GET REAL: A PHILOSOPHICAL ADVENTURE IN VIRTUAL REALITY By: Philip Zhai.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Descartes’ rationalism
Advertisements

Descartes’ cosmological argument
Discovering HOPE in the midst of evil SUFFERING AND THE HIDDENNESS OF GOD.
René Descartes ( ). The popular version of Descartes.
Knowledge innatism Michael Lacewing
Quick Quiz Cave, Sun, Evil.
Religious Views on Life after Death Philosophy of Religion Perspective
RATIONALISM AND EMPIRICISM: KNOWLEDGE EMPIRICISM Epistemology.
Plato Theory of Forms.
Faith thru Love: Galatians 5:1-12 Peter Fitch, St. Croix Vineyard Sunday, April 21, 2013.
1 Life’s Ultimate Questions “Plato” Christopher Ullman, Instructor Christian Life College.
PHL 201 March 18, 2004  Quiz #3 Answers  Next Quiz – Mar. 26 (new format)  Essay Assignments  Chapter Four – The Self  Faculty Course Surveys.
History of Philosophy. What is philosophy?  Philosophy is what everyone does when they’re not busy dealing with their everyday business and get a change.
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
Plato Plato’s way of philosophizing Plato’s way of philosophizing Ideas are the only reality Ideas are the only reality Human Nature Human Nature.
Misconceptions of Philosophy
Metaphysics: The Study of the Nature of Existence or Reality I Materialism: all reality is material/physical; only bodies in motion are real Eastern (Charvaka)
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Results from Meditation 2
 Derives from Greek words meaning Love of Wisdom.
Metaphysics Part I. The Concerns What are we referring to when we use the word “reality?” What is the nature of “reality?” Is there a difference between.
The World and Your Soul. Make Up of the Universe The universe is nothing plus vibrating energy The universe is nothing plus vibrating energy We notice.
ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER By Darcy Gomez. THE MAN  Lived from  German  Schopenhauer rejected most of his predecessors in philosophy  He only recognized.
Truth and Reality. Announcement: Tutorial Group 10 will meet next Wednesday at 2:00 Reminder: Your portfolio will be due on December 3 rd. Submit a hard.
Modern Philosophers Rationalists –Descartes –Spinoza –Leibniz Empiricists –Locke –Berkeley –Hume Epistemology - the theory of knowledge (what and how we.
Epistemology Revision
Socrates (d. 399 BCE) Plato ( BCE)
1 Introduction.
Rationalism and empiricism: Concept innatism
 According to philosophical skepticism, we can’t have knowledge of the external world.
The answer really annoys me for 3 reasons: 1.I think the statement is arrogant. It doesn’t take into account any definitions of God but solely focuses.
PHL105Y Introduction to Philosophy Monday, October 23, 2006 For Wednesday’s class, read to page 92 of the Plato book (= finish the Meno). The Philosophy.
Introduction to Philosophy
Lecture 4: The nature and value of truth. What is truth? Like the questions “What is knowledge?” and “What turns a true belief into knowledge?” asked.
Chapter 8 HUME. How does the mind/body problem reveal a partial incoherence within Cartesian metaphysics? In what ways does David Hume turn away from.
Philosophy of Mind Week 2: Descartes and Dualism
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
Epistemology, Part I Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Mind-Body Dualism. The Mind-Body Problem The problem of explaining how a mind is connected to and interacts with a body whose mind it is, or the problem.
 Doubt- to be uncertain about something, to hesitate to believe  Dualism- the belief that the mind and body are separate (but interact). Mind is a kind.
Descartes and Buddies “To be or not to be, that is the question”
IDEOLOGY AND DOUBLETHINK. DOUBLETHINK Winston sank his arms to his sides and slowly refilled his lungs with air. His mind slid away into the labyrinthine.
March 10 th, LIFE AFTER DEATH: THE NATURE OF DISEMBODIED EXISTENCE.
The Turn to the Science The problem with substance dualism is that, given what we know about how the world works, it is hard to take it seriously as a.
Faith By: Emily Bowtruczyk & Stasha Greenalch. Quote #1 “Never shall I forget that nocturnal silence which deprived me, for all eternity, of the desire.
BERKELEY AND IDEALISM Strange to claim there is an external world;
Brain Teasers To wake up your brains – In your head puzzle out the puzzle As I was going to St. Ives, I met a man with seven wives. Each wife had seven.
Philosophy of Mind: Theories of self / personal identity: REVISION Body & Soul - what makes you you?
Can you trust your senses?. WHAT DO YOU KNOW? AN INTRODUCTION TO SCEPTICISM.
What is Materialism?.
Three Theories of Knowledge
© Mark E. Damon - All Rights Reserved Meta- what?? Those Greek Bastards To Torture or not to Torture? I Think, Therefore I am Confused Don’t Touch my.
Argument From Dreaming. 1 This is the second sceptical argument – the second wave of doubt, after the argument from illusion – senses cannot be trusted.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
WEEK 4: EPISTEMOLOGY Introduction to Rationalism.
METAPHYSICS The study of the nature of reality. POPEYE STUDIES DESCARTES.
The philosophy of Ayn Rand…. Objectivism Ayn Rand is quoted as saying, “I had to originate a philosophical framework of my own, because my basic view.
This week’s aims  To test your understanding of substance dualism through an initial assessment task  To explain and analyse the philosophical zombies.
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Lecture on Plato BC
The Mind-Body Problem.
2 The Matrix (2) What is Reality?.
Describing Mental States
Are the body and soul inseparable, only intended to intervene?
Bellwork In two large groups, analyze the post-it notes for ABSTRACT or CONCRETE concepts Does the example fit the description of ABSTRACT or CONCRETE?
Conclusion – Truth and wisdom
Problems with IDR Before the holidays we discussed two problems with the indirect realist view. If we can’t perceive the external world directly (because.
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
2 The Matrix What is Reality (2).
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
Presentation transcript:

GET REAL: A PHILOSOPHICAL ADVENTURE IN VIRTUAL REALITY By: Philip Zhai

Plato  The Cave Analogy  we’ll he be able to go back to the real world? And accept it?  The cave:  cave cave

Descartes  Can we know that at least one something is real?  The thinking agent  “I think therefore I am”

Berkeley  The world of perception  If a tree falls in the forest, does it make a sound?  To be is to be perceived

Hume  Empiricism:  Everything we know comes from experience.  There are no a priori knowledge.  (circle example).  There is no creativity

Wittgenstein  To create a boundary, one must know both sides of the boundary.  Cannot separate things from a picture, as we can only know things by its totality or wholeness.

Chapter 1: Is it convincing?  The matrix  Strapping a suit that allows our brain to be fed chemical reactions to all senses in consensus with each other.  The odds are better for us living in a virtual world  Are we living in an ancestor’s virtual reality?

Chapter 2: Is it a coherent project?  Convincing dreams  Waking up IN a dream  The museum example  How to solve the problem of memory  Reproduction  Gods ‘R Us

Chapter 3: How would it work?  Creativity  Life without pain  Freedom to walk again  You submit your body for another  Different Laws of physics The bullet example

Chapter 4: The problem of consciousness

Chapter 5: Some implications  Time travel possible?  Health benefits?  Better conceptions of reality?  Solves Overpopulation? Conserves less resources? Global Warming? Evades potential nuclear disaster?  Shows that the question of reality might never be answered (as we can only know things in the system)?

Chapter 6: What could go wrong?  What is providing energy to the system?  Treadmill  Reap energy from human thinking itself  Reality Engine Breakdown  “We should never close the door back to the actual”  Would someone want to go back (cave analogy)?  Debugging  Need a minor population in the actual world  Death  How can someone create a game in which the loser who dies in the game dies in actuality? Is this mortal? Or is it simply blaming the creator, just as some might ask the same question for God? Some might justify and say that death is a good thing as it brings the soul to Heaven and etc.

Signs of Virtual Reality in this world  People get lost even in semi- virtual worlds, such as getting emotional over a movie, or angry at a game (crazy German kid), getting jumpy at a 3D moviecrazy German kid  There are two types of semi- virtual worlds:  Augmented Reality The sports score on Hockey game (interfaces) Night vision goggles  Augmented Virtuality Objects made digital Selling WoW weapons Second Life apparel

Negative Reactions  Some that are totally opposed to this idea would claim that they want the right to be unhappy. In essence, virtual reality limits freedom or creativity and even God.  We’ll all turn into mindless video-addicted zombies  If one would never see God’s creation, then wouldn’t their belief in God in their case be meaningless?

Rebuttals  Just as cyberspace is getting more open, where one can seek secondary opinions, maybe Virtual Reality would instead fix the problems of biasness that the media or TV (limited to a few in power) that it delivers.  Freedom is limited by physicality as well, for instance: Steven Hawking might have a desire to run a marathon, but limited by his Physical condition. Virtual reality would allow this to be possible, significantly increasing his experiences and thereby his freedom.