II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs Some Fiber Optics Examples and Exercises* Some 2 4-1 DOE’s Some 2 4-1 DOE’s Responses: Responses: –Shrinkage (S) –Excess.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 6 The 2k Factorial Design
Advertisements

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs Introduction Introduction Confounding Confounding –Confounding/Aliasing –Alias Structure Examples and Exercises Examples.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
The Two Factor ANOVA © 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs Demonstrating the Effects of Confounding* Response: Conductivity (milliohm/cm), Corrected for Concentration (CC) Response:
1 Chapter 6 The 2 k Factorial Design Introduction The special cases of the general factorial design (Chapter 5) k factors and each factor has only.
14-1 Introduction An experiment is a test or series of tests. The design of an experiment plays a major role in the eventual solution of the problem.
Chapter 8 Two-Level Fractional Factorial Designs
CHEN 4860 Unit Operations Lab Design of Experiments (DOE) With excerpts from “Strategy of Experiments” from Experimental Strategies, Inc.
1 14 Design of Experiments with Several Factors 14-1 Introduction 14-2 Factorial Experiments 14-3 Two-Factor Factorial Experiments Statistical analysis.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
Design of Experiments Chapter 21.
CPE 619 2k-p Factorial Design
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
Dr. Gary Blau, Sean HanMonday, Aug 13, 2007 Statistical Design of Experiments SECTION V SCREENING.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments.
1 The General 2 k Factorial Design Section 6-4, pg. 224, Table 6-9, pg. 225 There will be k main effects, and.
14-1 Introduction An experiment is a test or series of tests. The design of an experiment plays a major role in the eventual solution of the problem.
Fractional Factorial Design Full Factorial Disadvantages Full Factorial Disadvantages –Costly (Degrees of freedom wasted on estimating higher order terms)
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
1 The General 2 k-p Fractional Factorial Design 2 k-1 = one-half fraction, 2 k-2 = one-quarter fraction, 2 k-3 = one-eighth fraction, …, 2 k-p = 1/ 2 p.
DOX 6E Montgomery1 Unreplicated 2 k Factorial Designs These are 2 k factorial designs with one observation at each corner of the “cube” An unreplicated.
IE341 Midterm. 1. The effects of a 2 x 2 fixed effects factorial design are: A effect = 20 B effect = 10 AB effect = 16 = 35 (a) Write the fitted regression.
III.7 Blocking Two-level Designs _ Blocking _ Example _ Four Blocks _ Exercise.
Factors Affecting Student Study Allison FoyJustin Messina.
II.3 An Example and Analyzing Interactions Emergency Room Example Emergency Room Example Interaction Plots and Tables Interaction Plots and Tables.
Solutions. 1.The tensile strength of concrete produced by 4 mixer levels is being studied with 4 replications. The data are: Compute the MS due to mixers.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
The American University in Cairo Interdisciplinary Engineering Program ENGR 592: Probability & Statistics 2 k Factorial & Central Composite Designs Presented.
II.3 Screening Designs in Eight Runs: Other Screening Designs in 8 runs  In addition to 5 factors in 8 runs, Resolution III designs can be used to study.
Two-Way (Independent) ANOVA. PSYC 6130A, PROF. J. ELDER 2 Two-Way ANOVA “Two-Way” means groups are defined by 2 independent variables. These IVs are typically.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
1 Prof. Indrajit Mukherjee, School of Management, IIT Bombay High (2 pounds ) Low (1pound) B=60 ( ) Ab=90 ( ) (1)=80 ( ) A=100.
VII. Introduction to 2 k Factorial Based Experiments A. An Overview of Experimental Design In my experience, the absolute best way to teach the text's.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I:
ETM U k factorials Recall our example from last time … Estimate the effects Determine significant effects Develop regression model Examine.
Designs for Experiments with More Than One Factor When the experimenter is interested in the effect of multiple factors on a response a factorial design.
Engineering Statistics Design of Engineering Experiments.
1 Chapter 8 Two-level Fractional Factorial Designs.
1 Chapter 8 Two-level Fractional Factorial Designs.
南亚和印度.
CME Analysis: a New Method for Unraveling Aliased Effects in Two-Level Fractional Factorial Experiments C. F. Jeff Wu (Joint work with Heng Su) School.
Confounding the 2k Factorial Design in Four Blocks
Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments
Special Topics In Design
Fractional Factorial Design
I=ABD=ACE=BCF=BCDE=ACDF=ABEF=DEF
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James.
Some 24-1 DOE’s Responses: Shrinkage (S) Excess Length (L)
II.3 An Example and Analyzing Interactions
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part II: The Essentials of Fractional Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James.
III.7 Blocking Two-level Designs
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
ENM 310 Design of Experiments and Regression Analysis Chapter 3
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
Response: Conductivity (milliohm/cm), Corrected for Concentration (CC)
The Essentials of 2-Level Design of Experiments Part I: The Essentials of Full Factorial Designs Developed by Don Edwards, John Grego and James Lynch.
Graziano and Raulin Research Methods: Chapter 12
Recall: Conditional Main Effect
14 Design of Experiments with Several Factors CHAPTER OUTLINE
Presentation transcript:

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs Some Fiber Optics Examples and Exercises* Some DOE’s Some DOE’s Responses: Responses: –Shrinkage (S) –Excess Length (L) Factors: some are trade secrets and others include Factors: some are trade secrets and others include –Time –Temperature –Fiber Tension –Draw Ratio –Line Speed –Fiber Conditioning * Examples are based on some DOE studies done at the Pirelli’s Lexington, SC plant

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Examples Shrinkage

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Examples Shrinkage - Discussion and Interpretation The Fractional Factorial Used Here (D=ABC or ABCD=I) is called a Resolution IV Design. This Means That, Assuming that 3- way and 4-way Interactions are NEGLIGIBLE, Factors B and C Affect Shrinkage Without a Significant Interaction. (More About Resolution Later) The Fractional Factorial Used Here (D=ABC or ABCD=I) is called a Resolution IV Design. This Means That, Assuming that 3- way and 4-way Interactions are NEGLIGIBLE, Factors B and C Affect Shrinkage Without a Significant Interaction. (More About Resolution Later) We Estimate That We Estimate That –Setting B Hi Increases Shrinkage.36 over Setting it Lo –Setting C Lo Increases the Shrinkage.39 over Setting it Hi

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Examples Shrinkage - Estimated Mean Response (EMR) For B = + and C = -, EMR =.55  + (+1)(.36)/2 + For B = + and C = -, EMR =.55  + (+1)(.36)/2 + (-1)(-.39)/2 = =.925 (-1)(-.39)/2 = =.925

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Examples Excess Length

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Examples Excess Length - Discussion and Interpretation The Fractional Factorial Used Here is Again the Resolution IV Design, D=ABC (or ABCD=I). Thus, Assuming that 3-way and 4-way Interactions are NEGLIGIBLE, Factors B, C and D Affect Excess Length But There Appears To Be A Significant Interaction, (AD or BC, or Both). The Fractional Factorial Used Here is Again the Resolution IV Design, D=ABC (or ABCD=I). Thus, Assuming that 3-way and 4-way Interactions are NEGLIGIBLE, Factors B, C and D Affect Excess Length But There Appears To Be A Significant Interaction, (AD or BC, or Both). Since B and C signaled but A did not, We Shall ASSUME that the BC interaction is Significant for Interpretation Purposes. Since B and C signaled but A did not, We Shall ASSUME that the BC interaction is Significant for Interpretation Purposes.

