Intercarrier Compensation. Nextel calls to BellSouth BellSouth pays to terminate Nextel calls In aggregate, it may cause BellSouth to increase capacity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cost-based and demand- based tariffs The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the ITU or.
Advertisements

Continuing surveillance FCC didnt really rate regulate AT&T during this period; all done through informal negotiations AT&T made voluntary reductions in.
Universal Service Funding An Overview of the Connect America Fund Marsha Spellman, JD Oregon Connections Conference October 25,
Telecommunications Law CLE State Deregulation at the PUC December 2014 Pete Kirchhof Colorado Telecommunications Association.
Telecommunications and Natural Gas Industry. Telecommunications Voice (landline, wireless) Video (cable, satellite) Data (cable, wireless) Convergence.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act Before Telecom Act –Implicit cross subsidies –Based on rate of return approach –ILECs only receivers/IXCs.
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 Rural Telecom Revenues FCC Reform Spring 2012 Presented to ABC Communications.
An analysis of the FCC’s USF and ICC Broadband Reform Proposals.
Basic Telecom Sector Reform Issues: Competition, Tariffs & Interconnection Hank Intven Seminar on ICT Policy Reform and Rural Communication Infrastructure.
Broadband ? Bob Loube NASUCA 2011 Thanksgiving Loube NASUCA
February 19, 2008 How Should We Think About IP-PSTN Interconnection? NARUC Committee on Telecommunications.
Telecommunications Act of 1996 Signed into law, February 8, 1996 “ An Act to promote competition and reduce regulation in order to secure lower prices.
ECO 436 Industry Studies Seminar David G. Loomis Universal Service.
Intercarrier Compensation TC 310 June 3, Basic Concepts Originating Terminating Calling-Party's-Network-Pays (CPNP)‏ Bill-and-Keep Reciprocal Compensation.
Introduction to Local Number Portability: What VoIP Providers Need to Know Wednesday October 14, 2009 Astricon 2009 – Glendale, AZ
3/99©GVNW Consulting Inc. Separations 101 Rural Task Force Meeting March 3, 1999 Bob Schoonmaker.
Interconnection in a Liberalized Network: California’s ISPs View Reciprocal Compensation Yale M. Braunstein School of Information Management & Systems.
Development of the Telecommunications Industry. Early History initial telephone service Alexander Graham Bell.
Telecomm history and regulation MGT 825. Brief History of Telecommunications 1876: Alexander Graham Bell receives patent for the telephone. Bell speaks.
Creative Support Solutions CDG User Group CABS Information.
Unified Intercarrier Compensation – An Old Problem 1980 FCC Tentative Access Plan (pre- divestiture) Found the wide variety of existing access compensation.
Telecommunications The Transition to Competition.
The Public Network Chapter 4 Tamra Dean.
NMECG PRESENTATION TO THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION APRIL 3, 2012 THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION’S ORDERS TO IMPLEMENT REFORM AND.
The Public Network Chapter 4. Objectives In this chapter, you will learn to: Explain, in general terms, the structure of the public telephone network.
Carriers Carriers carry traffic for a fee Must have rights of way to lay wire Given some monopoly protection Regulated but being deregulated.
1 The Rural Alliance January 25, – A Critical Year 2006 will be a critical year for the RLEC industry Multiple events with significant impact.
TA 96 on pricing Prices for interconnection and for UNEs to be based on cost, to be nondiscriminatory, and may include a reasonable profit –Cost to be.
Opening Markets and Keeping Them Open: A Contract and Antitrust Model Ray Gifford, Chairman Colorado Public Utilities Commission.
ITS 302 Purposes of the course –Review the history of US telecommunications as a case study –Examine the basics of regulation, especially as they apply.
