Director, Investigator Support & Integration Services, OCTRI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Susan Burner Bankowski, M.S., J.D. Chair, OHSU IRB
Advertisements

Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Safety Reporting IN Clinical Trials
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING
What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one? Presented by Office of Human Research Protection.
Protocol Deviations : Identification, Responses and Solutions The Office of Human Subjects Research’s Compliance Monitoring Program Educational Seminars:
Unanticipated Problems Involving Risk to Subjects or Others (UPIRSO) Roy R. Estrada, PhD, PA-C, CIP Associate Director IRB UTHSCSA.
Adverse Event Reporting. Reporting Adverse Events Adverse Events (AEs) are “... any untoward medical occurrence in a subject that was not previously identified.
Reporting Unanticipated Problems Involving Risk to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events WFUHS Policy/Procedure Effective Date 6/1/07 Wendy Murray Monitoring.
Update: 21 CFR PART 312 FDA Safety Reporting Requirements for INDs
Capturing and Reporting Adverse Events in Clinical Research
Fulfilling the Promise of Medicine Together New FDA Safety Reporting Requirements 2010 John McLane, Ph.D. COO & Vice President Clinical and Regulatory.
IRB-Investigator/ Research Coordinator Mtg. “CUMC’s New Progressive Policy For Adverse Event Reporting” April 13, 2004 George Gasparis Andrew Wit, Ph.D.
Human Research Protection Program Training: Post-Approval Event Reporting March 26, 2008 Lisa Voss, MPH, CIP Assistant Director, QIU Human Research Protection.
Vanderbilt Human Research Protections Program
Defining Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRSO)
Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) Trial Adverse Event Reporting Catherine Dillon.
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING Elizabeth Dayag IRB Administrator Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.
Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
1.02 Advanced Compliance Strategies for Academic Medical Centers Kenneth L. Dretchen and Shelia Zimmet Georgetown University Medical Center.
Paula Peyrani, MD Division of Infectious Diseases University of Louisville Performing the Study.
1 Nuts and Bolts of Safety Reporting The Role of the CRO Dr. Noa Lowenton Spier Pharma-Clinical S.A.G.
Using the short form and reporting adverse events Erin Coons, Senior IRB Specialist, COMIRB 1.
Reporting Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events: A Change in Policy Mary A. Banks RN, BS, BSN Director, BUMC IRB Wednesday, November 14, 2007.
Unanticipated Problems Potentially Involving Risks to Subjects or Others Research Protections Office Serving UVM and FAHC Updated April 2012.
New Adverse Event Reporting Policy Effective September 1, 2007.
Office of Research Oversight ORO Reporting Adverse Events in Research to ORO Paula Squire Waterman, MS, CIP Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research.
H. Lundbeck A/S21-Sep-151 Pharmacovigilance during clinical development SAE reporting, ASUR and PSUR IFF Seminar, 21. February 2007.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
EMORY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD VERSION Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations and Non-Compliance.
Adverse Event/Unanticipated Problems Policy and Procedures November 2007.
AE/SAE/EAE Identification and Reporting AE/SAE/EAE Identification and Reporting.
Office of Research Oversight 1 VHA Handbook Research Compliance Reporting Requirements Revised May 21, 2010 (Presentation prepared for HRPP 101,
Planning for Data and Safety Monitoring: Developing Your Study-specific DSMP OCR/GCRC Clinical Research Seminar November 15 th, 2006 Mary-Tara Roth, RN,
THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH Data and Safety Monitoring Monitoring.
Understanding Unanticipated Problems (UPs) Elizabeth Ness, RN, MS Director, Staff Development Office of the Clinical Director Center for Cancer Research,
EAE Training EAE Reporting and Assessment Overview DAIDS Regional Training Event, Regulatory Compliance Center Kampala, Uganda, September 2009 DAIDS Regional.
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
EAE Training PROTOCOL ­ SPECIFIC Objectives  Definitions  Assessment of Adverse Events  EAE Reporting.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
Office of Research Oversight 1 Office of Research and Development Local Accountability Meeting January 2009.
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, and Protocol Deviations Kathleen O’Malley RN, BSN, CCRP Manager of Education and Training Jefferson Clinical Research.
Serious Adverse Event Reporting Start-up Meeting March 25, 2010 Kingston, ON.
Role of Site Investigator Ensure subject safety is protected & well-managed Full compliance with requirements of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Conduct the.
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY IRB ADAPTED FROM DHHS GUIDANCE ON UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS Unanticipated Problems.
Main Line Hospitals Institutional Review Board Unanticipated Problems Anne Marie Hobson, BSN, JD, ORA Director Theresa Greaves, ORA Manager.
Bussara Sukpanichnant, Human Subject Protection Office, USAMD-AFRIMS Unanticipated Problems 15 th FERCAP International Conference 24 Nov 15 Nagasaki, Japan.
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
Dartmouth Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Data Safety Monitoring and Reporting requirements Brown Bag Series: Noon / First Tuesday of the Month.
Reportable Events Emory IRB 9/11/2014.
FHIR Adverse Event Resource
Assessing expectedness of an adverse event
What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one?
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
Safety Reporting Nichol McBee, MPH, CCRP.
Remote Monitoring of Adverse Events
Pharmacovigilance in clinical trials
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Navigating Non-Compliance
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Reportable Events & Revised Common Rule
Human Gene Therapy Institutional Review Procedures
Ramy Abdelrahman, MD Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health (DPMH)
Dr Tim England TICH-2 SAE adjudicator
Event Reporting in Human Subjects Research
Serious Adverse Event Reconciliation
Presentation transcript:

Director, Investigator Support & Integration Services, OCTRI Expedited Reporting Darlene Kitterman, MBA Director, Investigator Support & Integration Services, OCTRI January 26, 2011

Journal of Clinical Research Best Practices Vol. 7, No. 1, January 2011 “Can You Handle the Truth?” Mayne Cartoon Research Laboratories FCA inspected and approved More cartoons from Mayne Cartoon Research Laboratories are at http://www.researchcartoons.com

Adverse Experience Any untoward or undesirable, although not necessarily unexpected, event experienced by a human subject that may be a result of: The interventions and interactions used in the research The collection of identifiable private information in the research An underlying disease, disorder, or condition of the subject ; and/or Other circumstances unrelated to the research or any underlying disease, disorder, or condition of the subject Change in the subject’s status from baseline Other equivalent references: Adverse Event AE Toxicity

Grading AE Severity Disease Specific Toxicity Criteria Example: Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) NCI, cancer specific Severity scale per adverse experience term General severity scale Protocol specific grading scales

General Severity Scale Example Grade 1 (mild): Experience resolved without intervention Grade 2 (moderate): Experience required treatment, but didn’t affect activities or lifestyle Grade 3 (severe): Experience required treatment and affected activities or lifestyle Grade 4 (life-threatening): Subject was at immediate risk of death (21CFR312.32) Grade 5 (fatal): Experience caused subject’s death

AE Causality/ Relationship Sponsor example causality categories (sponsor/study dependent) Definite: clearly related Probable: likely related Possible: may be related Unlikely: doubtfully related Unrelated: clearly not related OHSU IRB causality categories Not related: Caused by subject’s underlying condition Caused by conditions unrelated to research or underlying condition Possibly related Related

Agencies Requiring Expedited Safety Reports Applicable NIH institute: If funded by NIH FDA: If conducted under an IND or IDE Drug/device not approved for human use or Seeking to market for new use If involves recombinant DNA, infectious agents or “special agents”: NIH Office of Biotechnology Activities (OBA) Recombinant Advisory Committee (RAC) If international study: International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) requirements

OHSU Units Requiring Expedited Safety Reporting OHSU Compliance Committees OHSU Institutional Review Board (IRB): All research involving humans conducted by OHSU faculty If involves recombinant DNA, infectious agents or “special agents”: OHSU Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) If involves cancer: Knight Cancer Institute Data and Safety Monitoring Committee If conducted in CTRC: OCTRI Compliance Manager OHSU Patient Safety Net: If occurs in OHSU Healthsystem facility VA IRB: If involves humans and VA resources

Safety Reporting Definitions Serious adverse experience (21CFR312.32) Any adverse experience occurring at any dose that results in any of the following outcomes: death life-threatening adverse experience in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect

Safety Reporting Definitions (cont.) Serious adverse experience (cont.) Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization, may be considered a serious adverse drug experience when, based upon appropriate medical judgement: they may jeopardize the patient or subject, and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition.

