Navigating the Complexity of Life Science Compliance: A QAD Regulatory Primer Pete Schaubach October 10, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Compliance From The Ground Up September 18, 2013 Earlene Gibbons Director, Operational Technology.
Advertisements

Radiopharmaceutical Production
The New GMP Annex 11 and Chapter 4 Deadline for coming into operation: 30 June 2011.
1 RSCS Program Introduction Feb, 2006 UL Greater China RSCS Team.
What is ERP?  A software solution that streamlines and automation all business processes of a organization or a firm.  Main objective is to facilitate.
Serialization, Item Attributes & Quality Control Hank Canitz – Sr. Director Industry Solutions, QAD Marketing QAD Midwest User Group.
Audit of IT Systems SARQA / DKG Scandinavian Conference, October 2002, Copenhagen Sue Gregory.
GMP Document and Record Retention
Maura Kinahan, PhD MPSI “Medicines Shortages - Industry Perspective” 2013 INTERNATIONAL SUMMIT ON MEDICINES SHORTAGE Toronto 20 th -21 st June 2013.
Regulatory Compliant Performance Improvement for Pharmaceutical Plants AIChE New Jersey Section 01/13/2004 Murugan Govindasamy Pfizer Inc.
TALOS Total ATM Life-cycle operational Solution. The Cost equation Life cycle costs are high Life cycle costs are complex Life cycle costs involve all.
QAD On Demand Operational Delivery Kory D. Johnson QAD Explore 2012.
Chapter © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Chapter © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
On Demand (AMS) Services Vijay T/October 2011 OD (AMS) Services Overview.
Managing the Information Technology Resource Jerry N. Luftman
Saba Confidential 1 Next Generation HCDM April 16, 2003 E-Learning Brazil Conference Magna Session Bobby Yazdani President and COO.
The Effective Enterprise: QAD Technology and Foundation Tony Winter, QAD.
| Building the Effective Enterprise Benefits of Automating Quality Management Systems in Life Sciences Dave Medina Vice President – Life Sciences QAD,
Product Lifecycle Management: Meeting the Needs of Collaboration
Navigating the Complexity of Life Science Compliance
QAD Quality Management Systems Roll Out November 17, 2014.
Industry Trends and Tools for Generic Product Selection KATE KUHRT SHANGHAI JUNE 19-21, 2007.
Session 6: Data Integrity and Inspection of e-Clinical Computerized Systems May 15, 2011 | Beijing, China Kim Nitahara Principal Consultant and CEO META.
Gordon Fleming EVP & Chief Marketing Officer Life Sciences Update.
Pharmaceutical Regulatory and Compliance Congress and Best Practices Forum 21 CFR Part 11 Considerations November 14, 2002.
Computer Systems & Software
BRC Global Standards. Trust in Quality. Exploring the Standard BRC Global Standard for Packaging and Packaging Materials.
QAD SUPPORT TOOLS & EDUCATION Presented to the QAD California User Group Greg Weinert March 9, 2009.
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
MethodGXP The Solution for the Confusion.
QAD's Customer Engagement Dan Blake Consultancy Development Director, QAD QAD Explore 2012.
The Evergreen, Background, Methodology and IT Service Management Model
Easy On Boarding Carol Cvitkovich Director, Global Resource Model.
QAD On Demand – An Overview Charlie Eggerding VP On Demand, QAD QAD Explore 2012.
Introduction to ISO New and modified requirements.
Safety Driven Performance Conference 2013 The future of managing asset-intensive businesses John Keefe APM/RBMI Technical Manager Asset Integrity Services.
ENVIROTRAC: A Premier Chamber Monitoring and Data Acquisition System Envirotrac A Guided Tour.
© 2006 Avaya Inc. All rights reserved. Avaya Services Michael Dundon Business Development Manager.
Compliance in the Supply Chain – Implications of SOX on UK Businesses Dr. Jean-Anne Stewart.
1 Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application By: Richard J. Stec Jr., Ph.D. February 7, 2007.
SCSC 311 Information Systems: hardware and software.
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
InstantGMP: Electronic Batch Records System for GMP Manufacturing InstantGMP™ Inventory Control Module for GMP Manufacturing.
MD Digital Government Summit, June 26, Maryland Project Management Oversight & System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Robert Krauss MD Digital Government.
Our Customers JF Floor Experience Jonathan Dolp Ray Crews.
ECM in SaaS mode to maximize information sharing in a globalized world Business case: bwin.
PwC 21 CFR Part 11 – A Risk Management Perspective Patrick D. Roche 07 March 2003, Washington D.C.
QAD Manufacturing Solution Enhancements for 2012 March 12, 2012 QAD Midwest User Group Meeting.
Intelligent Supply Chain Management Strategic Supply Chain Management
The Second Annual Medical Device Regulatory, Reimbursement and Compliance Congress Presented by J. Glenn George Thursday, March 29, 2007 Day II – Track.
QAD Customer Support Helping to maximize your QAD Investment.
DATA MANAGEMENT AND IT IN BA/BE STUDIES DR. SHIVPRAKASH MANAGING DIRECTOR SYNCHRON RESEARCH SERVICES PVT. LTD., INDIA.
EU GMP Guide Annex 11 “Computerised Systems” Edwin Lindsey Understudy: Neil Fraser.
Introduction to Carilex Medical. Overview  Manufacturer and designer of OEM and Carilex-branded wound care products o Specializing in therapeutic support.
CLOUD-BASED VIDS A CIO’S PERSPECTIVE Stephen Alford, CIO WEP, Inc.
References: Supply Chain Saves the World. Boston, MA: AMR Research (2006); Designing and Managing the Supply Chain – Concepts, Strategies and Case Studies;
How Sage ERP X3 Systems Can Benefit Businesses.  Sage X3 is an affordable and flexible ERP solution designed to help mid-sized companies manage business.
The target: Regulated industries
Introduction for the Implementation of Software Configuration Management I thought I knew it all !
Implementation Challenges & Solutions
GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE FOR BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING (ERT 425)
Smarter, safer Pharmaceuticals
EOB Methodology Overview
Nancy McCrimmon – 32 Soft Inc.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Overview June 10, 2006.
FDA Regulated Special Interest Group
Computer System Validation
Radiopharmaceutical Production
Presentation transcript:

