Designing for the i-POD generation - Investigating students’ prior expectations and experiences of technology Amanda Jefferies, Nuz Quadri, Diana Kornbrot.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Blue skies storyboards. Iterative design process Blue skies design at Programme level Re-design at Programme level Risk assessment Design at Activity.
Advertisements

Supporting further and higher education Learning design for a flexible learning environment Sarah Knight and Ros Smith Pedagogy Strand of the JISC e-Learning.
Introduction Governments (federal, state and local) have been undertaking various steps to implement series of reform progammes. It has been widely.
Is Technology in the Classroom Important Enough? Natalie Chapman Texas Tech University.
Joint Information Systems Committee Great Expectations of ICT Malcolm Batchelor, JISC Joint Information Systems CommitteeSupporting education and research.
Study on the outcomes of teaching and learning about ‘race’ and racism Kish Bhatti-Sinclair (Division of Social Work Studies) Claire Bailey (Division of.
Tutoring and Academic Support How to Gain the Most From Northern Michigan University’s Academic Support Services.
Introduction There are various theoretical concepts and skills that bioscience students need to develop in order to become effective at solving problems.
HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2010 – 2011 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.
THE MOBILE INTERNET: FAMILY AND SOCIETY Thursday October 30 th, 2008.
Human Resources ‘Blue skies’ storyboards Greg Benfield Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
BLENDED LEARNING UNIT A Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (Part of the University of Hertfordshire Learning and Teaching Institute) Introduction.
information and communication technology by South African
E-learning in the 21 st Century Tang Chew Yong
Presented by Eroika Jeniffer.  What are we going to learn? - the use of chat in classroom - the most likely application on chat. And many more….. So,
Fremantle Visitor Information Centre Report 2011.
Implementation of e-Learning in Tertiary Institutions in Ghana: A Case Study of KNUST MIT LINC CONFERENCE MAY 23-26, 2010 ROBERT KABUTEY OKINE & JOHN SERBE.
E-learning has been used as a method of paedogogical transfer with the aim of enhancing satisfaction, retention and ultimately achievement for many years.
The Impact of On-line Teaching Practices On Young EFL Learners' Instruction Dr. Trisevgeni Liontou RHODES MAY
Making Big Classes Small: Penn State’s Blended Learning Initiative Renata Engel John T. Harwood January 30, 2006 Copyright Penn State, This work.
Computer and Video Games in the Classroom Laura Fabian, Taylor Toellner, Ashley Ellis, Kelly Maloney Introduction In today’s world, technology use is continually.
Psychology students’ experiences of peer tutoring in academic writing European Congress of Psychology, Oslo, July 2009 Kathy Harrington, Savita Bakhshi.
Barry A. Berger Professor of Regulatory Affairs Temple University School of Pharmacy QA/RA Graduate Program 1Discussion-BABTechDay2012.
Recommendations for Best Practice. Best Practice This section will present an analysis of the literature in the following categories: Organization of.
Mismatched Expectations of Staff and Students Towards Blackboard Teaching And Learning Conference 2006 Elisabeth Yaneske Andrew Bingham.
Tech-Connected Teacher (TC*Teacher)
Case Study: A Comparison of Online and Face- to-Face Learning in High Schools in the United States By Lori Cummings and Kelly Granfield EDTEC 690, Professor.
Dr Elena Luchinskaya, Lancaster University/ Leeds Metropolitan University, UK.
Maslina Mahdzan Mazlina Mustapha Badriyah Bt Minai International Conference on Life Long Learning
University Strategy Marcus Williams. Contents 0.1 Strategic goals 0.2 Re-positioning 0.3 Campus infrastructure 0.4 Sussex off campus 0.5 Malaysia Office.
2005 The Ohio State University Poll Results Information Technology Questions Office of the Chief Information Officer.
A comparison of two methods of synchronous (real time) interaction in distance learning Jane Montague University of Derby
TEACHERS APPROACH TO ELECTRONIC INFORMATION RESOURCES Dr. G.SIVAPRASAD Lecturer in Library Science, MVGRR Degree college, Bhattiprolu Guntur (Dt.) B. DHANA.
An Evaluation of SLIS Student Satisfaction and its Global Impacts Christina Hoffman, MLS Dr. Samantha Hastings, Interim Dean The University of North Texas.
Before & After: What Undergraduates and Alumni Say About Their College Experience and Outcomes Angie L. Miller, NSSE & SNAAP Research Analyst Amber D.