Communication & Information Technology Telecommunications Policy.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act Before Telecom Act –Implicit cross subsidies –Based on rate of return approach –ILECs only receivers/IXCs.
The Public Network Chapter 4. Objectives In this chapter, you will learn to: Explain, in general terms, the structure of the public telephone network.
Transforming Education Through Information Technologies Casey Lide Focus on IP Telephony February 26,1999 Focus.
Some questions to consider Do we need regulation? Does history matter? Why is one-stop shopping important? Why didn’t the U.S. Telecom Act of 1996 work?
Telecommunications Act of 1996 Signed into law, February 8, 1996 “ An Act to promote competition and reduce regulation in order to secure lower prices.
Missoula Plan Plan reflects themes that always seem to appear – Different treatment for different ILECs by size and by type of regulation (price cap versus.
Access Charges The major questions –What services did IXC’s require in order to provide their interLATA toll and private line services? –What to do about.
Proposal for Reforming the Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service Systems CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005.
Comptel/ASCENT February 17, Tom Sugrue Vice President Government Affairs T-Mobile.
1 Managing the Transition to IP-Based Public Phone Networks in the United States Joe Gillan CRNI November 22, 2013 Gillan Associates.
Local Loop Unbundling PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 6 th JUNE 2007.
McGraw-Hill©2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Chapter 8 Telephone and Cable TV Networks: Residential Connection to the Internet.
Implications of VoIP TC 310 May 28, Questions from Reviews Duty to Interconnect Reciprocal compensation Line of business v statutory line of business.
COMT 2201 Regulation This Material may be found in: Cole, Chapter 1. Also in: Datapro Reports on Communications Networking Services, Report #3002, A History.
Summary and State Implications FCC Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking CenturyLink February 28, 2012.
1 Intercarrier Compensation May 27, 2004 Glenn Brown
Cost Recovery Mechanisms MATI Tribal Telecommunications Conference June 7-9, 2004 Presented by Doug Kitch & Vince Wiemer Alexicon, Inc.
K-20 Co-pay and ISP Basics Valid for Fiscal Years 2010 & 2011 (July 1, 2009 – June 30, 2011)
The Regulation of Network Industries Simon Wilkie. Caltech Lecture for May 7, 2004.
Intercarrier Compensation: Rate of Return Carrier Impacts Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission – Workshop February 28, 2012 Jeff Dupree NECA.
Competitive Universal Service TC 310 June 5, 2008.
Per-Minute Access Charges Per-Minute Access Charges to long distance companies Rates for 1996 through 1998 from Telecommunications Industry Revenue: 1998,
Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 10: Universal Service Copyright © 2007.
Industry Overview AT&T and the Bell System Post Divestiture Factors in the Emergence of Competition to the Bells The Vision of the Telecommunications Act.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Prof. Karl Manheim Spring, : Interconnection Copyright © 2007.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. Intercarrier Compensation.
Interconnection and Access Presentation by Dale N. Hatfield Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission June 6, 2000.
Stephen Sweet Director, Business Development. Where are we now?
Development of the Telecommunications Industry
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act
Monopolies and Anti-Trust Regulation
Telecommunications Act of 1996
Lecture 5: TELEPHONE NETWORK
Reciprocal Compensation
CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005
Lecture 5: TELEPHONE NETWORK.
Wireline Post 1996 TC 310 May 20, 2008.
Lecture 3: TELEPHONE NETWORK.
Telecom History.
Presentation transcript:

Intercarrier Compensation

Nextel calls to BellSouth BellSouth pays to terminate Nextel calls In aggregate, it may cause BellSouth to increase capacity

2 Theoretical Pricing Schemes Bill and Keep Calling Network Pays

Crazy Patchwork of Intercarrier Compensation Schemes Long Distance Access Charges ILEC to CLEC reciprocal compensation for local interconnection

Price Discrimination Selling the same product to different customers for a different price Must be able to prevent arbitrage

LD Arbitrage If local interconnection price is less than LD access charge, there is an incentive to use arbitrage and terminate LD traffic as local. Worldcom/MCI, July 2003 accused of doing this.

ISP Reciprocal Compensation With "high" terminating rate for local calls, CLECs have an incentive to connect users with large terminating traffic like ISPs. Popular in late 90’s; 2001 FCC exempted inbound ISP traffic from reciprocal compensation

Intercarrier Compensation and VoIP IP-to-IP – no charges PSTN-to-PSTN – regular access charges IP-to-PSTN ILECS say access charges VoIP providers say reciprocal compensation

Other VoIP Complications Virtual FX arrangement – VoIP subscriber gets telephone number that “acts” as a local number Verizon lawsuit against Vonage

Wireless Interconnection Should wireless companies get terminating access charges? 1996 FCC suggested that they should nothing is done 2002 no tariffs only contracts; FCC gave no guidance on contracts; left in limbo again What charges for “transiting” or bridging a wireless carrier and other carrier?

Access Charges after Divestiture (1984) How do Long Distance Companies pay for Local Network after divestiture?

Types of Local Costs NTS (non-traffic-sensitive) costs largest category of costs subscriber lines, station equipment, inside wiring, and parts of the central office TS (Traffic Sensitive) Costs Local switching,trunking, tandem switching

1980 Access Charge Plan – Pure I NTS (non-traffic-sensitive) costs would be distributed on the basis of minutes of use. This plan is called Pure I - all NTS recovered through TS rates.

1982 Access Charge Plan – Pure II Argued that it was inefficient to recover NTS costs through TS rates. Pure II recovered NTS costs through fixed charge per subscriber. "Every customer would pay a flat (per line) access charge that did not vary with use, plus usage based interstate charges that reflected only usage sensitive facilities.”

1982 Plan cont’d Commission adopted Pure II as a long-run goal but had a long transition period and many special provisions. NTS costs for 1984 were $8.5 billion for 100 million lines or $85 per line. Plan had first year phase in of $4 per line for business and $2 per line for res. This became known as a SLC charge or subscriber line charge. Initial business rate changed in 1983 to $6 per line.

FCC changes plan. SLC delayed until June 1, 1985 and capped at $4 until OCCs were given a 55% discount and gradually phased out as equal access became available.

Initial Switched Access Charge Massive in size 43,000 pages of tariffs, 160,000 pages of support material. Price was based on RR/Q. Usually based on historical data - none existed.

CCL Rate declined 5.24 cents per minute (1984) 1 cent per minute originating and 1.53 cents per minute terminating (1990) Total TS & CCL on both ends went from 17.3 cents in 1984 to 7.8 cents in 1990.

Access Reform History after the Telecom Act of 1996

Unbundling of network under Telecom Act of 1996 Pricing for unbundling is based on T[E]LRIC. Total element long-run incremental cost. Forward-looking cost standard that looks at the incremental or additional cost that that element imposes on the network. FCC is modifying the TSLRIC methodology to include joint and common costs and a normal return on profit. Subject of much criticism.

Access Charge Reform Decision Effective 1/1/98 SLC charges - Res. - Primary Lines capped at $3.50; secondary lines $5.00 Single line bus. $3.50 Multiline bus /line/mo (avg now is $6,92/line/mo)

Access Charge Reform Effective 1/1/98 PICC - Presubscribed Interexchange Carrier Charge flat rate per line charge to IXCs to keep SLC low and lower CCL in 1998, max. PICC is $0.53/line/mo for res and single line bus. Non-primary res. PICC is $1.50/line/mo Multiline bus. Is $2.75 1/1/99 increase by $1.50

PICC increase 7/1/99 Max PICC raised to $1.04/line/mo for res. And single line business Non-primary res. PICC is $2.53/line/mo Lowered switched access charge (CCL rate)

Changes effective 2/1/00 Eliminates residential and single line business PICC Reduces over time the PICC for multiline business until it is eliminated in most areas

SLC Increases Increases SLC charge of residential and single line business 7/1/2000 $4.35 7/1/2001 $5.00 7/1/2002 $6.00 7/1/2003 $6.50

Removes Implicit Subsidies $650 million in implicit universal service support from access charges replaces it with an explicit, portable universal service fund charge ensures affordable phone service for high- cost areas.

Need for Unified Solution and Terminating Access monopoly Antiregulatory solution: Freedom to deny interconnection Highly regulatory solution: Cost-based calling network pays with no implicit subsidies Moderately regulatory solution: Bill and Keep