How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US Berkeley 2/12/2013 linking population-based data to child welfare records: a public health approach to surveillance Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD University.
Advertisements

Kinship Care and Behavioral Outcomes for Children in the Child Welfare System David Rubin, MD MSCE Director or Research & Policy Safe Place: The Center.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,
Race Matters: Synthesis of Research Findings Robert B. Hill, Ph. D. Disproportionality Teleconference May 24, 2005.
California Department of Social Services Children’s Services Operations and Evaluation PRESENTED TO THE CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 12, 2012 REVISED.
University as Entrepreneur A POPULATION IN THIRDS Arizona and National Data.
Demographics of Foster Care: Comparative Perspectives and Implications Fred Wulczyn, Ph.D Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago International.
How do Macon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Macon/Piatt Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement14833%
The Racial Geography of the Child Welfare System
Heidi Gulbrandson– Action Team Leader Hillary Millner Sunah Shin Champaign County Action Team.
Economic Incentives and Foster Child Adoptions Economic Incentives and Foster Child Adoptions Laura Argys and Brian Duncan Department of Economics University.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: 1. A Quick Tour of the Data 2. A Racial Equity Lens.
How do Coles County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Clark...Shelby Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement7136%
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
How do Logan County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Logan, Mason and Menard Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
CHAPIN HALL Permanency, Disparity and Social Context Fred Wulczyn Chapin Hall, University of Chicago.
Vermilion County Action Team Laurie Krolikowski & Susan Werner.
Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.
Improving Permanency and Addressing Disproportionality and Disparity in Peoria County Prepared by the Center for Adoption Studies School of Social Work.
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Racial Disparities in the Child Welfare System Contact: Susan J. Wells Mary PfohlAlex Beutel Scotty DanielsIla Kamath Conducted by: African American Disparities.
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara.
Contra Costa County Disproportionality – Examples and Changes Ray Merritt; Dorothy Powell; Children and Family Services Research and Evaluation.
AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.
Child Welfare in North Carolina: Ethnic and Racial Disproportionality and Disparity by D. F. Duncan UNC-CH School of Social Work June 10, 2009.
NYS Office of Children & Family Services Race and Ethnicity: Path Through the Juvenile Justice System Deputy Commissioner Joyce Burrell March 2008.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
Sangamon County Action Team Sara Sanders Christy Cunningham Chrissy Gosteli.
CHMDA/CWDA Partnership Series Child Welfare Services “It Takes a Village” Danna Fabella, Interim Director Contra County Employment and Human Services Department.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
Michigan’s Child Welfare System Why is Overrepresentation a Critical Issue?
HIV Care Continuum New Diagnoses, 2011, Fulton County, Georgia.
When permanency remains elusive: A longitudinal examination of the early foster care experiences of youth at risk of emancipating Joe Magruder, MSW Emily.
Trends in Child Welfare Outcomes CA Blue Ribbon Commission May1, 2013 The Performance Indicators Project is a collaboration of the California Department.
What’s Race Got To Do With It? An Honest Conversation About the Impact of Racism on the Child Welfare System.
Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Age 19 Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
Illinois State University Center for Adoption Studies at the School of Social Work.
Program Evaluation - Reunification of Foster Children with their Families: NYS Office of Children and Family Services, Division of Child Care Evelyn Jones,
The Prevalence of Children with Disabilities in the Child Welfare System: An Analysis of State Administrative Data Elizabeth Lightfoot, PhD Katharine Hill,
Santa Fe Community Baseline Report Early Childhood Indicators Prenatal – Four years Old November 16, 2015.
FOSTER CARE SERVICES Replicating Hope for Children Prepared by Wes Salsbury Foster Care Replication Committee.
HIV Care Continuum New Diagnoses, 2011, Georgia. Persons with HIV Engaged in Selected Stages of the Continuum of Care, United States Percent
Increasing Permanency Options in Child Welfare: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment (Kin-GAP) Program Daniel Webster Joseph Magruder University.
RELATIVE GUARDIANSHIPS: INCREASED OPTIONS FOR SUSTAINED PERMANENCY Joseph Magruder, PhD University of California, Berkeley Daniel Webster, PhD University.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
BackgroundBackground ObjectivesObjectives MethodsMethods Study Design 1E-06 One of the biggest challenges for the Child Welfare System is sustaining successful.
Recidivism Rates for DCJ Offenders Exiting Residential Treatment June 2007 Kim Pascual Research & Evaluation.
Performance and Progress 2012/2013. Why We Do an Annual Data Presentation To assess the Levy’s performance in various categories against goals. To highlight.
Child Welfare Permanency and Racial Equity Efforts in Illinois Angela Baron-Jeffrey Center for Child Welfare and Education Child Welfare Advisory Council.
How do health expenditures vary across the population?
Congregate Care in Ohio
Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.
Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.
Wake County Child Welfare EOY Report
Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement (APPLA)
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Presentation transcript:

How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548% Medical 6915% School personnel 5712% Relative/neighbor 38 8% Social Services 36 8% “Other” 29 6% DCFS personnel 12 3% % Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

How do Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County As shown above, law enforcement was the largest source of indicated reports in Champaign County. Further, law enforcement reports overall were more likely to be indicated than reports from other sources. - 55% of reports from law enforcement were indicated in FY % of reports from medical personnel were indicated. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

What Types of Harm do Children Experience? Champaign County Type N indicated% of total ABUSE Substantial risk of harm9616% Physical abuse49 8% Sexual abuse31 5% Emotional abuse3<1% NEGLECT Blatant disregard28648% Lack of supervision 9115% Environmental29 5% Lack of health 9 2% % Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

What Types of Harm …? Champaign County By far the most common harm to children is neglect/ blatant disregard for child’s welfare, representing almost half (48%) of all indicated reports. The second most common is abuse/substantial risk of harm (16%), followed by neglect/lack of supervision (15%). Sexual abuse per se accounts for 5% of indicated cases. However, when this is combined with substantial risk of sexual injury, then 12% of cases relate to sexual harm to children. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

Champaign County In 2010, 164 children and youth entered foster care in Champaign County. Gender: Male – 54%, Female – 46% Race: White 38% African American55% Hispanic05% Other/Missing02% Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Who Entered Care in 2010?

Who is in Care? Champaign County - At the close of FY10, 535 children were in out-of-home care in Champaign County. This was a slight decrease from the previous year. - 36% of children were White - 61% were African American - 02% were Latino* - 01 % were unknown - < 01% were Asian * Source: DCFS QA FY There are on-going concerns about how Latino or Hispanic ethnicity is determined for DCFS clients.

Who is in Care? Champaign County GENDER 48% of youth are female, 51% male, 1% unknown AGE 20% 2 or under 19% % % % % 18+ Children were fairly evenly distributed across age. A relatively large percent of youth (1 in 10) is 18 or older. 20% were 2 or under. Source: DCFS QA 2010

What are the Permanency Goals for Youth in Care?* Champaign County Reunification26055% Adoption 11324% Guardianship 12 3% Independence 8518% % Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 *This table excludes the children for whom data were missing or coded as “other”

Where are Children Placed?* Champaign County - with kin (52%) - traditional foster care (26%) - specialized care (13%) - institution/group care (9%) * QA data combines foster and relative care, thus this information is from CFRC for FY09.

How was Permanency Achieved For Children in 2010? Champaign County 139 children achieved permanency in FY10 Reunification7755% Adoption4935% Subsidized Guardianship13 9% Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

How have Permanency Rates Changed over Time? Champaign County Source: CFRC 2009

How have 24 Month Permanency Rates Changed Over Time? Champaign County Source: CFRC 2009

What are the Permanency Trends in our County? Champaign County Over the last 5 years, Champaign County has seen much fluctuation in 12 month permanency, ranging from 29% for youth entering in 2004, to just 10% for those entering in For the most recent data available, 25% of youth achieved permanency within 12 months of placement. 24 month permanency has improved, from 40% of children who entered care in 2006 to 48% of children who entered care in 2007 and exited by Source: CFRC [Such data are not yet available from QA]

