Double Beta Decay Experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COBRA A new Approach to -Decay UK HEP Forum, Abingdon, May 11 th, 2003 Daniel Muenstermann University of Dortmund COBRA.
Advertisements

SNOLAB and EXO David Sinclair SNOLAB Workshop August 2005.
Double Beta Decay review
March 12, 2005Benasque Neutrinos Theory Neutrinos Theory Carlos Pena Garay IAS, Princeton ~
DMSAG 14/8/06 Mark Boulay Towards Dark Matter with DEAP at SNOLAB Mark Boulay Canada Research Chair in Particle Astrophysics Queen’s University DEAP-1:
Activity for the Gerda-specific part Description of the Gerda setup including shielding (water tank, Cu tank, liquid Nitrogen), crystals array and kapton.
INTERNATIONAL PHD PROJECTS IN APPLIED NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES This project is supported by the Foundation for Polish Science – MPD.
September 14, 2007Hardy Simgen, TAUP 2007 / Sendai1 Status of the GERDA experiment Hardy Simgen Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik Heidelberg on behalf.
Experimental status of the Double Beta Decay Marisa Pedretti INFN Milano Bicocca.
GERDA: GERmanium Detector Array
Determining the neutrino mass:
DBD matrix elements Welcome and aim of the workshop Experimental situation Outcome.
From CUORICINO to CUORE: To probe the inverted hierarchy region On behalf of the CUORE collaboration DUSL Meeting, Washington DC November 2,-4, 2007 Frank.
Daniel Lenz, University of Wisconsin, Madison 11/05/ APS DNP Cryogenic search for neutrinoless double beta decay Daniel Lenz on behalf of the CUORE.
PANDAX Results and Outlook
Double Beta Decay With 20-ton Metal Loaded Scintillators A Detector for DUSEL? Frank Calaprice Princeton University Aldo Ianni LNGS.
Search for Dark Matter at CJPL with PANDAX
COBRA Double Beta Decay Experiment D.Y. Stewart, Dr. Y.A. Ramachers, Prof. P.F.Harrison Experimental Particle Physics Group University of Warwick What.
Double beta decay Ruben Saakyan UCL 25 March 2004.
Double Beta Decay Present and Future
Full EXO in Cryopit Cryopit Workshop August 2011 David Sinclair.
CUORICINO and CUORE Chiara Brofferio Università di Milano – Bicocca and INFN, Sez. di Milano NOW 2004 – Otranto 12 – 17 September 2004 On behalf of the.
NEMO-3  experiment First Results and Future Prospects Ruben Saakyan, UCL UK HEP Neutrino Forum The Cosener’s House, Abingdon.
Status of COBRA 6 th SNOLAB Workshop, Picture courtesy
Recommendations for Science at SNOLAB Andrew Hime On behalf of the Experiment Advisory Committee Aug. 17, 2005 SNOLAB Surface Building.
2004/Dec/12 Low Radioactivity in CANDLES T. Kishimoto Osaka Univ.
Stefano Pirro, IDEA Meeting -Zaragoza November 7, Nd Project High Temperature Thermistors News about NdGaO 3 Scintillating Bolometers Conclusions.
Andrea Giuliani University of Insubria (Como) and INFN Milano-Bicocca Italy Searches for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Epiphany Conference Krakow 6 th.
THE CUORE EXPERIMENT: A SEARCH FOR NEUTRINOLESS DOUBLE BETA DECAY Marco Andrea Carrettoni on behalf of the CUORE collaboration 2 nd International Conference.
A large water shield for dark matter, double beta decay and low background screening. T. Shutt - Case R. Gaitskell - Brown.
Status of Surface Sensitive Bolometers University of Insubria – Como, Italy INFN – Milano, Italy Prague, Chiara Salvioni.
ILIASN4 Cascina, November 3rd, 2005Dominique Lalanne.
The CUORE experiment Thomas Bloxham Lawrence Berkeley National Lab PHENO 2011 May 9th 2011.
NWG 4/11/03 Executive Summary R.N. Cahn, W.C. Carithers, S.J. Freedman, K.M. Heeger, R.W. Kadel, V. Koch, K.T. Lesko, Z. Ligeti (deputy), K-B. Luk, H.
M. Wójcik for the GERDA Collaboration Institute of Physics, Jagellonian University Epiphany 2006, Kraków, Poland, 6-7 January 2006.
Nuclear Track Emulsion Workshop Romania Nuclear emulsion with molybdenum filling for 2  -decay observation V.D.Ashitkov, A.S.Barabash, V.J.Bradnova,
Neutrinoless double-beta decay and the SuperNEMO project. Darren Price University of Manchester 24 November, 2004.
