Computational Thinking William C. Ridgeway 4/17/2011 CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerated Schools Will the Missouri Accelerated Schools project suit Central Middle School to a ?
Advertisements

Science and Society 1.6. Theories and Principles  A theory is a well-tested hypothesis that explains many scientific observations  Theories are believed.
Ground Rules for Meetings
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Problem  Co-teachers often receive little to no professional development. Solution The Designing Quality Education Program offers intensive ongoing.
I have always had a natural ability and a love of teaching. I want to impart and gain knowledge from children. Some great teachers taught me and because.
Leadership Philosophy
HCC CENTER for TLE TL 1071 – Implementing Learner-centered Teaching for Student Success READING ASSIGNMENT: From the learning handbook, review the chart.
Understanding Health and Wellness
Judge Rejects Google’s Deal to Digitize Books Rhea McCaslin CSCE390 – Spring 2011.
Colin Stewart.  Darpa announced it’s new project BOLT, Broad Operational Language Translation.  Given that the US fights a lot of wars in places where.
Why Program? CSE111 – Great ideas in Computer Science Clearly programming fits here Programming is a Great Idea in Computer Science. It has allowed computers.
Virtual War a Real Threat Will Galloway 4/18/2011 CSCE 390 Article: Virtual War a Real Threat By Ken Dilanian, Washington Bureau March 28, 2011
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Department of Computer Science and Engineering CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch.6: The.
SE is not like other projects. l The project is intangible. l There is no standardized solution process. l New projects may have little or no relationship.
1. LEADERSHIP I “The Basics” 2 Objectives 1.Be able to define leadership and followership. 2.Define the relationship between leader and a follower. 3.Know.
Improving your chances of getting accepted to Graduate School By Thomas Gottehrer.
CHAPTER 3 – DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHIES
Ethics & Professional Issues in Information Systems Development.
Teacher Interview Project
Critical Analysis and Problem Solving Merging Critical Thought and Assessments in Modern Maritime Education IMLA 19 Conference 2011 Captain Gregory Hanchrow.
Core Competencies Daemen College’s Liberal Arts Education is based on seven core competencies –Critical Thinking – Communication Skills – Affective Judgment.
Professional Ethics in Computing Dr. David Sinclair L253
CTAP 295 Teaching with Technology FINAL PRESENTATION Victor Martinez Exploring Careers Brawley Union High School.
Bioethics 101 Lesson two.
Innovative Schools toolkit Strategic Workshop 3 - Exploring good practice case studies.
Journal Write a paragraph about a decision you recently made. Describe the decision and circumstances surrounding it. How did it turn out? Looking back,
By: Raymond Morris. What is it? The “Internet of Things” Network of communication between devices i.e. electronics, computers, and power grids Bots –
Introduction to Critical Thinking Developing Critical Thinking Skills.
Student Led Conferences - Portfolio 8th Grade Science James Rivard.
Teigh Berg ACM tech news: 12/30/11 Source: Reuters (12/28/11) URL: trains-security-idUSTRE7BR0C
Fraser TEACH © 2011 McGraw- Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Good Teaching: What Is Its Impact?
“Britain Weighs Proposal to Allow Greatly Increased Internet Snooping ” Article By:Anthony Faiola and Ellen Nakashima Presentation By: Dedric Guest.
Proposal Report Proposals will either be accepted or rejected. Obviously, you want your proposal to be accepted. To help make this possible, follow the.
The Outline. Introduction Outline 1 Introduction 1.1 Problem Statement –In engineering, a problem is usually in the form of: –Given (some condition) –Subject.
1 Psych 5510/6510 Chapter 13 ANCOVA: Models with Continuous and Categorical Predictors Part 2: Controlling for Confounding Variables Spring, 2009.
IMPLEMENTING SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP: BUILDING COMMITMENTS.
Teaching Portfolios TA Training Session. What is a Teaching Portfolio?  Three types used in academia  The academic portfolio  The teaching portfolio.
BECOMING CRITICAL THINKERS: Four strategies to use in the classroom.
Summary of CPHS Course Evaluations: AY and Chuck Phillips August 2009.
Student lead-conferences Adam berg. Cover letter: I have learned many things this year one of those things I learned or got better at was the bohr models.
Who would you rather be: Spiderman or a Ninja Turtle? and Why? Introduction Task Process Resources Conclusion Rubric Teacher Page Teacher Page.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS Information for Families. WHAT ARE ACADEMIC STANDARDS? 2  Standards are what students need to learn in each grade and subject area.
Katlin Gibbons Professor Ron Sandland EDTE 519 – Section 1 January 31, 2013.
“Why I Want To Teach…” -Ernisha McCarter. Name of Artifact: Why I want to teach… Date: March 5, 2014 Course: EDUC 101 INTASC Professional Responsibility.
ACM Code of Ethics. Organization and Format O Organization: O Section 1: General Moral Imperatives (8) O Section 2: Professional Responsibilities (8)
 Professional Decision Making Model EDTE 519 Ashley Armstrong Section 2.
ED553 History and Philosophy of Education Seminar #2.
Field Experience / Factors that Influence Teaching.
The Big Interview EDU 650 Teaching, Learning and Leading in the 21 st Century Shirley Mcleod Dr. Wendy Ricci May 4, 2015.
Coding Connections at the Interface of Algebra I and Physical World Concepts Improving Teacher Quality Grant Program Summer 2016.
PHI 208 Course Extraordinary Success tutorialrank.com

