Professor Pamela Andanda, School of Law, University of the Witwatersrand and Visiting Fellow, WTI, University of Bern

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ARIPOs Initiative on Traditional knowledge and Access and Benefit Sharing. By F.K MPANJU Patent Examiner (ARIPO) Cape Town 19 th –24 th Nov
Advertisements

WIPO Roundtable on IP & Traditional Knowledge Geneva, November 1-2, 1999 Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A Global IP Issue Presenter: Richard Owens,
Documentation and Digitization of Intangible Cultural Heritage: the Experience of WIPO International Conference on Intellectual Property and Cultural Heritage.
WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON OMANI TRADITIONAL VALUES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD Muscat, February 13 and 14, 2005 International Legal Framework for the Protection.
Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC) Intellectual Property and Clean Technology in the context of the European Legal Framework Marisa Aranda.
THE DIVERSITY OF INTERESTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE A CHALLENGE FOR THE RULE OF LAW By Professor D E Fisher.
MULTI-STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF IP FOR TECHNOLOGICAL CAPACITYBUILDING & THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION SUPPORT CENTERS IN THE.
IP System and Economic Development: Empirical Evidence from China Qi Su IP Institute, Tong Ji University Dec 04, TongJi Global Intellectual Property.
Interface between patent and sui generis systems of protection of plant varieties The 1978 UPOV Act does not allow both systems to be applied to the same.
Convention on Biological Diversity, Traditional Knowledge and the TRIPS Agreement Yovana Reyes Tagle University of Helsinki.
Folklore, Traditional Knowledge and Benefit Sharing ATRIP CONGRESS 2003 Tokyo August 4-6, 2003.
Developing National Legislation based on the Pacific Model Law 2002 “Empowering Local Communities: Protection of Indigenous Rights” Knowledge Economy Fostering.
(16 th -17 th November, 2006) Breakaway Session Traditional Knowledge Protection and IPR Issues Mr. V K Gupta Director, NISCAIR, New Delhi & Shri Verghese.
Avenues for protecting and preserving TK within IPRs Professor Pamela Andanda, School of Law, University of the Witwatersrand and Visiting Fellow, WTI,
Access, Ownership and Copyright Issues in Preserving and Managing Cultural Heritage Resources International Conference on Challenges in Preserving and.
Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge, Genetic Resources and Traditional Cultural Expressions: Overview of Issues, Options and Recent International.
Intellectual Property Strategies For Development: Issues and Challenges WIPO Second Annual Conference on South-South Cooperation on Intellectual Property.
How to operationalize the disclosure requirement at the national level in a manner supportive to the TRIPS Agreement and the CBD? Dr. N.S. Gopalakrishnan,
Exception to rules on free trade Need to strike a balance between free trade and other values. Member can justify measures incompatible with WTO Agreements.
Intellectual Property and Cultural Heritage at the crossroads of law, technology and business: a view from WIPO INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL.
WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development United Nations.
THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN PROTECTING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE The Philippine Experience Presented by: Marga C. Domingo-Morales Senior Policy.
1 IFFRO INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON “KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY FOSTERING CREATIVE INDUSTRIES” AUCKLAND, 3 NOV 2006 Traditional Knowledge – Values of Traditional Cultural.
Ole Kr. Fauchald Introduction to biodiversity n What is ”biodiversity”? ä Distinguish between levels of biodiversity ä Development of biodiversity.
Breakaway Session Traditional Knowledge Protection and IPR Issues (17 th November, 2006) Mr. V K Gupta Director, NISCAIR, New Delhi International Conclave.
The WIPO Development Agenda: An Overview Geneva May, 2009 Esteban Burrone World Intellectual Property Organization.
IPR-INSIGHTS CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 1116 BUDAPEST, KONDORFA U. 10. TEL.: (+36-1) FAX: (+36-1)