ONLINE VS. FACE-TO-FACE: EDUCATOR OPINIONS ON PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DELIVERY METHODS BY TERESA SCRUGGS THOMAS Tamar AvineriEMS 792x.
Survey tools, focus groups and video as a means of capturing student experience and expectations of e-learning Dave.
How to use chat Prof; Dr: Sabri Koc Prepared by: Najah Albelazi.
Social media and social work students: the boundaries just got more complicated Robert Lomax The Faculty of Health & Social Care, The Open University UK.
Universal Design in Third Level Design Teaching in Ireland Marie Callanan, Antoinette Fennell, Anthony Owens, Mark R. Dyer, James Hubbard, Ger Craddock.
Eric DaubertDr. Anne Cummings Hlas Department of Foreign Languages University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE EFFECTS OF BLENDED LEARNING.
CHEMISTRY CROSSWORDS: LEARNING ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT NON-TRADITIONAL STUDENTS IN THIRD LEVEL Christine O’Connor, Claire Mc Donnell, Michael K Seery. Chemistry.
Some challenges to the future of Quality Assurance in Higher Education Dr. Richard Lewis, UK International consultant, HEP2 Vinh Workshop Challenges to.
Creative use of learning paces to encourage independent and collaborative learning. Maja Jankowska & Andrea Raiker Bridges CETL the Third Symposium on.
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results Dr Pam Wells Adviser, Evidence-Informed Practice.
Is Twitter for the Birds? Using Twitter to Enhance Student Learning Bill Collier Des Laffey Ben Lowe.
On-Line Discussion Forums: New Platforms to supplement Professional Development at Walter Sisulu University BY Z.G.Baleni RPL Manager 10/16/20151.
Attitudes towards E-Learning By Fairouz Farah Sarkis Director Arab Open University - Lebanon.
Barriers to E-learning for Health Professionals and Students: Identifying Solutions Dr Graham Walton, Research Fellow Human Information Behaviour & Competences.
The Use of Blogs in Learning and Teaching E-Learning Conference East London International Convention Centre 31 October – 1 November 2011 Mmampho Gogela.
EDTECH Module 7 Technology Survey by J.D. Winterhalter.
The use of information and communication technology to support physiotherapy students M. Rowe and Professor P. Struthers Department of Physiotherapy University.
2004 The Ohio State University Poll Results Information Technology Questions Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Supporting the Net Generation Learner Professor Eeva Leinonen – Deputy Vice Chancellor.
1 Computing Support of Instruction Dr. H.E. (Buster) Dunsmore Purdue University Department of Computer Science PowerPoint slides.
Digital Natives Impact on e-learning in schools. “One student walks across campus listening to an iPod; another is engrossed in text messaging on her.
E-Learning By : Amira AL-Qattan E-Learning By : Amira AL-Qattan.
Action Research GGGE6383 Materials for Teaching & Learning Name: Izyani Binti Mistar Matric No: P73940 Title: The Use of WhatsApp in Language Learning.
Strategies for blended learning in an undergraduate curriculum Benjamin Kehrwald, Massey University College of Education.
Engaging Students in Technical Modules: The Quest to Promote Student Identification of Problematic Knowledge. Dr William Lyons, School of Engineering,
To flip or not to flip: An exploratory analysis into student attitudes towards the flipped classroom approach to learning Enhancement Themes conference,
SUPPORTING VOCATIONAL LEARNERS INTO HE KIRAN RAMI – UXBRIDGE COLLEGE.
Pedagogy supplants technology to bridge the digital divide. Mat Schencks Lisette Toetenel Institute of Educational Technology and Technology Enhanced Learning,
NDLR Symposium 2012 Engaging Students in Technical Modules: The Quest to Promote Student Identification of Problematic Knowledge. Dr William Lyons, School.
Distributed Education Personalization for Student Success
MOTIVATOR FOR MODERN EDUCATION Assoc. Prof. Diana Popova, Ph.D.
