Making (Informed) Mental Math Decisions: Four Factors for Appropriate Use NCTM Annual Meeting Indianapolis, IN 4/15/11 Jim Olsen Western Illinois University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Setting Objectives and Providing Feedback Wilton/Higgins/Burch.
Advertisements

Curriculum Development and Course Design
Teaching of Numeracy in the BEP Curriculum. BEP Throughlines Creating Personal Futures Developing Literate and Numerate Citizens Enhancing Skills and.
“People do not want to be less informed. They want to be more informed with less information!” To move forward, backward or to a Contents page, move your.
Standard Assessment Tests Today we want to  Inform you about the tests your children will take this year  Let you know what has changed this year.
“People do not want to be less informed. They want to be more informed with less information!” To move forward, backward or to a Contents page, move your.
Expectations from the Number and Operations Standard Grades Pre-K-5 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
WHERE ARE THE COOKIES? A presentation by Jessica Hill.
Pencil and Paper Methods – Part II LEA Recommendations for Key Stages 1 – 3 & 4..? Leicestershire Numeracy Team 2004.
The Common Core Name that Domain Mastery When? Tribond Math Tools StrategiesMathematical Practices
Addressing the Challenges of Murphy’s Law of Fractions, Decimals, and Percents James Olsen, Ph.D. and Hayley Moore Western Illinois University
Making (Informed) Mental Math Decisions: Four Factors for Appropriate Use All-Day Workshop Jim Olsen Western Illinois University
Number Talks Math Institute Summer Activating Strategy Discussion: Which common errors would you expect to see? =
Stages of testing + Common test techniques
Teaching and Practicing Mental Math Strategies in Applied and Mathematical Contexts 56 th Annual Math Teachers Conference Eastern Illinois University April.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Lesson Plan - APP Area and Perimeter
Welcome to Module 8 Home Connections.
Assessment Cadre #3: “Assess How? Designing Assessments to Do What You Want”
Mental Mathematics.
Critical Thinking Primary Mathematics. Views of Mathematics The way in which we teach mathematics is likely to be influenced by what we think mathematics.
What we know…. Use Lisa’s call in number 3 1 Instructional Multiplier Customized and Adaptive Scaffolded Support Active Engagement Accelerated Learning.
Description of Strategies
Making Connections Through the Grades in Mathematics
Brandon Graham Putting The Practices Into Action March 20th.
Qualifications Update: Mathematics Qualifications Update: Mathematics.
Paper 2 Source Skills. Candidates’ weaknesses (according to examiners’ reports) Not supporting your answers with source detail Simply reproducing knowledge.
Progression through the teaching of addition and subtraction
Teacher Education Session: CCSSM, PARCC, and the Model Curriculum Jim Olsen, Western Illinois University ISMAA Annual Meeting Chicago, IL 4/5/2013 Jim.
Mastery Quizzes: One Piece of the Assessment Puzzle James R. Olsen Western Illinois University.
The levels of performance considered at the element level are not intended to be used to label teachers as Not Evident, Emerging, Proficient, and Exemplary.
Tuesday, July 19, 10:00 am -1:00pm Agenda 1.Discussion of “CLT Today” pp. 1-5, 23-27, and Articulating an approach 3.An “eclectic, enlightened.
1 Overview Comments on notebooks & mini- problem Teaching equitably Analyzing textbook lessons End-of-class check (Brief discussion) Introduction to multiplication.
Chosen Multiplication Methods and the Ability to Learn New Methods Introduction I intended to explore how students thought about the multiplication algorithms.
Common Core State Standards Mathematics CCSSM October 27, 2011 Todd Lindbloom Senior Curriculum Specialist Pearson Northeast Region School Group.
MODERATION MRLC Summer Institute Warren Nickerson.
Process Success Criteria for Girls. Assessment for Learning Assessment for learning: Using the teacher’s assessment of pupils’ performance to inform planning.
PROBLEM SOLVING What is the role of the teacher?.
Assessment. Workshop Outline Testing and assessment Why assess? Types of tests Types of assessment Some assessment task types Backwash Qualities of a.
Online Assessment System. IN THIS VIDEO Teacher account Student account Tutoring on ASSISTments Reporting on ASSISTments.
Preparing for the OCR Functional Skills Maths Assessment
Specialist maths orientation 2015 Mrs Zhuang Ms Dickson Ms Tran.
Understanding the 2015 Smarter Balanced Assessment Results Assessment Services.
Unit 9 Reflection. “Mathematics in the 21 st Century: What Mathematical Knowledge is Needed for Teaching Mathematics” Deborah Loewenberg Ball 1.What has.
METHODS PLANNING. Methods Class 4 Agenda 1. Overview of Ontario Curriculum Documents 2. Introduce lesson plan formats – GPF & APF 3. Sequence for planning.
Math Assessments Math Journals When students write in journals, they examine, they express, and they keep track of their reasoning. Reading their journals.
MH513: Developing Mathematical Proficiency: Algebra (6-8) Dr. Numeroff-Martin Week 4: Seminar 4 The Real Meaning of Equal.
End of Key Stage 1 Assessments Tuesday 1 st April pm.
Supporting Numeracy SN1014 – with thanks to Maggie Finney.
Ch4-1. Testing.
Standards Based Grading. Why Standards Based Grading? Standards-Based Grading (SBG) is based on current research of best practices in grading SBG is designed.
End of Year Targets (see handout)
Grade 2 Back to School Night
Charlton Kings Junior School
Grade 3 Back to School Night
WELCOME August 22, people:
Thinking Strategies for the Basic Facts
Grade 5 Back to School Night
Connecting Academics & Parents
Video 8: Practice Papers for
Division Page 87 – 119.
Responding to Common Questions
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Lesson Plan The BIG picture? Stickability!
© DMTI (2018) | Resource Materials |
Lower School Coffee February 4, 2015 SMI - Math
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Developing Mathematical Thinking Institute (DMTI)
Presentation transcript:

Making (Informed) Mental Math Decisions: Four Factors for Appropriate Use NCTM Annual Meeting Indianapolis, IN 4/15/11 Jim Olsen Western Illinois University

Purpose Helping 7-12 students develop mental math skills and understandings. These skills and understandings are beneficial in their own right, but additionally enhance students’ achievement and success throughout nearly all areas of mathematics.

Outline Three broad goals. Why mental math. 6 keys for helping students gain these skills. Making Informed Mental Math Decisions: Four Factors for Appropriate Use …including a story Revisiting the issue of students showing their work. Two-part exams (with and without calculators)

Three Broad Goals 1.Helping students understand the importance and usefulness of mental math. 2.Helping students make an informed decisions about which calculation method to use. 3.Helping students develop mental math strategies. Why mental math>>Cathy Seeley (04-06 NCTM President)

Six keys to helping our students “to be proficient with tools that include pencil and paper and technology, as well as mental techniques.” 1. Students see the importance and usefulness of mental math. 2. Students make good decisions about the calculation method to use.* 3. Students learn strategies for mental math. 4. Students practice the mental math strategies. 5. Teachers assess students’ mental math skills and sans calculator paper-and-pencil procedures.* 6. Students have a mindset of mental math, in which they have an expectation of and belief in mental math.

Making Informed Decisions The decision by teachers, students, and citizens to use mental math, paper-and-pencil, or technology to arrive at an answer. …who decides? Sometimes the teacher decides (!) Ultimately, we want students and citizens to make good decisions.

Making a good decision is harder than one might think The extremes of – Use all the available technology all the time OR – NO more calculators !! ….are not appropriate. The policy of allowing (or not allowing) calculators according to the grade level or course is short sighted. Making decisions based on the size of the numbers or number of digits is not appropriate. We need to send the right message about calculator use.

Consider adding language similar to the following in your course information: “In this course, the xyz [e.g., scientific] calculator will be used at times. In addition to performing calculations with a calculator, students will be expected to perform calculations mentally and with paper and pencil. All three methods of calculation are important and students will learn to make good decisions when choosing which method of calculation to use.”

The Teacher Making Decisions The decision to have the students do a process or calculation mentally, with paper and pencil, or with technology is a very important decision. These important decisions are made numerous times in each lesson. A decision that requires thought based on at least 4 factors.

Making Informed Mental Math Decisions: Four Factors for Appropriate Use

1. Numbers/Strategies factor: Teachers and students need to consider the operation and the numbers to determine if the calculation can be done with known strategies. If an efficient mental math or paper-and-pencil strategy is known, it should be used. Q: Do I have a mental math or paper-and- pencil strategy that would work well on these numbers?

2. Purpose factor: Here, teachers and students consider the purpose of the activity, exercises, or lesson in making the determination. Q: Would it be informative, instructional, or enlightening to carry out a mental or hand calculation?

Take a Break The Parable of the Bookshelf The lesson to be learned: When building something, consider its intended use. Build the structure in such a way that it will be able to successfully be used for its intended purpose. The lesson to be learned for education: When we are learning something, we need to consider how that knowledge will be used later. We need to learn the concepts and procedures in such a way that they will be able to be applied later.

3. Distraction factor: The teacher and student needs to consider the level to which the use of a method is distracting to the overall process. Q: Would it be distracting to carry out a hand calculation or use technology?

4. Accuracy/Time/Resources factor: Here the user considers practical issues such as the required accuracy of the task, available time, and available resources. Q: Do available resources, time constraints, or required accuracy dictate my method of calculation?

A Look At The Three Groups Of People Making The Decision TeacherStudentCitizen Available Strategies/Numbers factor #2#1#1-tie Purpose factor#1#2(#4) Distraction factor#3 #1-tie Accuracy/Time/Resources factor#4 #2 The #1-4 factors are in the order they are because students should consider the factors in this order.

Revisiting the issue of students showing their work Why do teachers have their students show their work? –

Revisiting the issue of students showing their work Why do students show their work? 

Getting an appropriate policy regarding students showing their work Appropriate for reaching our goals of seeing work. Reasonable. Flexible.

The Showing-Your-Work Continuum Consider having students do exercises here. Do exercises that are normally done with paper and pencil, mentally.

Do exercises that are normally done with paper and pencil, mentally. Examples: – – Two-step equations – Finding x-intercepts of linear functions – Pythagorean theorem to find an unknown side of a right triangle. –

Two-part Exams There is a – No Calculator part – Calculator part Usually one page each on different colors. First part tells the total number of problems and recommended amount of time for part 1.

Two-part Exams continued When writing the test, some questions can go on either part, giving you flexibility. Each part is about half the test. Usually I do not have the “same question” on both parts of the test (with different numbers). Similar questions yes. E.g., – Part 1: GCD using the prime factorization method – Part 2: GCD using the ladder method

Questions. Comments. Thank You. Jim Olsen Western Illinois University I hope that you and your students can make good decisions regarding the use of mental math, pencil and paper, and calculators.