Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build. Extensive master planning preceded this phase 2003 – Dagit Saylor Master Plan 2007- Hanbury Evans Update.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CM/CG Contracting Tom Ravn, Mn/DOT Director, Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting.
Advertisements

DESIGN BUILD NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE by Dwight Horne FHWA.
Organization of Primary Entities
Design/Build Solutions to your construction projects, large and small.
Project Delivery Approaches for Wastewater Utilities in Minnesota June 24, 2008 Metropolitan Council Environment Committee.
CMGC Contracting at UDOT Program, Projects & Lessons Learned
P ROJECT M ANAGEMENT The FORE SIGHT Partners. The FORE SIGHT Partners 2 Owner Support Professional Services The FORE SIGHT Partners.
Your Presenters Lisa Dal Gallo Dave Kirn Regional Executive/Justice Market Leader Partner, LEED AP
4 th ANNUAL JOINT CSU/UC PSSOA CONFERENCE March 25-26, 2003 “Emerging Construction Methodologies in CSU – What Public Works Contract Specialists Should.
1. A project delivery method describes the process of how a project will be designed and constructed. A project delivery method can be characterized in.
A Match made in Heaven? Connecting you with a builder.
Utah’s Use of CMGC & Project Delivery
Alternative Project Delivery Mechanisms The J. K. Spruce Experience Katherine Yates Assistant General Counsel.
Alternative Project Delivery
Lunchtime Topics Craig Weise Construction Reform Program Director Lisa Conomy Construction Counsel OSU Office of Legal Affairs.
Getting Certified In Consultant Selection Steps and Processes Diana Foster.
Procurement and Tendering Presentation to [NAME OF CLIENT] [YOUR NAME] [DATE]
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
Facilities Institute July , 2012 Houston, Texas Click to edit Master title style
Delivery of Multiple Small Projects—Now! Task Order Construction Agreements.
ATMES Spring Meeting April 26-27, 2012 Myrtle Beach, South Carolina International Projects.
Legal Perspective on NDOT Alternative Procurements Geoffrey S. Petrov, Nossaman LLP.
Delivery Methods  The Players from Handbook of Architectural Practice, Chapter 9.1 by Phillip Bernstein FAIA  Variables from Handbook of Architectural.
KFUPM, Department of Construction Engineering and Management Summary of AN IMPLEMENTATION MODEL FOR DESIGN-BUILD (D-B) PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEM BY : MOHAMMAD.
Prof Awad S. Hanna C HANGING P ROJECT D ELIVERY S YSTEMS by Awad S. Hanna, Ph. D., P. E. The University of Wisconsin, Madison Department of Civil and Environmental.
Genesis Solar Module Brochure ™
The Importance of the Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) Process
Honoraria for Design Build Projects Methodology Assessment Matrix.
Public Works Contracting Marsha Reilly Office of Program Research House of Representatives recommended.
PM/CAM Training H. Jeff Moore May 11, AGENDA Overview CM at Risk Design (Completion) / Build Lunch Break / Discussion – 11:30 AM – 12:30 PM CM Agency.
This Presentation is a Copyrighted Property of Waller S. Poage, AIA, CSI, MAI, CVS – All Rights are Reserved Session CDT 01 – Fundamentals Lesson CDT 1.3.
Design Build, Job Contracting, or Construction Manager at Risk In early 2000 the legislators added an alternate way to accelerate construction project.
Growing the Value of Your Firm through Supplemental Architectural Services May 2011.
Solving Challenges Others Cannot Virginia’s Public Private Partnership Law Toyo University Tokyo, Japan Christopher D. Lloyd September 29, 2008.
Project Delivery Options in the California Construction Market CSI Fresno Chapter - February 16, 2010 PROJECT DELIVERY OPTIONS in the CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION.
Construction Contracts and Project Delivery Methods
Developing and Issuing the RFP. Why should qualifications be your procurement focus? n Having the necessary range of capabilities is more important than.
Texas Turnpike Authority Division AASHTO Right of Way & Utilities Committee Conference Wednesday – April 22, 2009.
January 31, …a delivery method in which the construction team is known as the design-builder…and is responsible for taking a concept developed by.
The Owner’s Perspective
CE 366 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS Robert G. Batson, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Construction Engineering The University of Alabama
PROJECT PHASES ACT Objective To provide an understanding of the design & construction process and the roles of the different participants in this.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Project Delivery Methods Part I. What is A Project Delivery Method? The owner’s selection of the organizational structure of the project. Three popular.
Contractor Alternate Design Serving the Public’s Best Interest.
You passed the Bond or secured some funds What do we do now? 2014.
Project Delivery Methods CM CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Kevin A. Delorey 11 Feb 2010.
LACCD Building the Future THOMAS HALL Director Facilities Planning and Development.
1 Chapter two ROAD TO DESIGN BUILD. 2 ROAD MAP  THE COST PLUS GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE CONTRACT (GMP)  CM  PM  DB IS THE LATEST STAGE: NEW PERSPECTIVE.
The Design/Build Contract. What Is A Design/Build Contract? Contract that combines design & construction into one agreement The design/build team provides.
Construction Management At Risk Process
Measure N Modernization IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS Planning, Bidding, Construction, and Occupancy.
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AT RISK Prepared by: Nancy Fouad Carey Attorney AGC Alabama Birmingham Section Meeting November 5, 2012.
English for Construction Engineering Management ,建筑工 程专业英语 赖小东 授课教师:赖小东 Cell# 江西财经大学旅游与城市管理学院工程管理系.
PWGSC - KOREA 2nd JCC Meeting Canadian Federal Real Property Construction Contracting Presentation by Bruce Fletcher Director General – CASMS - PWGSC November.
CHANGING PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Introduction to Project Delivery Methods © Copyright 2017 NASBP.
Reconstruction site Investigation, Planning, Scheduling, Estimating and Design Eng. Fahmi Tarazi.
CM at Risk v. Design-Bid-Build
PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS
Enterprise Content Management Owners Representative Contract Approval
Developing and Issuing the RFP
CHANGING PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
FIVE PROJECT PHASES 5C-3 Sun. 8:00-10:00am 21/ 2/2016.
Green Line Extension Project
Design-Build Process Utilizing Negotiated Selection
PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS
CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES LCLS Office Space
CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES LCLS Office Space Procurement
Chapter 2 – Review ‘construction management’
Presentation transcript:

Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build

Extensive master planning preceded this phase 2003 – Dagit Saylor Master Plan Hanbury Evans Update RMA Update Phase I - Kellogg House - was delivered in fall of 2008 Provided 200 beds Phase II is the second phase of a six-phase Project That will ultimately provide over 2,200 beds in over 600,000 sf. Phase II Includes: Building 1 – a 66,000 sf 220 bed dorm Building 2 – a 62,000 sf 200 bed dorm Commons Building – an 8,000 sf assembly space for Student Affairs Alderman Road Residences Phase II Project Background

Definition Design-Build is the process by which a single entity provides both the design and construction through the use of a single contract between the agency and the design-build (D-B) contractor. This system is used to reduce the delivery schedule by overlapping the design phase and construction phase of a project. Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build

Advantages Integrated Approach to Project Delivery Enhanced communication between the service provider and the client Increased accountability by the service provider Single source of responsibility for cost, schedule & quality A value based project feedback system Cost Savings Time Savings Early Knowledge of Costs Maximum Flexibility, Shared Risk Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build

Cautions Without Bridging Documents - Abbreviated Design Process Unclear Definition of Scope Premature Cost Estimating Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build

Design Build Process Evaluate program and develop project budget Efficient, collaborative design environment Design parameters are developed along with budgetary goals, construction methodologies, and budget conditions Owner and design-builder work together to determine which materials and methods will maximize value Continuous cost estimating, constructability, and value analysis to maximize each program dollar Early release bid and construction packages Turn over functional facility that meets program criteria Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build

Pricing Fixed price typical for UVA projects Price break down for Design and Construction typically Industry alternatives include: Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Cost Plus Fee Incentives Awards Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build

Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build Procurement Process – AE Selection Bridging Document A/E Selection Minimum 3 Month Process Office of Architect for the University initiates and authors RFQ and RFP Include option to hire selected A/E for other work and phases in advertisement Selection Criteria typically include qualifications and experience of the project team with similar projects and delivery methods, UVA, and each other

Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build Procurement Process – Bridging Documents Bridging Documents Increased level of project documentation compared to standard DB process Provide a greater assurance of quality Some innovation and value permitted through DB procurement process Presently no definition of BDs in HECOM or Design Guidelines Agreements typically reference Preliminary Design requirements Different UVA constituents expect different degrees of documentation in BDs Fee expectations – no more than 50% of the total AE fee for the project type Early construction document packages (typically 100% Site and Civil) are required to ensure no schedule gaps between DB selection and construction start

Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build Procurement Process – Bridging Documents Bridging Documents, continued Process should include standard practices and procedures: ASBO reviews Value Management BOV Approvals Waterproofing Consulting Mock-up definitions Commissioning and Turnover EIR DCR Approvals

Bridging Documents Designing to Bridging Documents Design intent is more clearly defined Architectural vision is more clearly defined Focus is on completing the working drawings while maximizing the program through constructability and life-cycle cost analysis Designing without Bridging Documents Owner’s program is more conceptual in nature Architectural vision is open to interpretation Focus is on developing, enhancing, and maximizing the program through all stages of development Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build Procurement Process – Bridging Documents

Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build Procurement Process – DB Selection Design Builder Selection Minimum 4 Month Process – initiate during Bridging Document production Facilities Planning and Construction initiates and authors RFQ and RFP Include option to hire selected DB for other work and phases in advertisement Typically use competitive negotiation to contract Selection based on 50% Technical and 50% Price Proposal Technical Selection Criteria include: Qualifications of Proposed Team, Experience of Team on Similar Projects, Project Plan, Value Management Suggestions SWaM plan. Proposers must certify that their base proposal is in full conformance with the Bridging Documents. Value Management proposals are included in the technical proposal and must describe the change from the BD’s and the proposed benefit/value to Uva.

Alderman Road Residences Phase II Project Schedule