Maureen Sullivan Vermont’s Family Infant and Toddler Program October 7, 2009 Understanding and Utilizing Family Survey Data.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Community Themes and Strengths Assessment A How-To Guide.

Advertisements

Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.

Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment

An Introduction to the “new” NCDB …a webinar for the National Deaf-Blind TA Network November 13, 2013 November 15, 2013 Presented by:

1 What Counts: Measuring the Benefits of Early Intervention in Hawai’i Beppie Shapiro Teresa Vast Center for Disability Studies University of Hawai`i With.

Welcome! Review of the National Part C APR Indicator 4 Family Data FFY 2011 ( ) Siobhan Colgan, ECTA, DaSy Melissa Raspa, ECTA.

Heather Woltman, Renée Nossal, Nathalie Gougeon, & Dr. Lise Bisnaire 7 th Annual CANS Conference Baltimore, Maryland May Evaluation of the Connections.

© 2005 The Finance Project Module II: Developing a Vision and Results Orientation Oregon 21 st Century Community Learning Center Programs October 2011.

Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.

Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.

Linking Early Intervention Quality Practices With Child and Family Outcomes Technical Assistance for Local Early Intervention Systems Infant & Toddler.

The Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework A Focus on School Readiness for Infant and Toddler Children August 19, 2014 RGV Pre-Service.

Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.

Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.

Family Outcome Principles and Measurement Approaches Melissa Raspa Don Bailey ECO at RTI International International Society on Early Intervention (ISEI)

Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.

Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,

Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak May, 2011.

Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.

1 Trends in Child Outcomes (C-3 / B-7) and Family Outcomes (C-4) Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports Christina.

1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.

1 Statewide Assessment Elements of a Successful Statewide Assessment.

USDE and DHHS Listening and Learning Panel on Family Engagement

1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.

9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.

Oral Health Project Activities to Support Providers and National Partnerships Kathy Geurink, R.D.H., M.A.

Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,

Linking Early Intervention Quality Practices With Child and Family Outcomes Technical Assistance for a Local Early Intervention System Infant & Toddler.

Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.

1 What did Connecticut do?. 2 The Basics A group of people who hold stakes met to give the lead agency suggestions. We chose the NCSEAM survey and we.

National Parent Leadership Development Project for ICCs and the A.P.P.L.E. Project Models of Parent Leadership Development.

How to Explain the Numbers: Helping Staff, Parents, and Other Stakeholders Understand the Results of the NCSEAM Surveys for Part C and 619 Batya Elbaum,

Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:

A Report on the Texas Parent Survey for Students Receiving Special Education Services DataSource: Statewide Survey of Parents of Students Receiving Special.

Michigan Partnering with Parents to Help Measure Outcomes for Young Children and Families Chandra Jones Vanessa Winborne MICC Parent Michigan Part C Coordinator.

Results Driven Accountability PRT System Support Grant Targeted Improvement Plan Cole Johnson, NDE.

Family Outcomes Montana’s Method of Partnering with Families.

Michigan’s Experience Preparing for OSEP Results Visit Lisa Wasacz – Part C Consultant Michigan Department of Education Michigan Office of Great Start.

Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Encore Presentation October 7, 2009 Don Bailey, ECO at.

Vermont’s Approach to Creating a State Autism Plan March 28, 2012 Clare McFadden, Autism Specialist.

The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.

Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement Pam Roush, Director WV Birth to Three October 7, 2009.

Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation to Measuring Child and Family Outcomes for New People Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG/UNC.

What Did North Carolina Learn From Child Outcomes Pilots ? Sherry Franklin, NC Part C Quality Improvement Unit Manager Steve Snipes, NC Part C Program.

PARENT PARTNERS IN THE MEDICAL HOME © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network (2009)

The Use of Private Insurance to Support Part C Systems Ron Benham Andrew Gomm Maureen Greer OSEP Early Childhood Conference December 12, 2005.

Together We Grow North Carolina Early Intervention Services EISAS Parent Survey: Assessment of Early Intervention Service Provider Quality Presenters:

Michigan Partnering with Parents to Help Measure Outcomes for Young Children and Families Vanessa WinborneJulie Lagos Michigan Part C CoordinatorParent,

1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.

Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center MCWIC Purpose Our purpose is to facilitate the implementation of systemic change to improve outcomes for children.

Identifying and Promoting Family Outcomes at the Local Level Illinois Part C.

Improving Family Outcomes at the Local Level Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Washington, DC 27 August 2008 Don Bailey, RTI International.

ECO FAMILY EXPERIENCES AND OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT SYSTEM SIOBHAN COLGAN, ECO AT FPG CHELSEA GUILLEN, ILLINOIS MELISSA RASPA, ECO AT RTI ALICE RIGEWAY, CONNECTICUT.

Early Intervention Colorado TA Call December 5, 2013 Annual Performance Report.

Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.

Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference Washington, DC Sept , 2013 Planful Changes: Using Self-Assessments to Improve Child and Family Outcome.

Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.

Universal GO 4 IT Training. Welcome and Introductions.

Early Childhood Outcomes Trying to Get The Word Out Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut State Department of Education NECTAC National TA Meeting.

Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.

ECO Family Experiences and Outcomes measurement system

Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,

Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement

Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement

Why Collect Outcome Data?

Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,

Trends in Child Outcomes (C-3 / B-7) and Family Outcomes (C-4)

Integrating Outcomes Learning Community June 12, 2013

Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements

Vermont’s Child and Family Outcomes

Presentation transcript:

Maureen Sullivan Vermont’s Family Infant and Toddler Program October 7, 2009 Understanding and Utilizing Family Survey Data

Vermont’s Data Collection Process Use ECO Family Outcomes Survey Conducted annually First year used the complete survey (18 questions) All families receive survey who are in program a minimum of 6 months Including families exited within last 6 months Mailed survey Includes cover letter, demographic/comments page and SASE

Ensuring Quality of Our Data Return rate over three years Representation from all regions and populations served Family/child characteristics are comparable over time

Understanding and Utilizing Family Survey Our Process: I. Data Analysis II. Dissemination and Interpretation III. Prioritizing and Planning

OSEP Indicators 4a, 4b and 4c: Statewide Results (2006 – 2008) Data Analysis (2008)

OSEP Indicators 4a, 4b and 4c: Regional Results Data Analysis (2008)

ECO Family Survey Outcomes 1. Understanding your child’s strengths, abilities and special needs (questions 1 – 3) 2. Knowing your rights and advocating for your child (questions 4 – 5) 3. Helping your child develop and learn (questions 6 – 9) 4. Having support systems (questions 10 – 12) 5. Accessing your community (questions 13 – 15) 6. The helpfulness of early intervention (questions 16 – 18) = OSEP Indicators 4a, 4b and 4c.

ECO Family Survey: Statewide Response to Questions Data Analysis (2008)

ECO Outcome 2: Knowing your rights and advocating for your child : 4. A variety of programs and services may be available to help your child and family. How much does your family know about the programs and services that are available? 5. Families often meet with early intervention professionals to plan services or activities. How comfortable is your family participating in these meetings? 6. Families of children with special needs have rights, including what to do if you are not satisfied. How familiar is your family with your rights?

4a: Knowing Your Rights and Advocating for Your Child: Data Analysis (2008)

4a: Knowing Your Rights and Advocating for Your Child: Data Analysis (2008)

4a: Knowing Your Rights and Advocating for Your Child: Data Analysis (2008)

Link findings with other characteristics: Data Analysis (2008)

II. Dissemination and Interpretation: Discussions with our Stakeholders Create Reports: statewide and regional profiles Review family comments Family Focus Forums Present data to ICC and Host Agency Directors State TA liaisons work with their regions

III. Prioritization and Planning for change: Priorities are established in conversations with stakeholders Identify practices in regions related to successful outcomes Concerns are discussed with regions and identified in determination letters Regions develop wellness plans (PIP)

Lessons Learned: Engaging regions in discussing the importance of outcome research and in planning distribution strategies equals proactive partners! Linking data to family/child characteristics helps support future planning Involving stakeholders at every level – contributes to statewide discussion, gathers range of perspectives and supports adoption of the survey in other programs Family comments help to clarify the data.