Social Networks 101 P ROF. J ASON H ARTLINE AND P ROF. N ICOLE I MMORLICA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Social Networks 101 P ROF. J ASON H ARTLINE AND P ROF. N ICOLE I MMORLICA.
Advertisements

Social Networks 101 P ROF. J ASON H ARTLINE AND P ROF. N ICOLE I MMORLICA.
Mixed Strategies.
Nash’s Theorem Theorem (Nash, 1951): Every finite game (finite number of players, finite number of pure strategies) has at least one mixed-strategy Nash.
Price Of Anarchy: Routing
Game Theory Assignment For all of these games, P1 chooses between the columns, and P2 chooses between the rows.
Mixed Strategies CMPT 882 Computational Game Theory Simon Fraser University Spring 2010 Instructor: Oliver Schulte.
COMP 553: Algorithmic Game Theory Fall 2014 Yang Cai Lecture 21.
Probability Three basic types of probability: Probability as counting
Mixed Strategies For Managers
ECO290E: Game Theory Lecture 5 Mixed Strategy Equilibrium.
1 Chapter 4: Minimax Equilibrium in Zero Sum Game SCIT1003 Chapter 4: Minimax Equilibrium in Zero Sum Game Prof. Tsang.
For any player i, a strategy weakly dominates another strategy if (With at least one S -i that gives a strict inequality) strictly dominates if where.
MIT and James Orlin © Game Theory 2-person 0-sum (or constant sum) game theory 2-person game theory (e.g., prisoner’s dilemma)
EC3224 Autumn Lecture #04 Mixed-Strategy Equilibrium
Lectures 7&8 Revisit Elections Now range is left-wing or right-wing politics. Candidate-Voter model Assume even distribution of voters. Voters will vote.
Social Networks 101 P ROF. J ASON H ARTLINE AND P ROF. N ICOLE I MMORLICA.
Algorithms and Economics of Networks Abraham Flaxman and Vahab Mirrokni, Microsoft Research.
Network Theory and Dynamic Systems Game Theory: Mixed Strategies
General-sum games You could still play a minimax strategy in general- sum games –I.e., pretend that the opponent is only trying to hurt you But this is.
Working Some Problems. Telephone Game How about xexed strategies? Let Winnie call with probability p and wait with probability 1-p. For what values of.
Chapter 11 Game Theory and the Tools of Strategic Business Analysis.
An Introduction to Game Theory Part I: Strategic Games
Chapter 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Game Theory.
Social Networks 101 P ROF. J ASON H ARTLINE AND P ROF. N ICOLE I MMORLICA.
EC102: Class 9 Christina Ammon.
1 Duke PhD Summer Camp August 2007 Outline  Motivation  Mutual Consistency: CH Model  Noisy Best-Response: QRE Model  Instant Convergence: EWA Learning.
Intro to Game Theory Revisiting the territory we have covered.
COMP 553: Algorithmic Game Theory Fall 2014 Yang Cai Lecture 20.
An Introduction to Game Theory Part II: Mixed and Correlated Strategies Bernhard Nebel.
Social Networks 101 P ROF. J ASON H ARTLINE AND P ROF. N ICOLE I MMORLICA.
Social Networks 101 P ROF. J ASON H ARTLINE AND P ROF. N ICOLE I MMORLICA.
Yale lectures 3 and 4 review Iterative deletion of dominated strategies. Ex: two players choose positions on political spectrum. Endpoints become repeatedly.
Lecture 1 - Introduction 1.  Introduction to Game Theory  Basic Game Theory Examples  Strategic Games  More Game Theory Examples  Equilibrium  Mixed.
Yale 9&10 Mixed Strategies in Theory and Tennis. Overview As I randomize the strategies, the expected payoff is a weighted average of the pure strategies.
January 20 Lecture Econ 171. The game of matching pennies has A)two pure strategy Nash equilibria B)One pure strategy Nash equilibrium C)One mixed strategy.
Games of pure conflict two person constant sum. Two-person constant sum game Sometimes called zero-sum game. The sum of the players’ payoffs is the same,
1 Computing Nash Equilibrium Presenter: Yishay Mansour.
6.1 Consider a simultaneous game in which player A chooses one of two actions (Up or Down), and B chooses one of two actions (Left or Right). The game.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Bargaining and Negotiation Review.
Introduction to Game Theory and Behavior Networked Life CIS 112 Spring 2009 Prof. Michael Kearns.
Nash Equilibrium - definition A mixed-strategy profile σ * is a Nash equilibrium (NE) if for every player i we have u i (σ * i, σ * -i ) ≥ u i (s i, σ.
Game Theoretic Analysis of Oligopoly lr L R 0000 L R 1 22 The Lane Selection Game Rational Play is indicated by the black arrows.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Bargaining and Negotiation Review.
Inefficiency of equilibria, and potential games Computational game theory Spring 2008 Michal Feldman.
An Intro to Game Theory Avrim Blum 12/07/04.
Minimax strategies, Nash equilibria, correlated equilibria Vincent Conitzer
EC941 - Game Theory Prof. Francesco Squintani Lecture 2 1.
Mechanism Design without Money Lecture 2 1. Let’s start another way… Everyone choose a number between zero and a hundred, and write it on the piece of.
Assoc. Prof. Yeşim Kuştepeli1 GAME THEORY AND APPLICATIONS UNCERTAINTY AND EXPECTED UTILITY.
Games of Strategy (Game Theory) Topic 1 – Part IV.
Game theory & Linear Programming Steve Gu Mar 28, 2008.
Chapter 5 Game Theory and the Tools of Strategic Business Analysis.
Connections between Learning Theory, Game Theory, and Optimization Maria Florina (Nina) Balcan Lecture 14, October 7 th 2010.
Dominance Since Player I is maximizing her security level, she prefers “large” payoffs. If one row is smaller (element- wise) than another,
The Science of Networks 6.1 Today’s topics Game Theory Normal-form games Dominating strategies Nash equilibria Acknowledgements Vincent Conitzer, Michael.
UNCERTAINTY AND EXPECTED UTILITY Prof. Dr. Yeşim Kuştepeli ECO 4413 Game Theory 1.
Mixed Strategies and Repeated Games
Shall we play a game? Game Theory and Computer Science Game Theory /06/05 - Zero-sum games - General-sum games.
Game Theory A tool for modeling strategic interactions.
5.1.Static Games of Incomplete Information
Games of pure conflict two-person constant sum games.
Extensive Form (Dynamic) Games With Perfect Information (Theory)
9.2 Mixed Strategy Games In this section, we look at non-strictly determined games. For these type of games the payoff matrix has no saddle points.
Entry Deterrence Players Two firms, entrant and incumbent Order of play Entrant decides to enter or stay out. If entrant enters, incumbent decides to fight.
Network Formation Games. NFGs model distinct ways in which selfish agents might create and evaluate networks We’ll see two models: Global Connection Game.
Working Some Problems.
Games of pure conflict two person constant sum
Managerial Economics Kyle Anderson
Presentation transcript:

Social Networks 101 P ROF. J ASON H ARTLINE AND P ROF. N ICOLE I MMORLICA

Lecture Fourteen: Mixed Nash Equilibria and fixed points.

( -1, 1 ) HeadsTails Heads Matching pennies ( 1, -1 )( -1, 1 ) ( 1, -1 ) Mr. Row Mrs. Column Q. Is there a Nash equilibrium?

( -1, 1 ) HeadsTails Heads Matching pennies ( 1, -1 )( -1, 1 ) ( 1, -1 ) (heads, heads) (heads, tails) (tails, heads) (tails, tails)

Time for

Mixed strategies Each player picks a strategy randomly. Prob. p Prob. (1-p) Prob. q Prob. (1-q) HeadsTailsHeadsTails

Matching pennies equilibrium Ifplays Heads with prob. q, then if plays Heads, he gets [-q + (1 – q)] plays Tails, he gets [q + -(1 – q)]

Matching pennies equilibrium Mr. Row prefers Heads if (1 – 2q) > (2q – 1) or q ½, he prefers Tails.

Matching pennies equilibrium Mr. Row’s plan of play: q < ½: Play Heads q > ½: Play Tails q = ½: Indifferent ( -1, 1 ) HeadsTails Heads ( 1, -1 )( -1, 1 ) ( 1, -1 ) q (1-q)

Matching pennies equilibrium Similarly, Mrs. Columns’s plan of play: p < ½: Play Tails p > ½: Play Heads p = ½: Indifferent ( -1, 1 ) HeadsTails Heads ( 1, -1 )( -1, 1 ) ( 1, -1 ) p (1-p)

Matching pennies equilibrium Players flip coins to pick their strategies: (p, q) = (½, ½)

Germany-Argentina, WorldCup ‘06

GermanyArgentina Kicker GoalieGoal? Kicker GoalieGoal? Right Left Right Left Right GOAAL Left Right Left Right Left Right Left GOAAL NO!!! GOAAL NO!!!

