Conceptual Review Conceptual Formula, Sig Testing Calculating in SPSS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ONE WAY)
Advertisements

Kruskal Wallis and the Friedman Test.
Independent t -test Features: One Independent Variable Two Groups, or Levels of the Independent Variable Independent Samples (Between-Groups): the two.
Hypothesis Testing IV Chi Square.
Smith/Davis (c) 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter Thirteen Inferential Tests of Significance II: Analyzing and Interpreting Experiments with More than Two Groups.
ANOVA: Analysis of Variance
Lab Chapter 14: Analysis of Variance 1. Lab Topics: One-way ANOVA – the F ratio – post hoc multiple comparisons Two-way ANOVA – main effects – interaction.
R EVIEW OF T- TESTS And then…..an “F” for everyone.
The Two Sample t Review significance testing Review t distribution
CJ 526 Statistical Analysis in Criminal Justice
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
Chi-square Test of Independence
Lecture 9: One Way ANOVA Between Subjects
Two Groups Too Many? Try Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of Variance & Multivariate Analysis of Variance
Summary of Quantitative Analysis Neuman and Robson Ch. 11
Repeated Measures ANOVA Used when the research design contains one factor on which participants are measured more than twice (dependent, or within- groups.
The Two Sample t Review significance testing Review t distribution
Two-Way Analysis of Variance STAT E-150 Statistical Methods.
Leedy and Ormrod Ch. 11 Gray Ch. 14
Chapter 12: Analysis of Variance
Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Fall 2013 Thursday, November 21 Review for Exam #4.
ANOVA Chapter 12.
PS 225 Lecture 15 Analysis of Variance ANOVA Tables.
Inferential Statistics: SPSS
Week 9 Chapter 9 - Hypothesis Testing II: The Two-Sample Case.
ANOVA Analysis of Variance.  Basics of parametric statistics  ANOVA – Analysis of Variance  T-Test and ANOVA in SPSS  Lunch  T-test in SPSS  ANOVA.
1 Tests with two+ groups We have examined tests of means for a single group, and for a difference if we have a matched sample (as in husbands and wives)
CJ 526 Statistical Analysis in Criminal Justice
Stats Lunch: Day 7 One-Way ANOVA. Basic Steps of Calculating an ANOVA M = 3 M = 6 M = 10 Remember, there are 2 ways to estimate pop. variance in ANOVA:
Week 10 Chapter 10 - Hypothesis Testing III : The Analysis of Variance
One-Way Analysis of Variance Comparing means of more than 2 independent samples 1.
Chapter 11 HYPOTHESIS TESTING USING THE ONE-WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE.
Comparing Several Means: One-way ANOVA Lesson 15.
One-way Analysis of Variance 1-Factor ANOVA. Previously… We learned how to determine the probability that one sample belongs to a certain population.
Between-Groups ANOVA Chapter 12. >When to use an F distribution Working with more than two samples >ANOVA Used with two or more nominal independent variables.
Testing Hypotheses about Differences among Several Means.
ANOVA Conceptual Review Conceptual Formula, Sig Testing Calculating in SPSS.
Chapter 14 – 1 Chapter 14: Analysis of Variance Understanding Analysis of Variance The Structure of Hypothesis Testing with ANOVA Decomposition of SST.
Hypothesis testing Intermediate Food Security Analysis Training Rome, July 2010.
Inferential Statistics
Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.
Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Fall 2013 Tuesday, October 15, 2013 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
6/2/2016Slide 1 To extend the comparison of population means beyond the two groups tested by the independent samples t-test, we use a one-way analysis.
6/4/2016Slide 1 The one sample t-test compares two values for the population mean of a single variable. The two-sample t-test of population means (aka.
ANOVA: Analysis of Variance.
Chapter 14 – 1 Chapter 14: Analysis of Variance Understanding Analysis of Variance The Structure of Hypothesis Testing with ANOVA Decomposition of SST.
Chapter 13 - ANOVA. ANOVA Be able to explain in general terms and using an example what a one-way ANOVA is (370). Know the purpose of the one-way ANOVA.
1 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA) Heibatollah Baghi, and Mastee Badii.
R EVIEW OF T ERMINOLOGY Statistics Parameters Critical Region “Obtained” test statistic “Critical” test statistic Alpha/Confidence Level.
Chapter Seventeen. Figure 17.1 Relationship of Hypothesis Testing Related to Differences to the Previous Chapter and the Marketing Research Process Focus.
ONE-WAY BETWEEN-GROUPS ANOVA Psyc 301-SPSS Spring 2014.
Inferential Statistics. Explore relationships between variables Test hypotheses –Research hypothesis: a statement of the relationship between variables.
Hypothesis test flow chart frequency data Measurement scale number of variables 1 basic χ 2 test (19.5) Table I χ 2 test for independence (19.9) Table.
One-Way Analysis of Variance Recapitulation Recapitulation 1. Comparing differences among three or more subsamples requires a different statistical test.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 11 Testing for Differences Differences betweens groups or categories of the independent variable.
Research Methods and Data Analysis in Psychology Spring 2015 Kyle Stephenson.
Introduction to ANOVA Research Designs for ANOVAs Type I Error and Multiple Hypothesis Tests The Logic of ANOVA ANOVA vocabulary, notation, and formulas.
Analysis of Variance STAT E-150 Statistical Methods.
Sampling Distribution (a.k.a. “Distribution of Sample Outcomes”) – Based on the laws of probability – “OUTCOMES” = proportions, means, test statistics.
© 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 11 Testing for Differences Differences betweens groups or categories of the independent.
Analysis of Variance 11/6. Comparing Several Groups Do the group means differ? Naive approach – Independent-samples t-tests of all pairs – Each test doesn't.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEANS AND BETWEEN PROPORTIONS.
©2013, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 4 Investigating the Difference in Scores.
Between-Groups ANOVA Chapter 12. Quick Test Reminder >One person = Z score >One sample with population standard deviation = Z test >One sample no population.
CHAPTER 10: ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE(ANOVA) Leon-Guerrero and Frankfort-Nachmias, Essentials of Statistics for a Diverse Society.
And then…..an “F” for everyone!
Chapter 13 Group Differences
One way ANOVA One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) is used to test the significance difference of mean of one dependent variable across more than two.
Review Calculating in SPSS
Presentation transcript:

