Using the Best Science to Estimate Consumptive Use March 12, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Historical CU Analyses: A Case Study Introduction - Overview Crop ET – Weather/Climate Data Water Supply Analysis Crop Information Using StateCU Recap.
Advertisements

Surface Water Quantity Model Development Connely Baldwin USU.
LOGO Bangkok, May 2009 Water Resources Management in Ba River Basin under Future Development and Climate Scenarios Presented by: Nguyen Thi Thu Ha Examination.
Active Water Resource Management in the Lower Rio Grande TOOLS FOR A NEW ERA IN WATER MANAGEMENT presented by Peggy Barroll, Hydrologist New Mexico Office.
State Technical Committee Meeting August 28, 2013 Ritch Nelson – State Wildlife Biologist.
Case Study – Recap Summary and Tips  DWR review of HCU analyses for changes of water rights.  Applications to water court.  Applications for substitute.
Antamina Mine Water Management Model Alan Keizur Golder Associates Roberto Manrique Arce Compañia Minera Antamina User Conference 2006 Background The Antamina.
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Administration of surface and ground water within Colorado with the assistance of modeling Mike Sullivan, P.E. CO DWR - Deputy State Engineer James Heath,
Calibration for Historical Crop ET Estimates – A Process Ivan A. Walter, P.E. Ivan’s Engineering, Inc. EVAPOTRANSPIRATION WORKSHOP 3/12/20101Ivan A. Walter,
Briefing for the Upper Colorado River Basin Pilot Update Meeting, February 24, 2011.
The Colorado Drought : A Growing Concern Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center Prepared by Tara Green and Odie Bliss
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
Alan F. Hamlet Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Utilization of the SWAT Model and Remote Sensing to Demonstrate the Effects of Shrub Encroachment on a Small Watershed Jason Afinowicz Department of Biological.
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
Nathan VanRheenen Richard N. Palmer Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Recasting the Future Developing.
2011 Peak Flows and Daily Forecasts CBRFC 2011 Stakeholder Forum November 3, 2011.
Climate Change and Water Resources Management WEB pages on water management activities Max Campos San Jose – Costa Rica.
1 Statewide Water Supply Initiative Gunnison Water Workshop July 29, 2005.
How Much Do We Have Left? Coming to Terms With the Colorado River Water Availability Study Annual Colorado Water Workshop July 21, 2010 Ben Harding – AMEC.
Colorado River Compact Administration Program Steve Wolff Colorado River Coordinator Interstate Streams Division Wyoming State Engineer’s Office.
CRFS November 20, CBRFC Model Soil Moisture November 1, 2013 SEP-DEC PRECIPITATION.
SWAT – Land Phase of the Hydrologic Cycle Kristina Schneider Kristi Shaw.
Kristie J. Franz Department of Geological & Atmospheric Sciences Iowa State University
Crops to be Irrigated Factors for consideration
Key statements day 1 Water resources planning is a political process New agricultural policy will be based on water availability Water sector did not benefit.
The Upper Rio Grande. Multi-objective River and Reservoir System Modeling Flood Control Water Supply Navigation Aquatic/Riparian Habitat Recreational.
Nam Songkhram model application and field work National consultation with TNMC 20th of April 2006, Bangkok MRCS WUP-FIN.
An Analysis of the Pollutant Loads and Hydrological Condition for Water Quality Improvement for the Weihe River For implementing water resources management.
Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska Association of Western State Engineers Spring Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2015 Mahesh.
Dr. R.P.Pandey Scientist F. NIH- Nodal Agency Misconception: A DSS takes decisions ---(No)
