How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US Berkeley 2/12/2013 linking population-based data to child welfare records: a public health approach to surveillance Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD University.
Advertisements

Kinship Care and Behavioral Outcomes for Children in the Child Welfare System David Rubin, MD MSCE Director or Research & Policy Safe Place: The Center.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,
Race Matters: Synthesis of Research Findings Robert B. Hill, Ph. D. Disproportionality Teleconference May 24, 2005.
California Department of Social Services Children’s Services Operations and Evaluation PRESENTED TO THE CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 12, 2012 REVISED.
University as Entrepreneur A POPULATION IN THIRDS Arizona and National Data.
Demographics of Foster Care: Comparative Perspectives and Implications Fred Wulczyn, Ph.D Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago International.
How do Macon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Macon/Piatt Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement14833%
The Racial Geography of the Child Welfare System
Heidi Gulbrandson– Action Team Leader Hillary Millner Sunah Shin Champaign County Action Team.
Economic Incentives and Foster Child Adoptions Economic Incentives and Foster Child Adoptions Laura Argys and Brian Duncan Department of Economics University.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: 1. A Quick Tour of the Data 2. A Racial Equity Lens.
How do Coles County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Clark...Shelby Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement7136%
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Logan County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Logan, Mason and Menard Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Disproportionality in Human Services
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
Building a Better Child Welfare System for Fresno's Children: Using Data as Our Foundation (and Friend!) Daniel Webster, MSW PhD Center for Social Services.
CHAPIN HALL Permanency, Disparity and Social Context Fred Wulczyn Chapin Hall, University of Chicago.
Vermilion County Action Team Laurie Krolikowski & Susan Werner.
Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.
Improving Permanency and Addressing Disproportionality and Disparity in Peoria County Prepared by the Center for Adoption Studies School of Social Work.
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Racial Disparities in the Child Welfare System Contact: Susan J. Wells Mary PfohlAlex Beutel Scotty DanielsIla Kamath Conducted by: African American Disparities.
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara.
Rogers, A.N. (2010), Human Behavior in Social Environment, 2 nd Ed., New York, Routledge/Taylor and Francis,.
Contra Costa County Disproportionality – Examples and Changes Ray Merritt; Dorothy Powell; Children and Family Services Research and Evaluation.
AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.
Child Welfare in North Carolina: Ethnic and Racial Disproportionality and Disparity by D. F. Duncan UNC-CH School of Social Work June 10, 2009.
NYS Office of Children & Family Services Race and Ethnicity: Path Through the Juvenile Justice System Deputy Commissioner Joyce Burrell March 2008.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
DATA REPORT: MCLEAN COUNTY COMMUNITY PERMANENCY ENHANCEMENT ACTION TEAM Jeannie Higdon Jacki Schuster.
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
Sangamon County Action Team Sara Sanders Christy Cunningham Chrissy Gosteli.
CHMDA/CWDA Partnership Series Child Welfare Services “It Takes a Village” Danna Fabella, Interim Director Contra County Employment and Human Services Department.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
Michigan’s Child Welfare System Why is Overrepresentation a Critical Issue?
Trends in Child Welfare Outcomes CA Blue Ribbon Commission May1, 2013 The Performance Indicators Project is a collaboration of the California Department.
What’s Race Got To Do With It? An Honest Conversation About the Impact of Racism on the Child Welfare System.
Constructing Safety Indicators from Child Welfare Events and Trajectories Fred Wulczyn, Bridgette Lery Center for State Foster Care and Adoption Data Chapin.
Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Age 19 Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
Illinois State University Center for Adoption Studies at the School of Social Work.
Program Evaluation - Reunification of Foster Children with their Families: NYS Office of Children and Family Services, Division of Child Care Evelyn Jones,
The Prevalence of Children with Disabilities in the Child Welfare System: An Analysis of State Administrative Data Elizabeth Lightfoot, PhD Katharine Hill,
FOSTER CARE SERVICES Replicating Hope for Children Prepared by Wes Salsbury Foster Care Replication Committee.
Increasing Permanency Options in Child Welfare: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment (Kin-GAP) Program Daniel Webster Joseph Magruder University.
BackgroundBackground ObjectivesObjectives MethodsMethods Study Design 1E-06 One of the biggest challenges for the Child Welfare System is sustaining successful.
Performance and Progress 2012/2013. Why We Do an Annual Data Presentation To assess the Levy’s performance in various categories against goals. To highlight.
Child Welfare Permanency and Racial Equity Efforts in Illinois Angela Baron-Jeffrey Center for Child Welfare and Education Child Welfare Advisory Council.
Health of Wisconsin: Report Card 2016
How do health expenditures vary across the population?
Congregate Care in Ohio
Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.
Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.
Wake County Child Welfare EOY Report
Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement (APPLA)
How do health expenditures vary across the population?
Premiere Continuing Education
Presentation transcript:

How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638% Medical7914% School personnel 7713% Relative/neighbor 7112% Social Services6211% “Other” 326% DCFS personnel 275% Child care centers102% Coroner/Medical1<1% % Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

How do Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County As shown above, law enforcement was the largest source of indicated reports in Sangamon County. Further, law enforcement reports overall were more likely to be indicated than reports from other major sources. - 58% of reports from law enforcement were indicated in FY % of reports from social service agencies were indicated. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

What Types of Harm did Children Experience in FY10? Sangamon County Type N indicated% of total ABUSE Substantial risk of harm16721% Physical abuse8711% Sexual abuse769% Emotional abuse6<1% Death abuse1<1% NEGLECT Blatant disregard24730% Lack of supervision 16620% Environmental547% Lack of health 101% % Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

What Types of Harm …? Sangamon County By far the most common harm to children is neglect/ blatant disregard for child’s welfare, representing 30%) of all indicated reports. The second most common is abuse/substantial risk of harm (21%), followed by neglect/lack of supervision (20%). Sexual abuse per se accounts for 9% of indicated cases. However, when this is combined with substantial risk of sexual injury, then 20% of cases relate to sexual harm to children. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

Sangamon County In 2010, 98 children and youth entered foster care in Sangamon County. Gender: Male – 53%, Female – 47% Race: White 36% African American60% Hispanic 2% Other/Missing 2% Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 Who Entered Care in 2010?

Who is in Care? Sangamon County - At the close of FY10, 465 children were in out-of-home care in Sangamon County. This was virtually unchanged from the previous year. -40% of children were White -58% were African American - <1% were Hispanic/Latino* - <1% were unknown - 0% were Asian * Source: DCFS QA FY There are on-going concerns about how Latino or Hispanic ethnicity is determined for DCFS clients.

Who is in Care? Sangamon County GENDER 46% of youth are female, 54% male AGE 19% 2 or under 17% % % % % 18+ Children were fairly evenly distributed across age except for those 18 and older. Source: DCFS QA 2010

What are the Permanency Goals for Youth in Care?* Sangamon County Reunification19246% Adoption 15136% Guardianship 41% Independence6716% % Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 *This table excludes the children for whom data were missing or coded as “other”

Where are Children Placed?* Sangamon County - with kin (31%) - traditional foster care (43%) - specialized care (17%) - institution/group care (9%) * QA data combines foster and relative care, thus this information is from CFRC for FY09.

How was Permanency Achieved For Children in 2010? Sangamon County 98 children achieved permanency in FY10 Reunification7374% Adoption2424% Subsidized Guardianship11% Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

How have 12 Month Permanency Rates Changed over Time? Sangamon County Source: CFRC 2009

How have 24 Month Permanency Rates Changed Over Time? Sangamon County Source: CFRC 2009

What are the Permanency Trends in our County? Sangamon County Over the last 5 years, Sangamon County has seen fluctuation in 12 month permanency, ranging from 14% to 24%. For the most recent data available, 14% of youth achieved permanency within 12 months of placement. 24 month permanency has also shown fluctuation, ranging from 33% to 50%. For those who entered care in 2007, 40% achieved permanency by Source: CFRC [Such data are not yet available from QA]

