Pre-Doctorals (F31) and post-doctoral (F32) fellowships Individual Fellowships Individual Pre-doctoral Kirschstein - NRSA Fellowships to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research (F31) Individual Pre-doctoral Kirschstein - NRSA Fellowships (F31) Individual Pre-doctoral Kirschstein - National Research Service Awards For M.D./PH.D. Fellowships (F30) Individual Post-doctoral Kirschstein - NRSA Fellowships (F32) Individual Senior Kirschstein - NRSA Fellowships (F33) Dr. Silvia Moreno Dept Cell Biology UGA

Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards for Individual Predoctoral Fellowships (F31) to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research Announcement (PA) Number: PA Key Dates Release Date: February 16, 2010 Application Receipt Date(s): April 13, August 13, December 13 Peer Review Date(s): June-July, October-November, February-March Earliest Anticipated Start Date(s): December, April, July Expiration Date: January 8, 2011/will be re-issued

INSTITUTES PARTICIPATING National Cancer Institute (NCI), ( National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), ( National Eye Institute (NEI), ( National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), ( National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), ( National Institute on Aging (NIA), ( National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), ( /) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), ( National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), ( National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), ( Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), ( National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), ( National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), ( National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), ( National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), ( National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), ( National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), ( National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), ( National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), ( National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), ( National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), ( National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), (

The primary objective of this funding opportunity announcement is to help ensure that diverse pools of highly trained scientists will be available in appropriate research areas to carry out the Nation’s biomedical, behavioral, health services, or clinical research agenda. To improve the diversity of the health-related research workforce by supporting the training of predoctoral students from groups that have been shown to be underrepresented. OBJECTIVE OF THE DIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP

ELIGIBILITY Applicants must identify a sponsor (an co-sponsor). The applicant + sponsor(s) plan, direct and execute the proposed project. Applicant must be citizens or non-citizen nationals of the United States, or permanent residents. Individuals on temporary or student visas are not eligible. Applicants must have a baccalaureate degree and must be enrolled in a Ph.D. or equivalent program, a formally combined M.D./Ph.D. program, or another combined professional doctoral/research Ph.D. graduate program in the biomedical, behavioral, health services, or clinical sciences. Applicants must also show evidence of both high academic performance in the sciences and substantial interest in areas of high priority to the participating Institutes. Applicant should belong to one of these groups: A) An individual from racial and ethnic groups underrepresented in health-related sciences on a national basis; B) An individual with disabilities, who are defined as those with a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; (C) An individual from disadvantaged backgrounds:

1.A family with an annual income below established low-income thresholds. These thresholds are published by the U.S. Bureau of the Census. The institution must be able to demonstrate that such candidates have qualified for Federal disadvantaged assistance or they have received any of the following student loans: Health Professions Student Loans (HPSL), Loans for Disadvantaged Student Program, or they have received scholarships from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the Scholarship for Individuals with Exceptional Financial Need. 2. Individuals who come from a social, cultural, or educational environment such as that found in certain rural or inner-city environments that have demonstrably and recently directly inhibited the individual from obtaining the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to develop and participate in a research career. Disadvantaged backgrounds

Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards for Individual Predoctoral Fellows (F31) Announcement (PA) Number: PA Notice Number: NOT-OD Release Date: February 16, 2010 Application Receipt Date(s): April 8, August 8, December 8 Peer Review Date(s): June-July, October-November, February-March Earliest Anticipated Start Date(s): December, April, July Expiration Date: January 8, 2011/Will be re-issued before April 8 Forms: PHS (Revised 10/2005) Participating Organizations National Institute on Aging (NIA), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS),

The primary objective of this funding opportunity announcement is to help ensure that highly trained scientists will be available in adequate numbers and in appropriate research areas to carry out the Nation’s biomedical, behavioral, and clinical research agenda. The participating Institutes of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) provide individual pre-doctoral research training fellowship awards to promising doctoral candidates who have the potential to become productive, independent investigators in research fields relevant to the missions of these participating NIH Institutes and Centers. OBJECTIVE