Jane Akister Isabel Williams Andrew Maynard
Trends and Terminology in Online Learning
Can E-learning Replace the Traditional Classroom
Presentation transcript:

Designing for the i-POD generation - Investigating students’ prior expectations and experiences of technology Amanda Jefferies, Nuz Quadri, Diana Kornbrot The Blended Learning Unit, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK What is the prior level of technology experience in the new cohort of students? What are their expectations of using technology on their undergraduate degree? What are the barriers to the use of technology that they anticipate? This generation of students has had many nicknames – the ‘Net generation’ from their familiarity with the internet and the ‘iPOD generation’ from one of the icons of modern technology, being just two of them. What these titles should alert us to is the apparent ubiquity of technology in students’ daily live; they are surrounded by technology inside and outside the classroom. This raises a number of questions for academics in higher education. What is the impact of the technology available in prior study and home environments on students’ attitudes to tertiary education and their expectations of living and studying in a university environment? Furthermore are we as academics too eager to apply this stereotype of a generation at ease with technology to all of the current intake of students? Introduction The most recent cohort of new students entering HE in September 2005 were some of the first to experience widespread use of interactive whiteboards and e.learning technology in their schools, so what are their expectations? To coincide with the launch of the funding for the University of Hertfordshire’s Blended Learning Unit (its new Centre of Excellence in Teaching and Learning) a major survey of its newly enrolled students was conducted in Autumn The aims were to identify students’ prior experiences of using technology for learning and leisure and their expectations of whether technology can enhance the learning experience. With a response rate of over 600 participants, the university now has a clearer idea of their expectations of using technology in their studies as well as a greater understanding of the students’ perceived barriers to using technology in their learning. High prior levels of use and high levels of confidence 69% of the respondents (almost equally male and female) were aged between 18 and 21, with over 75% using and 82% using text messaging from their mobile phone on a daily basis. Confidence levels overall were high with 74% being very or extremely confident using technology and just under 3% who claimed to be not at all confident. How will this apparent ease with technology prepare students for their learning experience in Higher Education? Certainly the ability to access their learning electronically via an MLE both on and off-campus is important to these HE students. 88.7% identified access to learning while off-campus as one of the advantages of using technology to enhance learning. Another highly rated perceived advantage was that technology provided easier methods of communication. (79.2%).This may challenge the traditional teaching methods familiar to some more technophobic academic staff. Two thirds of the students anticipate that an advantage of using technology in accessing learning is the variety of learning styles and techniques that are made available. Other perceived advantages of using technology to enhance learning, with which over 50% of new students agreed were: improving their use of IT skills, learning at their own pace and managing time more effectively. Table 1 : The top 7 student rated perceived advantages in using technology for learning Barriers to the take up of technology in e.learning? Physical access to technology has previously been suggested as a major barrier to its take up for students in HEIs but this survey suggests that this may no longer be a valid suggestion. Over 90% of new students claimed they were able to access technology from home, with just under 3% claiming they could not easily gain access to a computer. This figure rose to just 4.1% who claimed they could not easily access the internet. There is a general mistrust of the reliability of access to technology by this sample because 50% stated that problems with accessibility could be a disadvantage to using technology to enhance learning. This is measured in a group of students who in general do not appear to have accessibility problems and in a situation where most of them had only just started using the university’s own e.learning environment, A far greater number (77%) thought that the general reliability of technology was a major disadvantage to using technology to enhance learning. It will be interesting to review students’ opinions later in the year after experiencing the university’s own e.learning environment to see whether their perceived concerns, prior to relying on the technology on a daily basis, are still a cause so important A blended learning approach? How far should the notion of blended learning (which in the University of Hertfordshire’s view, is a blend of on-line learning and face to face teaching) replace the traditional face to face teaching and learning environment in HE? While these students are enthusiastic users of technology, they want to see their e.learning combined with face to face teaching. Students were divided about whether they wanted more or less face to face teaching or in equal measures with computer based material. But it was clear that they expected to come to university to study with people and the least preferred option for learning for the overwhelming majority (89%) was for it to be all online. While students clearly prefer a face to face teaching environment and for meeting their friends, there is some reluctance to speak to their academics face-to face, 28% preferred to their lecturer to speaking to them, compared to just 4% who would friends (rather than texting or speaking to them), or 11% who would fellow students. Conclusions and further work The purpose of this survey was to identify a baseline against which to measure both current and future students’ attitudes to technology to enhance their learning experience and their willingness to engage with technology away from the traditional teaching timetable. Further analysis of the results is planned to identify trends in the data that can be used to inform future strategy decisions in the provision of staff and student support. The authors can be contacted through the Blended Learning Unit at the University of Hertfordshire:- or via Perceived AdvantagesPercentage Access to learning facilities when off campus82.9 Easier methods of communication74.9 Improve use of IT skills66.9 Learn at your own pace64.8 Variety of learning styles/ techniques61.1 More independence59.3 Manage time more effectively51.2