Navigating the Complexity of Life Science Compliance: A QAD Regulatory Primer Pete Schaubach October 10, 2011

2 Pete Schaubach Business Development Director, Life Sciences Previously… -CIO, AGA Medical -CIO, ev3 -Business Systems Integration Director, Medtronic -Information Services Director, SCIMED/BSC -… Introduction

3 Integrating regulatory compliance into your systems and processes while maintaining business flexibility is a challenge for every Life Sciences company. What can we do about this? Subject

4 Overview of business challenges My experiences at ev3 How QAD can help Interaction welcome! Agenda

5 External -Margin pressures from competitors and customers -Increased regulatory pressure on all aspects of product lifecycle Internal -Cost management/efficiency -Information Technology management Business Challenges

Key Issues -Increased competition -Healthcare reform -Customer consolidations -Group Purchasing Organizations -Revenue exposure in chargebacks & fees -Higher raw material & supply chain cost Margin Pressures External challenges 6

7 cGMP - current Good Manufacturing Practice Track & Trace Electronic records management - European Commission Annex 11 - US-FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Increased regulatory pressure External challenges

Key Issues -Regulations governing drug or device safety -Monitoring of adverse events -Managing global supply chain and supplier quality Greater Focus on Quality and Safety External challenges 8

9 Regulatory Agencies cGMP External challenges Poland Japan China USA Canada Mexico Europe Australia

10 Organization and personnel Buildings and facilities Equipment acquisition and maintenance Control of components & products Production and process controls Packaging & Labeling Identification and traceability Holding and distribution Records & Reports Returns and Complaints cGMP External challenges