ELIGIBILITY Applicants must identify a sponsor (an co-sponsor). The applicant + sponsor(s) plan, direct and execute the proposed project. Applicant must be citizens or non-citizen nationals of the United States, or permanent residents. Individuals on temporary or student visas are not eligible. Applicants must have a baccalaureate degree and must be enrolled in a Ph.D. or equivalent program, a formally combined M.D./Ph.D. program, or another combined professional doctoral/research Ph.D. graduate program in the biomedical, behavioral, health services, or clinical sciences. Applicants must be at the dissertation research stage of their doctoral training. Applicants must also show evidence of both high academic performance in the sciences and substantial interest in areas of high priority to the participating Institutes. Students seeking support for pursuit of a combined degree program may also be eligible to apply for the Kirschstein-NRSA for Individual Predoctoral M.D./Ph.D. Fellows (F30) (PA ).

All applications received for submission dates in January 2010 and thereafter must use only the new forms and instructions. Submission is electronic. APPLICATION Table Components of an NIH Application

Create a heading at the top of the first page titled “Section II--Sponsor and Co-Sponsor Information.” a. Research Support Available All current and pending research and research training support specifically available to the applicant for this particular training experience. b. Sponsor's/Co-Sponsor’s Previous Fellows/Trainees Give the total number of predoctoral and postdoctoral individuals previously sponsored. Select five and provide their present employing organizations and position titles or occupations. Include this information for any co-sponsor as well. c. Training Plan, Environment, Research Facilities Describe the research training plan developed specifically for the applicant. Include classes, seminars, and interaction with other groups and scientists. Describe research environment, facilities and equipment. Relationship of the proposed research training to the applicant's career goals. Describe the skills and techniques that the applicant will learn. d. Number of Fellows/Trainees to be Supervised During the Fellowship Indicate whether pre- or postdoctoral. Include this information for any co-sponsor as well. e. Applicant's Qualifications and Potential for a Research Career Describe how the applicant is suited for this research training opportunity based on his/her academic record and research experience level, including how the research training plan, and your own expertise will assist in his/her training. 2. Sponsor and any Co-Sponsor(s) (if any) Information (Limit to 6 pages)

PEER REVIEW: SPONSOR’s/CoSponsor’s ADVISOR: Biosketch as usual. Sponsor R01’s bios are used FUNDING is critical. If there is no funding, the proposal will not be funded. If the advisor is a young Assistant professor, it is wise to pick up a co-advisor. This could be someone more senior who shows strong funding record and will be able to support the research in case there is no funding from the advisor. Publication record is important. If an advisor does not publish for 4-5 years, you are in trouble. The committee will feel that you are not going to be very productive and this is not good for your training. The advisor and the co-advisor’s research interests have to match with your proposed research. IN ADDITION and very IMPORTANT: how does the advisor interact with the student. Meetings one-to-one, journal clubs, classes recommended, lab meetings, other people in the lab.

B. Additional Attachments 1. Collaborators and Dissertation Advisor(s), if applicable 2. Certification Letter for Predoctoral Fellowships (F31) to Promote Diversity Applications submitted for Individual Predoctoral Fellowships (F31) to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research are required to attach a Certification Letter (titled: Diversity_Eligibility_Ltr) from the institution certifying eligibility of the Fellowship applicant for the program. The Certification Letter must be on institutional letterhead and scanned so that an institutional official signature is visible.

Significance Is the problem important? How does your project will improve scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practive in one or more broad fields. How does your project will change the field if the proposed aims are achieved. Approach Describe the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses to be used to accomplish the specific aims of the project. Discuss potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success anticipated to achieve the aims. If the project is in the early stages of development, describe any strategy to establish feasibility, and address the management of any high risk aspects of the proposed work. Point out any procedures, situations, or materials that may be hazardous to personnel and precautions to be exercised. A full discussion on the use of Select Agents should be indicated. Include any courses that you plan to take to support the research training experience. RESEARCH PROJECT

PEER REVIEW: RESEARCH PROPOSAL It has to be interesting Feasible, likely to succeed and contain training components Good Science: hypothesis-driven if possible. There are three reviewers and one always likes to see hypothesis driven research Significance: Strong interest for the future of the field. DO NOT CUT AND PASTE FROM THE ADVISOR’S R01! Make it easy to read! Do not use lots of acronyms! Explain the figures in the text. Separate the preliminary results from the Research Design and Methods Discuss this with the advisor because if there are serious mistakes or miss-conceptions, then the reviewers will think that there is no good communication between you and the advisor.

