Paths Taken and Paths Forward Ivan J Kirov Fed Challenge Feb
Capital Savers Investment vehicles Financial Intermediation Banks Financial Markets Investment Firms Entrepreneurs Financial Institutions Solve informational asymmetry Leverage economies of scale
Bank “Self-Regulation” ◦ At sign of trouble: Creditors pull out Depositors withdraw Difficult to raise money in capital markets Hence capital kept on hand Discipline DepositorsCreditors Money Markets
Finance is systemically important to the functioning of the economy Real Economy Transmission Banks Financial Distress - I - Y- ΔY Credit tightens Less Profitability and Growth
Liquidity (Lender of last resort) ◦ Traditional purview of central banks Deposit insurance ◦ In US, from Depression Creditor guarantees ◦ Mostly from last crisis ◦ AIG ◦ Citi
Guarantees reduce risk in holding bank debt Moreover, they insulate creditors from loss ◦ Risk-taking proliferates Financial institutions’ incentives become out of line with those of regulators Source: Economist Banks’ Equity as % of Assets
To avoid moral hazard implicit in support, governments impose financial regulatory structures Capital Structural security Asset buffer Liquidity Rapid- response Psychological buffer Pay Align incentives “Micro” buffer Accounting Trans-border coordination Transparency
Basel-2: Current main international regulatory framework Financial institutions must keep on hand at least 4% of risk-weighted assets ◦ “On hand”: Tier-1 capital ◦ “Risk-weighted”: According to GAAP, but in practice a firm-specific definition Problems ◦ Tier-1 capital includes debt-like instruments ◦ Low capital margin ◦ Limited regulation of leverage
Tobin Tax Britain’s Bonus Tax Obama’s Bank Levy The Volcker Rule Basel-3
Originated by James Tobin in 1973 FX transactions above “optimal level” – tax to bring them in line with public optimum. Financial Tobin Tax is not strictly a form of regulation; more like enforced downsizing. Problems: ◦ How do governments know finance’s “optimal size”?
Dec. 10, 2009: UK gov’t imposes 50% tax rate on bank bonuses exceeding £25,000 Largely politically motivated
Tax on financial firms with >$50 billion in assets Would raise $90bn over 10 years To cover TARP fund Applies mostly to risky activities ◦ Proprietary trading desks In practice: small, symbolic Principle? Source: New York Times
Semi-reinstatement of Glass-Steagall Banks (or just deposit-taking institutions?) cannot engage in proprietary trading or invest in hedge funds or PE funds Details still pending Congressional crucible InstitutionEstimated Revenue Loss Goldman Sachs$4.5 bn JPMorgan$2 bn Citigroup~ $500 mil Source: New York Times
Work-in-progress: refinement of Basel-2 rules General thrust ◦ Safe “Tier 1” capital more narrowly defined (mostly only equity) ◦ Financial institutions cannot use proprietary risk models ◦ Liquidity: banks must withstand 30-day credit freeze ◦ Capital requirements increased to 6-8% of risk- adjusted assets
Liquidity regulation Institutions pay for not-so-implicit guarantees “Convertible capital” Balance between institution-specific and system-wide regulation
Julian Simon: The Dismal Science? “One can hardly imagine, I think, how poor we would be today were it not for the rapid population growth of the past to which we owe the enormous number of technological advances enjoyed today.... If I could re-do the history of the world, halving population size each year from the beginning of time on some random basis, I would not do it for fear of losing Mozart in the process.” -Edmund S. Phelps