11 US FDA Regulations -Finished Pharmaceuticals (human and animal products): 21 CFR 210 and 21 CFR CFR CFR 211 -Biological products: 21 CFR CFR 600 -Blood and blood-derived products: 21 CFR CFR 606 -Medical devices (“Quality System Regulation”): 21 CFR CFR 820 -Dietary supplements (published by FDA in June 2007): 21 CFR CFR 111 cGMP External challenges

FDA Quality System Requirements External challenges 12

Annex 11 This annex applies to all forms of computerised systems used as part of a GMP regulated activities. A computerised system is a set of software and hardware components which together fulfill certain functionalities. The application should be validated; IT infrastructure should be qualified. – Commission Europeenne Deadline June 30, 2011 Electronic Records Management External challenges

21 CFR Part 11 All production and/or quality system software, should have documented requirements that fully define its intended use, and information against which testing results and other evidence can be compared, to show that the software is validated for its intended use – United States Food & Drug Administration Electronic Records Management External challenges

15 Contents -Electronic system as replacement of Paper -Security -Data Transfer -Audit Trails -Electronic Signatures -Computer System Validation -Training -Supporting Procedural Infrastructure 21 CFR Part 11 External challenges

Key Issues -Increased product and compliance costs -Product commercialization Global expansion Operating in emerging markets Meeting revenue & growth targets -Continued focus on Lean principles -Increased leverage of shared services Cost management/efficiency Internal challenges 16

Key Issues -Reliability -Scalability -Cost predictability -Flexibility -Upgrade barriers Customizations Resources Time Information Technology Management Internal challenges 17

18 So what can we do to overcome these challenges?

19 Build a $1B global medical device company from scratch -Focus on three markets Cardiovascular (heart) Neurovascular (brain) Peripheral (legs) -Acquire and integrate quickly -Establish direct operations in global markets -Leverage centralized management and services ev3 My story

20 We chose QAD for core reasons -Reputation based on BSC and Medtronic experiences -Support for regulatory requirements -Solid supply chain functionality -Ease of implementation Selection criteria ev3

21 One source of the truth -Single instance -Standard processes -Strong data governance -Easy access to information Strong alignment between business and IT -Core process focus -Ability to execute -Flexibility Key strategies ev3

22 Leveraged strong QAD capabilities -Compliance module controls -Forward and backward traceability -EAM for CFR Part 820 and ISO Part 11/SOX change control requirements -Simple risk-based assessment with every request -Compliance requirements in every project plan Standard SDLC/change management -Standard process  continuous improvement -Reduced risk/fear of change Compliance ev3 strategies

23 Operate at the pace of business Steady delivery of high-value improvements Project duration: 3 days, 3 weeks, 3 months -3 Days: Single function affected Report modification -3 Weeks: Single organization Kaizen event opportunity, process change -3 Months: Multi-organization New process, acquisition integration Flexibility ev3 strategies

24 Europe implemented in 2 months -EU distribution center, 7 sales offices US implemented in 2 months -US distribution, sales & manufacturing Subsequent rollouts -Japan distribution and sales office -Multiple manufacturing sites in US and EU $40MM to >$440MM in six years From 40 to 800 users today Results ev3

25 Leverage QAD compliance capabilities Take advantage of on-demand Use the Validation toolkit Leverage QAD Reporting Framework and BI What if I had to do it again?

