 Performance Management, Performance Evaluation, and Correcting Problems  March 10, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Appraisals
Advertisements

Performance Management
Performance Management
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
What is Pay & Performance?
COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY/VIMS
Nova Southeastern University Nova Southeastern University facilitated by: facilitated by: Aaron Greenberg and Maureen Simunek-Appelt Office of Human Resources.
Rock Paper Scissor Tournament. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS 1.4.
EFFECTIVE DOCUMENTATION In Search of Improved Performance.
SITUATION RESPONSE FLOW CHART SUPERVISORS’S ACTIONS SITUATION OCCURS Direct observation, complainant reports, third party reports Document initial knowledge.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Supervisors.
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
Introduction and Overview.   PowerPoint  Civil Service chapter 10 rules  Planning and evaluation form  Performance notes  Request for review Handouts.
Performance Management Review FAQs
2012 Performance Evaluation System. Why An Evaluation? O Set expectations between Supervisor and the employee. O Valuable tool for an employees in their.
Performance Management 2012 Conducting Performance Evaluations Office of Human Resources UMW: “Putting U First”
Managing For Success Carnegie Mellon Human Resources Leadership Symposium 2002 Presenter: Jill Diskin Director, Human Resources Services.
Performance Evaluation/Management Training
System Office Performance Management
Performance Appraisal in the Public Sector
Performance Management Webinar Thursday, March 19, 2015.
OH 9-1 Evaluating Employee Performance Human Resources Management and Supervision OH 9-1.
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
2013 District Staff Supervision Overview
System Office Performance Management
Annual Review Process Georgi Lowe UWSA Office of Human Resources & Workforce Diversity.
Performance Management Training
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
Annual Self Assessment Workshop for Employees
Department of Human Resources. Progressive Process A progressive discipline system gives employees ample warning of misconduct or work-related problems;
Managing Employee Performance Kay Robinson, SPHR Erin Gilbert, National Summer Learning Association.
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
Managing Conflict in Organizations
United States Fire Administration Chief Officer Training Curriculum Human Resource Development Module 6: Managing the Workforce.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Performance Appraisal
Lecture 23.
PROGRAMS MONITORING AND SUPERVISION
PROVIDED BY ORGANIZATIONAL EXCELLENCE CLASSIFIED TRAINING BRANCH Supervisor’s Handbook to Orienting New Employees (O.N.E.)
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
Chapter 4 Performance Management and Appraisal
Performance Management  Performance Management Cycle  Organizational Success  Shared Responsibilities  Setting Goals and Expectations.
Performance Evaluations
Conducting Effective Performance Evaluations February 13, 2012 March 9, 2012.
Accountability Presented by Mollie Schaffer August 13 th, 2014.
Successfully Conducting Employee Performance Appraisals Wendy L. McCoy Director HR & Benefits Florida Conference of The United Methodist Church.
1 Performance Management and Appraisal Chapter 9.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
Performance Development Reviews All Classified, Non-Classified, and FEAP employees have performance development reviews completed on a fiscal year basis.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals Webinar for ANR Supervisors Spring 2016.
© BLR ® —Business & Legal Resources 1408 Conducting Effective Performance Appraisals.
Organizational Behavior (MGT-502) Lecture-43. Summary of Lecture-42.
Supervisor Success Series “3S” Session 5: Performance Management.
Introduction to SEPAP: An Explanation of the Program  Importance of employee participation in the appraisal process  Learn the three phases of SEPAP.
Preparing and Delivering Effective Performance Reviews Presented by Cari Keller.
Mid-Year Performance Review Process University System of New Hampshire System Office | 5 Chenell Drive, Suite 301, Concord, NH
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
HSA Performance Management Program 2016 Performance Development Plan.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING SHRA Employee Annual Performance Appraisal Program.
Preparing and Delivering Effective Performance Reviews
Performance Management
TOPS TRAINING.
Chapter 21 Making Assignments, Counseling, and Analyzing Performance
Chapter 21: Delegating, Coaching, and Evaluating Performance
Performance Management Training
Human Resources & Personnel Management
How to Conduct Effectively
Presentation transcript:

 Performance Management, Performance Evaluation, and Correcting Problems  March 10, 2011

 Performance Management ◦ Definition ◦ Job Descriptions  Performance Evaluation ◦ Purpose, Process, Procedure ◦ Do’s, Don’ts  Correcting Problems ◦ Performance ◦ Misconduct ◦ Attendance

 Definition: process in which management and employees work together to accomplish the mission, goals and objectives of their organization  More than an annual paper shuffle  A constant ongoing process (few jobs remain constant)

 Continuous on-going process of gathering information and communication about performance  Cyclical process – planning, setting expectations, observation, evaluation  Few jobs remain constant, early, initial, feedback, course correction  Silence = approval of behaviors