Safety Reporting Definitions (cont.) Unexpected adverse experience (21CFR312.32) Any adverse experience, the specificity or severity of which is not consistent with the current investigator brochure, or If an investigator brochure is not required or available, the specificity or severity of which is not consistent with the risk information described in the general investigational plan or elsewhere in the current application, as amended

NIH Expedited Reporting Requirements for reporting vary by institute

NIH Expedited Reporting (cont.) For NIH clinical trials Expedited reporting requirements outlined in a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan (DSMP) created by the investigator and submitted to the NIH Multicenter and high risk clinical trials require a Data & Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) For more information: http://www.ohsu.edu/ra/irb/dsmp/index.shtml

FDA Expedited Safety Reporting Required reports (21CRF312.32): Reported to the FDA by the sponsor no later than 15 calendar days after the sponsor’s initial receipt of the information Serious and; Associated with the use of the investigational agent and; Unexpected Reported to the FDA by telephone or fax no later than 7 calendar days after the sponsor’s receipt of the information Fatal or life-threatening events and; Report on Medwatch form Report to FDA responsibility of sponsor (= holder of IND/IDE)

Additional Issues With FDA Expedited Reporting If the study is sponsored by a company, often want all serious events reported to them, regardless of expectedness or association with study article Want to assure not underreporting May be international study (ICH requires all serious experiences to be reported) Follow the protocol

OHSU IRB Safety Monitoring/Reporting Initial review: Submit monitoring provisions All greater than minimal risk research Indicate appropriate monitoring entity: Review AEs and determine if reportable Investigator monitor Small number of subjects Only one site Low risk Independent monitor No anticipated serious events Involves moderate risk intervention Short term treatments Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB)/Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) Large numbers of subjects High risk interventions Multiple sites Blinded and/or controlled trials Plan format NIH clinical trial: Submit DSMP required by NIH Knight Cancer Institute: Submit Knight DSMP (from website) Other: Complete IRB DSMP template form

OHSU IRB Safety Monitoring/Reporting(cont.) Ongoing reporting Report all Unanticipated Problems (UPs), as determined by the monitoring entity, to the IRB Not expected and Place subjects or others at greater risk than previously known and Related Includes: Unanticipated SAEs during protocol that are related or possibly related or Anticipated SAEs during protocol that are and/or not related, but higher frequency or severity Unanticipated AE related or possibly related and alters the risk for subjects (warrants changes to the protocol or consent process) Unanticipated event, related or possibly related, potentially placing subjects or others at greater risk of harm/discomfort Timeframe Deaths or lifethreatening: 7 calendar days Other UPs: 15 calendar days Continuing Review: All AEs and Ups Annual Event Summary Form

VA Safety Monitoring/Reporting Initial review Data & Safety Monitoring plan: Same as OHSU Protocol Deviation Monitoring Plan PI defines elements to be monitored PI reports results of monitoring to the IRB in aggregate as total numbers and % missed at continuing review, if not serious enough to be reported sooner PI must check protocol compliance quarterly to track aggregate data Report All local Serious Adverse Events, regardless if anticipated or not All problems involving previously unknown risk Any allegations of investigator non-compliance Protocol Deviations based on approved monitoring plan Definition: Administrative deviations reaching the threshold to substantially damage the scientific integrity of the data collected for the entire study or that are evidence of willful or knowing noncompliance on the part of the investigator(s) Include: Missed key or safety data points Missed study clinic visits Significant deviation from protocol prescribed drug or device therapy As soon as possible, no later than 5 business days after awareness of event

OHSU Patient Safety Net Reporting What needs to be reported: Anything in the healthsystem you think is unsafe Anything in healthsystem not consistent with routine hospital operation or patient care Healthsystem errors or “near misses” If occurs in OHSU healthsystem facility What happens with reports All reports are reviewed by Healthsystem management and Quality If harm resulted, goes to Clinical Risk Committee and action plan developed Online report: http://ozone.ohsu.edu/healthsystem/dept/risk/UHC-PSN/ Policy: http://ozone.ohsu.edu/HealthSystems/Adm02CarePI/Adm02-04.pdf UP vs. PD vs. PSN

General Safety Reporting Tips If in doubt, report If reportable with available information, report immediately (do not wait for additional information or confirmation) If a cascade of events, report causal event not each individual symptom

Potential Consequences of Underreporting Suspension of funding Investigator Institution Suspension of ability to conduct research at institution Disqualification If due to falsification: Criminal penalties Disbarrment Closure of all University clinical research