Long-term Precipitation Trends in Colorado Nolan Doesken Colorado State Climatologist Presented: Friday, December 12, 2008.
Klamath Basin Water Distribution Model Workshop. OUTLINE Brief Description of Water Distribution Models Model Setups Examples of networks and inputs Demand.
Flow Estimation in the Wood River Sub-Basin. Study Motivation To estimate an historical record at the mouth of the Wood River. –Enables comparison of.
Upper Colorado River Basin spatial analysis of water demand Olga Wilhelmi Kevin Sampson Jennifer Boehnert Kathleen Miller NCAR, Boulder.
Western States Remote Sensing of ET Workshop Boise, 12 October 2011 METRIC TM Consumptive use from energy balance (METRIC) and conventional estimates for.
MRC Water Utilisation Programme 20 May 2003 Knowledge Base & DSF Software Presenter: Dr Jon Wicks, Software Integration Specialist in association with.
Overview of WEAP. Water Evaluation and Planning System WEAP A generic, object-oriented, programmable, integrated water resources management modelling.
Applying New Drought Decision Support Tools Mark Svoboda National Drought Mitigation Center International Drought Information Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
NWS FLDWAV ANALYSIS TOOL
Shared Vision Planning through Computer Aided Dispute Resolution Stacy Langsdale, P.E., Ph.D. Institute for Water Resources, USACE
Colorado River Water Availability Study Colorado Water Workshop Gunnison, Colorado July 21, 2010 CWCB Project Manager Ray Alvarado Consulting Team AECOM.
Integrating Spatial Information for Community-Based Management of a Hillside Watershed J.C. Luijten 1, E.B. Knapp 2, J.W. Jones 1 1 University of Florida,
Modeling Development CRFS—Technical Meeting November 14, 2012.
Analytic Vs Numeric Ground Water Models Ray R. Bennett, PE Colorado Division of Water Resources.
South Platte Decision Support System Colorado Water Conservation Board and Division of Water Resources.
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report Modeling Results Historical Record and Instream Claims Model Accuracy Jonathan La Marche KADR Hydrologist3/11/2000.
Use of Response Functions to Administer Water Rights AWSE Spring Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah June 2015 Michael Sullivan.
WEAP Demand Management
2016 Columbia River Basin Long-Term Water Supply and Demand Forecast Dan Haller, PE
Calibrating a Complex Environmental Model to Historic Data San Francisco, October 25-26, Goldsim User Conference Presented By: Alan Keizur, P.E.
Irrigation Water Requirements
Estimating Irrigated Acreage and Irrigation Ground-Water withdrawals in the Sierra Vista Subwatershed Saeid Tadayon & Brandon Forbes Upper San Pedro Partnership.
Water Census Progress: DRB Focus Area Perspective Bob Tudor Deputy Director Delaware River Basin Commission.
 Crop Consumptive Use Model Practical Application Software Scenarios Methods Structure Scenario Example Materials Available.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
Irrigation Water Management Brady S. McElroy, P.E. USDA-NRCS, Lamar, CO Custer County IWM Workshop March 3, 2016.
Water Availability 1996 Texas drought –Governor Bush asks “how much water do we have? How much are we using? How much do we need?” -- Ooops. No good answers!
19 States & Mexico Rely on Colorado Water
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report
INTEGRATED DECISION SUPPORT CONSUMPTIVE USE MODEL (IDSCU)
Beta Release of Delta Channel Depletion Model (DCD v1
WaterWare description
Beta Release of Delta Evapotranspiration of Applied Water (DETAW v2.0)
Structure Scenario Structure Scenario Wizard Walkthrough
C2VSimFG State of the IDC Calibration Dominick Amador Woodard & Curran
Systems and Components – A Process for Developing the Total Water Budget Handbook for Water Budget Development - With or Without Models CWEMF 2019 Annual.
SGMA Climate Change Desktop tools for IWFM and Modflow
Presentation transcript:

Using the Best Science to Estimate Consumptive Use March 12, 2010

“ Provide the capability to develop credible information on which to base informed decisions concerning water resource management issues. ”

How does Colorado’s Decision Support System Help Colorado Water Planners use the Best Science?

 Water right changes require extended period analysis of historical crop CU (~ 50 years)  Planners make decisions based on long- term hydrology and climate data that represents wet, dry, hot, cool periods

 Higher elevations and western slope areas do not have climate stations recording daily data required for methods incorporating better science (ex. ASCE Penman)  Daily data required for detailed methods in other areas of the State only available in recent periods  Historical satellite imagery may not be available for Energy-Balance Methods

Colorado’s Decision Support System helps mitigate limitations of those monthly methods However: Colorado water right consultants and water planners rely heavily on less data intensive monthly methods, generally Blaney-Criddle As a Result:

 State-wide Irrigated Acreage Assessments  Crop Type  Irrigation Method  Source (Ditch and/or Well)  Goal 5-year Snapshots  GIS and Stored in HydroBase  Water Supply Data  Daily Diversion Records, Pumping Data  Stored in HydroBase

 Climate Data “Managed” in HydroBase  NOAA Stations  CoAgMet Stations  Planning-Level Estimates  Specific Conveyance Efficiencies  Maximum Application Efficiencies  Available Water Content  Technical Documents Describing Estimate Procedures and Results

Data Management Interfaces Consumptive Use Model StateCU Surface Water Model StateMod Groundwater Model MODFLOW Results for Decision Makers HydroBase (Central Database) GIS Coverages

 Development/Review of Locally Calibrated Blaney-Criddle Crop Coefficients  Based on Lysimeter Studies, where available  Upper South Platte Basin, Gunnison Basin, Rio Grande  Based on ASCE Penman  Lower South Platte

 Coefficient Development Documented, Peer Reviewed, and Stored in HydroBase  Basin-Wide Crop Irrigation Requirements and Supply-limited CU Datasets Available  Yampa River BasinWhite River Basin  Colorado River BasinGunnison River Basin  San Juan River BasinRio Grande Basin  South Platte BasinNorth Platte River Basin  Basin-Wide Datasets are Structure Based

 The State of Colorado’s Consumptive Use Model  Developed to Estimate and Report Crop Consumptive Use within the State  Publically Available  Enhancements/Additions are Peer Reviewed  Comprehensive Documentation/User Guide

 StateCU ET Methods include:  Modified and Original Blaney-Criddle (monthly)  Pochop Bluegrass (monthly)  Penman Monteith, ASCE Penman, Modified Hargreaves (daily)  StateCU Effective Precipitation Methods include:  TR-21 SCS Method (monthly)  USBR Method (monthly)  Maximum per Day, Fraction per Day, SCS NEH4 method (daily)

 Includes Water Supply-Limited Options  Includes River Diversions, Well Pumping, Off- Channel Supplies (reservoirs, tail water)  Considers Conveyance, Application Efficiencies  Performs On-farm Soil Accounting  Includes Water Rights Options  Historical CU senior, junior to specific water right (ex. Upper Gunnison CU subordinated to Aspinall Unit water right)  Historical CU senior, junior to daily call

 CDSS Need for a Consumptive Use Analysis Tool  Need for Tool that could be Applied State-wide  Need to Standardize the Approach and Tools Used by CWCB and DWR

 Start with Basin-wide Dataset Developed for CDSS  Use CDSS Estimated Acreages, Efficiencies, AWC for initial estimates of Historical CU for Water Right transfers  Refine input files (through StateCU GUI) with site- specific or user-supplied detail  Use StateCU HydroBase Wizard to build CU analysis directly  Acreage, Diversion Records, Climate Data

 The StateCU Scenario Wizard is an interactive tool that guides the user step-by-step through the development of a new monthly scenario and pulls required input data directly from HydroBase through an internet connection.  The StateCU Scenario Wizard can be used to create a new monthly Climate Station Scenario or a Structure Scenario. Required data (e.g. climate data, diversion records, crop characteristics) is pulled directly from HydroBase via an active internet connection and formatted into the correct input files.

Climate stations, and their climate data, that are currently loaded in HydroBase are the only stations available for inclusion in the scenario through the Wizard. The user can either search by the name of the climate station or by the ID.

Several parameters and modeling options are not specifically input by the user into the Wizard, rather it is the responsibility of the user to review and edit these parameters through the GUI.

Website URL cdss.state.co.us Ray Alvarado – CWCB Water Information Section Chief