UN vs the Internet Summary
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
Developing Decision-Making Skills
An Ethical Decision-Making Framework
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
WHERE DO WE STAND? DISAGREE AGREE Activity 2A Continuum
COMPETENCY-BASED INSTRUCTION
CASAS Reports: Assess, Analyze and Adjust
Accepting Yourself is a key part of mental and emotional health.
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
ISTE Reflection.
Philosophic Inventory Kristie Wood
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering Ch
Presentation transcript:

Computational Thinking William C. Ridgeway 4/17/2011 CSCE 390 Professional Issues in Computer Science and Engineering

Subject Matter It is believed that by adding Computational Thinking needs to be added to all current educational programs. Its is believed that this will improve or promote skills like planning, learning, scheduling, searching, and making trade-offs. It is also believed that this will inspire more students to participate in the major of computer science.

Ethics I believe that the case here is that the idea is to try to force a style of thinking upon future students instead of allowing for the development of a natural way of thinking that fits the student. In this case the stakeholders are the people promoting this belief, the students, and the teachers who will have to teach it. When it comes to the people promoting this way of thinking it will inspire a believed proper way of thinking that will benefit students. Now when it comes to the students it could both hurt and benefit the students, some will be able to adapt to that way of thinking but some might not and will end up struggling while trying to keep up with the others who might excel. Then the teachers come into effect the teachers have to be able to teach the students or at least instill the thought process into them so that they will be able understand and be able to use it for there needs within their education.

Ethics continued To make sure this works they need to be able to test this and make sure that the overall outcome is what they proposed. I recommend a control group to see if this works and then have a conceptual test at the end where you test the students who where taught the computational way of thinking and another group of students who where taught a normal way. The best case for this project would be that the test shows that the computational students scored higher than the other students and should they not they know that this perhaps is not the way to present this way of thinking. A possible solution of all of this would be to slowly integrate a sort of learning process which instills the ideas behind the Computational thinking so that it develops into the norm over time.

People With this we need to make sure that all people are treated equally and given the same amount of time and help to see if the process is a success or not. The overall idea of this test is to see if this is going to be success or not so in this case we will be using people a means to a end but in the end it will hopefully prove useful to all future students. This solution is by far not a perfect solution so that is where the testing comes in. If the test proves successful in showing that Computational thinking will help all students in improving there overall thought process then it should be accepted by all. In my opinion the testing between the groups is the only way to show possible benefits from the Computational way of thinking. When it comes down to it there is no philosophy needed for this decision. Only a basic logical process. If the test shows a improvement then there is obviously some ground behind the claims of it.

Code of Ethics The ACM code helped to influence my decision making for this assignment because of mainly the first few sections within the code. 1.1 Contribute to society and human well-being. I believe that through test we can show that by implementing Computational thinking into current education we can help to make a more efficient way of society per say. 1.2 Avoid harm to others. In this we are trying to show that this new way of thinking will not hurt anyone but will but help every student and everyone associated with trying to implement this new learning process not only within school but within there lives.

Closing Statements In closing the implementation of this current learning process could very well help usher in a new and more productive way of thinking but it has to be slowly introduced so that we can avoid having any problems for anyone having to adjust to a completely new way of thinking for some. We also have to prove that this will be beneficial in the end and it will help.

Refrence Computational thinking ‘vital for child’s analytical ability’ Web Address: times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no= &version=1&template_id=36&parent_id=16