26 cGMP Compliance What if… Organization and personnel Process Maps Buildings and facilities EAM Equipment Acquisition and Maintenance EAM Control of component & products QAD EA Production and process controls QAD EA Complia nce PCC Packaging and labeling QAD EA Holding and distribution QAD EA WMS Records and reports QAD EA Returns and complaints SSM E- Controls WMS

27 Avoid multiple data center expenditures Avoid redundant support personnel Leverage resources and expertise for qualified environments and upgrades Provide remote site application support -Europe -Asia Leverage Hybrid environment for emerging markets On Demand What if…

28 Global Coverage On Demand Services United Kingdom Brierley Hill Belgium Antwerp Italy Milan The Netherlands Schiphol Rijk Japan Tokyo Thailand Bangkok China Shanghai India Mumbai South Africa Durban Spain Barcelona Brazil Sao Paulo Mexico Mexico City United States California Australia Sydney Poland Wroclaw United States Illinois United States New Jersey United States Georgia United States Utah QAD Support and Data Centers = Local Presence, Global Reach

29 On Premise vs. On Demand On Premise Your Data Center Typ. ~95% Availability Your Support Hours Some Languages Your Upgrade Cycle Backup? Disaster Recovery? Dedicated Personnel? On Demand SAS 70 Secure Data Center >99.5% Availability 24 x 7 Multi-Language Support Always Current Version Constant Database Admin Usage Analysis & Reporting Failover & Recovery Site Off Site Backup Guaranteed Capacity 300+ Certified Personnel What if…

30 What if…

Implement Rapid Implementation Best Practices Fixed Fee Transition Environment Migration Transition Management Fixed Fee Transformation Upgrade Application Conversion Best Practice DeliverManage Easy On-Boarding Service Components What if…

32 Proven, best-practice methodology Built-in continuous improvement Pre-defined reports and validation scripts Validation toolkit What if…

Validation Master Plan Installation Qualification Hardware Installation Software Installation Installation Qualification Report QAD Purchase Delivery Installation User Requirements Specification GXP Requirements Design Qualification System Acceptance Data Installation Qualification Execute Performance Qualification Write Performance Qualification Plan Execute Operational Protocols Operational Qualification Plan Configuration Fit to Business Operational Qualification Performance Qualification Installation Qualification Baseline Configuration Document Define Functional Requirements Traceability Matrix Risk Assessment Operational Qualification Protocols Performance Qualification and Stress Test Operational Qualification Protocol Summary Report Disaster Recovery Protocols Validation Report = Deliverables Performance Qualification Protocol Summary Report Data Migration Data Installation Qualification Protocol Summary Report Strategic Validation Methodology What if…

Installation Qualification Protocol (IQ) Operational Qualification Protocol (OQ) -Distribution -Master Files -Manufacturing Performance Qualification Protocol (PQ) Functional Requirements Risk Analysis Traceability Matrix Validation Toolkit includes: What if…

Security Sales Orders Routings Compliance Quality Management Inventory Control Distributed Orders Item-Site Master Records SSM Purchasing Physical Inventory Formulas Product Change Control Processes Work Order Shop Floor Control Product Structures Validation Scripts What if…

36 Leverage QAD Reporting Framework and BI -Minimize the use of forms packages -Easily create alerts and automatic delivery of reports -Avoid long development time of ETL processes and custom BI data marts Reporting What if…

37 Upgrade Convert to a new version Unwind customizations -Convert to new standard functionality -Mitigate complex customizations with ICT Convert to On Demand Validation Problems  Solutions How can we help?

© QAD Inc Q & A Thank you – please complete your survey 38

Life Sciences On Demand Sample Customers On Demand Life Sciences 39 Brazil

Regulatory uncertainty and inconsistency -Serialization (EMEA, China, Turkey, US) Unit level serialization Rx Track & Trace International, Federal, and State rules differ California ePedigree (2015) Federal Buyer & Matherson FDA Serialization (2011) EU -EFPIA (European Pharmaceutical Industry Association) – Plans for Pilot Mass Serialization project -Italy – Bolini, Turkey – Jan 1, Greece – National Registration Number + Sequential Number -Spain – Start to Define Serialization China (2009) Serialization Legislation Business Requirements

41 E-Pedigree Planned Schedule Business Requirements