AUTONOMY AND SPECIFICITY OF SPORT IN A EU LAW PERSPECTIVE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE PRINCIPLE OF FREE MOVEMENT OF PLAYERS AND ITS IMPACT ON THE FIFA REGULATIONS MICHELE COLUCCI
Advertisements

European Business Law Lesson 2 February 27 th, 2013.
1 FREE MOVEMENT OF PLAYERS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION MICHELE COLUCCI Tilburg University Academic year
1 FREE MOVEMENT OF PLAYERS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION MICHELE COLUCCI KULEUVEN,Tutorials Spring semester 2011.
1 SPORT AND COMPETITION LAW AT EU LEVEL beyond the White Paper on Sport Tilburg University, Spring semester 2010 MICHELE COLUCCI
EU Competition Policy Michele Colucci ISDE-JMLS Barcelona June 2-4, Web site:
1 THE WHITE PAPER ON SPORT THE EU AND SPORT: MATCHING EXPECTATIONS MICHELE COLUCCI Tilburg University, Spring semester 2012
1 THE WHITE PAPER ON SPORT THE EU AND SPORT: MATCHING EXPECTATIONS MICHELE COLUCCI ISDE, Madrid, Spring semester 2008
1 A FUTURE EUROPEAN SPORTS POLICY In the name of Autonomy and Specificity By Prof. Michele Colucci, Tilburg University Website: -
Bernard v. Bosman Michele Colucci
1 FIFA RULES GOVERNING THE PRACTICE AND PROCEDURES OF THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CHAMBER by Michele Colucci –
1 THE EUROPEAN UNION AND SPORT MICHELE COLUCCI Tilburg University, Spring semester 2012
1 SPORT AND COMPETITION LAW AT EU LEVEL Madrid, february 2007 MICHELE COLUCCI
1 FREE MOVEMENT OF PLAYERS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION MICHELE COLUCCI ISDE – IEB MADRID 26 – 27 February 2007.
1 THE EUROPEAN UNION AND SPORT MICHELE COLUCCI September 2012
THE WHITE PAPER ON SPORT THE EU AND SPORT: MATCHING EXPECTATIONS.
Le présent support ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation 1 Legal case « Pierre Fabre Laboratories»  Is it legal to require the permanent presence of.
The Internal Market and the Free
1 “Introduction to EU Trade Policy” – July 2008 How We Make Trade Policy n Contents n Part I: EU Trade Powers n Part II: The evolving scope of Trade Policy.
IP rights and competition law: Friends or foes? Etienne Wéry Attorney at the bars of Paris and Brussels Lecturer at Robert Schuman University (Strasbourg)
LUMSA – International Commercial Law COMPETITION LAW – GENERAL PRINCIPLES Competition law is law that promotes or seeks to maintain market competition.
Sam Pieters International Relations Unit DG COMP 12/11/2012 Break out session 1: State owned enterprises and competition neutrality.
EU Competition Policy. Internal Market One of the activities of the Community: “an internal market characterised by the abolition, as between member States,
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class I, 6th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
03/06/20151 FIFA REGULATIONS FOR THE STATUS AND TRANSFER OF PLAYERS IS IT ALL ABOUT « SPECIFICITY »? Michele Colucci University of Tilburg,
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class V, 3rd Nov 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
Basic consumer rights and fundamental rights Jules Stuyck Professor K.U.Leuven, partner, Liedekerke. Wolters. Waelbroeck. Kirkpatrick, Brussels.
European Commission Taxation and Customs Union Brussels, 10 November Taxation of International Artistes and Community Law European Commission
LUMSA – International Commercial Law 17 October 2014 Prof. Avv. Roberto Pirozzi