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Example Excess Length - Discussion and Interpretation Noise Factors/Control Factors Noise Factors/Control Factors –If Factor C was Hard to Control (a Noise Factor), But B was not (a Control Factor), Setting B Hi mitigates the effect of C –Similarly, Setting C Hi mitigates the effect of B Ideally, The Excess Length should be 0. Ideally, The Excess Length should be 0. –Setting B Lo and C Hi Give the Smallest Magnitude of Excess Length with Excess Length at about –In addition, changing D from Lo to Hi increases Excess Length –Thus, Set B Lo, and C and D both Hi. Noise Factors/Control Factors Noise Factors/Control Factors –If Factor C was Hard to Control (a Noise Factor), But B was not (a Control Factor), Setting B Hi mitigates the effect of C –Similarly, Setting C Hi mitigates the effect of B Ideally, The Excess Length should be 0. Ideally, The Excess Length should be 0. –Setting B Lo and C Hi Give the Smallest Magnitude of Excess Length with Excess Length at about –In addition, changing D from Lo to Hi increases Excess Length –Thus, Set B Lo, and C and D both Hi.

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Examples Excess Length - Estimated Mean Response (EMR) For B = -, C = +, D=+: For B = -, C = +, D=+: EMR =  + (-1)(-.18)/2 + (+1)(-.09)/2 + (+1)(.07)/2 +(-1)(.12)/2 =  +.02 = EMR =  + (-1)(-.18)/2 + (+1)(-.09)/2 + (+1)(.07)/2 +(-1)(.12)/2 =  +.02 = -.037

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: U-Do-It Exercise Completed Signs Tables and Normal Probability Plots are Provided for Two Other Experiments (D=ABC or ABCD=I) Involving Shrinkage and Excess Length Completed Signs Tables and Normal Probability Plots are Provided for Two Other Experiments (D=ABC or ABCD=I) Involving Shrinkage and Excess Length Analyze These Experiments Analyze These Experiments Calculate the EMR for Shrinkage and Excess Length when A and B are both Lo and C and D are both Hi Calculate the EMR for Shrinkage and Excess Length when A and B are both Lo and C and D are both Hi

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: U-Do-It Exercise Shrinkage

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: U-Do-It Exercise Excess Length

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: U-Do-It Exercise Shrinkage Solution - Discussion and Interpretation C+ABD is Statistically Significant. Thus, Assuming that 3-way and 4-way Interactions are NEGLIGIBLE, Factor C Affects Shrinkage. There are No Significant Two-way Interactions. C+ABD is Statistically Significant. Thus, Assuming that 3-way and 4-way Interactions are NEGLIGIBLE, Factor C Affects Shrinkage. There are No Significant Two-way Interactions. We Estimate That We Estimate That –Setting C Hi Increases the Shrinkage.206 over Setting it Lo When C = +, EMR =.692  + (+1)(.206)/2 = =.795 When C = +, EMR =.692  + (+1)(.206)/2 = =.795

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: U-Do-It Exercise Excess Length Solution - Discussion and Interpretation A+BCD, C+ABD and AC+BD are Statistically Significant. Thus, Assuming that 3-way and 4-way Interactions are NEGLIGIBLE, Factors A and C Affect Excess Length. To interpret AC+BD, we will ASSUME that BD is Negligible Since A and C are Significant. A+BCD, C+ABD and AC+BD are Statistically Significant. Thus, Assuming that 3-way and 4-way Interactions are NEGLIGIBLE, Factors A and C Affect Excess Length. To interpret AC+BD, we will ASSUME that BD is Negligible Since A and C are Significant.

II.2 Four Factors in Eight Runs: Exercises Excess Length Solution - Discussion and Interpretation Ideally, Excess Length should be 0. Ideally, Excess Length should be 0. –Setting A Lo and C Hi Reduces the Magnitude of Excess Length with Excess Length at about –For A = - and C = +, EMR =.074  + (-1)(.107)/2 + (+1)(-.07)/2 +(-1)(.045)/2 = = Ideally, Excess Length should be 0. Ideally, Excess Length should be 0. –Setting A Lo and C Hi Reduces the Magnitude of Excess Length with Excess Length at about –For A = - and C = +, EMR =.074  + (-1)(.107)/2 + (+1)(-.07)/2 +(-1)(.045)/2 = = -.037