4.3 Fitted Effects for Factorial Data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Randomized Complete Block and Repeated Measures (Each Subject Receives Each Treatment) Designs KNNL – Chapters 21,
Advertisements

SPH 247 Statistical Analysis of Laboratory Data 1April 2, 2013SPH 247 Statistical Analysis of Laboratory Data.
1 Chapter 4 Experiments with Blocking Factors The Randomized Complete Block Design Nuisance factor: a design factor that probably has an effect.
Chapter 4 Randomized Blocks, Latin Squares, and Related Designs
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)-the General Linear Model (GLM)
Chapter Fourteen The Two-Way Analysis of Variance.
Correlation and regression
2 Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Peter Shaw RU.
Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs
MAE 552 Heuristic Optimization Instructor: John Eddy Lecture #19 3/8/02 Taguchi’s Orthogonal Arrays.
14-1 Introduction An experiment is a test or series of tests. The design of an experiment plays a major role in the eventual solution of the problem.
BA 555 Practical Business Analysis
Statistics for Business and Economics
1 Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs Basic Definitions and Principles Study the effects of two or more factors. Factorial designs Crossed:
Chapter 10 - Part 1 Factorial Experiments.
k r Factorial Designs with Replications r replications of 2 k Experiments –2 k r observations. –Allows estimation of experimental errors Model:
Simple Linear Regression Analysis
Ch 2 and 9.1 Relationships Between 2 Variables
Measures of Variability: Range, Variance, and Standard Deviation
Chapter 2 Describing distributions with numbers. Chapter Outline 1. Measuring center: the mean 2. Measuring center: the median 3. Comparing the mean and.
1 14 Design of Experiments with Several Factors 14-1 Introduction 14-2 Factorial Experiments 14-3 Two-Factor Factorial Experiments Statistical analysis.
Advantages of Multivariate Analysis Close resemblance to how the researcher thinks. Close resemblance to how the researcher thinks. Easy visualisation.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Discrete Random Variables Chapter 4.
Jeopardy Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy.
Design of Engineering Experiments Part 4 – Introduction to Factorials
© 1998, Geoff Kuenning General 2 k Factorial Designs Used to explain the effects of k factors, each with two alternatives or levels 2 2 factorial designs.
1 The General Factorial Design Two-factor factorial design General case: Factor A – a levels Factor B – b levels … n replicate (n  2) Total observations:
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 15 Multiple Regression n Multiple Regression Model n Least Squares Method n Multiple.
1 Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 6 Solving Normal Equations and Estimating Estimable Model Parameters.
AP STATISTICS LESSON 3 – 3 LEAST – SQUARES REGRESSION.
Two-way ANOVA Introduction to Factorial Designs and their Analysis.
Design of Engineering Experiments Part 5 – The 2k Factorial Design
14-1 Introduction An experiment is a test or series of tests. The design of an experiment plays a major role in the eventual solution of the problem.
Inference for Regression Simple Linear Regression IPS Chapter 10.1 © 2009 W.H. Freeman and Company.
Chapter 5 Residuals, Residual Plots, & Influential points.
STA305 week 51 Two-Factor Fixed Effects Model The model usually used for this design includes effects for both factors A and B. In addition, it includes.
Design Of Experiments With Several Factors
Lecture 9-1 Analysis of Variance
Previous Lecture: Phylogenetics. Analysis of Variance This Lecture Judy Zhong Ph.D.
11/23/2015Slide 1 Using a combination of tables and plots from SPSS plus spreadsheets from Excel, we will show the linkage between correlation and linear.
CPE 619 Two-Factor Full Factorial Design With Replications Aleksandar Milenković The LaCASA Laboratory Electrical and Computer Engineering Department The.
Outliers and influential data points. No outliers?
Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication KNNL – Chapter 19.
Statistical Analysis of Data. What is a Statistic???? Population Sample Parameter: value that describes a population Statistic: a value that describes.
Section 9.3 Measures of Regression and Prediction Intervals.
Designs for Experiments with More Than One Factor When the experimenter is interested in the effect of multiple factors on a response a factorial design.
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Experimental Design and Analysis of Variance Chapter 11.
1 Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture #10 Testing the Statistical Significance of Factor Effects.
Engineering Statistics Design of Engineering Experiments.
CHAPTER 3 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) PART 3 = TWO-WAY ANOVA WITH REPLICATION (FACTORIAL EXPERIMENT)
Exploratory Data Analysis
Notes 13.2 Measures of Center & Spread
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Two-Way Analysis of Variance Chapter 11.
CHAPTER 1 Exploring Data
Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs
What if. . . You were asked to determine if psychology and sociology majors have significantly different class attendance (i.e., the number of days a person.
CHAPTER 29: Multiple Regression*
Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication
residual = observed y – predicted y residual = y - ŷ
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication
Two Factor ANOVA with 1 Unit per Treatment
Unit 4 Vocabulary.
Two Factor ANOVA with 1 Unit per Treatment
One-Way Analysis of Variance
Replicated Binary Designs
Section 6.2 Prediction.
ENM 310 Design of Experiments and Regression Analysis Chapter 3
14 Design of Experiments with Several Factors CHAPTER OUTLINE
Presentation transcript:

4.3 Fitted Effects for Factorial Data

4.3.1 Fitted Effects for 2-Factor Studies Factor A → I levels Factor B → J levels   Equal replication, n replicates, in each treatment group. → Balanced design.

8. Bauer, Dirks, Palkovic, and Wittmer fired tennis balls out of a “Polish cannon” inclined at an angle of 45 degree, using three different Propellants and two different Charge Sizes of propellant. They observed the distances traveled in the air by the tennis balls. Their data are given in the accompanying table. (Five trials were made for each Propellant/Charge Size combination and the values given are in feet.)

Problem 8: A = charge size with I = 2 levels of 2.5 ml and 5.0 ml B = propellant with J = 3 levels of lighter fluid, gasoline and carburetor fluid Propellant Lighter Carburetor Fluid Gasoline Fluid 58 50 76 79 90 86 2.5 53 49 84 73 79 82 Charge 59 71 86 size 5.0 65 59 96 101 107 102 61 68 94 91 91 95 67 87 97

First, plot the data! As always the first step is to plot the data. Checking for -Effects of factors Main effects Interactions -Outliers -Changes in variances   If we have only 2 factors this is relatively easy.

Notations

From the plot, Propellant ordered by travelled distance are “Carburetor fluid is better than gasoline, which in turn is better than lighter fluid” “Charge size of 5 ml is better than charge size of 2.5 ml.” The distance pattern across propellant types is similar for charge size of 5ml and charge size of 2.5ml.

Fitted Effected We use the idea of fitted effects to quantify the qualitative summaries from the plot. For factorial data, the effects of factors are described as Main effect Interaction effect

Interaction effect Interactions check the extent to which main effects are consistent at different levels of the other factor. Are the propellant effects the same for each charge? Are the charge effects the same at each propellant?

The interaction between factor A and B is denoted AB or A*B. The corresponding effect sizes for interactions are abij, analogous to ai and bj. abij measures the extent to which from a fit with parallel lines. To fit parallel lines, the fitted values depend only on main effects, no interaction terms. For parallel profiles

Fitting parallel lines: Fitted value for a=1 and b=1, charge 2.5 and propellant lighter fluid 78.53 – 6.87 – 19.63 = 52.03 Compared to the overall average, we lose 6.87 feet using charge 2.5 19.63 feet using lighter fluid

The deviation of =53.8 from the parallel lines, no interaction fit is ab11 = 53.8 – 52.03 = 1.77 Using charge 1 and propellant 1 went 1.77 feet farther than expected than predicted with a no interaction model.

Interaction Effects The fitted interactions in some sense measure how much pattern the combination means carry that is not explainable in terms of the factors A and B acting separately.

Now, the overall mean, the fitted main effects, and the fitted interactions provide a decomposition or breakdown of the combination sample means into interpretable pieces. Those pieces correspond to an overall effect, the effects of factors acting separately, and the effects of factors acting jointly.

, as before, is the fraction reduction in sum of squared errors using the model fitted values compared to using a single mean to predict all y values