Developing and Demonstrating Proficiency in Instructional Leadership 2015 MASBO Annual Institute Mary C. DeLai Superintendent, Wilmington Public Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The 21st Century Context for
Advertisements

June 20, Your Presenters  Ken Mattingly – Rockcastle County  Jessica Addison – Todd County/KDE.
The High School Professional Development Plan December 8, 2012.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Professional Performance Process Principal Level Meetings October 19 & 22, 2009.
Leading the Learning and Creating High Expectations for Student Achievement- Make AYP Now! Theresa West NAESP Convention April 11, 2010.
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Kristen Rossheim Academic Coach Imagine Town Center North Florida, Sunshine and South Carolina Regional Forum August 7th, 2014 Powerful Expectations Setting.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Word Generation and Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation August 5, 2013 Presenter: Sophia Boyer Documents 1 and 2 adopted from Catherine.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Superintendent’s Vision In the following slide show I will share information that I believe will give you a picture of what I believe will get us to excellence.
CIcu Conference June 18, 2014 Joan Thompson Mid- Hudson Region.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Teacher Leadership Specialist Standards and Evaluation Process Overview.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
School Counselor Evaluation RubricEvaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Learning Goals, Scales, and Learning Activities Clarity and Purpose.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards
Understanding and Designing Blended Experiences.
Implementing Race to the Top
Update on UDL Implementation Measurement and GD Comparison Districts
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
OTL:NGP:EA:1217.
February 21-22, 2018.
Final Exam Reflection IDT3600 SARAH HERBERT.
VISION & DESIGN WORKBOOK
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Developing and Demonstrating Proficiency in Instructional Leadership 2015 MASBO Annual Institute Mary C. DeLai Superintendent, Wilmington Public Schools

Learning Objectives Understand the SBO Evaluation Process Develop a shared understanding of what is meant by Instructional Leadership and its relevance to the SBO role Work collaboratively to “unpack” Standard I’s Indicators and Elements Brainstorm goals and action steps that would lead to demonstration of proficiency in various Elements of Instructional Leadership

The Five Step Evaluation Process

Standard I: Instructional Leadership The education leader I promotes the learning and growth of all students and the success of all staff by cultivating supporting a shared vision that makes powerful teaching and learning the central focus of schooling.

1.Read the standard closely three times 2.Highlight the words that you find most meaningful 3.Turn and talk with your neighbor about why you chose those words

Instructional Leadership A. Curriculum Indicator 1.Standards-Based Unit Design 2.Lesson Development Support B. Instruction Indicator 1.Instructional Practices 2.Quality and Effort of Work 3.Diverse Learners’ Needs C. Assessment Indicator 1.Variety of Assessments 2.Adjustment to Practice D. Evaluation Indicator 1.Educator Goals 2.Observation & Feedback 3.Ratings 4.Alignment Review E. Data-Informed Decision Making Indictor 1.Knowledge & Use of Data 2.School and District Goals 3.Improvement of Performance, Effectiveness, and Learning

Curriculum The knowledge and skills students are expected to learn, which includes: the learning standards or objectives they are expected to meet; the units and lessons that are taught; the assignments and projects given to students; the books, materials, videos, presentations, and readings used; and the tests, assessments, and other methods used to evaluate student learning.

Instruction The act (art) or process (science) of teaching –Direct –Small group –Individualized –Differentiated –Interactive –Real World Source: expanding-blooms-taxonomy/

Assessment Methods that educators use to evaluate, measure, and document the academic readiness, learning progress, and skill acquisition of students Source:

Source:

Evaluation Providing effective and timely supervision and evaluation of all staff in alignment with state regulations and contract provisions

Data-Informed Decision Making Using multiple sources of evidence related to student learning, including state, district, and school assessment results and growth data, to inform school and district goals and improve organizational performance, educator effectiveness, and student learning. Source:

Collaborative Work Team 1: CurriculumI-A-2. Lesson Development Support Team 2: InstructionI-B-1. Instructional Practices Team 3: AssessmentI-C-1. Variety of Assessments Team 4: EvaluationI-D-1. Educator Goals Team 5: Data-InformedI-E-3. Improvement of Performance, Decision Making Effectiveness, and Learning

Unpacking the Element 1. Paraphrase the Element 2. Why you would do this? 3. How you would do this? What skills would you need? What strategies you would use? 4. What does this look like in practice? How you would I know if you were doing this well? 5.Develop one goal that you could set to incorporate this into your practice. 6.Develop 3-5 action steps that you could take to accomplish the goal

Interactive Learning Post chart paper on the wall –Results will be posted on Google Drive Do a silent gallery walk (5 minutes) Reflect and share –What was one important take away from this session? –What worked well? –What would you change?

Mary C. DeLai Superintendent of Schools Wilmington Public Schools Thank you for playing along!