C2V2 Technical Requirements and Constraints

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Steven F. Mattern Science and Engineering Associates, Inc. (505)
Advertisements

SM. FlexPod site readiness assessment services verify that all required Layer 1 Physical Infrastructure items are in- place, properly installed, and correctly.
Requirements for the MOB Mars Habitat
Russian Vehicle Automated Rendezvous and Docking C. Scott Merkle NASA Johnson Space Center Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Division 5/22-23/2002, AR&C.
Secondary Payloads Overview
The Vision for Space Exploration – Challenge & Opportunity ISS Panel Report Robert D. Cabana ISS Panel Chair March 30, 2005.
AMS-02 Rebaselining Outbrief ISS PIA/ICD & SSP MIP/ICD ISS Payload Mission Integration & Planning/OZ2 Space Shuttle Mission & Cargo Integration Office/MO3.
1 IAC Late-Breaking News Analysis of STS-118 Tile Damage Utilizing the Tools and Techniques Developed Since Return to Flight William H. Gerstenmaier Associate.
Waypoints. 2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture Requirements for Waypoints  Located along race path  Provide rovers with supplies.
EEE440 Modern Communication Systems Satellite Systems.
Architecture Outline. 2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture Race Overview  What is HERCULES? Race Logistics Provider Subsystems Orchestration.
Habitat & Waypoints Picture. 2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture Design Requirements: A safe, reliable, low maintenance habitat to.
Palletizing the Easy Way
Automation for System Safety Analysis: Executive Briefing Jane T. Malin, Principal Investigator Project: Automated Tool and Method for System Safety Analysis.
Corporate Overview. TACTICAL EDGE COMMUNICATIONS Solutions for Today’s Ever-Changing Warfare Environment.
Systems Engineering for Space Vehicles Bryan Palaszewski with the Digital Learning Network NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH.
Page 1 Presentation title – file name – date From ATV to ATV Evolution February 2004 Hans-Jörg Heidmann Transportation for In-Orbit Infrastructure and.
ISS COTS Interface Requirements Document SSP 50808
ANSALDO: BACKGROUND experience in dependable Signalling Automation Systems experience in dependable Management Automation Systems experience in installation,
Student Satellite Project University of Arizona Team Goals Design, Fabricate, and Analyze a Structure that will Support the Payload –Space Allocation of.
Maximizing ISS Utilization for Small Satellite Deployments and External Hardware/Sensor Testing Photo credit: NASA.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration General ICD information for SDRs For consideration for EDS Development Sandra Johnson NASA Glenn.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
Future Plans for Wireless Standards Development Richard J. Barton NASA Johnson Space Center.
MCCS Status Update SOFIA SITR Kendall Mauldin SOFIA Platform Project Flight Systems Lead SOFIA Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy.
Columbus Operations Columbus Control Centre 8 October 2009 Prague ASE XXII Congress Space – Opportunities for all An Overview to Columbus Operations Reinhold.
CSI-09 COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY FAULT TOLERANCE AUTHOR: V.V. SUBRAHMANYAM.
Transition to 6-person crew ASE conference, Praha Oct 8, 2009 Andreas Schön, ESA All dates used in this presentation are examples only, they do not necessarily.
Daniel E. Frye A GENERAL VIEW OF GATEWAY PLATFORMS Daniel E. Frye Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
Welcome to the Johnson Space Center Common Communications for Visiting Vehicles (C2V2) for the International Space Station (ISS) Virtual Industry Day 1.
VERMONT COMMUNICATIONS (VCOMM) March 2, 2006.
Problem Statement Overview of tasks Requirements for selection test.
TESTING LEVELS Unit Testing Integration Testing System Testing Acceptance Testing.
Universal Chassis for Modular Ground Vehicles University of Michigan Mars Rover Team Presented by Eric Nytko August 6, 2005 The 2 nd Mars Expedition Planning.
Communication, Navigation, and Networking reConfigurable Testbed (CoNNeCT): An International Space Station National Lab Ann P. Over Project Manager NASA.
ARISSat-1 Overview Loudon County ARES November 2010 Gould Smith, WA4SXM ARISSat-1 AMSAT Project Manager.
Chapter 12 The Network Development Life Cycle
Crew Mobility for Lunar Surface Exploration Dr. Rob Ambrose NASA-JSC May 2008.
KSC Ground Operations Timeline. KSC CGSE TIM A Technical Interchange Meeting regarding the Cryo Ground Support Equipment was held at KSC November 1 st.
Permanent Magnet Impacts to STS/ISS/MOD Chris Tutt 5 May 2010.
ISS Commercial Resupply Services Michael Suffredini ISS Program Manager June 17 th, 2009 Augustine Committee UPDATED: Corrected page 10 (replaced “first.
Need for Commercial Cargo to ISS William Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Space Operations FAA Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Council.
GLAST LAT ProjectFace to Face, 14 April 2004 LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: EGSE and Interface Verification Pat Hascall SLAC System.
Testing Overview Software Reliability Techniques Testing Concepts CEN 4010 Class 24 – 11/17.
Microgravity Science Glovebox Video Overview. Course: MSG05 Version: May 2014 For Training Purposes Only Course Description  Detailed presentation of.
Be P16102 Constrain Subsystems House Internals Provide Access Mount components securely Stow Solar Panels Gather Solar Energy Expose Panels before Deployment.
1 MINUS EIGHTY DEGREE LABORATORY FREEZER FOR ISS (MELFI) MSFC Briefing February 2005 John Cornwell
1 Columbus Control Center - Teams and Responsibilities - Roland Luettgens ESA Columbus Lead Flight Director Tel:
Note: Glacier is launched unpowered and hardmounted in EXPRESS Rack 6 on Flight ULF2. For the following three weeks after activation or transfer, two 2-hour.
MSG Seal Replacement Mission Scenario Pre-Pack List (SOC OCR – ULF 1.1) MSG Front Window Exchange MSG Glove Rings & Feed- through Install MSG.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory EXPRESS Logisitics Carrier (ELC) Operations Overview POIWG #26, August.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Obsolescence Driven Avionics Redesign (ODAR) Status POIWG #31, January.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.
February 14, 2013 POIWG Technical Overview CR / HM-3430 Ku Forward Capability.
Phil Dempsey ISS Vehicle Office July 15, 2014 Inspection Considerations from the ISS Program NASA In-Space Inspection Workshop 2014.
NASA – MSFC, Huntsville, Alabama Muscle Atrophy Research and Exercise System (MARES) Operations Summary Part I/II Karen Somers EO20/ Operations Lead
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Cindy Grant SPACE-X & Orbital Lead POD Office/EO
LunaRTT Lunar Real-Time Telerobotics Jeff Moring ASTE 527 Dec 15, 2008.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Obsolescence Driven Avionics Redesign (ODAR) Status POIWG #32, July.
Range Operations Craig Griffith Chief, Range Operations Branch WATR Operations Branch Dryden Flight Research Center February 21, 2001.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Radiation Environment Monitor Kevin Hargrave EO
Future Plans for Wireless Standards Development
Communications in Railway Centralized Traffic Control Systems
Software and Systems Integration
Fault Tolerant Computer for the AUTOMATED TRANSFER VEHICLE
The International Space Station (ISS)
LSG Capabilities LSG nomenclature: WV - Work Volume AL - Air Lock
© [2012] Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Command and Data Handling
Presentation transcript:

C2V2 Technical Requirements and Constraints Penny Roberts C2V2 SLPT Technical Chair

High Level Requirements Two-way communications for all future ISS Visiting Vehicles (VVs) Crewed VV docking Uncrewed VV berthing Uncrewed VV docking Provide a system that can meet each of these VV needs for the life of the ISS program Maximize the system’s capabilities to ensure supportability throughout the life of the ISS Provide coverage to all ISS docking ports Provide coverage throughout the VV trajectory Meet National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) requirements Meet safety requirements Single fault tolerance Reference SOW Section 1.2 and 2.3

Coverage for VV Trajectories (200m radius) Reference SOW Section 1.2 and 2.3

VV Data Communications Data types are VV dependent All VVs ISS and VV state of health and navigation states – two-way exchange Relative navigation state – from ISS to VV May be used as a third string of redundancy for the VV’s navigation Crewed VV Audio – two way Uncrewed VV Commands from ISS to VV and associated VV to ISS command responses VV pass through commands and data due to space-to-ground Video from the VV to the ISS – the best possible within the bandwidth available Data types are range dependent Data required for VV navigation or commanding is time and safety critical Reference SOW Section 1.2 and 2.3

Coverage, Range, and Data Types Reference SOW Section 1.2 and 2.3

ISS Communication Coverage Constraints During nominal operations, the following must not be constrained Solar panels Thermal radiators ISS attitude ISS configuration is not constant Reference SOW Section 1.2 and 2.3

Reference SOW Section 1.2 and 2.3 ISS Constraints Antenna mounting locations limited Keep out zones must be avoided Vehicle penetrations limited Minimize Extravehicular Activities (EVAs) C2V2-related EVAs should be limited to installation only – the fewer, the better High Mean Time Between Failure for external ISS-C2V2 – EVAs due to failed ISS-C2v2 are HIGHLY undesirable If equipment is launched in pressurized volume (maximum launch possibilities), then external ORUs must fit within the airlock for EVA installation Internal locations limited –available volume in USL Mobile Servicing System (MSS) rack ISS software transitions occur in September once a year – C2V2 capability must support this transition date in 2014 in order to support early 2015 operational need date Telemetry definitions required in 2012 to support onboard and ground system implementation by onboard SW transition date Reference SOW Section 1.2 and 2.3

Antenna Locations Evaluated Reference SOW Section 1.2 and 2.3

Internal Cable Routing and C2V2 Location Maximum of Two Available Coax Feedthrough Pins Maximum of Seven Available Coax Feedthrough Pins Reference SOW Section 1.2 and 2.3

Reference SOW Section 1.2 and 2.3 Deployment Plan Perform integrated test Data rate changes may be performed during planned holds Perform system check-out Check-out minimal if passive elstronics only Reference SOW Section 1.2 and 2.3 Perform subsystem check-out, may involve ISS attitude manuevers

Manifesting and Launch Constraints Launch vehicles Progress Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV) H-II Transfer Vehicle (HTV) Dragon Cygnus Delivery before launch requirements Late stow is typically 3 months before launch and limited to “small” items Typical delivery dates are 6-9 months before launch Unpressurized cargo launches require even earlier delivery dates to support integration on launch pallet Reference SOW Section 1.2 and 2.3

Visiting Vehicle Requirements VV-C2V2 launches installed – higher vibration and loads than the soft-stowed launch for ISS installations Size, weight, and power constrained - minimize Need data, hardware, software, and ground support equipment to support VV development and integrated testing Standard command, control, and data interface 28 Volts Direct Current (VDC) interface Reference SOW Section 1.2 and 2.3