, Self-Assessment, and Student Learning Outcomes in Higher Education.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
A Case for ID Card Program Benchmarking and Standards Presented by Jörrun Liston Director Griz Card Center The University of Montana Missoula, Montana.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Program Evaluation and Outcomes Assessment: Channels to Quality Assurance February 9, 2008 ACCA 4 th National Conference Savannah, GA PRESENTER Laura A.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education CAS Standards and Self- Assessment in Higher Education Tony Ellis, CAE Director of Education,
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Using the CAS Standards for Program Assessment & Strategic Planning Marybeth Drechsler Sharp Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

John Purdie II, Ph.D. Assoc. Dir., Residence Life Western Washington University

Remember “getting a physical”? “Again this year, members of the Whatcom Medical Society will be performing sports physicals for Squalicum and other area high school athletes. This is not intended to be a comprehensive physical exam and should not take the place of those recommended by your family physician. These physicals are designed to be limited to sports- directed examinations. As such, only returning athletes (current 9th, 10th, and 11th graders) with record of a comprehensive exam on file at their high school will be eligible. INCOMING HIGH SCHOOL 9TH GRADERS ARE NOT ELIGIBLE.

What game are you playing…? Together we provide an environment for our diverse student population to reach their greatest potential through inspiration, accessibility, and support. UAA Student Affairs departments and staff are committed to providing student-centered services and programs that support students' academic and social integration into the UAA community, engage students in active learning, and foster the growth and development of each student.

Purpose Introduce the CAS Standards Develop capacity to conduct a CAS self-study Provide support and motivation as you continue to progress toward becoming… Mission Driven Evidence-based decision-making Informed Practitioners Culture of Evidence Data driven Able to demonstrate contributions to student learning

A Connoisseur, a Critic, and a Skeptic walk into a student union… CAS provides a structured method of evaluation: Is the “X” functioning effectively to achieve its mission? X is usually a program, service, or department What evidence is available to support the determination?

Participant Outcomes In order to be able to conduct a CAS self-study, by the end of this session participants will be able to: Articulate the purpose and benefits of a self-study Articulate the purpose and benefits of a self-study Feel increased self-efficacy Feel increased self-efficacy Identify institutional stakeholders needed for the process Identify institutional stakeholders needed for the process Identify and obtain appropriate sources of data/evidence Identify and obtain appropriate sources of data/evidence

What is CAS? The mission of the Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS) is to promote the improvement of programs and services to enhance the quality of student learning and development. CAS is a consortium of 40 professional associations who work collaboratively to develop and promulgate standards and guidelines and to encourage self-assessment.consortium

Essential Elements in the CAS Approach Culture that values involvement of all its members Has identified quality indicators Use of standards and guidelines Willingness/capacity: To examine itself and assemble results To report and use the results Has accountability, credibility, improvement Measures of quality & effectiveness, impact on learning, and program & service improvement HmmmHmmm...

We hold these truths to be self-evident…

Evaluative Evidence STUDENT RECRUITMENT MATERIALS: Brochures & other program information Participation policies & procedures PROGRAM DOCUMENTS: Mission statements; program purpose & philosophy statements Catalogs & related materials Staff & student manuals; policies & procedures ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS: Organization charts; student & staff profiles Financial resource statements & budgets Annual reports

Evaluative Evidence (cont.) STAFF ACTIVITY REPORTS: Curriculum vitae & resumes; professional activity Service to other programs, departments, or community STUDENT ACTIVITY REPORTS: Portfolios, developmental transcripts, resumes Reports of student service RESEARCH & EVALUATION DATA: Needs assessments & self-studies Program evaluation; graduate & follow-up studies

Quantitative Data Summary of objective responses on a questionnaire or program evaluation Statistics about use by students and various population subgroups Needs assessments, follow-up studies, and self-study reports Institutional research reports and fact books Comparative or benchmark data at local, regional or national level

Qualitative Data Focus group information Written summaries of responses to open-ended questions in interviews and on evaluations Client satisfaction surveys, self-reports, and written comments, both solicited and unsolicited Team Discussion – what would be useful and where can you get that

Organization of CAS Standards Mission Program Leadership Human Resources Ethics Legal Responsibilities Equity and Access Diversity Organization and Management Campus and External Relations Financial Resources Technology Facilities and Equipment Assessment and Evaluation

CAS: Standards and Guidelines STANDARD (BOLD TYPE; AUXILARY VERB MUST) must must Financial Aid Programs (FAP) must have adequate, suitably located facilities, adequate technology, and equipment to support its mission and goals efficiently and effectively. Facilities, technology, and equipment must be evaluated regularly and be in compliance with relevant federal, state, provincial, and local requirements to provide for access, health, safety, and security. GUIDELINE (LIGHT-FACED TYPE; VERB SHOULD) should The program should have facilities or have access to: private office or space for confidential counseling, interviewing, and other meetings office, reception, and storage space and security sufficient to accommodate assigned staff, supplies, equipment, library resources, and machinery conference room or meeting space

"If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.“ ~Yogi Berra

CAS Self-Assessment Process 1. Establish and prepare the Self-Assessment Team 2. Compile and review Documentary and Evaluative Evidence 3. Identify Discrepancies 4. Determine appropriate Corrective Action 5. Recommend Steps for Program Enhancement 6. Prepare an Action Plan

The Self-Study Team Appointing the Team: Size of team ≈ 5 Composition: Faculty, Staff, Students & Others Most, if not all, should be from outside the unit At least 2 of those should be pretty knowledgeable Admin. support?

The Self-Study Team Training the Team: Establish team ground rules Discuss meaning of each standard Establish team’s inter-rater reliability Encourage team discussion; expect disagreements; commit to consensual resolution

Status Report!

Participant Outcomes In order to be able to conduct a CAS self-study, by the end of this session participants will be able to: Articulate the purpose and benefits of the review Articulate the purpose and benefits of the review Feel increased self-efficacy Feel increased self-efficacy Identify institutional stakeholders needed for review process Identify institutional stakeholders needed for review process Identify and obtain appropriate sources of data/evidence Identify and obtain appropriate sources of data/evidence With pilot teams after lunch: A cursory review of “what” and “why” In-depth on “how” (i.e., using SAGs)