INVESTMENTS IN FRENCH FOOTBALL CLUBS By Patricia Moyersoen UIA Sport Commission Firenze 30/10/2014.
Football Transfers, Third Party Player Ownership and UEFA’s Home-Grown Rule Daniel Geey Solicitor in the Sports Group at Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP 27.
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class II, 13th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
Practical Impact Of European Community Anti Trust Law On R&D Agreements Volker Linden, Rechtsanwalt, German-Australian-Pacific Lawyers Association International.
Competition Policy and Law Presentation to Study Tour for Russian Member Universities of the Virtual Institute Network 26 March 2009.
International & Foreign Law Search, Liu 1 Separation of Powers? Commission—executive? Council—Legislative? Parliament—Legislative? Court--Judiciary.
Slide 1 Recognition of Professional Qualifications in the European Single Market for Services Henri Olivier FEE Secretary General FEE (Fédération des Experts.
EU and Governing Bodies A challenge to understand where we are going Live in Germany work in the UK and support the EU.
Basic economic freedoms. 1. Free movement of goods The Community shall be based upon a customs union which shall cover all trade in goods and which shall.
Law and Economics EU/EC Competition Law Professional Career Programme (PCP) Yoshiharu, ICHIKAWA 2011/12/17.
EU Business Law: Anticompetitive agreements (Art. 101 TFEU) Dr. Agata Jurkowska-Gomułka.
From Bosman to Bernard Prof. dr. Frank Hendrickx Faculty of Law, University of Leuven Workshop on Economics and Law of Sport, Leuven, 14 May 2013.
Commission Staff Working Document Free Movement of Workers in the Public Sector 18 January 2011 Ursula Scheuer European Commission DG Employment, Social.
Jean Monnet Chair of EU Labour Law Academic Year Silvia Borelli:
Law and Economics EU/EC Competition Law Professional Career Programme (PCP) Yoshiharu, ICHIKAWA 2012/01/14.
LEB Slide Set 14 Competition Law Matti Rudanko. LEB Slide Set 14 2 A Constitution of Market Economy Well-functioning markets – an unwritten fundamental.
Markkinoiden juridinen toimintaympäristö Kalvot 15
European Union Law Week 10.
Bernard v. Bosman Michele Colucci.
 The term “prevention, restriction and distortion” Used interchangeably
Lear - Laboratorio di economia, antitrust, regolamentazione
THE WHITE PAPER ON SPORT THE EU AND SPORT: MATCHING EXPECTATIONS
European Union Law Law 326.
Intel: Back to the Future?
FIFA REGULATIONS FOR THE STATUS AND TRANSFER OF PLAYERS
Environmental Considerations in European Competition Law
EU Sports Law & Policy Professor Richard Parrish edgehill.ac.uk.
The Autonomy and Specificity of sport beyond The ISU case
FREE MOVEMENT OF PLAYERS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
Bernard v. Bosman Michele Colucci.
SPORT AND COMPETITION LAW AT EU LEVEL beyond the White Paper on Sport
FIFA REGULATIONS FOR THE STATUS AND TRANSFER OF PLAYERS
EU Competition Policy Article 101 TFEU.
Free movement of persons
THE EUROPEAN UNION AND SPORT
By Prof. Michele Colucci, Tilburg University Website:
SPORT AND EU COMPETITION LAW
SPORT AND COMPETITION LAW AT EU LEVEL beyond the White Paper on Sport
FREE MOVEMENT OF PLAYERS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
FREE MOVEMENT OF PLAYERS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
Presentation transcript:

AUTONOMY AND SPECIFICITY OF SPORT IN A EU LAW PERSPECTIVE Michele Colucci www.colucci.eu E-mail: info@colucci.eu

THE TREATY “The Union shall contribute to the promotion of European sporting issues while taking account of its specific nature, its structures based on voluntary activity and its social and educational function” (art. 165 TFEU)

The ‘economic’dimension of sport 15 million people or 5.4 % labour force Value-added of 407 billion euros Tool for local and regional development Tourism

The Organisation of Sport SELF-REGULATION respectful of: Good governance principles EU law The European Commission Plays a “facilitating role” or Takes action if necessary

Sport as economic activity:EU LAW applies General Principle Sport as economic activity:EU LAW applies Competition Law Internal Market rules No discrimination on basis of nationality

Specificity of the ‘Sport structure’ Autonomy and diversity of sport organisations Pyramide structure of competitions One national federation per sport

The European Model of Sport The “Pyramid” model

Promotion and relegation Grassroots approach (starting from the clubs) Characteristics Promotion and relegation Grassroots approach (starting from the clubs) Stakeholders and their role (who does what)

FREE MOVEMENT OF WORKERS Art.45 TFEU Workers have the right to: accept offers of employment actually made; move freely within the territory of Member States for this purpose; to stay in a Member State for the purpose of employment; to remain in the territory of a Member State after having been employed in that State.

CASE LAW OF ECJ: evolution Definition of «worker»: A PERSON PERFORMS SERVICES OF SOME ECONOMIC VALUE FOR AND UNDER THE DIRECTION OF ANOTHER PERSON IN RETURN FOR WHICH HE RECEIVES REMUNERATION (Lawrie-Blum, C-66/85). «Community meaning»(Unger, C-75/63). Fundamental Principle: broad interpretation (Levin, C-53/81). Exceptions and derogations: strict interpretation (Kempf,C-139/85).

BAN ON “DIRECT” DISCRIMINATIONS EQUAL TREATMENT BAN ON “DIRECT” DISCRIMINATIONS Art. 18 TFEU on the basis of nationality Art. 45 TFEU:… Access to employment Pay Employment conditions Association agreement, Co-operation agreement, and so on. SPORT: Balog case, Simutenkov case

COVERT DISCRIMINATIONS NO « COVERT FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION” which, by the application of other criteria of differentiation, lead in fact to the same result . (cause 152/73 Sotgiu)

THE UEFA HOMEGROWN PLAYER RULE Homegrown: player trained by a club for 3 years when he is between 15 and 21 years old 2006/2007 4 up to 25 2007/2008 6 up to 25 2008/2009 8 up to 25 No discrimination on the basis of nationality. Theo Walcott Adnan Januzaj Steven Gerrard

Reverse discrimination “National law” v. “EU law”: Different scope different goals EU Law does not apply to purely internal matters.

Donà v. Montero case, C- 13/76(nationality clause). The case law of the ECJ “Sport is subject to Community law in so far as it constitutes an economic activity within the meaning of Article 2 of the Treaty” . Walrave case, C-36/74. Donà v. Montero case, C- 13/76(nationality clause). sports or economic activity? C-51/96 Deliège case”, C-176/96, Lethonen case, Meca – Medina case(doping). Bruno Walrave David Meca Medina

THE BOSMAN case Cause C - 415/93 DAVID v. GOLIAH! Sport= economic activity= the end of transfer compensation NO QUOTA! Quid training ? The new FIFA regulations on Status and Transfer of Players

FIFA regulations on Status and Transfer of Players The Gentlemen’s agreement (2001) The five principles: free of movement, protection of minors, training compensation, solidarity mechanism, dispute resolution and arbitration system. 2001 FIFA Regulations FIFA Regulations

Training Compensation ARSENAL have handed academy star ’98 Chris Willock his first professional contract. Wayne Rooney has signed his first contract as Pro at 17yrs old with Everton must be paid when: a player signs his first contract as a professional, on each transfer of a professional until the end of the season of his 23rd birthday. Eden Hazard, from Lille to Chelsea (21 years) : 40 million € Eden Hazard, from Lille to Chelsea (21 years) : 40 million €

TRAINING COMPENSATION Clubs from Europe: First category: 90.000 euros Second category: 60.000 euros Third category: 30.000 Fourth category: 10.000 euros

BERNARD 16 of March 2010 “A scheme providing for the payment of compensation for training where a young player, at the end of his training, signs a professional contract with a club other than the one which trained him can, in principle, be justified by the objective of encouraging the recruitment and training of young players. However, such a scheme must be actually capable of attaining that objective and be proportionate to it, taking due account of the costs borne by the clubs in training both future professional players and those who will never play professionally (para. 45).

