Mr. Niall Douglas
9am-10am: Reading and vocab check 10am-11am: Niall’s History of the History of the Irish Revolution part 1 of 2 11.20am-12.20pm: Group Task Check 12.20pm-1pm: More English Language Cementing 1pm-1.20pm: Work on tonight’s readings if there is time
As we are into our final week together, I thought I’d throw some of my own research at you. I used to give lectures on this sort of stuff at St. Andrews University for free Personally I think this sort of stuff will save human civilisation from extinction, but there is very little support out there for it In other words, most people think I am a crackpot...
The proper term for the History of History is Historiography This is a very fashionable trend in the study of History right now, starting from E.H. Carr’s 1961 book What is History? However my take on it is deeply unpopular in the field of History because I am “too quantitative” and Historiography is almost entirely sociocultural analysis...
Before we can explain the Irish revolution, we need to understand time... So, what are THE MOST IMPORTANT INVENTIONS ever in human history? For convenience, I have labelled time in the format “tEn” = “t x 10 n ” where n is the number of zeros, so4.3e6 = 4.3 x 10 6 = 4,300,000 years
MilestoneYears before 2008Creative Step 11.37E+10Universe Begins 28.30E+09Milky Way Forms 34.50E+09Solar System Forms 44.00E+09Life Begins 53.50E+09Photosynthesis Invented 62.25E+09Eukaryotes & Oxygen 71.20E+09Sexual Reproduction 88.00E+08Predation 95.40E+08Cambrian Explosion E+08Modern Biodiversity Reached Table 1: Major Creative Steps (Milestones) before 2008
112.51E+08Dinosaurs & Mammals E+08Flowers E+07Dinosaurs End, Birds Begin E+07C4 photosynthesis E+07Hominidae E+06Pan/Homo split E+06Australopithecus E+06Humans Begin 1.40E+06Knife E+05Fire for cooking E+05Pigments & Spears
212.00E+05Burial & Composite Tools E+05Lithic Blades E+04Ships & Bow/Arrow E+04Mining E+04Ceramics E+04Rope Irrigation Writing Greek Philosophy/Christianity Islam
31510Printing Press/Renaissance 32296Steam Engine/Libertae 33135Electricity/Mechanisation 3480Quantum/Holism 3540Computerisation/Systems
One might think from this graph that a point is coming when technological advances will become so rapid that we reach a “technological singularity” (e.g. Ray Kurzweil) Ray Kurzweil and those like him is full of shit This has nothing to do with technology...
If you try making ANY list of the most important advances in something long lived and which is still advancing today... For example, try writing down the most important single tracks in rock music Or creative advances in the use of language or mathematics
It turns out that you will ALWAYS get thirty- five or thirty-six items And these items will ALWAYS have a smooth line when plotted logarithmically over time So what is going on? What happens if you regress that timeline down to zero?
It turns out that there are ALWAYS forty or forty one steps in that progression, it’s just that the most recent five are unknowable to us (too recent to discern) So how come any of this matters?
What’s the ratio between the largest and smallest observations? Distance: Size of the universe = 4.4e26, size of an electron is 2.8e-15. Ratio: 1.57e41 Time: Age of the universe 4.33e17, lifetime of a top quark 1e-24. Ratio: 4.33e41 Forces: Ratio of electrical to gravitational forces between a proton and an electron: 4.4e40 What’s so special about powers of forty then?
It turns out that WE – as in, us humans – can only perceive about forty levels of significance It’s a cognitive processing artefact, and no technology can EVER remove this problem So why is this important?
You all know from walking into any shop that consumer choice is king Yet so much choice is so overwhelming (more than forty) we do things like REDUCE the choice down to price or branding The key to success in life is REDUCING choice down to less than forty options
What makes some of us succeed and some fail is how we do that choice reduction For example, in the SNOs Group 3 likes to reduce uncertainty whereas Group 4 likes to reduce costs Neither is right and neither is wrong. Both are good choices
Which brings us to the Irish revolution... Why did the revolution succeed when all previous revolutions failed? : Fitzgeralds revolution : O Neill revolution 1641 1803 1867 1916 Easter Rising
If you start to think in terms of powers of forty then the revolution starts to look different to previous revolutions It all has to do with information... Because REDUCING CHOICE is really all about reducing INFORMATION Which is why, in my opinion, the revolution was the first information war in human history But more on that tomorrow!
Group Task Work Check