17: Respective contributions Describe the collaborative process between you and your sponsor/co-sponsor in the development, review, and editing of this research training plan. Discuss the respective roles in accomplishing the proposed research. Limited to one page.

Describe the rationale/justification for the selection of the sponsor and institution. 1.Explain why the sponsor, co-sponsor (if any), and institution were selected to accomplish the research training goals. If the proposed research training is to take place at a site other than the sponsoring organization, provide an explanation here. 2. Foreign Institution. The foreign institution and sponsor offer special opportunities for training that are not currently available in the United States. Key factors in the selection of a foreign institution should be described. If applicable, the need for and level of proficiency in reading, speaking, and comprehending the foreign language should be addressed. 18. Selection of Sponsor and Institution

APPLICANT 7. Goals for Fellowship Training and Career The fellowship applicant must describe his/her overall career goals, and explain how the proposed research training will enable the attainment of these goals. Identify the skills, theories, conceptual approaches, etc. to be learned or enhanced during the award.

Describe by year the activities (research, coursework, etc.) he/she will be involved during the proposed award and estimate the percentage of time to be devoted to each activity, based on a normal working day for a full-time fellow as defined by the sponsoring institution. The percentage should total 100 for each year. Predoctoral fellowships (F31), including fellowship applicants for the M.D./Ph.D. (F30) program may reflect up to six years if allowed by the applicable funding opportunity announcement. Limited to one page. 8. Activities Planned Under This Award

REFERENCE LETTERS PLUS OTHER INFORMATION At least three reference letters using the PHS Reference Page must be included with the application. Must be from individuals other than the sponsor and any co-sponsor(s). A description of plans to receive instruction in the responsible conduct of research must be included in the application. No award will be issued if an application lacks this component. Applicants must also provide scores for the Graduate Record Examination (GRE), if available. MD/PhD applicants should provide MCAT scores, if available. A listing of the applicant’s courses with grades from all undergraduate and graduate institutions in which the applicant is/has been enrolled must be included in the Applicant/Fellow Biographical Sketch Format Page.

Advisors’s statement: it should show that there is real interaction between him/her and the student. He/she should be aware up to the last detail of your project. Please make sure there are no contradictions! Reference Letters: No letter from the advisor! These are rotation professors, people who really know you and can talk about your performance in the laboratory bench. It is not critical that professors discuss your class performance. Good letters (mostly 1s and 2s and very few 3s) overcome low grades and GREs but the reverse does not happen. These and the advisor’s statement are very critical to determine student’s preparation for graduate school. PEER REVIEW: APPLICANT

Applicant goals: Important but not so critical. Need to show your commitment toward research in your area of research. It helps to include a sentence saying that you have an interest in becoming a role-model for your ethnic group. PEER REVIEW: APPLICANT

REFERENCE LETTERS

SCORES 10-25: The committee really liked you and the advisor and the proposal. Fundable. It depends on the Institute 25-35: Not likable fundable but the reviewers liked it and they expect you to re-submit and respond to the critique and they will lower their score : There are some concerns and you need to address them in depth if you want the reviewers to go down in their score the second time 40-50: there is something important that they did not like. Read the critique very carefully to find out what it is and address that. They might not have liked the advisor although they liked you and in that case you are in trouble. You can try to find a co-advisor and some students even change advisors 50-90: poorly written and presented proposal. Needs to be re-written from the beginning to the end. This is a warning sign: you might want to see if your proposed research is actually feasible or if you are in the right place to do what you want to do.

IMPORTANT RECOMMENDATIONS Advisor should read the proposal carefully. Look for contradictions. Budget: specify the number of months that you are requesting and make sure they fit with the number of years that you have been in the program. The proposed research should be feasible in the amount of time requested. Animals and humans: the same as an R01.

National Institutes of Health

APPLYING Sponsor Good publication record Research support available (> 1 year). If not, look for co-sponsor Previous experience in training. If not, look for co-sponsor Not many student to advise Training Program Detailed training plan (graduate program description, meetings with sponsor, lab meetings, seminars, other activities) Proposal Complete proposal, written by the student Applicant Excellent academic records: grades, GRE, MCAT. If not, justify. Statement Good reference letters