Disproportionality and Disparity in our Action Team Area Peoria County DISPROPORTIONALITY: The percentage of children in a population as compared to the percentage of children in the same group in the child welfare system. For example, if 25% of the children in a county were African American, then 25% of those in foster care should be African American, all things being equal. That would be proportional. If these percents differ there is disproportionality. DISPARITY: Unequal treatment and/or outcomes when comparing children of color to non-minority children. For example, if Hispanic children are less likely to achieve permanency than white children then there is disparity - disparate outcomes by race/ethnicity

Is There Disproportionality in Champaign County? Champaign County YES. African American children continue to be overrepresented among children in care in our County. 22% of the child population is African American, compared to 61% of those in care. 72% of the child population is White, compared to 37% of those in care. 6% of the child population is Hispanic, compared to 2% of those in care This overrepresentation of African American children has been the trend for many years. Source: 2009 population data come from CFRC, 2010 placement data from QA

Champaign County Disproportionality

Champaign County Disproportionality Over Time

Champaign County Are There Differences in Permanency Goals by Race?* NO African American White. Reunification157 54%9856% Adoption74 26%3721% Guardianship 9 3%3 2% Independence 49 17%36 21% African American and White children are similar in their permanency goals, with AA children somewhat more likely to have a goal of adoption and White children somewhat more likely to have a goal of independence. *This table excludes children for whom permanency goals were missing or coded as “other”. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

Is There Disparity in Permanency Achievement? Champaign County YES, but the difference was small in FY10. In FY10, 80 African American children and 55 white children achieved permanency. African American children and White children who were in care in FY10 left care at similar rates, with White children somewhat more likely to leave care than African American children (White 28% & African American 25%) White youth were much more likely than African American youth to exit via reunification (64% vs. 48%) African American youth were much more likely than White youth to exit via guardianship (14% vs. 4%) African American youth were more likely than White youth to exit via adoption (39% vs. 33%) Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

Is There Disparity in Permanency Achievement Over Time? Champaign County Source: CFRC 2009

Is There Disparity in Permanency Achievement Over Time? Champaign County

What is the “Bottom Line” on Disproportionality? Champaign County Are African American children more likely to be reported as neglected / abused than White children in Champaign County? YES Children in Champaign County are reported at very different rates, with African American children reported at far higher rates than their numbers in the population would predict. In FY 10, AA children represented about 22% of the child population but 46% of the reported cases. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

What is the “Bottom Line” on Disproportionality? Champaign County Once reported, are African American children more likely to be indicated than White children? YES In FY10 of all reports for African American children, 31% were indicated. Of all reports for White children, 22% were indicated. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

Champaign County Once indicated do African American and White children enter care at similar rates? NO In FY10, African American children were slightly more likely to enter care. 31% of African American children of those indicated entered care 29% of White children of those indicated entered care Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 What is the “Bottom Line” on Disparity?

Disparity Champaign County Were African American children less likely to have reunification as a goal than White children? NO There was little difference in FY10. However, African American children were somewhat more likely to have a goal of adoption. White children were somewhat more likely to have a goal of independence. Were African American children less likely to exit care than White children? NO There was little difference in Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

Disparity Champaign County Did African American children achieve permanency differently from White children? YES African American children were less likely than White children to go home, more likely to exit care through guardianship and more likely to exit through adoption. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

Disproportionality and Disparity: The Summary Champaign County YES African American children and youth are reported at much higher rates than White children in Champaign County and these reports are more likely to be indicated. Once in care, however, African American and White children have similar permanency rates, particularly in recent years. The difference is in how permanency is achieved.

On-going Questions for our Area Champaign County In Champaign County difference by race is clear at entry (far more African American children are reported and a higher percentage of reported African American child reports are indicated). This suggests that one area of effort might be the front end, e.g. – developing community responses that divert African American families – meeting with law enforcement and medical personnel to examine disproportionate reporting