Conceptual Review Conceptual Formula, Sig Testing Calculating in SPSS ANOVA Conceptual Review Conceptual Formula, Sig Testing Calculating in SPSS

ANOVA as extension of t-test T-test = difference between two means Univariate/1 sample Population mean compared to sample mean Bivariate/2 sample Compare sample means across two categories (males vs. female, old vs. young, white vs. nonwhite). ANOVA Compare sample means across three or more categories Can no longer calculate a simple “difference between means”

The Logic of ANOVA Instead of difference between means, analyze “variance” Variance = sum of squared deviations from mean appropriate df Between group variance Measure of how group means vary around “grand mean.” Larger mean differences produce larger values Within group variance Measure of how cases vary around their group mean. Considered “error” or “unexplained” variance, because it cannot be accounted for by the IV.

The F Ratio F = Mean square between = Explained variance Mean square within Unexplained variance Mean squared = variance = Sum of Squares df df for between = number of groups – 1 df for within = N – number of groups

Use ANOVA when… IV = nominal/ordinal with more than 2 categories DV = interval ratio Example Instructor Iggy believes that the custody level of a prison is related to the number of prison infractions that an inmate accumulates in a year NULL? µmin= µmed = µmax

Random sample of three prisons N = 15 (5 for each prison). minimum medium maximum Xmin (xmin - xmin )2 Xmed (xmed - xmed )2 Xmax (xmax - xmax )2 1 1 4 2.56 8 .04 2 0 6 .16 10 3.24 3 1 7 1.96 7 1.44 2 0 5 .36 9 .64 2 0 6 .16 7 1.44 ________________________________________________________________  10 2 28 5.2 41 6.8 _________________________________________________________________ xmin=2.0 xmed=5.6 xmax=8.2 Grand mean = 5.267

Conceptual Plot of the 3 groups GRAND MEAN = 5.27 Based on all cases from all groups 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BLUE: Minimum security (mean = 2) GREEN: Medium security (mean = 5.2) RED: Maximum security (mean = 6.8)

