Summary of SILS Grading Practices April 28, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHAT YOU NEED TO DO AS AN UNDERGRADUATE TO GET INTO GRADUATE SCHOOL So you want to go to grad school, huh?
Advertisements

UNIVERSITIES FY 2015 Spring 2014 State Share of Instruction.
Alex Waldie Early College High School Liaison
NCAA Eligibility Center.  NCAA Eligibility Center Responsibilities.  Academic Initial-Eligibility Requirements.  Amateurism (Sports Participation).
Your Path to the Student-Athlete Experience NCAA Eligibility Center Expires September 1, 2014.
UMCP Study on Defaults A Study of Ten Year Default Rates of Undergraduate Students Who Borrowed Any Loan in /6/2012UMD Office of Student Financial.
Tuition Revenue Working Group Meeting #1 November 17, 2009.
Redesign of PSYC 1101 into a 50% Online (Hybrid) Course Sue Spaulding, UNC Charlotte Pearson Education March 9, 2012 Boston Office.
Pass Rates in Paired and Unpaired Courses Fall 1998 Office of Institutional Research LaGuardia Community College.
Illinois CEE Student Survey Results Dr. Julia Melkers, Associate Professor School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia Summary.
University Council Teresa Branch and Kent McGowan April 19, 2011.
Illinois State University transfer student overview Spring Advisor Day 2010.
Number of undergraduate openings offered in 1999, and number of undergraduates called in the same year. Proportion of brazilians enrolled in undergraduate.
Undergraduate Persistence and Graduation Rates Bernadette Gray-Little Faculty Council September 15, 2006.
Allocations for Temporary FTE and Teaching Assistants: How Do They Work? Presentation to ABA Tuesday, January 12, 2010 Kathy Farrelly Director, Budget.
AS /AA Restrict Repeat Enrollment in Classes.
Welcome to the Computer Science Masters Program. Classified Status Undergraduate prerequisite courses complete Undergraduate prerequisite courses complete.
What do these have in common? Looking over a fellow student ’ s shoulder during an exam Telling a police officer your speedometer is broken Omitting some.
Monitoring Student Outcomes in California Partnership Academies David Stern Graduate School of Education University of California, Berkeley College & Career.
Online community-building techniques contributed to student success in a face-to-face large-enrollment rigorous undergraduate course Cara H. Cario, Ph.D.
Foundation Program for International Student Success BCCIE Summer Seminar 2015.
CS507 Fundamentals of Research Fall About the Course - Topics Graduate School How to read a research paper Planning and conducting research Writing.
Goal 2025: To increase the proportion of Americans with high-quality degrees and credentials to 60 percent by the year 2025.
 UTeach replication site  Initiated in 2010  Seven degree tracks  Distinguished by BSEngineering:STEM Ed  78 majors  Mission: To increase the number.
LPC Student Demographics and Outcomes Data Prepared by the LPC Office of Institutional Research and Planning December 2009 Dr. Amber Machamer.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Program Collaboration and Transfer Update
Online Course Evaluations Is there a perfect time? Presenters: Cassandra Jones, Ph.D., Director of Assessment Michael Anuszkiewicz, Research Associate.
University Forum April 3, Percent of Undergraduate Instruction Taught by Tenured/Tenure-Earning Faculty Weighted Average excludes NMU T/TEF.
Faculty Assistant Coordinator ROB NICHOLS AUGUST 14, 2015 AB
Faculty Center CIT Conference at.illinoisstate.edu/training.
College Preparatory Course Certification Pilot May 5th,
Graduating Class. College- UNC Unweighted GPA of 2.6 or higher 2 credits in the same world language College Unweighted GPA of 2.6 or higher.
Retention: Some Recurring Themes n Impact of small groups on freshmen retention n Does declaring a major make a difference in retention? n Do GPA ranges.
THECB 7/2007 Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Glenda Barron and Joe Stafford October 5, 2007.
St. George Campus Residence Demand Analysis: Forecast 2020 (UPDATE) Planning and Budget Office July 30, 2014.
Presentation to Enrollment Management Council Mary Beth Myers January 29, 2010.
GRADUATE & UNDERGRADUATE ENROLMENT UPDATE Senate November 16, 2015 Data Prepared by Institutional Analysis & Planning.
The Student Athlete Experience.  Answer the following Questions: ◦ What should I be doing now? ◦ What are the eligibility requirements?  NCAA, NAIA,
Ph.D., in Applied Science with Major in Systems Engineering 2001 Vs Prepared by: Gerard Ibarra.
President’s Special Commission to Improve Graduation Rates Retention & Graduation Presentation to PAC 1.
Transition to Kean (T 2 K): A Comprehensive Program to Assist Students in Transition Presented by Terry Y. Fung, Ph.D. Director of General Education and.
 TSI for HCC Dual Credit is June 3.  HCC paperwork was April 15.
HLC Academy on Student Persistence and Completion – A Presentation on Statistical Analyses of Illinois Tech Data May 24, 2016 Illinois Institute of Technology.
C R E S S T / U C L A UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies Center for the Study of Evaluation National Center for Research on Evaluation,
The Process The Results The Repository of Assessment Documents (ROAD) Project Sample Characteristics (“All” refers to all students enrolled in ENGL 1551)
Repeat Policies Office of the University Registrar December, 2011.
Instruction, Assessment, and Student Outcomes in Online Learning Environments Eric Riedel Rebecca Jobe Jim Lenio Kimberlee Bethany Bonura 2016 AALHE Annual.
Progress report on Performance Indicators
RISING 9TH GRADE REGISTRATION PREVIEW 2017 – 2018 Registration
Psychology Minor Tutorial
Probation Workshop Counseling Division
The Grading Process Office of the Registrar WELCOME!
Total Academic Cost Financial Affairs Tuition and Fee Committee
UOIT – Masters of Education
UOIT – Master of Education
Academic Probation Flow Chart
Probation Workshop Counseling Division
Annual Report on Faculty to MCEF
Relational Schemas Classroom (building, room-number, capacity) Department (dept-name, building, budget) Course (course-id, title, dept-name, credits) Instructor.
Dr. Michael Schrlau Graduate Director Associate Professor
Internship for Credit Process
Your Path to the Student-Athlete Experience
University of Minnesota Athletic Compliance
Career and College Ready Graduates NC Legislation
Undergraduate Retention
Academic Paper Writing I
Topic Scotland and the impact of the Great
Norman Public Schools Athletic Department
a key to unlocking your future potential
NCAA Eligibility Center Academic requirements
Presentation transcript:

Summary of SILS Grading Practices April 28, 2010

Basis for analysis “ Regular ” SILS courses ▫ Excludes courses with enrollment under 6 ( grad or undergrad ) ▫ Excludes independent studies, master ’ s papers, and dissertations / theses Courses offered during Fall 2008 and Spring 2009 Averages / percentages weighted by number of students in class

Grading of undergraduate courses Overall GPA = 3.38 (3.3 = B +) Fall 2008 data include : ▫ 12 courses, taught by 12 different instructors Spring 2009 data include : ▫ 13 courses, taught by 13 different instructors 7 courses were included in both the analyses of undergraduate and graduate grades

Analysis of UG GPA by course level

Analysis of UG GPA by type of instructor

Analysis of UG GPA for required courses

Comparison with other schools/depts at UNC

Conclusions: UG grading No big differences by course level No big differences by type of instructor No big differences by whether the course is required SILS is relatively high, compared to others at UNC Individual extremes ▫ 11 of 25 courses had average GPA over 3.5 (9 instructors ) ▫ 4 of 25 courses had average GPA over 3.7 (4 instructors )

Grading of graduate courses In F 08, 49% H ’ s ; in S 09, 52% H ’ s Fall 2008 data include : ▫ 47 courses taught by 37 different instructors Spring 2009 data include : ▫ 47 courses, taught by 37 different instructors 7 courses were included in both the analyses of undergraduate and graduate grades

Analysis of graduate grades by course level

Analysis of graduate grades by type of instructor

Analysis of graduate grades by requirement level

Conclusions: Graduate grading A slightly higher proportion of H ’ s is assigned in 400- level courses (461, 490) No big differences by type of instructor No big differences by whether course is required Individual extremes ▫ 47 of 94 courses with 50% or more H ’ s (36 instructors ) ▫ 30 of 94 courses with 67% or more H ’ s (25 instructors ) ▫ 6 of 94 courses with 95% or more H ’ s (6 instructors )

Discussion Are these grading practices acceptable ? If not, what action should be taken by whom ?