Disproportionality and Disparity in our Action Team Area Peoria County DISPROPORTIONALITY: The percentage of children in a population as compared to the percentage of children in the same group in the child welfare system. For example, if 25% of the children in a county were African American, then 25% of those in foster care should be African American, all things being equal. That would be proportional. If these percents differ there is disproportionality. DISPARITY: Unequal treatment and/or outcomes when comparing children of color to non-minority children. For example, if Hispanic children are less likely to achieve permanency than white children then there is disparity - disparate outcomes by race/ethnicity

Is There Disproportionality in Sangamon County? Sangamon County YES African American children continue to be overrepresented among children in care in our County. 18% of the child population is African American, compared to 58% of those in care. 79% of the child population is White, compared to 41% of those in care. 3% of the child population is Hispanic, compared to 1% of those in care This overrepresentation of African American children has been the trend for many years. Source: 2009 population data come from CFRC, 2010 placement data from QA

Sangamon County Disproportionality

Sangamon County Disproportionality Over Time

Sangamon County Are There Differences in Permanency Goals by Race?* NO African American White. Reunification11448%7344% Adoption8335%6640% Guardianship 42%00% Independence 3916%2716% African American and White children are similar in their permanency goals, with White children somewhat more likely to have a goal of adoption and AA children somewhat more likely to have a goal of reunification. *This table excludes children for whom permanency goals were missing or coded as “other”. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

Is There Disparity in Permanency Achievement? Sangamon County Not Really. In FY10, 59 African American children and 37 white children achieved permanency. African American children and White children who were in care in FY10 left care at similar rates, with AA children somewhat more likely to leave care than White children (African American 22% & White 20%) African American youth and White youth exited via reunification at similar rates(75% & 73% respectively) White youth exited via adoption at similar rates as African American youth (27% & 24% respectively) Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

Is There Disparity in 12 Month Permanency Achievement Over Time? Sangamon County

Is There Disparity in Permanency Achievement Over Time? Sangamon County

What is the “Bottom Line” on Disproportionality? Sangamon County Are African American children more likely to be reported as neglected / abused than White children in Sangamon County? YES Children in Sangamon County are reported at very different rates, with African American children reported at higher rates than their numbers in the population would predict. In FY 10, AA children represented about 18% of the child population but 37% of the reported cases. White children represented about 79% of the child population but 61% of the reported cases. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

What is the “Bottom Line” on Disproportionality? Sangamon County Once reported, are African American children more likely to be indicated than White children? YES, slightly. In FY10 of all reports for African American children, 27% were indicated. Of all reports for White children, 24% were indicated. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

Sangamon County Once indicated do African American and White children enter care at similar rates? NO In FY10, African American children were more likely to enter care. 21% of African American children of those indicated entered care 9% of White children of those indicated entered care Source: DCFS QA FY 2010 What is the “Bottom Line” on Disparity?

Disparity Sangamon County Were African American children less likely to have reunification as a goal than White children? NO There was little difference in FY10. 48% of African American children and 44% of White children had a goal of reunification. However, African American children were somewhat less likely to have a goal of adoption than White children (AA 35% and White 40%). Were African American children less likely to exit care than White children? NO There was little difference in Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

Disparity Sangamon County Did African American children achieve permanency differently from White children in FY10? NO African American children and White children had very similar rates for exiting care via Adoption, Reunification and Sub-Guardianship. Source: DCFS QA FY 2010

Disproportionality and Disparity: The Summary Sangamon County African American children and youth are reported at much higher rates than White children in Sangamon County and these reports are more likely to be indicated. Once in care, however, African American and White children have similar 24 month permanency rates, particularly in recent years. White children have better 12 month permanency rates. In FY10, both African American and White children exited care at similar rates.

On-going Questions for our Area Sangamon County In Sangamon County difference by race is clear at entry (far more African American children are reported and a higher percentage of reported African American child reports are indicated). This suggests that one area of effort might be the front end, e.g. – developing community responses that divert African American families – meeting with law enforcement personnel to examine disproportionate reporting