Béla Majorovits for the GERDA collaboration ICHEP 2012, Melbourne, Australia, July Béla Majorovits for the GERDA collaboration Status and plans.
Half Day IoP Meeting: Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay, University College London, Great Britain The GERDA Experiment at Gran Sasso Grzegorz Zuzel.
M. Wójcik Instytut Fizyki, Uniwersytet Jagielloński Instytut Fizyki Doświadczalnej, Uniwersytet Warszawski Warszawa, 10 Marca 2006.
MaGe framework for Monte Carlo simulations MaGe is a Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulation package dedicated to experiments searching for 0 2  decay of.
Cracow Epiphany Conference on Physics in Underground Laboratories and its Connection with LHC Cracow, Poland The GERDA Experiment at Gran.
Reactor neutrinos, double beta and beta decays Experimental review Fabrice Piquemal Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane (CNRS/IN2P3 and CEA/IRFU) and Centre.
Stefano Pirro – NuMass 2010 Stefano Pirro Double beta decay searches with enriched and scintillating bolometers - Milano - Bicocca The Future of Neutrino.
BACKGROUND REJECTION AND SENSITIVITY FOR NEW GENERATION Ge DETECTORS EXPERIMENTS. Héctor Gómez Maluenda University of Zaragoza (SPAIN)
28 May 2008NEMO-3 Neutrino081 NEMO-3 A search for double beta decay Robert L. Flack University College London On behalf of the NEMO-3 collaboration.
May 19, 2005UAM-IFT, Madrid : Neutrino physics in underground labs Carlos Pena Garay IAS ~
NEMO3 experiment: results G. Broudin-Bay LAL (CNRS/ Université Paris-Sud 11) for the NEMO collaboration Moriond EW conference La Thuile, March 2008.
Activities on double beta decay search experiments in Korea 1.Yangyang Underground laboratory 2.Double beta decay search with HPGe & CsI(Tl) 3.Metal Loaded.
Results of the NEMO-3 experiment (Summer 2009) Outline   The  decay  The NEMO-3 experiment  Measurement of the backgrounds   and  results.
Double Beta Decay Experiments Jeanne Wilson University of Sussex 29/06/05, RAL.
Claudia Nones CEA/IRFU/SPP GDR Neutrino Meeting – Saclay – 4/11/15 The bolometric way towards the inverted hierarchy of the neutrino mass: CUORE-0 → CUORE.
A screening facility for next generation low-background experiments Tom Shutt Case Western Reserve University.
The COBRA Experiment Jeanne Wilson University of Sussex, UK On behalf of the COBRA Collaboration TAUP 2007, Sendai, Japan.
1 Study of 48 Ca Double Beta Decay by CANDLES T. Kishimoto Osaka Univ.
M.Altmann, GERDA Status Report SNOLAB Workshop IV, Investigating Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Status of the GERDA Experiment Michael Altmann.
Double Beta Decay - status and future Double beta decay basics Double beta decay basics Experimental challenges Experimental challenges Current experimental.
Phase I: Use available 76 Ge diodes from Heidelberg- Moscow and IGEX experiments (~18 kg). Scrutinize with high siginificance current evidence. Phase II:
November 19, 2007Hardy Simgen, IDEA-Meeting Paris Status of the GERDA experiment Hardy Simgen Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik Heidelberg on behalf.
Development of CaMoO 4 Scintillation Crystals for the 0-  decay search 1.Introduction 2.CaMoO4 Crystal R&D 3.YangYang underground laboratory for KIMS.
0νDBD Experimental Review and 136 Xe With HP Gas at CJPL 季向 东.
Yuri Shitov Imperial College London On behalf of the NEMO Collaboration A search for neutrinoless double beta decay: from NEMO-3 to SuperNEMO Moriond EW.
Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay – Status and Plans FNAL PAC 20 June 2016.
Search for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Werner Tornow Duke University & Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory (TUNL) & Kavli-Tokyo Institute of the.
ArchPbMoO4 scintillating bolometers as detectors to search for neutrinoless double beta decay of 100Mo Serge Nagorny INFN – Gran Sasso Science Institute,
The COBRA Experiment: Future Prospects
SoLid: Recent Results and Future Prospects
Double Beta Decay - status and future
XAX Can DM and DBD detectors combined?
UCLA High Energy & Astro-Particle (HEAP) Seminar
Presentation transcript:

Double Beta Decay Experiment R. D. McKeown U. Mass BLV Workshop Jefferson Lab April 27, 2015 College of William and Mary

0nbb Decay Majorana n Flip helicity: Experimental Issues - RH coupling - m ≠ 0 Experimental Issues Good energy resolution Low background

Major Issue: Background For “background-free” experiment, lifetime sensitivity goes as T1/2~ M·trun (M= isotope mass)  factor of 50 in T1/2 needs factor of 50 in M (for constant trun) For experiment with background, as T1/2~ (M·trun)1/2  factor of 50 in T1/2 needs factor of 2500 in M (for constant trun) Background reduction is the key to a successful program  R&D is crucial

Background Limits Sensitivity From John Wilkerson

Potential Contributions to the Background • Primordial, natural radioactivity in the detector and array components: U, Th, K • Backgrounds from cosmogenic activation while material is above ground (ββ-isotope or shield specific, 60Co, 3H... ) • Backgrounds from the surrounding environment: external γ, (α,n), (n,α), Rn plate-out, etc. • μ-induced backgrounds generated at depth: Cu,Pb(n,n’ γ), ββ-decay specific(n,n),(n,γ), direct μ • 2 neutrino double beta decay (irreducible, E resolution dependent) • neutrino backgrounds (negligible)

Background Reduction Strategies • Directly reduce intrinsic, extrinsic, & cosmogenic activities – Select and use ultra-pure materials – Minimize all non “source” materials – Clean (low-activity) shielding – Fabricate ultra-clean materials (underground fab in some cases) – Go deep — reduced μ’s & related induced activities • Utilize background measurement & discrimination techniques – Energy resolution – Active veto detector – Tracking (topology) – Particle ID, angular, spatial, & time correlations 0nββ is a localized phenomenon, many backgrounds have multiple site interactions or different energy loss interactions – Fiducial Fits – Granularity [multiple detectors] – Pulse shape discrimination (PSD) – Ion Identification

Methods 136Xe TPCs (liquid, gas) 76Ge Crystals TeO2 bolometers ( enhancements) Doped Liquid Scintillators (136Xe, Te) Foils with tracking chambers (82Se + )

Current Projects Project Isotope Isotope Mass (kg fiducial) Currently Achieved (1026 yr) CUORE 130Te 206 >0.028 MAJORANA 76Ge 24.7 GERDA 18-20 >0.21 EXO200 136Xe 79 >0.11 NEXT-100 100 SuperNEMO 82Se+ 7 >0.001 KamLAND-Zen 434 >0.19 SNO+ 160 LUCIFER 82Se 8.9 Primary goals: Demonstrate background reduction for next generation experiment Extend sensitivity to T1/2~1026 years.

