Quality Enhancement Plan Exploratory Committee Status Update to University Senate November 16, 2010 11/16/101QEP Exploratory Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UMR’s Accreditation Self-Study. The Value of Accreditation  Institutional Reputation  Standard of Quality  Vehicle for Self Improvement  Transferability.
Advertisements

Tri-County Technical College Quality Enhancement Plan.
QEP -- What & Why? The Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) is part of the Reaffirmation Process for the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association.
Sample Presentation Headline REPRESENTATIVE SUBHEAD TO SUPPORT SUBJECT Presenter’s Name Position Title February 12, 2005 Quality Enhancement Plan PROPOSAL.
TTU Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Improving Critical Thinking and Real-World Problem Solving Skills Through Active Learning TTU Quality Enhancement Plan.
David S. Adegboye, PhD Professor of Biology Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs & SACS Liaison University Professional Conference August 18,
Teaching Effectiveness Committee & CoursEval Implementation Committee Status Update to University Senate October 4, 2011 October 4, 20111TEC/CIC University.
Version 2 November Provost and VPAA G.E. Assessment Task Force Centers Program Assessment and Review Committee President Director of Institutional.
Standards 2.5, 3.3.1, & The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that.
EXCELLENCE AT CAROLINA SACS REAFFIRMATION PROCESS APRIL 2008 Making Critical Connections Quality Enhancement Plan Annual Report #2 Faculty Council April.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Roanoke-Chowan Community College’s QEP. SACS’ Expectations 1. Institution identifies barriers to student learning. 2. Focus on learning outcomes or learning.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
NLU Governance Understanding our Structure November, 2012.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
University Senate August 26, 2014 KEY FINDINGS FROM THE COACHE FACULTY JOB SATISFACTION SURVEY.
Msubillings.edu/futureu PROVOST FORUM October 15, 2012 msubillings.edu/futureu.
Academic Affairs BOT Orientation 29 August 2011 Dr. Chula King Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
SACS as an opportunity to advance library programs The University of Miami QEP ASERL Williamsburg, April 2009.
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
Central Virginia Community College Where your future begins.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet September 28, 2004.
Update on Selected Strategic Plan Student Success Initiatives May 2014, University Senate.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Reaffirmation of WCU General Orientation Wednesday, June 22, 2005 Carol Burton, Director, SACS Review.
Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) What is it, why do it, and what is ours? Faculty Senate – October 28, 2013 Clayton State University.
Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.
Updates on Office of International Programs Presentation to the Faculty Senate November 8 th, 2012 Prema Arasu Professor & Vice Provost International Programs.
SACS Reaffirmation Robert B. Bradley October 2013 THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY 1.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Preparing for SACS: Focusing our Quality Enhancement Plan.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
Assessment Update Report to the University Senate 3 October 2006.
The Quality Enhancement Plan Better known as the QEP.
Presented to University Senate Deanna Sellnow & Kaveh Tagavi November 9, 2009.
Fayetteville State University’s Quality Enhancement Plan Why Are We Doing This?
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
University of Houston-Clear Lake Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP)
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
Assessment Liaisons Orientation Meeting October 8.
Developing a QEP that is Relevant to the Institutional Vision and Mission SACS/COC 2005 Dr. Robert R. Bell, PRESIDENT Dr. Leo McGee, Associate Vice-President.
SACS Review and WCU Training and Orientation Thursday, February 24, 2005 Carol Burton, Director, SACS Review.
Core Curriculum Oversight Committee Learning Outcomes University Senate Dr. Linda S. Glaze, Chair.
Enrollment Management Council (EMC) Overview July 8, 2008.
October 15, 2015 QEP: PAST AND PRESENT AND FUTURE.
Academic Program Realignment Draft- For Discussion Only Julie A. Furst-Bowe Provost and Vice Chancellor University of Wisconsin-Stout July 24, 2007.
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
The Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP). SACS Principles of Accreditation Integrity Quality Enhancement.
Academic Affairs BOT Orientation 22 August 2012 David Marker, Ph.D. Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
QEP Topic Reveal QEP Core & Implementation Teams December 2015.
Lander University QEP Committee Report October 14, 2015 Committee Chair Jim Colbert.
Timetable and preparation. Why Accreditation is Important? Recognition of credits by other institutions Recognition of degrees Federal funding Recruitment.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Armstrong’s QEP Quality Enhancement Plan. QEP Steering Committee Nancy Remler, Chair – John Kraft, Andy Clark, Marilyn O’Mallon, Bob LeFavi, Mario Incorvaia,
Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Western Carolina University Carol Burton, Director, SACS Review.
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
Presentation to the Faculty Senate on General Education Beth Rosenberg, Dir. of Gen. Ed. – Jeff Jablonski, Asst. Dir.
QEP Topic Selection Team Announcement and Invitation
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Undergraduate Experiential Inquiry and Research at Rice.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
4/16/07 SACS Reaffirmation Process Susan P. Himburg SACS Director of Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost
Developing an Effective and Acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan [QEP]
From Here to QEP Presented to UCAPP, Senate Council, & Deans’ Council
Cañada College Full-Time Equity Director Position
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Presentation transcript:

Quality Enhancement Plan Exploratory Committee Status Update to University Senate November 16, /16/101QEP Exploratory Committee

SACS Core Requirement 2.12 (The Quality Enhancement Plan) The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1) includes a broad-based institutional process identifying key issues emerging from institutional assessment, and (2) focuses on learning outcomes and/or the environment supporting student learning and accomplishing the mission of the institution. 11/16/102QEP Exploratory Committee

SACS QEP Introduction Process for Developing the QEP Document Due Date One year out Two years out QEP Exploratory Committee QEP Development Pre-Planning 9/29/2010

11/16/10QEP Exploratory Committee4 Bernard, NancyDirector, Career Development Services Bhavnani, Sushil Professor, Mechanical Engr. (Comm. Chair) Boosinger, Marcia Librarian III & Associate Dean, AU Libraries Boston, KatelynUndergraduate Student (SO, AERO) Burk, ThorAdministrative Support Assistant I, HDFS Chaudhury, RajAssociate Director, Biggio Center Clark, Drew SACS Liaison, Dir., OIRA (Ex officio, non- voting) DeTure, MonicaDirector, Distance Learning Duffy, Patricia Assistant Provost for Undergraduate Studies Dowdle, Deedie Exec. Dir., Univ Communications and Mktg. Eick, Charles Associate Professor, Curriculum and Teaching Erath, Stephen Asst Professor, Human Devel. & Family Studies Flowers, GeorgeDean, Graduate School Flynn, KathrynDirector, Interdisciplinary Studies Program Harris, PaulAssociate Director, Honors College Gillespie, Andy Assistant Provost for International Programs Hecht, Amy Asst Vice President, Division of Student Affairs Hendricks, Constance Professor, Nursing Inabinet, SteveAlumnus, Aviation Management, 1978 Jarvis, KathrynDirector, Student Academic Support Johnson, IrynaAssociate Director for Assessment, OIRA Josephson, Missy Assoc Prof, Anatomy, Phys. & Pharmacology Key, KimAssociate Professor, Accounting Marshall, MargaretDirector, University Writing Program Mathies, BrittnyGraduate Student, EFLT Oleinick, TherezaAssociate Professor, Theatre Phelps, KevinProfessor, Mathematics and Statistics Rogers, TomUndergraduate Student (JR, POLI) Scott-Harris, Shirley Coordinator III, Minority Program, Engineering Weaver, DavidProfessor, Agronomy & Soils QEP Exploratory Committee Roster

QEP Exploration Deliverables Set of 3-4 viable QEP topics to Leadership Team in April 2011 – Must be supportable by research – Must be informed by Auburn assessment results – Must be important for our students – Must be important for the university – Must clearly address student learning (defined as changes in knowledge, skills, behaviors, or values) – Must be implementable with reasonable resources – Must be broadly seen as important and valuable (faculty, students, staff) 11/16/105QEP Exploratory Committee

11/16/10QEP Exploratory Committee6 Review institutional assessment data AU Strategic Plan National Survey of Student Engagement Collegiate Learning Assessment Review of best practices at peer institutions Develop a broad-based information dissemination plan Obtain additional input through inclusive campus-wide process Focus groups Surveys Web page with suggestion drop-box Additional input from students through SGA event Current Status