 Homework #2 due Thursday  Exam #1 on Thursday  Writing Assignment due Oct. 27th.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Extending the external costs framework Prof. Anil Markandya University of Bath External costs of energy and their internalisation in Europe Dialogue with.
Advertisements

Valuation of Non-Market Goods Lecture 5. Outline 1.Project Evaluation 2.The Need for Values of Non-Market Goods Cost benefit analysis Concepts of economic.
Session 14 Non-Market Valuation
The Economics of Ecosystem Services Steve Polasky University of Minnesota.
A Few Basic Principles of Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services John Loomis Dept. of Ag & Resource Economics Colorado State University’ Fort Collins,
Valuation 2 and 3: Demand and welfare theory
ECON 6012 Cost Benefit Analysis Memorial University of Newfoundland
2 April, InVEST Introductory Seminar, Bangkok
Environmental of Impacts
Assessing Benefits for Environmental Decision Making
Assessing Benefits for Environmental Decision Making Chapter 8 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternThomas and Callan, Environmental Economics.
BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
Economics 101: How to Measure Indirect Values Benjamin S. Rashford Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wyoming.
Valuing the Environment What exactly do economists mean when they talk about “valuing the environment” in monetary terms?
317_L24, Mar 11/08, J. Schaafsma 1 Review of the Last Lecture are discussing shadow pricing in the context of cost-benefit analysis noted that shadow pricing.
Highlights of Chapter 14. Measuring the value of outcomes (or social surplus) Two basic methods – Revealed preference (observing what people actually.
1 Travel Costs Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture /25/2004.
Evaluating the environment Gauri-Shankar Guha. Dr. Gauri-Shankar Guha ASU - Econ Evaluating the Environment For the individual, economic values.
7. BCA - Benefits Benefits = willingness to pay! Benefit from an environmental program Sometimes WTP for amenities = damages avoided Damage functions Cost.
Why do an economic analysis? Estimating expenditures to abate pollution Assessing alternatives for multiple objectives Determining how costs of abatement.
Agenda Benefits Overview Travel Cost Method Random Utility Models
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE 14 Pesticide Runoff Potential from Field Crops.
AGEC 608 Lecture 13, p. 1 AGEC 608: Lecture 13 Objective: Discuss various ways to estimate value of impacts using revealed preference approaches, highlighting.
AGEC 608 Lecture 14, p. 1 AGEC 608: Lecture 14 Objective: Provide overview of contingent valuation method (CVM) and review strengths and weaknesses of.
 Group Quiz Thursday  Homework #2 Due Next Thursday  Exam #1 Next Thursday  Writing Assignment Due Oct. 27th.
Economic Value refers to the contribution made to human welfare, measured in terms of each individual’s personal assessment is a comparative concept, defining.
The Economic Approach to Environmental and Natural Resources, 3e
1 Topic 4.c: Non-market Valuation Many policies and projects involve inputs and outputs for which there are no formal markets. Important examples include.
Assessing Costs and Benefits of Environmental Policies & Regulations.
Valuation Methods focus on conventional market approaches Session Objectives: Identify key steps in valuing the environment Use selected methods to analyze.
 Homework #8 due Next Thursday  Group Outline due Nov. 11 (next Thurs.)
COST – BENEFIT ANALYSIS (CBA)
Econ 231: Natural Resources and Environmental Economics SCHOOL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS.
“Assessing Costs and Benefits of Adaptation: Methods and Data” First Regional Training Workshop – Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of Adaptation.
Valuation of Intangibles. Measuring the value of outcomes (or social surplus) Two basic methods – Revealed preference (observing what people actually.
1 Evaluating the management of invasive species: A role for non-market valuation and benefit transfer AARES Workshop 13 th of February, 2007 Queenstown,
Welfare economics Outline Expressing changes in human well-being (utility) in monetary terms Deciding between monetary measures that are equally theoretically.
Valuation Discussion: Motivation, Concepts and Methods Emily McKenzie and Shan Ma.
Ecosystem Valuation Ecosystems offer benefits to current and future generations. Ecosystem services are defined as the flow of benefits from nature to.
Chapter 10 CBA and valuation1 CHAPTER 10 Cost-Benefit Analysis and Valuation.
Lecture 11: Valuation of Environmental Amenities
What I was doing on Thursday during class.... Measuring Environmental Benefits: Revealed Preference Approaches Travel Cost and Hedonic Methods.
Normative Criteria for Decision Making Applying the Concepts
Part II. Environmental Valuation
Valuing the Environment: Methods
NICK HANLEY UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING Valuing cultural heritage using methods from environmental economics.
On visible choice set and scope sensitivity: - Dealing with the impact of study design on the scope sensitivity Improving the Practice of Benefit Transfer:
Ecosystem Valuation Social and Environmental Aspects Kathryn Benson CE 397 November 25, 2003.
Outline of presentation Travel cost method – concept, example, assumptions Consumer surplus related to TCM Visitor’s table Demand curve Concerns regarding.
Contingent Valuation Methods See Boardman et al., Chapter 14 Interview individuals to elicit their preferences for different states of the world. Based.
Environmental Economics Class 4. Valuing the Environment: Methods Methodologies available for quantifying benefits and costs. Valuation techniques available.
Human costs of tobacco-related diseases * Marco Vannotti, France Priez, Claude Jeanrenaud, Jean-Pierre Zellweger Institut de recherches économiques et.
Economic evaluation of health programmes Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health Class no. 13: Cost-benefit analysis – Part 2.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Valuing the Environment: Methods.
Measuring Environmental Benefits. In principle, benefits can be represented by consumer surplus, or the area under the demand curve: Market good sold.
Assessing Benefits for Environmental Decision Making Chapter 7.
Promoting conservation and public goods provision Lecture 29. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Evaluating Recreational Benefits of Water Resources on Small Geographical Areas An Application to Rivers in Puerto Rico Prepared by: Juan Marcos González.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Project update Each step builds on the previous step Each step builds on the previous step Your problem statement uses your literature review to tell a.
Nonmarket Values Property, ideas and experiences can have “value” even if not exchanged in a market.
Economic valuation OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Economic Valuation of Environmental attributes Larry Dwyer Qantas Professor of Travel and Tourism Economics School of Marketing University of New South.
Lecture 9 Life and other anomalies. Life and other non-mon. benefits In RIA we need to monetize benefits; but benefits in case of externalities come in.
Valuation methods II Revealed preference methods (RP) Elina Lampi
A Quick Intro to Non-Market Valuation
Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Azerbaijan
Exam 1 review.
Return to Home Page GEOG 370 May 5,
10. Valuing Impacts from Observed Behavior: Indirect Methods
Presentation transcript:

 Homework #2 due Thursday  Exam #1 on Thursday  Writing Assignment due Oct. 27th

 Classify environmental values  Discuss methods of valuation Stated vs. Revealed Preferences  Using Cost/Benefit Analysis

 Revealed Preferences  Market price  Simulated market  Travel cost  Hedonic property values  Hedonic wage values  Avoidance expenditures  Stated Preferences  Contingent valuation  Attribute based models  Conjoint analysis  Choice experiments  Contingent ranking

 Individuals reveal their value through their actions and choices Direct and observable methods  Market price  Simulated markets Indirect and inferred methods  Travel Cost  Hedonic values  Avoidance Expenditures

 Used primarily to estimate the value of various recreational activities such as fishing, hiking, camping and hunting.  In this approach, travel costs incurred in getting to a recreation site serve as a proxy for the price of recreation at the site.  Statistical methods are used to estimate a demand curve for a recreation site using data on travel costs, distance to the site, and other socio-demographic variables.  Does not capture option, existence, or bequest values

 Value relative to a characteristic, uses regression analysis (stat. technique)  Hard to separate environmental factors from other housing characteristics  Hedonic property values –  use market data on houses, break down the house’s characteristics, environmental characteristics and compare differences  estimate the marginal willingness to pay for some environmental attribute, such as cleaner air or a decrease in the probability of death. The value of the attribute is measured by estimating its contribution to the value of some other good; for example, how does a change in air quality contribute to the value of a house with a given set of characteristics.  Hedonic wage approach – workers in high-risk occupation demand higher wages

 The amount people must pay to avoid the adverse effects of the environmental damage.  Involves examining averting or defensive expenditures  Air purifiers for air pollution  Bottled water for water quality  A problem with this measure is that it only considers adverse effects to humans who directly use the resource. As such, other sources of value and costs are neglected.

 How much would it cost to replace or restore the damaged/destroyed resource?  A major problem here concerns equivalence. Is the replacement or restoration equivalent to that which was initially harmed. If not, this measure of value is not accurate.

 Individuals state their value.  Used when value is not directly observable (i.e. non-use values)  Typically done in survey form.

 Survey to elicit responses of valuation.  How much are you willing to pay?  Would you pay $X to preserve or prevent change? Biased  Strategic bias – respondents provide biased answers to influence results  Information bias – respondents have little or no experience  Starting-point bias – predefined range  Hypothetical Bias – respondents treat survey casual and give poor answers  Discrepancy between WTP and WTA  WTP - for quality improvements  WTA – for a loss Economists working to improve estimation methods  CV analysis use in court cases all the time  Meta –analysis – “analysis of analyses”

 Cost/Benefit  Issues in Benefit Estimation  Tendency to overstate benefits and understate costs in policy analysis.  Who reaps benefits and who reaps costs? Efficiency is not the only criteria in the policy arena. Equity may also be a concern.  Primary effects vs. secondary effects  Tangible benefits vs. Intangible benefits  Treatment of Risk and Uncertainty  Discount rate  Public sector rate ≠ private sector rate => inefficiency

 Cost Effectiveness  Set a minimum or maximum standard  Evaluate policies on that criterion  All efficient policies are cost-effective, but not all cost-effective policies are efficient.  Impact Analysis  List of potential impacts both environmental and economic.

 Homework #2 due Thursday  Exam #1 on Thursday  Writing Assignment due Oct. 27th