* 07/16/96 Current Situation of Traditional Knowledge and its protection under Intellectual Property Contexts in Cambodia (Report of Cambodia) Penn Sovicheat.
16 Intellectual Property © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved.
Cross-border Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Expressions Pedro A. De Miguel Asensio – UCM AIPPI 2011 Hyderabad.
IP LAW AND ADMINISTRATION IN TANZANIA Presented by: Leonila Kishebuka Deputy Registrar, Business Registrations and Licensing Agency [BRELA],
SUCCESSFUL TECHNOLOGY LICENSING (STL) Key Terms of a Licensing Agreement Cluster I an II : Subject Matter and Scope ________________ INAPI – WIPO Santiago.
ZIMBABWE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES CONSORTIUM (ZULC) OPEN ACCESS AND CREATING A KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY CONFERENCE 24 – 26 April 2006 Crowne Plaza Monomotapa, Zimbabwe.
Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation KT Training – 9 September 2014 Introduction to Intellectual Property Rights D. Mazur – 9 September 2014.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE Professor Bernard Martin.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
Access to Genetic Resources & Traditional Knowledge The Bellagio compulsory cross-licensing proposal for benefit sharing consistent with more competition.
4.1 Chapter 4 Copyrights © 2003 by West Legal Studies in Business/A Division of Thomson Learning.
Protection of Traditional Knowledge -The Indian Perspective A presentation by Desh Deepak Verma, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt.
1 Traditional Knowledge and Genetic Resources in Economic Partnership Agreements: Elements of a Positive Agenda for ECOWAS Countries ECOWAS Regional Dialogue.
UNCTAD/CD-TFT 1 IP Provisions in Bilateral & Regional Trade Agreements and Public Health ICTSD/QUNO Dinner Discussion on IPRs in Bilateral & Regional Trade.
The Basics of Intellectual Property Law Understanding IP by A. David Spevack, Office of Naval Research.
UNCTAD-Government of India Seminar New Delhi, April 3-5, 2002 Traditional Knowledge Vijaya Kumar Sri Lanka.
Olivier Rukundo. Copyright provisions Article 6 A work, except a broadcast, programme-carrying signal or a traditional work, shall not be eligible for.
1 WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE PROTECTION OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS Damascus, April 25 and 26, 2005 Effective Protection.
Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Session 7: IPRs II: How Intellectual Property Rights Can Affect the Daily.
Strategic Dialogue on Coherence Between Multilateral, Regional and Bilateral Processes on Intellectual Property and a pro-Development Agenda on IPRs 20.
Session 9: Cross-Cutting Issues. Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources  To describe the key cross-cutting.
Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Objectives of Day Four 1.To discuss and understand how intellectual property.
© 2004 The IPR-Helpdesk is a project of the European Commission DG Enterprise, co-financed within the fifth framework programme of the European Community.
Intellectual Property Law Introduction Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
4.1 Chapter 4 Copyrights © 2003 by West Legal Studies in Business/A Division of Thomson Learning.
International Protection of Traditional Wisdom on Bio-diversity and Sacred Landscapes Lyndel V. Prott and Patrick.J. O’Keefe.
Introduction to Copyright & Related Rights Lucinda Jones WIPO-INSME International Training Program on Intellectual Property and Management of Innovation.
1 Protection of Traditional Knowledges (TKs) – Sui Generis Ann Marie Chischilly Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals Northern Arizona University.
Copyright, Intellectual Property, and Privacy 1 Lesson Plan: BMM A9-4.
Protecting Innovation
CIPC Presentation to the
Intellectual Property Rights: A Part of the Problem?
Intro to Intellectual Property 3.0
Exception to rules on free trade
World Heritage List Procedure for inscription
IP Protection under the WTO
Dai Davis, Solicitor and Chartered Engineer
Faculty of Law Cultural Human Rights Prof. Dr. Yvonne Donders.
Legal challenges facing franchising in Kenya
Christoph Spennemann, Legal Expert
Case and statute analysis
Introduction to IP, TK and TCEs
COPYRIGHT & IPR IN DIGITAL AGE- ISSUES & CONCERNS FOR LIBRARIES
Presentation transcript:

Professor Pamela Andanda, School of Law, University of the Witwatersrand and Visiting Fellow, WTI, University of Bern Striking a balance between progressive appropriation of TK through IPRs, Cultural Preservation and Access to Knowledge

overview 3. Means that are currently used in attempting to strike a balance between IP protection, cultural preservation and access to knowledge. 4. Conclusions: are the means capable of striking the balance? 2. Issues that are involved in attempting to strike a balance a) Can the progressive means of appropriating TK through IPRs adequately protect the interests of the communities that hold TK? b) Main shortcomings of the formal IP system in preserving TK and fostering access to Knowledge. 1. Introduction a) What lies at the cross-roads between IP protection, cultural preservation and access to knowledge? b) Progressive appropriation of Traditional Knowledge (TK) through IPRs and its impact on cultural preservation and access to knowledge

1.a) What lies at the cross-roads? The dichotomy between the product that is protected by IPRs and the knowledge from which the product is derived. The ‘cross-cultural problem’: ‘the IP needs of TK holders are shaped by their contact with the formal IP systems on the one hand and informal IP regimes that prevail in their societies and communities on the other…’ -See WIPO (2001) Intellectual Property Needs and Expectations of Traditional Knowledge Holders: WIPO Report on Fact-Finding Missions on Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge ( ), p.57.

b)Progressive appropriation of TK) through IPRs and its impact on cultural preservation and access to knowledge IP protection does not necessarily guarantee the preservation or safeguarding of TK The inaccessibility of the formal IP system for TK holders: ‘This system is based on document- intensive, codified and governmentally administered structures and procedures.’ - See WIPO (2001), p.57.

2.Issues that are involved in attempting to strike a balance a)Main shortcomings of the formal IP system in preserving TK and fostering access to knowledge b)Can the progressive means of appropriating Traditional Knowledge (TK) through IPRs adequately protect the interests of the communities that hold TK?

a)Main shortcomings of the formal IP system (See Dutfield G, 2004, pp ) CopyrightPatentsTrademarks, GIs, plant varieties protection, utility models 1.‘notion of authorship is a problematic concept in many traditional societies’. 2.has time limit, ‘whereas folkloric expressions that are important elements of people’s cultural identity’ would require permanent protection. 3.requires works to be fixed whereas folkloric expressions are not fixed but passed on orally from generation to generation. 4.‘Qualified person’ requirement is practically inconvenient to ‘collective groups’ 1.the requirement of naming an inventor can be an obstacle for TK applicants. 2. prohibitive costs for acquiring and enforcing rights against infringement 3.Duration and restricted time for protection TK holders may find the requisite formalities difficult to comply with

b)Challenges i. IP protection does not necessarily guarantee the preservation or safeguarding of TK and access to knowledge. ii.IPRs regime is too narrow; communities desire to protect their entire culture not isolated manifestations. iii.Communities want some control over the use of knowledge that originates from their culture while formal IP as a rule (except trade secrets) doesn’t allow such control -for ii and iii, see Biber-Klemm S, ‘Origin and allocation of Traditional Knowledge and landraces’ in Biber- Klemm S & Cottier T (eds) Rights to plant genetic resources and traditional knowledge: basic issues and perspectives, Wallingford: CABI, 2005 pp.159ff

Challenges (cont). iv. Access to knowledge issues: a)Difficulty in gaining access to knowledge in public domain & enormity of public domain make it complex to find prior art that is relevant to patent applications -Curci 2007 thesis, p.339 b)Differing interpretations of the scope of the ‘public domain’ in relation to TK -See Correa CM ‘Access to knowledge: The case of indigenous and traditional knowledge’ in Krikorian G & Kapczynski A (eds) Access to knowledge in the age of intellectual property, Zone Books, New York, 2010, p.241

3.Means that are currently used in attempting to strike a balance between IP protection, cultural preservation and access to knowledge Defensive and positive protection of TK through IPRs Elimination of erroneously granted patents Establishment of databases to disseminate information related to TK Circumscribing exclusive rights for a limited period & imposing exceptions and limitations. Contract-based systems

4.Conclusions; are the means capable of striking the balance? There is currently no balance There are gaps within these means How can the gaps be covered and with what means? Note: More discussions on these will come under panel 3

Thank you!!