PRRP Respect = Balance between RP & PR RP = Resolve the problem PR = Preserve the relationship RESPECT

 Hire the Best People, Train them Well  Have Clear Expectations  Set Goals  Communicate  Give Feedback

◦ Foundational tool, essential to effective performance management ◦ Clarify job responsibilities and expectations ◦ In legal challenge situations, provides the supervisor with the ability to prove that the employee did know the expectations and standards

◦ Management best practice; ensures unit mission, goals, and objectives are in alignment and being met ◦ A more involved feedback session, with discussion, covering many aspects of performance over a period of time ◦ Formal, written, No Surprises! ◦ Done WITH the employee, not TO the employee ◦ Communicate, communicate, communicate

 Identify performance expectations  Be consistent in measuring and communicating the extent to which those expectations are being met  Provide opportunities for feedback and clarification

 Purpose – why do it?  Process – how to do it?  Procedure – how we do it at MSU!

 Purpose - Why Do It?  Personnel Policy 600 – evaluation policy.htm evaluation policy.htm  Management Best Practice  An annual performance evaluation is required for classified and contract professional employees

 Provides on-going, two-way communication between employee and the manager  Sets clear expectations to employees  Employees want to know what is expected of them  Facilitates employee development and growth  Flexible Pay Options available through the MUS Staff Compensation Plan

Do’s  Establish clear performance expectations and review annually with each person  Focus on the employee’s conduct and job performance  Discuss individual instance of problem performance when it arises and how the problem should be addressed

 Document problem performance  Objectively describe what the employee did or did not do  Review patterns of poor or unacceptable performance  Be discreet

 Written plan to improve performance with deadlines and milestones  Follow-up

 Don’t generalize individual problems to the group  Don’t ignore patterns of poor job performance  Don’t become involved in personal problems

 Updated job/role description  Set/establish expectations and/or goals ◦ Focus on job related skills or activities – realistic and achievable ◦ Work performance and behaviors – objectively observable and measurable ◦ Reasonable indicators of successful performance are expressed in terms of quality, quantity, timeliness, cost ◦ Performance measures/indicators are subject to change, are not permanent, are not perfect

 Definition: information about performance communicated to the employee soon after the performance occurs or the information is gathered  One of the most effective ways to reinforce or increase productivity involves providing employees with specific feedback about their performance, at a high frequency, immediately following the desired performance

 Plan ahead, plan for the desired outcome  No Interruptions  In writing, face-to face  Done WITH the employee, not TO the employee  Communicate, communicate, communicate

 Formal official document!  Do not discriminate on basis of race, sex, ethnic origin, marital status, religion, sexual orientation, or disability  Do not focus on personality traits  No surprises!

 Exceeds – Frequently exceeds performance standards for the position. Employee makes unique and significant contributions to the department.  Meets – Meets performance standards for the position. Consistently and effectively performs job duties.  Needs Improvement – Fails to meet performance standards for the position. Improvement is needed.

 Central tendency  Leniency  Halo effect  Recency effect

 How To Do Them, the MSU Way!  Forms to use – ions.htm ions.htm ◦ Version 1, developed with MPEA – ad hoc labor management committee ◦ Version 2, historical form ◦ If you wish to design an alternate evaluation tool for classified employees, it must be pre-approved by Employee & Labor Relations.

 Affirmative Action Website  Two options available – Word and Excel – can be edited to fit your needs  Please remember the COVER SHEET on all evaluations

 Rebuttal process; No grievance process  An employee who disagrees with the evaluation of his or her supervisor may submit a written request for review by the supervisor’s supervisor.  The written request must outline the specific areas of disagreement and the reasons the employee disagrees with the supervisor’s evaluation.  The decision of the supervisor’s supervisor will be the final decision on the evaluation.  The employee’s written disagreement will be included with a copy of the final performance evaluation and placed in the employee’s personnel file.

 Should probationary employees be evaluated during the probationary period?  Recommended: Conduct the discussion immediately upon conclusion of the probationary period  My supervisor asked me to fill out a self evaluation. Is this legit?  Yes. This method may meet multiple managerial needs.

◦ Aids the discussion ◦ Self evaluation by the employee may help establish the thought processes for an effective discussion ◦ May help align employee and supervisor understanding of the job duties

 Performance  Conduct PerformanceConduct

 Do not tolerate, minimize, or ignore problems  Prompt, appropriate and consistent follow-up – meet with employee  Corrective action not reaction

 Poor quality of work  Missed deadlines  Mistakes  Complaints (from others)

 Performance: ◦ Clear descriptions of expectations ◦ Regular meetings ◦ Corrective action plans ◦ Training

 Argumentative, angry  Complaints from co-workers  Verbal fights with co-workers, customers, others  Inappropriate or intimidating physical contact

 Susan Alt  Director, Employee & Labor Relations    Diane Letendre  Interim Director, Human Resources/AA  