Sport in so far as economic activity Free movement of workers Bosman versus Bernard Sport in so far as economic activity Free movement of workers Restrictions regardless of nationality Professional to professional End of (prof.) contract Sport in so far as economic activity Free movement of workers Restrictions regardless of nationality Amateur to professional End of (amateur) contract/training 21

affect trade between Member States THE TREATY ART. 101 TFEU: Are incompatible (and void )with the common market all agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which may: affect trade between Member States have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the common market

Agreements which contributes to improving: Exceptions Agreements which contributes to improving: the production or distribution of goods or to promoting technical or economic progress, while allowing consumers a fair share of the resulting benefit, And which does not: (a) impose on the undertakings concerned restrictions which are not indispensable to the attainment of these objectives; (b) afford such undertakings the possibility of eliminating competition in respect of a substantial part of the products in questio

ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION ART. 102 TFEU: Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the common market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States.

ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION Such abuse may, in particular, consist in: (a) directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions; (b) limiting production, markets or technical development to the prejudice of consumers; (c) applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage; (d) making the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts.

Fields of application in Sport Transfer rules Sale of tickets Broadcasting rights Monopoly of federations Multi-ownership of clubs

Basic Principles of Community Law EC law applies to Sport in so far it constitutes an economic activity (ECJ case law) No Activities “purely” social, artistic or sporting ...... but then “MECA MEDICA” judgement of 18 July 2006... Test of “Necessity” Test of “Proportionality”

The Legal Methodology in the Meca Medina case STEP 1: Are the EC anti-trust rules, i.e. Articles 101 and/or Art. 102 TFEU applicable to Sporting rules? STEP 2: If EC anti-trust rules are applicable, does the sporting rule fall outside the prohibition of Articles 101 (1) and 102 TFEU? STEP 3: Can the rule be considered compatible with EC anti-trust rules because it fulfils the conditions of Article 101(3) or because of an objective justification under Article 102 TFEU?

Step 1 1 1. Is the sports association that adopted the rule in question an “undertaking” or an“association of undertakings”? a. The sports association is an “undertaking” to the extent it carries out an “economic activity” itself (e.g., the selling of broadcasting rights). b. The sports association is an “association of undertakings” if its members carry out an economic activity. If no economic activity, Articles 101 and 102 do not apply Is trade between MS affected (geographical market, production market, Community interest...)?

Step 2 2 Compatibility of rules with the Community rules on competition cannot be assessed in the abstract. Taking into account: “the overall context” in which the decision of the association of undertakings was taken or produces its effects. Its objectives: measures inherent in the pursuit of those objectives and proportionate to them. Proportionality of measures (quid sportive sanctions?)

Step 3 3 Can the rule be considered compatible with EC anti-trust rules because it fulfils the conditions of Article 101(3) TFEU or because of an objective justification under Article 102 TFEU? Case by case approach No General sports exception!

Selection criteria for sport competition At home and away rules Sporting rules that are more likely to comply with Art. 101 and Art. 102 TFEU Selection criteria for sport competition At home and away rules Transfer periods Nationality clauses for national teams Rules prohibiting the multiple ownership of clubs Antidoping rules Rules of the game

Rules regulating professions ancillary to sport Sporting rules that are less likely to comply with Articles 81 and 82 EC Rules regulating professions ancillary to sport Rules excluding legal challenges of sports awards before ordinary Courts Rules limiting the number of foreign players Rules requiring transfer payments for players at the end of their contracts

ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME BUT FIRST ... THEY GO THROUGH BRUSSELS CONCLUSION ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME BUT FIRST ... THEY GO THROUGH BRUSSELS