Penalty kicks ( 0.58, 0.42 ) LeftRight Left ( 0.93, 0.07 )( 0.70, 0.30 ) ( 0.95, 0.05 ) Goalie Kicker

Penalty Kicks Experiment: In your envelope is a card indicating if you are a Kicker or a Goalie. Your payoff will be the average over all of your opponents x 2. ( 0.58, 0.42 ) LeftRight Left ( 0.93, 0.07 )( 0.70, 0.30 ) ( 0.95, 0.05 ) Goalie Kicker

Mixed Nash equilibrium Kickers: kick to the left 39% (61% to the right) Goalies: defend left 42% of the time (defend right 58% of the time)

Rates of play Kickers: kick left 40% Goalies: defend left 42% of the time

Equilibria Last time: Dominant strategy equilibria and pure Nash equilibria don’t always exist. Today, so far: Mixed Nash equilibria exist for matching pennies and penalty kicks. Do mixed Nash equilibria always exist?

John Nash, Ph.D. Thesis, 1950 Mixed NE always exist in finite games. Nobel Prize, 1994 (von Neumann: ``That’s trivial, you know. That’s just a fixed point theorem.’’)

Intuition Procedure (for finding mixed NE): Initially, players have mixed strategies (p, q) Repeatedly, Mr. Row picks a best-response p’ to q Mrs. Column picks a best-response q’ to p Set p = p’, q = q’ f(p,q) = (p’, q’)

Intuition A Nash equilibrium is: a)an input to this procedure such that the players simply stay put, b)the limit of this procedure if it converges (cf. PageRank), c)a fixed-point of the “best-response function” f(p,q)

Intuition Every well-behaved function has a fixed point. NE are fixed pts of the best-response function mapping each strategy profile to a new profile in which every player plays his best-response.

Existence of fixed points Consider a continuous function mapping real numbers between 0 and 1 to themselves. (i.e., f(x) is a number in [0,1]). f(x) line x=y Fixed point As defined, best-response function is not exactly continuous, but we can fix this using the fact that we are looking at mixed strategies. This comes from the fact that we have finitely many players, each of which has finitely many pure strategies.

Existence of fixed points Given function f, draw g(x) = f(x) – x. Note g(x) maps [0,1] to [-1,1]. g(x) = f(x) - x Fixed point g(0) = f(0) – 0 ≥ 0 g(1) = f(1) – 1 ≤ 0

Existence of fixed points Divide x-axis interval into segments. Label endpoint + if g > 0, - if g < 0. g(x) = f(x) - x Function must cross in this segment.

Existence of fixed points For any labeling of the interval in which the left-most point is “+” and the right-most point is “-”, there must be a bi-chromatic segment (i.e., a segment with a “+” on one side and a “-” on the other side) Bi-chromatic segments.

Higher dimensions Puzzle: show there is a tri-chromatic triangle (i.e., a triangle with a red, blue, and green vertex). Color top node blue, left node green, right node red. Nodes on the edges get a color equal to one of the endpoints. Nodes in the middle get an arbitrary color. Enter grey region in a bi- chromatic edge. Continue traversing bi- chromatic edges until you hit tri- chromatic triangle. Number of bi- chromatic edges along a side is odd, so we can always find a new entry.

Time for

Finding mixed NE ( 4, 2 ) LeftRight Down Up ( 3, 3 )( 5, 1 ) ( 0, 6 ) p(1-p) q (1-q)

( 4, 2 ) LeftRight Down Up ( 3, 3 )( 5, 1 ) ( 0, 6 ) p(1-p) q (1-q) will only set 0 < p < 1 if 2q + 3(1-q) = 6q + (1-q)

( 4, 2 ) LeftRight Down Up ( 3, 3 )( 5, 1 ) ( 0, 6 ) p(1-p) q (1-q) will only set 0 < q < 1 if 4p = 3p + 5(1-p) 2q + 3(1-q) = 6q + (1-q)

( 4, 2 ) LeftRight Down Up ( 3, 3 )( 5, 1 ) ( 0, 6 ) p(1-p) q (1-q) 4p = 3p + 5(1-p) 2q + 3(1-q) = 6q + (1-q) (p=5/6,q=1/3) is a mixed NE

Next time Selfish routing and price of anarchy.