Notional Timeline Construction Operation Today

GERDA Phase I (2014) • 87% enriched 76Ge detectors (crystals) in LAr • Qββ=2039 keV • 14.6 kg of 86% enriched 76Ge (6 p-type semi-coax detectors from H-M & IGEX). (4.8 keV FWHM @ Qββ) • 3 kg of 87% enriched BEGe enriched detectors (5 detectors) (3.2 keV FWHM @ Qββ) • Single-site, multi-site pulse shape discrimination 21.6 kg-year exposure T1/2 > 2.1 x 1025 y (90% CL) GERDA Collaboration, PRL 111 (2013) 122503 Eur. Phys. J. C (2014) 74:2764

EXO-200 136Xe (2014) Enriched Liquid Xe in TPC - Qββ=2457.8 keV - 200 kg of 80.6 % enriched136Xe - 75.6 kg fiducial mass, - 100 kg years exposure - Combine Scintillation-Ionization signal for improved resolution (88 keV FWHM @ Qββ) - Single site - Multisite discrimination T1/2 > 1.1 x 1025 y (90% CL)

KamLAND-ZEN 136Xe (2014) • Qββ=2457.8 keV • Phase 1 • enrXe in liquid scintillator, balloon of R=1.5 m • Qββ=2457.8 keV • Phase 1 - 179 kg (2.44% by Xe wt.) 91.7% enriched136Xe - R=1.35 m fiducial cut - 213.4 days, with 89.5 kg years exposure - 400 keV FWHM @ Qββ - evidence for 110mAg contamination T1/2 > 1.9 x 1025 y (90% CL) • Phase 2 - 383 kg (2.96% by Xe wt.) - R=1 m fiducial cut - 114.8 days, with 27.6 kg years exposure - 110mAg contamination reduced by x10 T1/2 > 1.3 x 1025 y (90% CL) Combined (1&2) T1/2 > 2.6 x 1025 y (90% CL) KamLAND ZEN Collaboration, Shimizu, Neutrino 2014

CUORE-0 130Te (2015) • 11kg 130Te (34% nat.) bolometer (10 mK) • Qββ=2527.5 keV • Array of 52 5x5x5 cm3 TeO2 crystals • 9.8 kg - years exposure • FWHM of 5.1 keV T1/2 > 2.7 x 1024 y (90% CL) CUORE-0 T1/2 > 4.0 x 1024 y (90% CL) CUORE-0 & Cuoricino arXiv 1504.02454v1 0ββ 2527.5 keV

Inverted Hierarchy Coverage (<mbb>=17.5meV) T½ 1028 y 1027 y 5 yrs 1026 y now 76Ge 130Te 136Xe Figure source: A. Dueck, W. Rodejohann, and K. Zuber, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 113010.

Guidelines for the Future The Subcommittee recommends the following guidelines be used in the development and consideration of future proposals for the next generation experiments:   Discovery potential: Favor approaches that have a credible path toward reaching 3 sensitivity to the effective Majorana neutrino mass parameter m=15 meV within 10 years of counting, assuming the lower matrix element values among viable nuclear structure model calculations. Staging: Given the risks and level of resources required, support for one or more intermediate stages along the maximum discovery potential path may be the optimal approach. Standard of proof: Each next-generation experiment worldwide must be capable of providing, on its own, compelling evidence of the validity of a possible non-null signal.

Guidelines for the Future (cont’d) Continuing R&D: The demands on background reduction are so stringent that modest scope demonstration projects for promising new approaches to background suppression or sensitivity enhancement should be pursued with high priority, in parallel with or in combination with ongoing NLDBD searches. International Collaboration: Given the desirability of establishing a signal in multiple isotopes and the likely cost of these experiments, it is important to coordinate with other countries and funding agencies to develop an international approach. Timeliness: It is desirable to push for results from at least the first stage of a next-generation effort on time scales competitive with other international double beta decay efforts and with independent experiments aiming to pin down the neutrino mass hierarchy.