Types of Variation (SS) Within group variation (error variation) Add the variation from within each group together SSminimim + SSmeduim + SSmaximum 2 + 5.2 + 6.8 = 14 Between group variation (explained variation) (grand mean - xmin)2 * Nmin + (grand mean - xmed)2 * Nmed + (grand mean - xmax)2 * Nmax = [(5.27-2)25] + [(5.27-5.6)2 5] + [(5.27-8.2)2 5] 53.6 + .56 + 43 = 97.16

Variation  Variance Variation = sum of squared deviations (SS) Variance = mean sum of squares (mean square) Divide SS by appropriate degrees of freedom SS within/N-K = within mean squared SS between/K-1 = between mean squared K means the number of groups Prison Example Within variance = 14/(15-3) = 1.17 Between variance = 97.16/(3-1) = 48.58

Variance  F ratio F = Between variance / Within Variance Prison Example Fobtained = 48.58/1.17 = 41.5 With an alpha of .05, Fcritical (2, 12) = 3.88 Reject the NULL hypothesis that the mean number of infractions across the different types of prison are equal (That prison type and number of infractions are unrelated) Specific p value associated with an Fobtained of 41.5? From SPSS, p = .000004

The F test is Exploratory Null rejected  means are not equal in population Next step is to conduct a series of t-test like comparisons Compares each pair of means to find differences “Post-hoc” tests USE LSD  If you FAIL to reject the null for the F-test, STOP THERE

PRISON EXAMPLE (BECAUSE OUR F WAS SIGNIFICANT AND WE REJECTED NULL) Number of infractions LSD (I) Type of prison (J) Type of prison Mean Difference (I-J) Std. Error Sig. 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound 1.00 minimum security 2.00 medium security -3.60000* (1st) .68313 .000 -5.0884 -2.1116 3.00 maximum security -6.20000* (2nd) -7.6884 -4.7116 3.60000* 2.1116 5.0884 -2.60000* (3rd) .003 -4.0884 -1.1116 6.20000* 4.7116 7.6884 2.60000* 1.1116 4.0884 *. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

SPSS (EXAMPLE 2) Example: 1994 county-level data (N=295) Sentencing outcomes (prison versus other [jail or noncustodial sanction]) for convicted felons Breakdown of counties by region:

SPSS EXAMPLE Question: Is there a regional difference in the percentage of felons receiving a prison sentence? (0 = none; 100 = all) Null hypothesis (H0): There is no difference across regions in the mean percentage of felons receiving a prison sentence. Mean percents by region:

SPSS EXAMPLE These results show that we can reject the null hypothesis that there is no regional difference among the 4 sample means The differences between the samples are large enough to reject Ho The F statistic tells you there is almost 20 X more between group variance than within group variance The number under “Sig.” is the exact probability of obtaining this F by chance A.K.A. “VARIANCE”

ANOVA: Post hoc tests The ANOVA test is exploratory ONLY tells you there are sig. differences between means, but not WHICH means Post hoc (“after the fact”) Use when F statistic is significant Run in SPSS to determine which means (of the 3+) are significantly different

OUTPUT: POST HOC TEST This post hoc test shows that 5 of the 6 mean differences are statistically significant (at the alpha =.05 level) (numbers with same colors highlight duplicate comparisons) p value (info under in “Sig.” column) tells us whether the difference between a given pair of means is statistically significant

ANOVA in SPSS STEPS TO GET THE CORRECT OUTPUT… ANALYZE  COMPARE MEANS  ONE-WAY ANOVA INSERT… INDEPENDENT VARIABLE (Nominal, >3 Categories) IN BOX LABELED “FACTOR:” DEPENDENT VARIABLE (Interval/Ratio) IN THE BOX LABELED “DEPENDENT LIST:” CLICK ON “POST HOC” AND CHOOSE “LSD” CLICK ON “OPTIONS” AND CHOOSE “DESCRIPTIVE” AND MEANS PLOT

SPSS Exercise Test the following hypotheses using the GSS data and an alpha of .05. 1. Fundamentalism (how fundamentalist a person is) is related to family size (number of siblings). 2. Fundamentalism is related to age (years). Write out the interpretation of the “p” values you obtain. Where appropriate, also interpret the LSD tests

What you need to know for homework and exams Difference between group variance and within group variance Degrees of freedom  go from sum of squares to variance Calculate F-ratio given either sum of squares or variance How to calculate F in SPSS and how to interpret SPSS output