Capstone 2011 Kisha Davis, M.D.
Created in 1965 to provide medical coverage to the poor Children, the disabled, pregnant women, very low income parents and the elderly poor are eligible Federally funded, state administered Income limits range from 17% (AK) to 215% (MN) of FPL
In 2007 Maryland passed the Working Families and Small Business Health Coverage Act The Medical Assistance to Families program increased Medicaid eligibility for parents from 36% to 116% (FPL) Covered an additional 65,000 people Similar to the coming Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion
The purpose of this study is to examine the characteristics of the expansion population in comparison to the non-expansion population to determine if there are differences in health care costs and utilization. ◦ Sicker or healthier? ◦ More expensive or less? ◦ Pent up demand?
Claims data from a Managed Care Organization (MCO) FY 2009 & 2010 Newly enrolled individuals aged 19 to 64 Remained enrolled for at least six months Study groups ◦ Expansion ◦ Previously Eligible ◦ Continuous- enrolled last 6 months of FY 2008
Identified by the state as expansion or not Excluded disabled persons, pregnant women, persons with substance abuse diagnosis Each member followed for maximum of 12 months after start of experience period
Categorical variables: chi-square Continuous Variables: ANOVA with Tukey’s test for adjustment for multiple comparison Multivariate analysis done using proc genmod All analyses done in SAS
Expansion (N = 13,987) Previously Eligible (N=7,922) Continuously Enrolled (N= 1,159) P-Value Mean months enrolled (SD) p < for all Mean age (SD) E v P p < E v C p= P v C p= Female, %71.4%74.2%82.1%p < Race, % White37.2%33.0%33.1%p < Black/Hispanic/ Asian/Indian 40.2%46.5%61.9% Unknown22.6%20.5%5.1% Region*, % Urban14.0%21.6%33.7%p < Suburban38.6%42.1%35.0% Rural47.4%36.4%31.3%
Expansion (N = 13,987) Previously Eligible (N=7,922) Continuously Enrolled (N= 1,159) P-Value Number of Chronic Conditions p < %64.2%46.1% 117.7%17.2%21.7% 29.1%8.3%12.7% %10.3%19.6% Mean ACG- (prob. of being high cost in the next year) E v P p= E v C p< P v C p < RUB Score (morbidity)p < Non-users11.7%14.6%11.0% Very low12.2%12.3%4.5% Low12.7%12.0%10.4% Moderate44.1%40.9%45.5% High15.2%15.9%19.3% Very high4.2%4.3%9.2%
Mean Total Costs Mean Inpatient Costs
Regression Analysis P-Value Expansion0 Previously Eligible $55P< Continuous-$74P=0.0001
Limitations ◦ Time frame continuous vs newly enrolled ◦ Drop outs Implications for Affordable Care Act ◦ Predictions on health status of new enrollees ◦ Cost considerations ◦ Continuous coverage Future Directions
Dr. Jonathan Weiner Alyson Schuster Dr. Peter Fagan Priority Partners
Hadley, J. (2003). Sicker and Poorer- the consequences of being uninsured:. Medical Care Research Review, 60 (2 suppl) 3S-75S. Institute of Medicine. (2003). Hidden Costs, Value lost, uninsurance in America. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. JM McWilliams, E. M. (2007). Health of previously uninsured adults after acquiring Medicare coverage. JAMA, 298(24):2886–94. JM McWilliams, E. M. (2007). Use of health services by previously uninsured Medicare beneficiaries. NEJM, 357(2):143–53. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2010). Medicaid and children's health insurance program provisions. Focus on Health Reform, Publication # Kaiser Family Foundation. (2010). Medicaid Facts. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, Publication # Kaiser Family Foundation. (2011). State Medicaid Fact Sheet. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, Ku, L. (2010). Ready, Set, Plan, Implement: Executing The Expansion of Medicaid. Health Affairs, 29(6): Maryland DHMH. (2011, March 4). Maryland Medical Assistance for Families. Retrieved April 21, 2011, from State Coverage Initiatives. (2010). State Coverage Initiatives. Retrieved January 26, 2011, from State Specific Strategies: Tilford, J., Robbins, J., Shema, S., & Farmer, F. (1999). Response to health insurance by previously uninsured rural children. Health Services Research, 34(3):