Next Generation Tonne Scale Experiments • Active international collaborations building on current efforts. - 76Ge : Large Scale Ge, O(tonne) HPGE crystals (GERDA & MAJORANA) - 82Se : SuperNEMO : Se foils, tracking and calorimeter, 100 kg scale - 136Xe : nEXO — Liquid TPC, 5 tonnes NEXT — High pressure gas TPC, tonne scale KamLAND2 Zen — 136Xe in scintillator - 130Te : CUPID — Bolometer - Scintillation SNO+ Phase II — 130Te in scintillator - Additional efforts underway in Asia (AMoRE, CANDLES, PandaX III, CDEX 1T) & Europe (LUCIFER, COBRA) • Experiments can be done in a staged (phased) approach; many are considering stepwise increments • Isotope enrichment (76Ge, 82Se, 136Xe) requires time and $s. - There is considerable dependence on Russia, and concern about the future availability of this source. • Potential underground lab sites - SNOLAB, JingPing, Gran Sasso, SURF, CanFranc, Frejus, Kamioka, ANDES, Y2L

Large Scale 76Ge MAJORANA and GERDA are working towards the establishment of a single international 76Ge 0νββ collaboration. (Name not set: Ge1T, LSGe, …) • Envision a phased, stepwise implementation; e.g. 250 → 500 → 1000 kg 5 yr 90% CL sensitivity: T1/2 > 3.2·1027 yr 10 yr 3σ discovery: T1/2 ~ 3·1027 yr • Moving forward predicated on demonstration of projected backgrounds by MJD and/or GERDA • Anticipate down-select of best technologies, based on results of the two experiments Compact shield Cryogenic shield

Scintillating Bolometers L. Cardani Light Detector: Ge slab operated as bolometer Main bolometer: ~470 g ZnSe crystal equipped with NTD Ge thermistors

SNO+ Phase II 130Te Phase II: T1/2 > 7x1026 y (90% CL, natural) • 3% loading of Te already demonstrated • Detector response model from Phase I predicts Phase II response • Plug-in replacement of SNO+ PMTs with R5912-HQEs more than doubles light yield for Phase II Additional wavelength-shifter R&D could further improve this • Containment bag R&D necessary to achieve cleanliness? Can leverage KamLAND-Zen and BOREXINO knowledge T1/2 = 2.5x1026 y Phase II: T1/2 > 7x1026 y (90% CL, natural) T1/2 > 1027 y (90% CL, enriched) T1/2 > 4x1026 y (3σ, natural)

KamLAND2-Zen

nEXO 136Xe Single-­‐site: Mainly signal, 2ν and 0ν Multi-­‐site: • 5 tonnes of enrXe • nEXO 5 yr 90% CL sensitivity: T1/2 > 6.6·1027 yr • Lxe homogeneous imaging TPC similar to EXO-­‐200: -­ Baseline: install at SNOLAB (cosmogenic background reduced wrt EXO-­‐200) - Simultaneous measurement: energy, spatial extent, location, particle ID -­ Multi-­‐parameter approach improves sensitivity: strengthens proof in case of discovery -­ Inverted hierarchy covered with a well proven detector concept -­ Possible later upgrade for Ba retrieval/tagging: start accessing normal hierarchy Deeper into fiducial volume  Single-­‐site: Mainly signal, 2ν and 0ν Multi-­‐site: background

NEXT → BEXT NEXT: BEXT: TPC with 100 kg 136Xe gas at 15 atm Event energy from PMTs Event topology from silicon pixels (MPPCs) 2016-20 BEXT: 1 Ton B field

Cosmological Limits • Within the ΛCDM model, cosmology probes the neutrino freestreaming scale (neutrino hot dark matter component), which depends on Σ≡Σi mi and the relic neutrino energy spectra • Current combined bound: Σ < 230 meV • Projected bounds (~5 years): Σ < 100 meV (can tell ordering) • Projected bounds (~10 years): Σ < 50 meV

Summary • Significant experimental progress in the last decade - Multiple experiments have attained sensitivities of T1/2 > 1025 years. - In the next few years expect to reach sensitivity exceeding T1/2 > 1026 years. - Major advances in development of ultra-clean low activity materials and assay capabilities. • Large international collaborations are moving forward with designs for next generation experiments based on lessons learned from the current measurements. - All aim for sensitivity and discovery levels at T1/2 > 1027 years - An improvement of ×100 over current results. • The field is rapidly approaching readiness to proceed with tonne scale experiments. Thanks to J. Wilkerson, G. Gratta, J. J. Gomez-Cadenas, B. Fujikawa, and others