Designing for the i-POD generation - Investigating students’ prior expectations and experiences of technology Amanda Jefferies, Nuz Quadri, Diana Kornbrot The Blended Learning Unit, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK What is the prior level of technology experience in the new cohort of students? What are their expectations of using technology on their undergraduate degree? What are the barriers to the use of technology that they anticipate? This generation of new students has many nicknames – the ‘Net generation’ from their familiarity with the internet and the ‘iPOD generation’ from one of the icons of modern technology, being just two of them. What these titles should alert us to is the apparent ubiquity of technology in students’ daily live; they are surrounded by technology inside and outside the classroom. This raises a number of questions for academics in higher education. What is the impact of the technology available in prior study and home environments on students’ attitudes to tertiary education and their expectations of living and studying in a university environment? Furthermore are we as academics too eager to apply this stereotype of a generation at ease with technology to all of the current intake of students? Introduction The most recent cohort of new students entering HE in September 2005 were some of the first to experience widespread use of interactive whiteboards and e.learning technology in their schools, so what are their expectations? To coincide with the launch of the funding for the University of Hertfordshire’s Blended Learning Unit (its new Centre of Excellence in Teaching and Learning) a major survey of its newly enrolled students was conducted in autumn The aims were to identify students’ prior experiences of using technology for learning and leisure and their expectations of whether technology can enhance the learning experience. With a response rate of over 600 participants, the university now has a clearer idea of their expectations of using technology in their studies as well as a greater understanding of the students’ perceived barriers to using technology in their learning. High prior levels of use and high levels of confidence 69% of the respondents (almost equally male and female) were aged between 18 and 21, with over 75% using and 82% using text messaging from their mobile phone on a daily basis. Confidence levels overall were high with 74% being very or extremely confident using technology and just under 3% who claimed to be not at all confident. How will this apparent ease with technology prepare students for their learning experience in Higher Education? Certainly the ability to access their learning electronically via an MLE both on and off-campus is important to these HE students. 88.7% identified access to learning while off-campus as one of the advantages of using technology to enhance learning. Another highly rated perceived advantage was that technology provided easier methods of communication. (79.2%).This may challenge the traditional teaching methods familiar to some more technophobic academic staff. Two thirds of the students anticipate that an advantage of using technology in accessing learning is the variety of learning styles and techniques that are made available. Other perceived advantages of using technology to enhance learning, with which over 50% of new students agreed were: improving their use of IT skills, learning at their own pace and managing time more effectively. Table 1: The top 7 ‘student rated' perceived advantages in using technology for learning Barriers to the take up of technology in e.learning? Physical access to technology has previously been suggested as a major barrier to its take up for students in HEIs but this survey suggests that this may no longer be a valid suggestion. Over 90% of new students claimed they were able to access technology from home, with just under 3% claiming they could not easily gain access to a computer. This figure rose to just 4.1% who claimed they could not easily access the internet. There is a general mistrust of the reliability of access to technology by this sample because 50% stated that problems with accessibility could be a disadvantage to using technology to enhance learning. This is measured in a group of students who in general do not appear to have accessibility problems and in a situation where most of them had only just started using the university’s own e.learning environment, A far greater number (77%) thought that the general reliability of technology was a major disadvantage to using technology to enhance learning. It will be interesting to review students’ opinions later in the year after experiencing the university’s own e.learning environment to see whether their perceived concerns, prior to relying on the technology on a daily basis, are still a cause so important A blended learning approach? How far should the notion of blended learning (which in the University of Hertfordshire’s view, is a blend of on-line learning and face to face teaching) replace the traditional face to face teaching and learning environment in HE? While these students are enthusiastic users of technology, they want to see their e.learning combined with face to face teaching. Students were divided about whether they wanted more or less face to face teaching or in equal measures with computer based material. But it was clear that they expected to come to university to study with people and the least preferred option for learning for the overwhelming majority (89%) was for it to be all online. While students clearly prefer a face to face teaching environment and for meeting their friends, there is some reluctance to speak to their academics face-to face, 28% preferred to their lecturer to speaking to them, compared to just 4% who would friends (rather than texting or speaking to them) or 11% who would fellow students. Conclusions and further work The purpose of this survey was to identify a baseline against which to measure both current and future students’ attitudes to technology to enhance their learning experience and their willingness to engage with technology away from the traditional teaching timetable. Further analysis of the results is planned to identify trends in the data that can be used to inform future strategy decisions in the provision of staff and student support. The authors can be contacted through the Blended Learning Unit at the University of Hertfordshire:- or via Perceived AdvantagesPercentage Access to learning facilities when off campus82.9 Easier methods of communication74.9 Improve use of IT skills66.9 Learn at your own pace64.8 Variety of learning styles/ techniques61.1 More independence59.3 Manage time more effectively51.2